Not Another Encryption!!

[Delos]

Hey, you even got a couple extra hours! Anyhow, the offer/suggestion to have your XOR encryption included into Mystic's tut (which would then become your's and Mystic's tut) still stands - since he did make the point of asking for more advanced encryption methods to be included.

I'm also a little confused at that little tirade of yours - exploding at both Martin and I.... Ah well. If it made you feel better.

Anyhow, this thread has gotten *way* off topic anyhow, and shall be moved to [Source]. I expect that we'll be seeing an update to Mystic's tut sooner rather than later.
When you've drafted your final tut (working w/ Mystic of course), PM either myself or Cervantes and we'll proof it and send you the BBCode to keep it in line with the other upscale tuts.

As a side note: if this was intended to 'explain' or 'tutor' as you said, then chances are it'll get more game time in [Source] than in [Tutorials], simply because people come here less frequently. So while we can have dozens of posts in [Source] detailing the same topics, we can just have one comprehensive on in [Tutorials].

[upthescale]

wtf all u had to do is

put"your key was 12"
put"your original message was aaaaa"
put"Encrpyt....."
u get hte point? u put sooo muh coding when all u ahd to add was 3 lines

[Delos]

Sorry, what?

upthescale, before you make an utter idiot out of yourself, again, please try and come to grips with this little piece of advice: read the whole topic, understand the whole topic, and try to make sense when you post...[sigh].

The only mention of lacking code in here was cleared up completely by Cornflake. This, of course, involved some rather advanced topics based upon base manipulation. And no, I'm not talking about pH and buffers either.
Now, if you have nothing better to do than attempt to impose your apparently meaningless and ill-thought out ideas upon the rest of us, please move on. This is your second warning in the space of three days. Those are not good numbers.

I suggest you either apologise to Imm0rtal for wrongfully critisizing his work, or if you really do have a construtive comment to make, then by all means please do so in a comprehendable manner.
Whipping up a quick comment and not even bothering to use [code] tags or for that matter, some semblence of grammar is simply a testament to your inability to formulate coherent thoughts. Of course no one is going to "get the point" in such a case.

[Martin]

Imm0rtal wrote:

Martin wrote:

Imm0rtal wrote:

codemage wrote:

I like how you've placed "compiled" in quotes.

Despite what most people on this forum say.. its still just a translation to C++ as far as I am concerned.. but lets not start this arguement again..

And C++ is just translated into assembly, which is just translated into machine code.

I couldn't resist. Sorry.

How mature.. are you gonna make a post like this in evey thread that discusses Turing as a language? Is it really THAT important to you that everyone believes what you do? Interesting...

Note to Mod: If it makes you happy then delete this thread.. I was only trying to help.. in truth this XOR encryption was just for personnal use. You can post dictionary definations until your fingers go numb.. Tutor and Explain mean the same thing. NOT everyone in the world knows what an Xor encrpytion is.. same as NOT everyone in the world knows what a Array is. Thats why we have tutorials. Theres no other explanation of XOR anywhere on the turing related forums that I could find.

End Of Arguement. Delete the thread if your not convinced.

It was moved to Turing source just because it was more of a learn by example thing than a tutorial. Don't take it as an insult, it has nothing to do with the quality of the content, only the style.

As for the Turing thing, it's not a point of view. Turing is a programming language, in the exact same way that Perl and Ruby and Java are programming languages. As one of this site's humble moderators, it's my duty to keep everyone informed.

Wikipedia wrote:

A compiler is a computer program (or set of programs) that translates text written in a computer language (the source language) into another computer language (the target language).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compiler

[codemage]

I think it's neat how, the next time someone looks up encryption or XOR, they'll be happy to see that there's a post that meets their search criteria, and then be even more happy to find two whole pages of flame.

[Delos]

codemage wrote:

I think it's neat how, the next time someone looks up encryption or XOR, they'll be happy to see that there's a post that meets their search criteria, and then be even more happy to find two whole pages of flame.

That happens frequently !