andrew. @ Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:25 pm wrote:
The "w" in DtY's post is double the actual width because it accounts for both the top and bottom of the frame. Either divide the answer in half at the end, or do it like this:
204 = (17 + 2w)(12 + 2w) - 204
Now "w" will be the width of each side of the border. I believe this is the answer you're looking for.
Thanks for pointing that out, I hadn't noticed that!
As for the second question, I'll try to do my best to not give away too much. If you have a rectangle with the dimensions w*h where 2w*2h=n, where n is constant (the perimeter is always the same), what ratio of w:h will maximize x*y? If you're not sure, pick an arbitrary n, and plot the ratio vs. area graph (it should be a parabola).
I am pretty sure that if you were asked this on a test, you should be expected to know what ratio will maximize area (if you don't, I'm sure it will be obvious once you figure it out), and then you just need to figure how big you can make that rectangle to fit within the price restriction.