Bob Saget Is God

MyPistolsIn3D · **Posted:** Tue Dec 06, 2005 12:08 am

codemage · **Posted:** Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:54 am

Wow.

Apparently Bob's standup is actually pretty funny.

Probably not dissimilar with Tim Allen, who's funny when you see him outside the context of his sitcom & movies.

pavol · **Posted:** Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:59 am

this is hillarious, who would believe in this?

MyPistolsIn3D · **Posted:** Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:13 pm

Question is who wouldnt?

(BOB = 3 LETTERS) X (GOD = 3 LETTERS) = LORD SAGET

Thats enough for me.

rizzix · **Posted:** Tue Dec 06, 2005 11:03 pm

i c... so 3 letter words in the english language is a good enough definition for god... figures..

Boo-chan · **Posted:** Tue Dec 06, 2005 11:16 pm

MyPistolsIn3D wrote:

Question is who wouldnt?

(BOB = 3 LETTERS) X (GOD = 3 LETTERS) = LORD SAGET

Thats enough for me.

Well that does show a very strong relationship however it doesn't quite achieve a total proof.

Following the same logic system,

(DOG=3 Letters) (GOD=3 Letters)
DOG contains the same letters as GOD
DOG is merely the reverse of GOD
Therefore, DOG+Mirror=GOD
DOG=GOD+Mirror

Since god is an infinite being, GOD-Mirror=GOD, since Mirror<<GOD
Therefore, DOG=GOD

Its amazing what you can logically prove when your basic assumptions are faulty Very Happy

MyPistolsIn3D · **Posted:** Wed Dec 07, 2005 12:21 am

Alright.... so maybe Bob Saget is not God. But imagine if he was!!

codemage · **Posted:** Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:49 am

If DOG is the mirror of GOD, wouldn't that imply an opposite relationship?

Perhaps DOG is the DEVIL.
After all, ROVER has the same number of letters as DEVIL, ***and*** SATAN.

pavol · **Posted:** Wed Dec 07, 2005 10:51 am

boo-chan's right, the only problem is proving your basic assumptions to be logical

Mr. T · **Posted:** Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:36 am

Boo-chan wrote:

Therefore, DOG+Mirror=GOD
DOG=GOD+Mirror

DOG=GOD-MIRROR
You transposed incorrectly.

MysticVegeta · **Posted:** Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:01 pm

MIRROR = GLASS + SILVER

DOG = GOD - MIRROR
DOG = GOD - (GLASS + SILVER)

GLASS = TRANSPARENT
SILVER = OPAQUE

DOG = GOD - (TRANSPARENT + OPAQUE)

TRANSPARENT = reverse of OPAQUE
So TRANSPARENT cancels OPAQUE out

DOG = GOD? Woot I am great!

ZeroPaladn · **Posted:** Fri Dec 09, 2005 1:59 pm

wow, thats confusing...

Mr. T · **Posted:** Sat Dec 10, 2005 2:57 pm

cyclical logic Rolling Eyes

Paul · **Posted:** Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:30 pm

.. I think they use aluminum instead of silver now, and silver is reflective Razz

MysticVegeta · **Posted:** Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:14 pm

Not talking about reflectiv surfaces, talking about opacity Wink

	Computer Science Canada Programming C, C++, Java, PHP, Ruby, Turing, VB Username: Password: Register
Wiki Blog Search Turing Chat Room Members