Just because I'm Wondering

[Ennsy_908]

I know this would be the stupidest thing ever made in turing, but

Is it possible to make turing in turing?

[bapb10]

it probably would be possible but i wouldnt because we already have it why make it again

[Dan]

Yes, infact in the very eraly days of turing holth soft made the public versions of turing in somthing caled turing pro witch was apperntly a more powerfull version of turing that was for holths use only.

The new versions however are made in visual c++.

You could make turing in the version of turing you have, however it whould take alot of work and effort then it whould in other langues and whould be rather pointless.

Some peoleop on this site an intrested in remaking turing in C++ or Java so we can have an open sorce free turing. However not much has been done with the idea.

[bapb10]

it would be alot better if we had a free Turing

[rollerdude]

it came to me in a dream... actually i came up with myself, i have turing because i copied the installer when my teacher gave me the disc so i could have it at home

[ZeppelinManiac]

lol this summer chris, we're gonna make turing in turing, but i also want to make that operating system lol, we think of the most pointless stuff....

[Tony]

http://worsethanfailure.com/Articles/OMGWTF-Finalist-11-VICE,-Virtual-Integrated-Circuit-Engine.aspx

Quote:

Virtualization was not an uncommon theme among several of the OMGWTF entries. It only makes sense: why stop at abstracting layers of software when the entire hardware platform might need to be changed later on? Sure, some might argue that the “operating system” or “compiler” can handle all those changes, but why risk it? Entry #100336 (Randolpho St. John’s VICE, Virtual Integrated Circuit Engine) sure didn’t: it took the concept of a virtual machine way too far.

[Martin]

Yes, it is possible. You should read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing-complete