Author |
Message |
Amailer
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:53 pm Post subject: Compsci CS 1.6 Server (Unofficial) |
|
|
If you do... come to the compsci server o.O
207.210.217.214
207.210.217.214
uh yeah... old game but w/e free server (for a month or so not sure) |
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsor Sponsor
|
|
|
MihaiG
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:59 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
meh....halo pc and battle front pc are way better... |
|
|
|
|
|
[Gandalf]
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 6:02 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
It'd be great to play on a compsci server, but I'm 100% anti-counterstrike. I don't care that it's an old game, I play a lot of those, but I can't see how a game with such bad gameplay could become so popular. Switch to some better game, and I'll be glad to join .
*edit* I think the same of Halo btw |
|
|
|
|
|
Paul
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 11:38 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Thats like saying wack-a-mole sucks 'cause of the horrible gameplay. CS is good when you just wanna have some simple ass kicking |
|
|
|
|
|
Mazer
|
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 11:43 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Paul wrote: Thats like saying wack-a-mole sucks 'cause of the horrible gameplay.
No, no. Whack-a-mole sucks becaue of it's horribly outdated graphics! |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. T
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:04 am Post subject: Alex's Opinion |
|
|
Coutsos wrote: Paul wrote: Thats like saying wack-a-mole sucks 'cause of the horrible gameplay.
No, no. Whack-a-mole sucks becaue of it's horribly outdated graphics!
What if you were to make some uber 3D whack-a-mole. The graphics would be better, but gameplay would still suck. |
|
|
|
|
|
[Gandalf]
|
|
|
|
|
Paul
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 3:45 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Is one of the reasons you suck at CS? 'cause i don't see how you can't like it if you kick ass at it. I mean just the feeling of owning others...
On the other hand I found halo extremely boring... just me though. The most I enjoyed from halo is checking out what I can do with physics + warthogs, and the different ways I can kill myself. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsor Sponsor
|
|
|
[Gandalf]
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:04 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Yep, I hate Halo and CS. The reason is not that I suck, if I wanted to I could probably play that game good, but I never really tried. I haven't played the game much because I don't want to, I couldn't stand it.
Do I want to play a game full of hackers?
Do I want to play a game that gives no sense of accomplishment?
Do I want to play a game where the average maturity level of a person is 6 years old?
etc, etc.
Have you played many other fps games? You get a much better game and feeling of owning others from things other than counterstrike. I understand liking it because you have played it for a long time and are good at it, but you will get much better experiences if you stay away from that game . |
|
|
|
|
|
Paul
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:22 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
FPS's in general don't give me a sense of accomplishment, they're fun to play with a bunch of people you know. Like I've almost always played on a clan server, with mature people who are friendly.
If I wanted to own people and then feel accomplished afterwards I'd go for SC or WC3 or something.
If I wanted to own people in general without alot of skills, I'd go for a MMO lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
[Gandalf]
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:36 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Playing on servers you are familiar with is always more fun, but personally I do see skill being assosiated with FPS's and strategy games like Starcraft.
I must agree about MMO's though. Specially made for people who felt like 'owning' others simply because they were bored more often than them...
Still, I'd go for a better alternative than CS. Dang, the guns always face/aim down! Are they shooting at the floor? |
|
|
|
|
|
Paul
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:53 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Face down... what?
I'm confused. Are you sure you're not holding your gun the wrong way?
What do you prefer? Halflife? or Doom? I do not subscribe to those games simply because i get nauseous easily from them. Even more so from teh so called "third person shooters" like max payne, ugh, i can't stand max payne. |
|
|
|
|
|
[Gandalf]
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:59 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Halo? Ugh. Counterstrike? Blah. Half-Life? Eegh... They're all basically in the same category - but luckily that's just about where it ends.
Doom... Well, that was an alright game, but generally I don't like monsters and dark alleys, etc. If you want to see what I prefer, click my sig . That's from the past few months...
As for third-person-shooters, only one I liked was Metal Gear Solid, but that's for console.
*edit* Oh, well, from what I remember what I mean by facing down is that whenever you see someone else, they are slanted down, even if they are normally playing. Just one of my many bashes again CS though . |
|
|
|
|
|
Mazer
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:25 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
[Gandalf] wrote: As for third-person-shooters, only one I liked was Metal Gear Solid, but that's for console.
I take my hat off to you, sir. No wait... I wasn't wearing a hat...
Anywho, just thought you'd like to know that MGS has been available on the PC for some time now. It'd probably be a better experience on the console, but nobody has come up to me with a free PlayStation yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
Martin
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:15 pm Post subject: (No subject) |
|
|
Rome Total War is where it's at. |
|
|
|
|
|
|