Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 5:36 pm Post subject: Turing Excecutables |
|
|
Is there any way I can read the Turing program when it is turned into an excecutable? I have Resource Hacker, would that do it? Or what will I need? |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Sponsor Sponsor
![Sponsor Sponsor](templates/subSilver/images/ranks/stars_rank5.gif)
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Tony
![](http://wiki.compsci.ca/images/f/f4/OniTony.gif)
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 6:09 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Turing is actually first interpreted into C++ and then compiled as such (not directly). So even if you reverse engineer the executable, you're not going to get to the Turing sytax. |
Tony's programming blog. DWITE - a programming contest. |
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 10:06 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Ok, so that means "C++ > Turing > Syntax". Cool. Is C++ interpreted from a different language? |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Tony
![](http://wiki.compsci.ca/images/f/f4/OniTony.gif)
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
MysticVegeta
![](http://www.geocities.com/ohsoinsane/my_avatar.JPG)
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 10:38 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Hmm, Holtsoft seems to have some really crappy encryption from viewing the C++ code on resource hackers / Ollydbg, but I think it could be broken easily with the new ollydbg version and some x86 knowledge... apparently my assembly sucks -_- |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
[Gandalf]
![](http://compsci.ca/v3/uploads/user_avatars/189297994e4c716fec7f1.png)
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 11:16 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Eh? Encryption? From viewing the C++ code? In a compiled Turing executable there is no "C++ code". At best, yes, you could use something like Ollydbg to view the assembly code for it, but I doubt that's going to help the common Turing programmer to get the exact original Turing code, or even the equivalent C++ code. |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
|