Author |
Message |
Blade
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2003 9:40 pm Post subject: Pong |
|
|
ah, isnt much compared to what you guys have submitted... but then again i've only been at turing since the beginning of Feb.. it has 2 player or one player functions... but hey.. i think its pretty good consitering the rest of the guys in my class dont even understand arrays
MOD Edit: You just started programming? Not bad at all... most people will have trouble drawing boxes, not to mention move them and implement collision detections. +10Bits - Tony
Description: |
|
Download |
Filename: |
pong.zip |
Filesize: |
268.45 KB |
Downloaded: |
1712 Time(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsor Sponsor
|
|
|
Tony
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2003 9:49 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
nice.... I like the idea of the single player mode to practice and two player mode works out well too Best of all you cant jam each others keys so its a smooth motion to both players.
the only problem is that its missing a file to record the highscores Atleast at the time I'm writing this
|
Tony's programming blog. DWITE - a programming contest. |
|
|
|
|
Blade
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2003 9:54 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
i'm so sorry man, i totally forgot all about it, i updated the zip file, it should have it in there now
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delta
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2003 8:58 am Post subject: Good Job! |
|
|
I'm glad you got it finished Looks good!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prince Pwn
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 2:14 pm Post subject: RE:Pong |
|
|
I wonder if it's possible to make plasma pong in Turing... google it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aziz
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 6:18 pm Post subject: RE:Pong |
|
|
Wow. Major Necro posting. Pwn, do you browse posts from 4 years ago often? or did you do a search? It's generally considered...er.....stupid.... to necro-post
|
|
|
|
|
|
chrisbrown
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:01 pm Post subject: Re: Pong |
|
|
I feel like I should rectify things here. I had a momentary wave of d*uchebag-ism and spammed this thread. My post was deleted shortly thereafter, but Pwn probably lookead at the date (which was today's) and did not know any different. I apologize for my lame newbishness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|