| Is there any ignore warnings option? 
 
	 
	
		| Author | Message |   
		| TheOneTrueGod 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:18 pm    Post subject: Is there any ignore warnings option? |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| The title says it all... Is there any way I can tell turing "I don't care about your 'warnings'"? |  
				|  |  |   
		|  |  |  
	  
		|  |   
		| Sponsor Sponsor
 
  
   |  |   
		|  |   
		| [Gandalf] 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:50 pm    Post subject: (No subject) |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| I highly doubt it.  What I must ask though is, why?  Warnings, even in Turing, are generated for a purpose, whether it be minor or less minor, and should generally be heeded. |  
				|  |  |   
		|  |  |  
	  
		|  |   
		| TheOneTrueGod 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:59 pm    Post subject: (No subject) |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| Yah, but I know in languages like C++, the warnings don't hinder you from finding errors, but in Turing they do... and in my current program, there were gonna be quite a few warnings.  Oh well, I guess i'll find a longer way around it.  Thanks  |  
				|  |  |   
		|  |  |  
	  
		|  |   
		| Delos 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 11:19 am    Post subject: (No subject) |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| Which warning are you getting?  Oftentimes, warnings only display once, then you can run your proggie normally until you reset the compiler. |  
				|  |  |   
		|  |  |  
	  
		|  |   
		| TheOneTrueGod 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 2:23 pm    Post subject: (No subject) |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| You can ignore the warnings until you insert another character into the turing compiler  So I can ignore them, as long as I don't plan on changing my code   
 The error is the one about "new"ing a class within a module.  I'm thinking that the best thing to do is just have a huge block of imports... no warnings, no fuss, but looks ugly
 |  
				|  |  |   
		|  |  |  
	  
		|  |   
		| Cervantes 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 3:17 pm    Post subject: (No subject) |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| It's such a shame that Turing whines about these things that are perfectly acceptable. Modules should definately be able to hold classes. Aside from being an effective way to categorize a bunch of classes, it serves to reduce namespace pollution. |  
				|  |  |   
		|  |  |  
	  
		|  |   
		|  |  
 |