Programming C, C++, Java, PHP, Ruby, Turing, VB
Computer Science Canada 
Programming C, C++, Java, PHP, Ruby, Turing, VB  

Username:   Password: 
 RegisterRegister   
 Turing and C++
Index -> General Discussion
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic Printable versionDownload TopicSubscribe to this topicPrivate MessagesRefresh page View next topic
Author Message
bugzpodder




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 6:10 pm   Post subject: Turing and C++

a few things i could think of which Turing does better than C++ is base conversion, draw stars, and mapleleafs.
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
sponsor
Homer_simpson




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 6:16 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

no that's bulljizz!!!
you can draw stars or maple leaf or whatever 10 times faster with c++!!!
Tony




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 6:19 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

bugz... its the same damn function... Turing does convert to C++ and compile Confused
Latest from compsci.ca/blog: Tony's programming blog. DWITE - a programming contest.
Homer_simpson




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 6:24 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

yes but it also compiles a lotta other shit that we dont want and slows are program down =/
Catalyst




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 6:28 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

the other stuff just makes the exe large ,that and the fact turing is hybrid interpreter, at least thats what the holt site says and the runtime debug and error checking slow turing down
bugzpodder




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 8:03 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

you guys misunderstood me. there is no base convertion function, draw star function and draw maple leaf function in C++
PaddyLong




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 8:09 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

hehe that's what I was thinking bugz Razz
Tony




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 8:09 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

yeah... thats cuz tom west is pretending to be a nice guy and wrote one (or more likely found on) and included it in a custom library that is being attached to turing files.
Latest from compsci.ca/blog: Tony's programming blog. DWITE - a programming contest.
Martin




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 8:36 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

You also have to admit that turing does have a much nicer error checking system than c++ (at least microsoft visual c++).

Also, umm...yeah. Better error checking.
Homer_simpson




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 8:48 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

what do u mean by base convertion?!
bugzpodder




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 8:55 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

yes that too, Darkness.

base conversion is when you convert from one base to another (helpful, arent I)
Mazer




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 8:57 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

he means 1000101(base 2) = 69 (base 10)

which can be done easily in turing by:

code:

put strint ("1000101", 2)
Homer_simpson




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 9:28 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

lol of course c++ does base changin!!!
AsianSensation




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 9:50 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

not as easy as Turing. I rememeber that DWITE contest, question 5, with base changing, it was soooo easy to do with turing. I think it would been a lot harder with C++
Martin




PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2003 9:51 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

Turing's a nice language to use for low level contests because of its easy syntax
Display posts from previous:   
   Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic Tell A FriendPrintable versionDownload TopicSubscribe to this topicPrivate MessagesRefresh page View next topic

Page 1 of 3  [ 36 Posts ]
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Jump to:   


Style:  
Search: