Which is better
(No ending time set) |
| Binary |
|
11% |
[ 2 ] |
| Hexadeciamal |
|
23% |
[ 4 ] |
| Octodecimal |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Decimal |
|
5% |
[ 1 ] |
| Normal |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| This is stupid |
|
58% |
[ 10 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 17 |
|
| Author |
Message |
MihaiG
|
 Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:49 pm Post subject: Binary |
|
|
Which is the best way to communicate   |
|
|
|
|
 |
Sponsor
Sponsor
|
|
|
Neo
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:05 pm Post subject: Re: Binary |
|
|
ELCOMANDANTE wrote:
Trinary |
|
|
|
|
|
Drakain Zeil
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:16 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Hex. Because f>10  |
|
|
|
|
|
Hikaru79
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:25 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Why is "decimal" and "normal" two different choices? 
Anyway, if by "communicate" you mean "with other human beings" then I don't think that there's much of a contest. When was the last time you said "I went to sleep at 010110 hours last night!"? |
|
|
|
|
|
Tony
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:56 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
| We should all speak in BF |
|
|
|
|
|
Drakain Zeil
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 11:40 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Quote: "I went to sleep at 010110 hours last night!"? Yes, I too want that binary clock for christmas...  |
|
|
|
|
|
MihaiG
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:23 am Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
| yes the BF is cool.... and decimal is... using just numbers....while normal is abc...123...!@#>....?:" |
|
|
|
|
|
Maverick
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:09 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Who would wanna write that much just to say Hello World.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsor
Sponsor
|
|
|
MihaiG
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:21 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
maybe a cheap form of encryption?
like for a low budget company....
besides the algoriths would be almost impossible to memorize... like binary is with powers............. |
|
|
|
|
|
Drakain Zeil
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 2:36 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
| You'd be better off learning assembly then BF. |
|
|
|
|
|
Andy
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:25 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
wow.. soo many ppl think this is stupid, great poll option  |
|
|
|
|
|
MihaiG
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:38 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
thnx.... but binary started it all.... before puch card.. and there were three swtches for programming
1. on/off
2. 1
3. 0
hehehehehe |
|
|
|
|
|
Andy
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:41 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
r u talking about the adding machine? and yes punchcards used to be the programming language in the old days... who would have known that women started programming before men.. we need aoi back  |
|
|
|
|
|
Dan
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:41 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
ELCOMANDANTE wrote: thnx.... but binary started it all.... before puch card.. and there were three swtches for programming
1. on/off
2. 1
3. 0
hehehehehe
no......thress swtches whould be qoutmecomputing where u can have somting on and off at the same time. right now it is just 2, on or off but not both at the same time....... |
| Computer Science Canada
Help with programming in C, C++, Java, PHP, Ruby, Turing, VB and more! |
|
|
|
|
MihaiG
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:59 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Hacker Dan wrote: ELCOMANDANTE wrote: thnx.... but binary started it all.... before puch card.. and there were three swtches for programming
1. on/off
2. 1
3. 0
hehehehehe
no......thress swtches whould be qoutmecomputing where u can have somting on and off at the same time. right now it is just 2, on or off but not both at the same time.......
i was reffering to 1.on/off as the power switch to the "Computer" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Register
Wiki
Blog
Search
Turing
Chat Room
Members
