May I suggest "D" from digitalmars

[btiffin]

Hi,

An alternative to C/C++ is now D. D the language is in active development and release 2.0 is in beta test.

The primary designer, Walter Bright is very active in the D forums and the community, while perhaps a little more harsh than here at compsci.ca, is quite helpful.

D could well be (but no guarantees) the up and comer that displaces C/C++ as the general programming language of choice. Then again, it probably won't ... Walter is not making enough mistakes.

One of the main advantages of D over C/C++ is the compiler's built in garbage collection. This removes the malloc/free code path correctness and heap corruption problems faced by most C coders. You can still manage your own memory, but you don't HAVE to.

Plus it has some very nice features for supporting professional level programming practices. Documentation can be built right into the source code of a program, Unit testing in source is well supported as well as "contract" programming with pre and post conditions that can be part of any programmer defined function.

D can be found at http://www.digitalmars.com/d/

Perhaps you will be the new employee that influences an entire corporate empire in the choice of development language.

D is my new favourite for Programming in the Small (PitS), Programming in the Many (PitM) and Programming in the Large (PitL). It is a great environment for rapid development of personal projects (PitS) and the compiler has professional grade tools that assist with large team efforts (PitM) and on large scale projects (PitL). It's not as mature as C/C++ but it's quickly building a user and source code base.

Cheers,
Brian Tiffin
Oh and I better mention REBOL, I live for coding in REBOL, everyone should know REBOL.

[Mackie]

You sure have a thing for unconventional languages don't you? Anyway, D looks alright.

[btiffin]

Yep, I do like the unconventional; makes for more well rounded problem solving regardless of the target language in use.

Good programmers know of C, Java, Ruby et al.
Great programmers know of John von Neuman, Ralph Griswold, John McCarthy, John Backus, Niklaus Wirth, Bertrand Meyer, Larry Wall, Guido van Rossum, Chuck Moore, Carl Sassenrath, Donald Knuth, James Gosling, Walter Bright, ... et al.

Oh ... and Really Great programmers are Canadian.

Cheers,
Brian Tiffin

[syntax_error]

btiffin wrote:

One of the main advantages of D over C/C++ is the compiler's built in garbage collection. This removes the malloc/free code path correctness and heap corruption problems faced by most C coders. You can still manage your own memory, but you don't HAVE to.

since im not that well informed of how a language works with the computer type thing this may sound stupid anyhoo :

what i wanted to say was that in the above statement isn't it the same as in java which has a auto garbage collector ??

if so then whats the big difference and if not ...

[PaulButler]

syntax_error @ Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:51 pm wrote:

btiffin wrote:

One of the main advantages of D over C/C++ is the compiler's built in garbage collection. This removes the malloc/free code path correctness and heap corruption problems faced by most C coders. You can still manage your own memory, but you don't HAVE to.

since im not that well informed of how a language works with the computer type thing this may sound stupid anyhoo :

what i wanted to say was that in the above statement isn't it the same as in java which has a auto garbage collector ??

if so then whats the big difference and if not ...

Yes, it's the same idea as what Java has. D also does things that Java doesn't (yet) do, like closures and a few other things inspired by functional programming.

[syntax_error]

care to explain to me what those

PaulButler wrote:

also does things that Java doesn't (yet) do, like closures and a few other things inspired by functional programming.

extra things are and how they are more helpful?

[btiffin]

difference from D to Java;

Biggest would probably be that D compiles native. There is no virtual machine.

I would say D and Java compete in similar problem domains, but D (or C or C++) excel at systems level coding compared to Java.

Know Java, (besides, James is Canadian) but D may also be worth knowing. imho, D takes C++ and builds on it while cutting some of the "chaff" (where the definition of chaff varies from coder to coder).

Cheers,
Brian Tiffin

[OneOffDriveByPoster]

C++0x is coming soon (with garbage collection afaik). I guess I might find out myself, but how "open" is D (with regards to platform support)?

[btiffin]

I've used D on Vista, Win98 and Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 - can't speak for other platforms but there is a D frontend to GCC.

The license for the digitalmars compiler is somewhat proprietary; the frontend is open source and the source is included, the RTL is open source. The gdc (D using GCC) version is completely open source. You can safely redistribute solutions, but not the digitalmars compiler; but then, IANAL (I am not a lawyer).

Cheers,
Brian Tiffin

[wtd]

I've previously evangelized D here. However, it is a solution to a problem people are increasingly sidestepping by continuing to use C and then wrapping that C code to be available from Ruby, Python, etc, or by using more expressive languages that compile down to CLR or JVM code.

[Tony]

does jRuby support inline C?

[btiffin]

wtd; I'd like to request your permission to repost your sidestepping comment to the REBOL 3 alpha board for Carl's benefit. I think the core design team may find it an interesting point of view.

Cheers,
Brian

[wtd]

Not a problem, assuming you properly credit the comments.

[wtd]

syntax_error @ Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:07 am wrote:

care to explain to me what those

PaulButler wrote:

also does things that Java doesn't (yet) do, like closures and a few other things inspired by functional programming.

extra things are and how they are more helpful?

Closures are immensely useful, but can be difficult to appreciate for those not versed in functional programming to appreciate. They arer also hard to appreciate if one's programming language doesn't have a library that makes good use of them.

[rdrake]

I also rather like lambda expressions, even C# has them now:

code:

var adults = allPeople.FindAll(p => p.Age >= 18);

The above goes through every person and finds the ones who are aged 18 or above, then adds those to a new list called "adults."

The equivalent code in Java would be something like:

Java:

List<Person> adults = new List<Person>(); for (Person p : allPeople) {     if (p.getAge() >= 18) {         adults.add(p);     } }

But anyways, I'm probably straying far off topic now.