Do you agree with me? (No ending time set) |
Yes! Your math is teh roxxor! |
|
20% |
[ 2 ] |
No! You're insane! |
|
30% |
[ 3 ] |
Too cool to participate |
|
40% |
[ 4 ] |
Don't know what the cwazy sidewards 8 means |
|
10% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 10 |
|
Author |
Message |
blaster009
|
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 10:22 pm Post subject: Theoretical! |
|
|
Yar har har. Let's argue why or why not anything divided by ∞ is 0, and if it should work the other way.
To ponder (where n is any real number):
n/∞ = 0
n/0 = ∞
0/0 = Undefined (instead of 1)
∞/∞ = Undefined (instead of 1)
|
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Sponsor Sponsor
![Sponsor Sponsor](templates/subSilver/images/ranks/stars_rank5.gif)
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
md
![](http://compsci.ca/v3/uploads/user_avatars/1849317514ed6c4399768d.png)
|
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 10:30 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
n/x as x-> ∞ = 0. Likewise n/x as x -> 0 = ∞. That's not the same as n/∞=0 or n/0 = ∞.
Infinites are difficult in math... they tend to break people's minds ![Wink Wink](http://compsci.ca/v3/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif) |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
rizzix
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 10:37 am Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
pshhht..
n/x -> 0 as x -> ∞
and
n/x -> ∞ as x -> 0 |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
codemage
![](http://usera.imagecave.com/codemage/codemage-small.gif)
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 11:09 am Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Cornflake wrote: Infinites are difficult in math... they tend to break people's minds ![Wink Wink](http://compsci.ca/v3/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif)
That's because infinity doesn't really have a place in reality. It's a mathematical abstraction. Most people can't get over Zeno's paradox. |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Andy
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 1:16 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
the way my highschool physics teacher described it, infinity is just a sign post somewhere, once you past that sign post, you're in infinity land haha..
i miss physics ![Laughing Laughing](http://compsci.ca/v3/images/smiles/icon_lol.gif) |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Cervantes
![](http://compsci.ca/v3/uploads/user_avatars/1023105758475ab2e040bde.jpg)
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 4:26 pm Post subject: Re: Theoretical! |
|
|
blaster009 wrote:
0/0 = Undefined (instead of 1)
I have my own little theory about this one. It represents any number. This sort of comes through when solving limits that go to 0/0.
Better yet, set 0/0 to x and solve for x.
x = 0/0
0x = 0
Any value of x satisfies this equation, and so 0/0 represents any number.
Similarly for ∞/∞ |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Andy
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 5:58 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
you cant multiply both sides of an equation by 0 and use it as a valid argument |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
MysticVegeta
![](http://www.geocities.com/ohsoinsane/my_avatar.JPG)
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 8:53 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
yup andy is right.
say: x = 0/5
5x = 0
x must be 0, other #s dont satisfy |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Sponsor Sponsor
![Sponsor Sponsor](templates/subSilver/images/ranks/stars_rank5.gif)
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
md
![](http://compsci.ca/v3/uploads/user_avatars/1849317514ed6c4399768d.png)
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 10:13 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
MysticVegeta wrote: yup andy is right.
say: x = 0/5
5x = 0
x must be 0, other #s dont satisfy
Umm... that's a totally different arguement...
And rizzix; that's what I said. Aproaches is not the same as equals... another thing people don't always understand.
0/0 is undefined (not 1) as you cannot divide anything by nothing (not even nothing). ∞/∞ is one because the two ∞'s cancel out (just as any two variables of the same name and power would. |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Cervantes
![](http://compsci.ca/v3/uploads/user_avatars/1023105758475ab2e040bde.jpg)
|
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 5:27 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
MysticVegeta wrote: yup andy is right.
say: x = 0/5
5x = 0
x must be 0, other #s dont satisfy
Aw great, now I've got water all over my monitor. Well, not really, but I thought I'd say that anyways because it neatly described my reaction. If I happened to have had water in my mouth at the time, that would have been the outcome.
MysticVegeta, 0/5 is 0.
Andy wrote: you cant multiply both sides of an equation by 0 and use it as a valid argument
Why not? It's a tricky reason to articulate, I'm sure.
Now that I've thought about it a bit more, I'm thinking you're right. My reason: multiplying both sides by zero (which is a perfectly legal operation) gives:
0x = (0 / 0) * 0
Not what I previously had:
0x = 0
which assumed that 0/0 was 1. |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Andy
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 1:47 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
the simplest way to look at 0/a a/0 and 0/0 is
if you have 0 apples and try to split it with a people, each person gets 0
thus 0/a = 0
if you have a apples and try to split it with 0 people,we have nobody to ask about how many apples they recieved all we know is the a apples disappeared.
thus a/0 is undefined
and if you have 0 apples split betwen 0 people, then we cannot determine how many apples each person recieved since we had no proof of the apple, and no body to tell us what happened
thus 0/0 is indeterminate |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Mazer
![](http://compsci.ca/v3/uploads/user_avatars/1323750815476d9f446d80c.png)
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 2:41 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
I took the apples, Andy. I took the apples, and I threw them at your windows. Then when your neighbours saw me I blamed it on the ten year old kid who happened to be riding by at the time. The police want to know if you'll be pressing charges. |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
jamonathin
![](http://compsci.ca/v3/uploads/user_avatars/57683465145f851a43dd9a.gif)
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 6:07 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
lmao mazer . . but yeah, any way your slice it, it's still going to turn out the way Andy explained it. No matter what variables you stick in there.
But here's something . .
Let's say n / x = 0 then
n = 0x
1 = 0x / n
1 = 0 / n
1 = 0 ?
Did I miss something or does there have to be restrictions for n (n = 0, n E R). . |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
md
![](http://compsci.ca/v3/uploads/user_avatars/1849317514ed6c4399768d.png)
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 9:12 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
No restriction because take n = 0
n = 0x
0 = 0x
0 = 0 |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Martin
![](http://www.compsci.ca/wiki/images/4/46/CanadianStickUp.jpg)
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 12:04 am Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Or we can get into exciting things to confuse people such as that 0.99.. = 1.
The big problem that people have with infinities is that they think of it as a really big number, which it isn't. Infinity is a concept, not a number. There is no number that equals 'infinity,' because infinity is NOT a number. Once you get over that, it's much easier.
As such, something like 1/infinity has no meaning, because you're dividing a number (1) by not a number (infinity). This makes a number of operations useless on infinity, such as addition (infinity + 1 anyone?). It's like asking what 5 + purple is - it doesn't make any sense.
When you're saying 1/infinity, for the most part you're saying 1/BIG, which tends to zero as BIG gets bigger. What this means is that you can get arbitrarily close to zero - give me a positive distance to zero, and I can make it so that 1/BIG is within that distance. |
|
|
|
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
|