including .css file into html

[Homer_simpson]

how do i do that?

[Amailer]

including that is ez.

code:

<LINK REL=stylesheet HREF="MA DAMM STYLE.css" TYPE="text/css">

[PaddyLong]

this is kinda unrelated... but just a heads up .. in what they're hoping will become the new standard, XHTML (looks like you starting to use it with the / at the end of the tag )... all tags will be lower case ...

[Homer_simpson]

I have no idea what xhtml even is all i wanna do is use css to make my site look little better...

[UBC_Wiskatos]

PaddyLong wrote:

this is kinda unrelated... but just a heads up .. in what they're hoping will become the new standard, XHTML (looks like you starting to use it with the / at the end of the tag )... all tags will be lower case ...

Also XHTML requires a space, such that <blah /> not <blah/>.

[Amailer]

that was a mistake there should be no / at the end of the tag -.-

[rizzix]

UBC_Wiskatos wrote:

PaddyLong wrote:

this is kinda unrelated... but just a heads up .. in what they're hoping will become the new standard, XHTML (looks like you starting to use it with the / at the end of the tag )... all tags will be lower case ...

Also XHTML requires a space, such that

code:

<blah /> not <blah/>

.

no thats not true!
it can be

code:

<blah/>

here's the proof

[Homer_simpson]

what's xhtml anyways?

[PaddyLong]

heh, it's gonna be new standard for websites ... basically HTML but stricter ... for example all tags and attributes are lower case and all attribute values are in quotes ... also all tags must be closed (like instead of just <p>some paragraph ... you now would have <p>some paragraph</p> and instead of just
you would have
)

so basically it'll force things to be more standardized and force better practises (I always close my paragraph tags any way, because to me it's cleaner .. )


yeah the space before the / is so that it won't screw up browsers that don't have the interpretation for it built in yet

[UBC_Wiskatos]

rizzix wrote:

UBC_Wiskatos wrote:

PaddyLong wrote:

this is kinda unrelated... but just a heads up .. in what they're hoping will become the new standard, XHTML (looks like you starting to use it with the / at the end of the tag )... all tags will be lower case ...

Also XHTML requires a space, such that

code:

<blah /> not <blah/>

.

no thats not true!
it can be

code:

<blah/>

here's the proof

What the hell, that contradicts the XML standard.

[PaddyLong]

it needs to have the space so that browsers that don't know what it's there for don't screw up because of it

[rizzix]

UBC_Wiskatos wrote:

rizzix wrote:

UBC_Wiskatos wrote:

PaddyLong wrote:

this is kinda unrelated... but just a heads up .. in what they're hoping will become the new standard, XHTML (looks like you starting to use it with the / at the end of the tag )... all tags will be lower case ...

Also XHTML requires a space, such that

code:

<blah /> not <blah/>

.

no thats not true!
it can be

code:

<blah/>

here's the proof

What the hell, that contradicts the XML standard.

well that actually does not contradict the XML standard.. want some more proof?

here's how the empty tag is defined (u need to know a bit on regex to understand this):

'<' Name (S Attribute)* S? '/>'

[theguru]

it really doesn't matter which way you do it in xhtml

code:

<br></br> <br /> <br/>

are all the same. i personally don't like xhtml, it takes all the fun out of coding and makes it look more boring

[md]

Way to bring up a two year old topic... and <br> is not valid xhtml, only <br/> and <br /> are; </br> isn't even a tag.