Relation between a text locate and a graphic locate
Author |
Message |
efan41
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 2:45 pm Post subject: Relation between a text locate and a graphic locate |
|
|
What is it you are trying to achieve?
I am trying to figure out if there is a simple algorithm to convert a graphic locate into a text locate
What is the problem you are having?
I'm not smart enough to figure it out on my own
Please specify what version of Turing you are using
4.0.5
I know that I cannot just take the coordinates from a graphic locate and use them with a text locate.A graphic locate uses each individual pixel on the screen as a reference instead of several pixels like the text locate, therefore when if I were to try and use a value of 625 (the 625th pixel), I'd get a max row error, 625 is greater than max row 125. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsor Sponsor
|
|
|
Tony
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 2:56 pm Post subject: RE:Relation between a text locate and a graphic locate |
|
|
values of maxx and maxcol should give you enough information to figure this out. |
Tony's programming blog. DWITE - a programming contest. |
|
|
|
|
andrew.
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:09 pm Post subject: RE:Relation between a text locate and a graphic locate |
|
|
Here's an even bigger hint. To find the horizontal pixel size of one character's area: maxx/maxcol. To find the vertical pixel size: maxy/maxrow. |
|
|
|
|
|
Tony
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:03 pm Post subject: RE:Relation between a text locate and a graphic locate |
|
|
That hint is so big, it's almost a solution |
Tony's programming blog. DWITE - a programming contest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|