Is there any ignore warnings option?
Author |
Message |
TheOneTrueGod
![](http://www.drmcninja.com/images/mcninjab3.jpg)
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:18 pm Post subject: Is there any ignore warnings option? |
|
|
The title says it all... Is there any way I can tell turing "I don't care about your 'warnings'"? |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Sponsor Sponsor
![Sponsor Sponsor](templates/subSilver/images/ranks/stars_rank5.gif)
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
[Gandalf]
![](http://compsci.ca/v3/uploads/user_avatars/189297994e4c716fec7f1.png)
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:50 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
I highly doubt it. What I must ask though is, why? Warnings, even in Turing, are generated for a purpose, whether it be minor or less minor, and should generally be heeded. |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
TheOneTrueGod
![](http://www.drmcninja.com/images/mcninjab3.jpg)
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:59 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Yah, but I know in languages like C++, the warnings don't hinder you from finding errors, but in Turing they do... and in my current program, there were gonna be quite a few warnings. Oh well, I guess i'll find a longer way around it. Thanks ![Very Happy Very Happy](http://compsci.ca/v3/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif) |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Delos
![](http://www.members.shaw.ca/rfolz/delos_avatar.gif)
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 11:19 am Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Which warning are you getting? Oftentimes, warnings only display once, then you can run your proggie normally until you reset the compiler. |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
TheOneTrueGod
![](http://www.drmcninja.com/images/mcninjab3.jpg)
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 2:23 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
You can ignore the warnings until you insert another character into the turing compiler So I can ignore them, as long as I don't plan on changing my code
The error is the one about "new"ing a class within a module. I'm thinking that the best thing to do is just have a huge block of imports... no warnings, no fuss, but looks ugly |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Cervantes
![](http://compsci.ca/v3/uploads/user_avatars/1023105758475ab2e040bde.jpg)
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 3:17 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
It's such a shame that Turing whines about these things that are perfectly acceptable. Modules should definately be able to hold classes. Aside from being an effective way to categorize a bunch of classes, it serves to reduce namespace pollution. |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
|
|