| Author | Message | 
		 
		| ProgrammingFun 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 1:09 pm    Post subject: Loop Fail |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| I can't think of any way to do this in a more efficient way (perhaps using for-loops)...so I posted to ask, is there a better way to do this? 
 
 	  | Java: |  	  | 
checkBoard[0][0] = gameBoard[x-1][y-1];
 checkBoard[0][1] = gameBoard[x][y-1];
 checkBoard[0][2] = gameBoard[x+1][y-1];
 checkBoard[1][0] = gameBoard[x-1][y];
 checkBoard[1][1] = gameBoard[x][y];
 checkBoard[1][2] = gameBoard[x+1][y];
 checkBoard[2][0] = gameBoard[x-1][y+1];
 checkBoard[2][1] = gameBoard[x][y+1];
 checkBoard[2][2] = gameBoard[x+1][y+1];
 
 | 
 |  
				|  |  | 
	 
		|  |  | 
	
 
		|  | 
		 
		| Sponsor Sponsor
 
  
   |  | 
	 
		|  | 
				 
		| Tony 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 1:15 pm    Post subject: RE:Loop Fail |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| If by "more efficient" you mean "less lines of code", then yes. Two for-loops and a single assignment statement. 
 Edit: strictly speaking, you can do this with a single for-loop, at the cost of readability.
 |  
				|  Tony's programming blog. DWITE - a programming contest. |  | 
	 
		|  |  | 
	
 
		|  | 
				 
		| Insectoid 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 1:17 pm    Post subject: RE:Loop Fail |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| A nested for loop should do the trick. 
 	  | code: |  	  | 
for x_ : 0-2 {
 for y : 0-2 {
 checkerBoard[x_][y] = gameBoard[x+y-1][x+x_-1]
 }
 }
 
 | 
 |  
				|  |  | 
	 
		|  |  | 
	
 
		|  | 
				 
		| ProgrammingFun 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 2:23 pm    Post subject: RE:Loop Fail |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| Thanks for the help. I used the following method: 
 	  | Java: |  	  | 
for (int a = 0 ; a < 3 ; a++)
{
        for (int  b = 0 ; b < 3 ; b++)
        { 
                checkBoard[ a][ b]  = gameBoard[ y + b - 1][ x + a - 1] ;
                System .out .print ( checkBoard[ a][ b]  + " ") ;
        }
                                        
} | 
 |  
				|  |  | 
	 
		|  |  | 
	
 
		|  | 
				 
		| ProgrammingFun 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 5:02 pm    Post subject: RE:Loop Fail |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| An unrelated question: 
 If nowin is a boolean will:
 
 
 if (nowin) mean the same thing as if (nowin == true) 
 if (!nowin) mean the same thing as if (nowin == false) 
 Thanks for the help!
 |  
				|  |  | 
	 
		|  |  | 
	
 
		|  | 
				 
		| 2goto1 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 5:24 pm    Post subject: RE:Loop Fail |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| Yes and yes. Try spitting out each to your console to confirm |  
				|  |  | 
	 
		|  |  | 
	
 
		|  | 
				 
		| ProgrammingFun 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 5:52 pm    Post subject: Re: RE:Loop Fail |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| 2goto1 @ Sat Jan 08, 2011 5:24 pm wrote: Yes and yes. Try spitting out each to your console to confirmOK, thanks for the help... |  
				|  |  | 
	 
		|  |  | 
	
 
		|  | 
				 
		| copthesaint 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:31 am    Post subject: Re: Loop Fail |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| Tony wrote: 
If by "more efficient" you mean "less lines of code", then yes. Two for-loops and a single assignment statement.
 Edit: strictly speaking, you can do this with a single for-loop, at the cost of readability.
 
 
 Sooo...
 Does this work for yea then
  SAVES  1 LINE!!!  *not counting brackets* 
 
 	  | Java: |  	  | for (int i = 0 ; i < 9 ; i++){ 
heckBoard[(( i-( i%3)) /3)][( i%3)]  = gameBoard[ y + ( i%3)  - 1][ x + (( i-( i%3)) /3)  - 1] ; 
                System .out .print ( checkBoard[ a][( i%3)]  + " ") ;
} | 
 
 Lol I dont want to know how complex it would be to minipulate the values for a 3 dimensional array doing this... lol
 |  
				|  |  | 
	 
		|  |  | 
	
 
		|  | 
		 
		| Sponsor Sponsor
 
  
   |  | 
	 
		|  | 
				 
		| DemonWasp 
 
 
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:45 am    Post subject: RE:Loop Fail |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| Incidentally, always choose readability over number of lines of code. In fact, choose readability over anything except a real requirement. |  
				|  |  | 
	 
		|  |  | 
	
 
		|  | 
				 
		| Tony 
 
  
 
 
 |  | 
	 
		|  |  | 
	
 
		|  | 
				 
		| copthesaint 
 
  
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:28 pm    Post subject: RE:Loop Fail |  |   
				| 
 |  
				| Lol, that is really great tony...  , Also DemonWasp, whats the fun in readability  jk |  
				|  |  | 
	 
		|  |  | 
	
 
		|  | 
				 
		|  |