Author |
Message |
recneps
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsor Sponsor
|
|
|
Maverick
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:13 am Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Still a bit behind some of the other ones, but we'll get there. |
|
|
|
|
|
G.I._Jane
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:46 am Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
I agree we are about middle with everything we should be first |
|
|
|
|
|
Amailer
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:13 am Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
compsci has the rating (in google) of 5/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
G.I._Jane
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 10:06 am Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
cool anything else I should now |
|
|
|
|
|
Amailer
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 10:28 am Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
google has the rating of 9/10 on google ?
phpbb.com has the rating of 9/10
sourceforge has the rating of 9/10
gfx-pro.ath.cx has some how go the rating of 3/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
jonos
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:10 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
i think its only 5/10 on compsci because we spam so much, most of the content on this site has nothing to do with programming. |
|
|
|
|
|
Maverick
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:30 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Where do you find out the ratings of sites? |
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsor Sponsor
|
|
|
Amailer
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 5:26 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Maverick wrote: Where do you find out the ratings of sites?
google bar on IE |
|
|
|
|
|
G.I._Jane
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:21 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
jonos wrote: i think its only 5/10 on compsci because we spam so much, most of the content on this site has nothing to do with programming.
Yah what's your point |
|
|
|
|
|
jonos
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 2:45 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
that was my point, the abundance of spam may have brought the score down because it may take a while to find code or help that you need amidst all the spam that is in existence on this board. other than that, i don't really know what you mean by "what's my point" to a point that i already made... |
|
|
|
|
|
AsianSensation
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 5:46 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
I thought the google rating was for the number of hits per a period of time?
that explains amailer's site's rating. . |
|
|
|
|
|
Amailer
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 7:50 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
AsianSensation wrote: I thought the google rating was for the number of hits per a period of time?
that explains amailer's site's rating. . \
Now, which site-- if it is the gfx-pro.ath.cx one you should know that it's a brand new site. amailer.sf.net.... i killed it *DIE SITE* |
|
|
|
|
|
the_short1
|
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 5:53 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
compsci should be way higher..... no fair... and the one at the top is just a FOrum... not realy for turorials and stuff...
i think dan should give out 20 bits to each user that adds a compsci link to their page
and post taht information on main page, so... compsci gets more hits...
and.....
http://www.addpro.com ... submit ur site for free to 20 top engines
it gives lots of good hits,.,,
wow... if you search for the_short22 in google web... it comes up 22 results...
and the_short1 comes up with 30...
... cool stuff....
**reminds himself to submit his turing page across the net with www.addpro.com*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|