martin wrote:
It's so funny, schools insist on teaching obsolete versions of obsolete languages.
Why does the school board not go with a freely available, easy to learn language?
Quoted from a post I made at ArsTechnica:
Quote:
I love it when schools decide to teach a particular language because it's "the industry standard", then proceed to teach it in a completely non-standard way.
Or when they develop their own (typically half-assed) custom language because "C++ (or Java) is too complex" for first year students, utterly ignoring the wealth of other languages out there, or dismissing them "because they aren't industry standard tools".