Lens Filter V 2.0
Author |
Message |
Delos

|
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2004 8:20 pm Post subject: Lens Filter V 2.0 |
|
|
V 3.0 now available:
Here! |
|
|
|
|
 |
Sponsor Sponsor

|
|
 |
shorthair

|
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2004 8:54 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
The first one was amazing , this one is jsut outright awsome ,all the power to you man , this jsut rocks , everyone should check this out |
|
|
|
|
 |
Delos

|
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 5:06 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
V 2.1 up there^!
Get it! |
|
|
|
|
 |
white_dragon
|
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 6:44 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
nice update. i'm likin it! |
|
|
|
|
 |
shorthair

|
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:02 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Wow what else is there to imporve on Delos , you have really developed this killer app |
|
|
|
|
 |
Delos

|
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:08 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Well...
Let's see...this update also improves the greyscale function - works especially well on animé .
I've got the 'dark' filters (blue, red, green) and the 'light' filters (yellow, algae [IMHO, the best next to grey], and purple.
I also made an inverse black&white filter - white where there should be black, vice versa. It's interesting, but I didn't like it too much.
I could add 2 more options to it:
- Output file name
- Ensure integrity for immediate Turing Implementation.
At the moment, the second option is default. For those who just want the pics rendered, and not converted, I could add an option for that.
Other suggestions?
BTW, the reason I made this programme was as an app for a much larger programme I'm thinking of working on...time permitting of course. Lol. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Method
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 4:23 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Not bad, RK.
Here, take these useless bits off my hands. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Cervantes

|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2004 5:43 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
shorthair wrote: Method Wrote
Quote:
Take These Useless Bits Off My Hands
You underestimea the power of hte bits , because you are a newbie i can understand this , but do not speak ill of the buts of bad things might happen ,
yes those buts sure are something
great program delos! I really really like it  |
|
|
|
|
 |
Sponsor Sponsor

|
|
 |
Kuntzy

|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2004 5:57 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
This is cool, you use whatdotcolor ... right? |
|
|
|
|
 |
Cervantes

|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2004 6:10 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
gogo whatdotcolour!!
I don't think that could be done without whatdotcolour..
thing I don't get is that the color numbers in Turing are all messed up in a wierd order.... did you just use colours from like 30 to 120 or something? |
|
|
|
|
 |
Andy
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2004 6:44 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
gj cervantes, nothing can be done without whatdotcolor... at least nothing cool
take 10 bits |
|
|
|
|
 |
Delos

|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 4:06 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Yes, I used whatdotcolour. Quite copiously really.
As I've said before, the point of this programme is that after reading and rendering the image, it converts it into a format that uses only 256 colours. Thus, images can be put into Turing and won't screw up when you do something w/ them . |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|