3D Engine (rizzix)

rizzix · **Posted:** Sun Jun 27, 2004 12:03 am

pre-alpha version. but i dont think i'm going to carry on development of this project. its good for rendering 3d objects. but.. lacks movement etc.. ah and heh boy those 2 are going to kill me if i say this: its by far the most accurate rendering engine i've seen on compsci so far Mr. Green

(oh and y turing? dont ask.. long story)

PS: built on a completly different (new) code-base
PPS: included the other engines as well Rolling Eyes

if a .raw file is corrupt.. dl them from here:
smurf
spacestation2
spacestation
woman
bridget
sphere
balloon

PPPS: oh and its recomended to have 2ghz of processing power at the least Laughing

Tony · **Posted:** Sun Jun 27, 2004 12:26 am

impressive... though... you seem to have some glitch in rendering the sphere Confused

few faces are rendered before they should and get covered Thinking

rizzix · **Posted:** Sun Jun 27, 2004 2:06 am

yep.. aware of that heh. i didn't add the algorithm to do the sorting.

Delos · **Posted:** Sun Jun 27, 2004 11:09 am

Now, did you include those other engines so that we may consider all 3 in entirely objective stances?

Or just for gloatware?

Eitherway, it's still pretty darn cool...and it ran well on my 900 MHz Athalon...though it did take about 20 seconds for the smuft to begin loading...

Far too much complexity in those files to bother looking at...I probably wouldn't understand anyhow...I'll just stick to manageable 2D...

So, tell us the story, of 'why Turing'. I'm sure we're all anxious to hear... Wink

rizzix · **Posted:** Sun Jun 27, 2004 12:40 pm

objective stance or gloatware.. heh ur choice.
(actually i didn't even know i had added them in unitl i dl'd the file my self and extracted it)

Catalyst · **Posted:** Sun Jun 27, 2004 1:26 pm

what exactly do u mean by accurate? Laughing

oh and if ur gonna include my engine at least use the newer version

zylum · **Posted:** Sun Jun 27, 2004 1:36 pm

when i try to extract the files i get like 66 errors because all the files are corrupt...

rizzix · **Posted:** Sun Jun 27, 2004 2:17 pm

yep.. no idea y.. but its usually just the .raw files.. dl them from the links above

zylum · **Posted:** Sun Jun 27, 2004 3:05 pm

its not just the raw files... when i decompress all i get is empty folders... n souce files or anything

rizzix · **Posted:** Sun Jun 27, 2004 8:50 pm

Catalyst wrote:

what exactly do u mean by accurate? Laughing

oh and if ur gonna include my engine at least use the newer version

by accurate i meant perspective correct interpolation. but the newer version appears to be quite accurate heh. yet i can't really tell.. how do i zoom?

EDIT: figured it out nvm

futher y is it i can;t zoom in much.. after a point it the object appears smaller

rizzix · **Posted:** Sun Jun 27, 2004 8:52 pm

zylum wrote:

its not just the raw files... when i decompress all i get is empty folders... n souce files or anything

that is strange.. cuz i just did tried extracting it my self.. works prefectly.

Catalyst · **Posted:** Sun Jun 27, 2004 9:43 pm

oh thats the object passing through the camera
i never really finished this engine because i started a new one which was more advanced (which i also never finished Laughing

)

Delos · **Posted:** Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:13 am

Catalyst...I'm curious, what is your avatar all about?

rizzix · **Posted:** Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:14 am

he's a very curious guy. Laughing

Catalyst · **Posted:** Mon Jun 28, 2004 2:22 pm

its a fractal (from the julia set most of the time)
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/JuliaSet.html

	Computer Science Canada Programming C, C++, Java, PHP, Ruby, Turing, VB Username: Password: Register
Wiki Blog Search Turing Chat Room Members