Write a simple source code

[jhooper3581]

Output: "C++ programming is fun!"

Write a C++ source code that will give the correct output given above

[A.J]

c++:

#include<iostream> using namespace std; int main() {     cout << "C++ programming is fun!" << endl;     return 0; }

[jhooper3581]

Thanks for the reply!

[saltpro15]

an alternative

c++:

#include<cstdio> main() {     printf ("C++ Programming is fun!");     return 0; }

[bbi5291]

Shortest code contest!

c++:

#import <cstdio> main() {      return puts("C++ programming is fun!"),0; }

[wtd]

saltpro15 @ Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:07 am wrote:

an alternative

c++:

#include<cstdio> main() {     printf ("C++ Programming is fun!");     return 0; }

No return type for "main" is being bad. Also, if memory serves, the C++ standard says that main implicitly returns zero if no explicit return is coded.

[A.J]

How about we open a new thread for an obfuscated code contest?

[bbi5291]

wtd @ Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:55 am wrote:

No return type for "main" is being bad. Also, if memory serves, the C++ standard says that main implicitly returns zero if no explicit return is coded.

Fine then.

c++:

#import <cstdio> int main() {      puts("C++ programming is fun!"); }

[rdrake]

Didn't the OP ask for C++ code?

[Zren]

Write a C++ source code that will give the correct output given above.

Mwahaha, never said it had to compile. I rename my empty source code file to "C++ programming is fun!.cpp".

None of your sass bout how the filename isn't actually the file itself either. >,<

[saltpro15]

A.J @ Fri Aug 28, 2009 wrote:

How about we open a new thread for an obfuscated code contest?

I'm on it.

[bbi5291]

rdrake @ Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:01 pm wrote:

Didn't the OP ask for C++ code?

It is C++. Try compiling it as C.

[rdrake]

bbi5291 @ Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:40 pm wrote:

rdrake @ Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:01 pm wrote:

Didn't the OP ask for C++ code?

It is C++. Try compiling it as C.

You're using C functions and a C header file pretending it's C++ code. Just saying.

Sure you can compile C as C++, but why not use the C++ equivalents when available? After all, C++ is more than just "C with classes."

[md]

Just because you need the C++ compiler, doesn't mean it's C++. If you use C libraries for things like basic IO you're not writing C++.

[bbi5291]

OP already received a satisfactory answer from posters before me. I was just having a bit of fun. As far as I am concerned, anything that compiles under a C++ compiler is C++. Even if you write it in machine code (this is actually possible, if you were wondering: char main[] = {...}; ). Obviously this goes against the spirit of writing a solution in C++, but oh well...