Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:11 pm Post subject: 3d Game
Just how do you make a 3d game in Turing? I made 2d games before but where do you start when it comes to a 3d game?Do you start out with three value x,y,z or something. Or is there a way to access programs like directX.
Sponsor Sponsor
beard0
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:15 pm Post subject: (No subject)
You should ask for help in the - OMG - Turing Help forum. This is for submitting apps.
You don't make a 3d game in Turing. It's just not powerful enough to be effective.
Cervantes
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:52 pm Post subject: (No subject)
Moved! (There isn't much point in me saying this, except to prevent beard0 from looking like an idiot, which he is not.)
Enjoy, and don't hurt yourself with this newfound knowledge.
haseeb
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 6:26 pm Post subject: (No subject)
Import turing into autocad and that will work.
Martin
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:19 pm Post subject: (No subject)
You can totally make a 3d game in Turing. Search the turing forums for posts by Catalyst.
[Gandalf]
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:27 pm Post subject: (No subject)
And be prepared for one heck of a surprise! He made some nice 2d particle-related stuff too, heck I only saw one a few days ago for the first time - amazing.
Still, if you wish to expand then Turing will make it difficult. But no worries, by that time you will be ready (and willing) to move on to another language.
beard0
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:35 am Post subject: (No subject)
I know that you can make a 3D game in Turing - it's just going to run extremely slowly as soon as you get into anything remotely complicated.
[Gandalf]
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:38 pm Post subject: (No subject)
[Gandalf] wrote:
Still, if you wish to expand then Turing will make it difficult. But no worries, by that time you will be ready (and willing) to move on to another language.
=
beard0 wrote:
I know that you can make a 3D game in Turing - it's just going to run extremely slowly as soon as you get into anything remotely complicated.
We were simply trying to expand on what you said .