Author |
Message |
bbi5291
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:07 pm Post subject: DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
|
|
Why does 1001 not appear in the sample output? |
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsor Sponsor
|
|
|
Tony
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:09 pm Post subject: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
|
|
Because I FAIL. Please disregard Question 3. |
Tony's programming blog. DWITE - a programming contest. |
|
|
|
|
bbi5291
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:15 pm Post subject: Re: DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
|
|
Are there problems with the actual test data too, then? By "disregard question 3", do you mean that it isn't going to be counted? |
|
|
|
|
|
Tony
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:27 pm Post subject: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
|
|
Yes, there are problems in the test data as well. It would leave us with less post-contest cleanup maintenance if you were to not figure out a way to score anyway. |
Tony's programming blog. DWITE - a programming contest. |
|
|
|
|
saltpro15
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:37 pm Post subject: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
|
|
...sooo do it or do not do it? |
|
|
|
|
|
Dan
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:39 pm Post subject: Re: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
|
|
saltpro15 @ 25th November 2009, 4:37 pm wrote: ...sooo do it or do not do it?
Do the question as it is writen and don't try to manipulate it so you get 5/5 with incorect data that judge will mark right. |
Computer Science Canada
Help with programming in C, C++, Java, PHP, Ruby, Turing, VB and more! |
|
|
|
|
Tony
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:43 pm Post subject: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
|
|
The thing is, the question is written wrong as well. I think Dan is saying "Do the question as it was intended".
But the judge has wrong test data. |
Tony's programming blog. DWITE - a programming contest. |
|
|
|
|
Dan
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:51 pm Post subject: Re: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
|
|
Tony @ 25th November 2009, 4:43 pm wrote: I think Dan is saying "Do the question as it was intended".
Indeed :p |
Computer Science Canada
Help with programming in C, C++, Java, PHP, Ruby, Turing, VB and more! |
|
|
|
|
Sponsor Sponsor
|
|
|
saltpro15
|
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:01 pm Post subject: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
|
|
Ok, done 1/5 as expected |
|
|
|
|
|
Tony
|
|
|
|
|
Vengeance101
|
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:36 am Post subject: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
|
|
Hey, I hardcoded the problem and I got 0/5 for it. Is it because you took it down after a while? If so, missed out on some very easy points. |
|
|
|
|
|
Tony
|
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:10 pm Post subject: Re: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
|
|
Vengeance101 @ Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:36 am wrote: Hey, I hardcoded the problem and I got 0/5 for it.
I'm not sure how one even attempt to hard code a solution for variable input, but...
http://compsci.ca/blog/hard-code/ |
Tony's programming blog. DWITE - a programming contest. |
|
|
|
|
|