Signature Thread, Rate Plox.

[Demagogue]

Uh, my signatures with original stocks, C&C.


http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc24/Bornsatin/Forgotten_Fairytales_II_by_zemot-1.jpg


http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc24/Bornsatin/ce8fd95c53cc98df.jpg


http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc24/Bornsatin/____by_ZeEnigMa.jpg


http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc24/Bornsatin/4b179c9df6c77d61.jpg




http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc24/Bornsatin/Frog_Rain_Forest_Cleveland_Zoo.jpg

V2

[Dan]

Thos all look realy nice but they seem a bit big, height wise, for signatures to me.

[Tony]

I'd have to agree. It's generally in bad taste to consistently make posts where the height of the text is less than the height of the signature (insufficient signal to noise ratio).

Thought that being said, I absolutely love the the "Urban" one

Great composition, theme, colour (lack of colour, as in greyscale, etc, is also "colour"). It's awesome.

[jernst]

Quote:

Thought that being said, I absolutely love the the "Urban" one

agreed, that one is my favourite

[[Gandalf]]

jernst @ 2008-05-13, 10:21 am wrote:

Quote:

Thought that being said, I absolutely love the the "Urban" one

agreed, that one is my favourite

I prefer the glowing stone one, however that is sadly the only one that is missing the original image?

Also agreed about the height... ~100 pixels should probably be your vertical limit.