| Author | 
		Message | 
	
		 
		SilverSprite
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 2:47 pm    Post subject: another quick math question for 100  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| This one isnt quite as hard as darknesses question but since i wont put my bits to any good use.. here we go.. prove that 6x^2 + 2y^2 = z^2 has no natural solutions | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
		 
		Sponsor Sponsor 
		 
  
		 | 
		
 | 
	
	 
		  | 
	
				 
		AsianSensation
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 3:39 pm    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				I don't know if Im right or not(probably not), but here is mine solution:
 
 
6x^2 + 2y^2 = z^2
 
 
assuming the statement is true, i'll try to prove it by using contradiction:
 
 
first take out a common factor of 2 from the left side:
 
2(3x^2 + y^2) = z^2
 
 
if the above statement is true, with x,y,z belonging to Integers, then:
 
3x^2 + y^2 must be an odd power of 2.
 
 
let n be a number belonging to the set of positive integers
 
3x^2 + y^2 = 2^(2n+1)
 
 
therefore, 
 
0 = 2^(2n+1) - 3x^2 - y^2 
 
 
0 = 3x^2 + y^2 - 2^(2n+1) 
 
 
0 = x^2 + y^2 + 2x^2 - 2^(2n+1)
 
 
0 = x^2 + y^2 + 2(x^2 - 2^(2n))
 
 
0 = x^2 + y^2 + 2((x - 2^n)(x + 2^n))
 
 
now since x^2, y^2, and x + 2^n are all positive, therefore, for the equation to be true, x - 2^n must be negative.
 
 
therefore, x - 2^n < 0
 
x < 2^ n
 
 
sub that statement back into 3x^2 + y^2 = 2^(2n+1), and we get:
 
 
3(2^(2n)) + y^2 < 2^(2n+1)
 
 
but this statement is obviously false, because 
 
3(2^(2n)) > 2^(2n+1)
 
 
therefore, contradiction arises, and there does not exist integer solutions to 6x^2 + 2y^2 = z^2 | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		SilverSprite
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 4:02 pm    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
					  | code: | 	 		  
 
therefore, x - 2^n < 0 
 
x < 2^ n 
 
 
sub that statement back into 3x^2 + y^2 = 2^(2n+1), and we get: 
 
 
3(2^(2n)) + y^2 < 2^(2n+1) 
 
  | 	  
 
 
when you sub in x<2^n .. wouldnt you get 3(2^(2n)) + y^2 > 2^(2n+1) ? or am i wrong? that makes your proof false.. unless someone can tell me i'm wrong.. i hate working with these inequalities:S | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		SilverSprite
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 4:03 pm    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| try again.. if you like.. anybody else? come on it isnt that hard.. | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		AsianSensation
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 4:05 pm    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				am I even close, or am I like way off?
 
 
(still working on it......) | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		SilverSprite
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 4:08 pm    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| i actually don't remember the solution.. i just remember doing it for night math last year.. | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		SilverSprite
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 4:11 pm    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I have realised something else.. it is false for you to assume that 3x^2 + y^2 = 2^(2n+1) | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		SilverSprite
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 4:17 pm    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| yeah i just got it.. you were on the right track at the second line.. after that everything went bad | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
		 
		Sponsor Sponsor 
		 
  
		 | 
		
 | 
	
	 
		  | 
	
				 
		AsianSensation
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 4:19 pm    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| lol, i just realized that too, so instead of assuming 2^something, i'll assume it's a perfect square multiplied by 2 | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		SilverSprite
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 4:24 pm    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| yes that would be fair.. | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		SilverSprite
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2003 10:34 pm    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| nobody?? come on whoa fine the new prize is all my bits.. | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		Amailer
 
  
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2003 12:35 am    Post subject: IS THIS IT?:  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| There is no solution because they are all different variables | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		SilverSprite
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2003 7:19 am    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| haha..what? | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		Amailer
 
  
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2003 7:36 am    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				| Oh nothing....i just did some crap....duh im not in grd 12 but hehe i need bits! lol | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		AsianSensation
 
 
 
    
		 | 
		
		
			
				  Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2003 10:39 am    Post subject: (No subject)  | 
	
				
				 | 
			 
			 
				
  | 
			 
			
				Does this problem involves ellipse? 
 
 
x^2 / (2(n^2)/ 3) + y^2 / (2(n^2)) = 1
 
 
cause when you graphed it, you get a ellipse, but how do you prove there isn't integer solutions to a ellipse? Or maybe I am on a completely different approach then what is required? (probably the latter...) | 
			 
			
				 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	 
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
	
 
		  | 
	
				 
		 |