Many spelling mistakes in the website's agreement

[s3a]

The mistakes are capitalized. I must've missed some but I'm tired and in a rush. Here is the agreement with the spelling mistakes pointed out:

While the administrators and moderators of this forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. Therefore you acknowledge that all posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author and not the administrators, moderators or webmaster (except for posts by these people) and hence will not be held liable.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should they see fit. As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. The webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised.

This forum system uses cookies to store information on your local computer. These cookies do not contain any of the information you have entered above; they serve only to improve your viewing pleasure. The e-mail address is used only for confirming your registration details, password (and for sending new passwords should you forget your current one) and forum mailouts.

All content posted or SUMBITED in any way to this site most be of your orgainl creation and not copyrighted unless PERMISION is give form the copyrighter. Your agree that all content submiited will be put under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Canada License copy right agreement (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ca/legalcode.en). All MATERALS on this site are under the same agreement (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ca/legalcode.en) and use for them most FALLOW the code.

You agree to FALLOW and read all rules of the site and network as presented here: http://www.compsci.ca/rules.html and that all DESIONS by ADMINS are FINALE unless OTHER WISE SPESFICED. YOUR also agree to respect all staff members of the site both on and off the FOURMS system and that you will not use any PEROSNAL contact INFROMATION found on the site for PEROSNAL gain or inappropriate USEAGES.

You ASLO agree to FALLOW the?Terms of Use?andPrivacy Policy.

By clicking below you agree to be bound by these conditions, the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.

Edit: Even newbie is misspelled under my username!

[Tony]

yup. http://compsci.ca/v3/viewtopic.php?t=12897

[mirhagk]

well is he the only one that has access to make changes? not that it matters a lot, but a so called legal document (although they don't really hold any legal power) should be reviewed by others, regardless of who wrote it.

[busterkomo]

Is using spell-check really that difficult? Don't most modern browsers have it built-in?

[Raknarg]

@Tony wow, thanks, I just always assumed he was bad at spelling XD

@busterkomo Only in some browsers, I think. It's there is Safari for sure, but I don't know about IE or Firefox

[mirhagk]

dan wrote:

Q: Can't you just use spell check?

A: Althougth i am shure spell checking progames work for noraml spelling mistakes and peoleop with out disbalitys, this process is exteramly uneffective for me. I either get no resuestes at all or a big list of them witch all look the same to me. If you think it is confusing to see my posts with thess spelling erorrs, just think about replaing every other word with another random word. Not only dose this make it less readable but has goten me in to turoble in the past (i am not going to go there, but switching some words or other ones with negitve meanings in elemtry shcool is not a good thing).

EDIT: I actually have a question for Dan though,does it get hard to program since compilers don't work with spelling mistakes? Or have you learned how to get around it someway? I don't mean to be rude or offensive, I'm just curious.

[Velocity]

lol you have not seen the old dictionary of dan? Thats normal english... If the reader is smart he will decypher the anagram on sight without studder.

[ProgrammingFun]

Velocity @ Sat Jan 28, 2012 12:07 pm wrote:

lol you have not seen the old dictionary of dan? Thats normal english... If the reader is smart he will decypher the anagram on sight without studder.

Yup, you have to get used to it...it's part of what makes Dan so mysterious

[Raknarg]

The beauty of english (and possibly other languages, idk) is that as long as what you put down phonetically sounds almost the same, it can be interpreted as the same word (2, or skewl, or in DAn's case, intengent)

[Tony]

mirhagk @ Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:59 am wrote:

EDIT: I actually have a question for Dan though,does it get hard to program since compilers don't work with spelling mistakes? Or have you learned how to get around it someway? I don't mean to be rude or offensive, I'm just curious.

I'll try to answer -- while there certainly are some challenges associated with dyslexia, it does not make programming prohibitive. There are many great developers who don't speak English natively, I'm sure that they would also have some trouble with spelling of general words.

[mirhagk]

It's pretty amazing that he is so good then, because I know if I had trouble spelling I'd have a hard time not giving up.

[shorthair]

Do we still have the book of dan's typos cTeam comic strip?
We were intending on making a full story arc about this very topic.

Dan's typos used to make compsci.ca threads extremely interesting. Back when this was all started I do not think there was browser based spellcheck.

#OldTimer.