To fork or not to fork.
Author |
Message |
Mackie
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 9:15 pm Post subject: To fork or not to fork. |
|
|
I have to decide whether or not to use my Color Selector as a procedure, which will halt all other operations while it executes, or to fork a process, but everyone says that's bad because of the randomness of it all. I don't really see any problems with forking it so far. Any suggestions?
I still need to optimize. And rename some stuff. Just to let everyone know that I am aware.
Description: |
|
Download |
Filename: |
colorselect.zip |
Filesize: |
2.79 KB |
Downloaded: |
69 Time(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsor Sponsor
|
|
|
syntax_error
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 9:26 pm Post subject: RE:To fork or not to fork. |
|
|
im sure you can find a way around, "forking"
I say : not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LaZ3R
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 9:49 pm Post subject: RE:To fork or not to fork. |
|
|
I'll say no as well. It's a nice program by the way
Fork should only be used for music. If you make turing do two things at once aside from playing a music file on top of processing data, you end up asking for trouble
I don't see your program doing anything wacky itself while it's running, however, I still think if you can avoid forking anything, try it out instead
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mackie
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 9:59 pm Post subject: RE:To fork or not to fork. |
|
|
Thanks, for the input. I just don't see any good reason not to fork yet. The only way I could think of integrating it with the main loop would be to make it a class. Which veers away from my original concept of a one line call. If anyone has an idea of how I could accomplish this while still keeping it a procedure, please share.
Also, I hear that the preview gradients don't work on some computers, if they don't, please speak up.
Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LaZ3R
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:40 pm Post subject: RE:To fork or not to fork. |
|
|
They show up fine here Very nice job I must say
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|