Programming C, C++, Java, PHP, Ruby, Turing, VB
Computer Science Canada 
Programming C, C++, Java, PHP, Ruby, Turing, VB  

Username:   Password: 
 RegisterRegister   
 Yay! Compsci is doin pretty good....
Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic Printable versionDownload TopicSubscribe to this topicPrivate MessagesRefresh page View next topic
Author Message
recneps




PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 8:59 pm   Post subject: Yay! Compsci is doin pretty good....

http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Education/Programming/Tutorials/
Compsci listed in Google's categories, and if the green bar means popularity, its pretty good there.. Very Happy
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
sponsor
Maverick




PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:13 am   Post subject: (No subject)

Still a bit behind some of the other ones, but we'll get there.
G.I._Jane




PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:46 am   Post subject: (No subject)

I agree we are about middle with everything we should be first Dance
Amailer




PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:13 am   Post subject: (No subject)

compsci has the rating (in google) of 5/10 Wink
G.I._Jane




PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 10:06 am   Post subject: (No subject)

cool anything else I should now
Amailer




PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 10:28 am   Post subject: (No subject)

google has the rating of 9/10 on google ? Laughing
phpbb.com has the rating of 9/10
sourceforge has the rating of 9/10
gfx-pro.ath.cx has some how go the rating of 3/10 Evil or Very Mad
jonos




PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:10 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

i think its only 5/10 on compsci because we spam so much, most of the content on this site has nothing to do with programming.
Maverick




PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:30 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

Where do you find out the ratings of sites?
Amailer




PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 5:26 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

Maverick wrote:
Where do you find out the ratings of sites?


google bar on IE Razz
G.I._Jane




PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:21 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

jonos wrote:
i think its only 5/10 on compsci because we spam so much, most of the content on this site has nothing to do with programming.


Yah what's your point
jonos




PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 2:45 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

that was my point, the abundance of spam may have brought the score down because it may take a while to find code or help that you need amidst all the spam that is in existence on this board. other than that, i don't really know what you mean by "what's my point" to a point that i already made...
AsianSensation




PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 5:46 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

I thought the google rating was for the number of hits per a period of time?

that explains amailer's site's rating. Razz .
Amailer




PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 7:50 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

AsianSensation wrote:
I thought the google rating was for the number of hits per a period of time?

that explains amailer's site's rating. Razz .
\


Now, which site-- if it is the gfx-pro.ath.cx one you should know that it's a brand new site. amailer.sf.net.... i killed it *DIE SITE*
the_short1




PostPosted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 5:53 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

compsci should be way higher..... no fair... and the one at the top is just a FOrum... not realy for turorials and stuff...

i think dan should give out 20 bits to each user that adds a compsci link to their page
and post taht information on main page, so... compsci gets more hits...
and.....
http://www.addpro.com ... submit ur site for free to 20 top engines
it gives lots of good hits,.,,

wow... if you search for the_short22 in google web... it comes up 22 results...
and the_short1 comes up with 30...

... cool stuff....


**reminds himself to submit his turing page across the net with www.addpro.com***
Display posts from previous:   
   Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic Tell A FriendPrintable versionDownload TopicSubscribe to this topicPrivate MessagesRefresh page View next topic

Page 1 of 1  [ 14 Posts ]
Jump to:   


Style:  
Search: