Programming C, C++, Java, PHP, Ruby, Turing, VB
Computer Science Canada 
Programming C, C++, Java, PHP, Ruby, Turing, VB  

Username:   Password: 
 RegisterRegister   
 COM+, winsock, or DCOM
Index -> Programming, Visual Basic and Other Basics -> Visual Basic Help
View previous topic Printable versionDownload TopicSubscribe to this topicPrivate MessagesRefresh page View next topic
Author Message
tupac




PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 9:13 am   Post subject: COM+, winsock, or DCOM

k, i am working on a multiuser chat program, and i'm using Winsock. I've heard that using COM+ or DCOM is better and more secure than using Winsock. Can someone help me decide what is the better component to use. [P.S. I've already made a 1 to 1 user chat program using Winsock, but am having trouble making a multiuser chat program with this component.]

-thnx
Sponsor
Sponsor
Sponsor
sponsor
wtd




PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:42 am   Post subject: (No subject)

Why in the world wouldn't you be using the .NET libraries and tools?
tupac




PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:41 am   Post subject: (No subject)

well, 1st of all, i want to do something like the program im working on for my year end project. and since the skools use VB6 and not .NET i cant do it using .NET tools. And the other reason is: i dont rele like .NET... i tried that one free VB.NET program, and i didnt like it one bit. And by now i came to the conclusion that i probably want to use winsock, since thats wat the teacher suggested me.
md




PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:53 pm   Post subject: (No subject)

Seeing as winwock is hte windows soclet layer you'll end up using it no matter what. As for using it within VB I don't rightly remember except that I think there is a winsock control somewhere...
Display posts from previous:   
   Index -> Programming, Visual Basic and Other Basics -> Visual Basic Help
View previous topic Tell A FriendPrintable versionDownload TopicSubscribe to this topicPrivate MessagesRefresh page View next topic

Page 1 of 1  [ 4 Posts ]
Jump to:   


Style:  
Search: