Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 4:20 pm Post subject: (No subject)
Just to clarify, I enter debates with an academic objective. wtd was getting a little defensive there for no reason.
Sponsor Sponsor
md
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 4:58 pm Post subject: (No subject)
I disagree. I would argue that wtd's position is well justified, whereas you are arguing for the sake of arguing. A working solution is the first goal; once you know it works you can worry about if it conforms to conventions, which you don't need to follow if you prefer not to.
Justin_
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 5:07 pm Post subject: (No subject)
You might be right Cornflake, but I did feel that wtd was giving mixed messages and not understanding where I was coming from.