Convert * to int 
	 
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
		 
		hamid14
 
  
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:02 pm    Post subject: Convert * to int  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				Basically I'm trying to give a variable called b, which is a string, a integer value of 1 and be able to add it to another integer
 
 
String b = "*";
 
int i = 0; 
 
 
//b should have an intege value of 1, so its basically the same thing as 1, it just has a symbol representing the 1, rather than just typing 1
 
 
i + b = 2;
 
 
 
Is this even possible? | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	 
	  
		  | 
	 
		 
		Sponsor Sponsor 
		 
  
		 | 
		
 | 
	 
	 
		  | 
	 
				 
		TerranceN
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:00 pm    Post subject: RE:Convert * to int  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				Something like this?
 
 
 | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	 
	  
		  | 
	 
				 
		hamid14
 
  
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:02 pm    Post subject: Re: Convert * to int  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| the string has to be * not 1, it should represent and function as a 1 but appear to the user as a * | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	 
	  
		  | 
	 
				 
		TerranceN
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:14 pm    Post subject: RE:Convert * to int  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				Well if it only has to appear to the user to be all *s, then you can just make a function that creates a string the same length, but all *s.
 
 
Something like this:
 
	  | Java: | 	 		  
public static void main  (String[] args ) 
{
        String b =  "5780";
         int i =  0;
 
        i =  Integer. parseInt(b ) +  1;
        
         System. out. println(starredOutString (b ));
         System. out. println(i );
 }
static String starredOutString (String src )
{
        String temp =  "";
        
         for (int i =  0; i < src. length(); i++ )
        {
                temp +=  "*";
         }
        
        return temp;
 }
  | 	  
 
 
Although unless the string with a number in it is input, theres not much point of it being a string anymore. | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	 
	  
		  | 
	 
				 
		hamid14
 
  
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:19 pm    Post subject: Re: Convert * to int  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| no thats not it. good try though. IT should be like 1 + * = ** and 2 + * = *** and 3 + * = **** and so on. | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	 
	  
		  | 
	 
				 
		TerranceN
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:24 pm    Post subject: RE:Convert * to int  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| Oh in that case you can just use b.length() to get the number of stars there are. | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	 
	  
		  | 
	 
				 
		DtY
 
  
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:54 pm    Post subject: Re: RE:Convert * to int  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				TerranceN @ Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:14 pm wrote: Well if it only has to appear to the user to be all *s, then you can just make a function that creates a string the same length, but all *s.
 
 
[...]
 
 
Although unless the string with a number in it is input, theres not much point of it being a string anymore. This really is the best option, store it as a number (because that's what it is), and if you need to display it, convert it to a string, like above, and if you need to get that as input, use another function to convert it back. (you might even consider creating a class to wrap all this.)
 
 
If you really don't want to do that, you will still need to use those functions. For reference:
 
toStar(int) => string
 
fromStar(string) => int
 
fromStar(int) => int
 
 
And then:
 
toStar(fromStar("*") + fromStar(1)) = "**";
 
(fromStar(1) really isn't necessary, but it makes it more symmetrical. In dynamically typed languages this would allow you to use them interchangeably, but I don't know if it has any real advantage in a statically typed language like Java.) | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	 
	  
		  | 
	 
				 
		 | 
	 
 
	
	
	 
	
	 |