Computer Science Canada Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Author: | md [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Because pointless and contentious threads get the most posts, I've decided to try and set a new record. Thusly the topic is one of (whichever you choose) What's the best gaming console ever? Linux Distro Deathmatch Why Counter-Strike Sucks First Person Shooters Are Gay! Why turing is the best language ever! Why turing is the worst language ever! Turing isn't just a bad language... it'll cause kids to go out and club baby seals! Myspace sucks! LOL is not a word, and nor is rofl. Though the ROFLCopter rocks! Windows is stable as a brick. Windows bricked my computer. I threw a brick at my screen 'cause I got drunk and hi and my name is bob. |
Author: | rdrake [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: Why Counter-Strike Sucks |
Author: | ZeroPaladn [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:52 am ] |
Post subject: | |
md wrote: Turing isn't just a bad language... it'll cause kids to go out and club baby seals!
It's not all bad, I got a cool pair of slippers out of it (and a hat). |
Author: | War_Caymore [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:55 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Number of posts before mods get annoyed: 367 posts. Number of bits removed from people posting in this forum: ~4450 the percentage that this theory might be plausible: ~3% everyone getting annoyed of me trying to get this thread locked and putting "/me slaps war_caymore so hard his mother/father/brother/exe... felt it" and getting the thread locked anways: PRICELESS!
by the way.... I HATE CORN! md wrote: Windows is as stable as a brick
Does this mean that bricks are not stable... or is it the other way around... |
Author: | Mazer [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 12:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
You know what pisses off this mod? When people parody those old "priceless" commercials. HOLY SHIT DUDE, get over it! |
Author: | md [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 12:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
/me slaps war_caymore so hard his mother/father/brother/exe... felt it Windows is so stable like a brick! If you take a windows machine and throw it at a window the window will break just like if your threw a brick at it! |
Author: | ZeroPaladn [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 1:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
War_Caymore wrote: ..."/me slaps war_caymore so hard his mother/father/brother/exe... felt it"...
Not cool. Quote: Windows bricked my computer
That s*** is real! Bill Gates came over to my house, and hucked a brick at my computer! So my OS was pirated, so what?! |
Author: | Cervantes [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 1:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: Windows is stable as a brick. Windows bricked my computer. http://s94651884.onlinehome.us/pics/554_data.gif |
Author: | ZeroPaladn [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
/me rofl. oh, wait... md wrote: LOL is not a word, and nor is rofl. Though the ROFLCopter rocks! |
Author: | md [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 3:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
haha, nice cervantes; now if only it had a roflcopter in it... |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
md wrote: Linux Distro Deathmatch Sounds good to me @Cervantes: very nice, where on earth did you find that? EDIT: kind of funny i used the : lol : smiley considering thats another possible topic |
Author: | Cervantes [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 5:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Freakman wrote: @Cervantes: very nice, where on earth did you find that?
Funny story! The link was given to me by a friend. That's it. |
Author: | md [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 5:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Cervantes wrote: Freakman wrote: @Cervantes: very nice, where on earth did you find that?
Funny story! The link was given to me by a friend. That's it. That's not funny... you must be a CS:S fan... I hope you get eaten by a Grue. |
Author: | Cervantes [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 6:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Gosh, I don't know what either of those things are: "CS:S" and "Grue". |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 6:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hahaha, nice GIF! It's Counter Strike: Source, sadly, no clue what Grue is, gladly. On which note... Quote: Why Counter-Strike/Half Life/Halo/Warcraft Sucks
Along with: Quote: Myspace sucks!
Windows is stable as a brick. |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: I threw a brick at my screen 'cause I got drunk and hi and my name is bob.
My names not BOB! haha anyways im starting to hate turing OOP. Windows rocks! and Wii > all but PC. but PC gets boring, so Wii will sell |
Author: | md [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 9:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
TokenHerbz wrote: Windows rocks!
Since when did Microsoft start selling crack?! I'm really liking the title of "Dr. Strangelove; or 'How I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb'". Mostly because I shamelessly stole it. Go Bob! |
Author: | mynameisbob [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 9:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: I threw a brick at my screen 'cause I got drunk and hi and my name is bob. WTF? |
Author: | Cervantes [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 9:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: I'm really liking the title of "Dr. Strangelove; or 'How I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb'". Mostly because I shamelessly stole it.
Have you read the book that movie is based on? "Failsafe". It's a fantastic novel. One of my favorites. |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 9:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: Since when did Microsoft start selling crack?!
crack isn't a "herb" ......i don't do, crack! And haha:: /points at mynameisbob |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
mynameisbob wrote: md wrote: I threw a brick at my screen 'cause I got drunk and hi and my name is bob. WTF? |
Author: | md [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 12:48 am ] |
Post subject: | |
OMGWTFBBQ! There is actually a person who's nick is 'mynameisbob'! I am officially awestruck... and maybe a little drunk |
Author: | Aziz [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 1:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I'm drunk just from the posts in this topic. Damn, now i need to repeat highschool. |
Author: | md [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Pubcrawls are fun... though I am still more hten a bit amazed that there is someone who's name is "mynameisbob"... even if it does seem a bit too coincidental... |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: Windows is stable as a brick. Well, since the Matrix was running off windows, Agent Smith got an illegal operation and died. |
Author: | Delos [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 6:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
My head hurts, and I'm not sure if it's from the lack of sleep anymore... |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Don't you dare blame it on this thread! If you do, I do condemn you (to what I don't know yet) |
Author: | Mazer [ Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Delos wrote: My head hurts, and I'm not sure if it's from the lack of sleep anymore...
DELOoOoOoOoOoOOOOOOOS~! Is everyone well aware of the fact that the things at the end of shoelaces are called... wait, what is this thread for? |
Author: | md [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:58 am ] |
Post subject: | |
The point of this thread is to spawn the longest discussion about nothing that compsci.ca has seen. It should ideally get to say 40 pages. Ducks are made of wood, which burns; so logically they are witches! |
Author: | rdrake [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:27 am ] |
Post subject: | |
md wrote: The point of this thread is to spawn the longest discussion about nothing that compsci.ca has seen. It should ideally get to say 40 pages.
Ducks float like wood, wood burns, witches burn... so therefore they must float like a duck.
Ducks are made of wood, which burns; so logically they are witches! Too much to drink tonight, md . |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:12 am ] |
Post subject: | |
HuH? ducks fly, like witchs on wood, but wood floats like ducks, somtimes unless there broken then there like a dead duck... Moral of the story??? A dead duck is a burning witch! S o A nY oN e G o Ou T s Id E t Od Ay? Canyoureadthisalrightorwhat? IsThisBetterForYou? welltobadcausemyspacebarisbroken ithi nkitlo ok scool ifipu tth espa cesint he wrongsp otsdo ntyou? ?etsaw i did emit ruoy fo hcum woh oS ZOMG! It's FORIGN TALK!!!!! Anyone up for pig latten? |
Author: | md [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 11:59 am ] |
Post subject: | |
My head hurts... damned open bar staff x-mas parties... but at least someone got my monty python reference... now burn her anyways (refering to tokenherbz ) |
Author: | ZeroPaladn [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Well, it's official, this is the first thread to cause massive migrains upon reading... WARNING!
This thread, upon reading, will generate massive headaches. We, the members, admins, and moderators, of Compsci.ca are not responsible for any injury, loss of memory, or death cause by said migrains and headaches generated by this thread. |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
md wrote: monty python reference
What is that???? monty???????? ZeroPaladn wrote: WARNING! How do i use color???? and size? |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
you've got to be joking me, use BBCode... perhaps you should seriously consider stopping the drug use... |
Author: | md [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
not only that, but he should really read up on pop-culture references... Month Python isn't exactly small... Ni, Ni I say! |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Well its probably small in canada.... and testing : RED man im going to have a Very lovly sentence one day. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
So how about them Canadians, EH? |
Author: | md [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
The Canadian's suck; I hope they get knocked out of the playoffs quickly. Tokenherbz: they are quite big. I would recommend using oh say... google. And now for something completely different: I like toast. |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
So... uhm... If this topic exists, what the hell happened to the odd post times thread? resurrect.votes++; |
Author: | md [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I think this one counts; the odd post tiem thread should still be good for oddly timed posts. I see nothing wrong with two threads... though I would prefer to set a record here |
Author: | rdrake [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
TokenHerbz wrote: Well its probably small in canada.... You know TokenHerbz, drug abuse does affect your memory. Apparently the abuse is so bad you have forgotten nearly everything, even what Google is. I applaud you. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
all your drugs are belong to us. surrender now or make your time! |
Author: | md [ Thu Dec 14, 2006 11:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
HAHAHA. |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
uh, i dont abuse drugs!!!! anyways.... I'm not uptodate on anything canadian, since for some retarded reason the schools here think AMERICANS is what we should learn about.... Anyways, usa sucks, never wanna live there... oh and, Canada's the best, its not ever populated, theres nice forests, lots of animals, clean air (where i live anyway), free (mostly) medicare... Face it, Canada > USA. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
TokenHerbz, stop trying to write in a Canadian accent, and saying u like Canadian stuff. we all kno u are American. now for something really off topic do you kno the muffinman? |
Author: | md [ Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
TokenHerbz, you're an idiot (though you're right about Canada being better then the USA). spearmonkey, and everyone else who seemingly can't write proper english, "u" is not a word, nor is "kno"; the words are "you" and "know". Seriously, the added effort to type correctly is infinitesimally small so please write like someone who didn't fail grade 1 english. And I do know the Muffin Man... and if I see him again I'll take another bite out of him Cervantes edit: fixed md's spelling in the sentence where he called TokenHerbz an idiot. I've got your back, md. |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
YOU know the MUFFIN MAN?!?!?! You gotta introduce me to him, pleeeeaaaaaseeeeee. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
oh you can find him on Drury Lane. for a complete history of the muffin man see: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Muffin_Man |
Author: | md [ Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:54 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Sweet! My back is so not gonna get burnt out in the sun now |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:41 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Ya, look out for those UV rays Cervantes |
Author: | Cervantes [ Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Don't worry about me, guys. I'm so hot I burn UV rays. |
Author: | md [ Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
... that's just not right, I really hope someone locks you in the real-time lab for that pun. |
Author: | Cervantes [ Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Nooooo! Not the real-time lab! What would I have done to deserve that? I never fed the real-time students. |
Author: | Mazer [ Sat Dec 16, 2006 4:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Two guys walk into a bar. The bartender looks at them and says [lolomg inside joke!] and then everyone in the bar bursts into laughter. Even the duck. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Dec 16, 2006 6:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
ha! that was so funny I forgot to laugh yes Cervantes, the real-time lab, you are doomed there to eternity. |
Author: | md [ Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Wow wow, not eternity, a minute tops. Any longer then that and our beloved Cervantes would turn into some kind of mutant pants-less freak. |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
X-mens are cool.... He can have a alias: Xervantes |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
md, eternity isn't that long, and pants aren't that hard to keep on... so I fail to see the issue here |
Author: | ZeroPaladn [ Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:21 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Freakman wrote: md, eternity isn't that long, and pants aren't that hard to keep on... so I fail to see the issue here
Splurge and get a belt. They gotta have a clothes store in the real-time lab, right Cervantes, er i mean Xervantes . |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
speaking of pants, i was walking to school and i realized im not a kid anymore :S i dont want to grow up the world is too cruel...:S what could all this mean?? better yet, WTF does this have to do with pants???!!!??? Why is this topic.....nvm by the way, i feel all warm and fuzzy in my pants all of a sudden, its freaking me out. |
Author: | md [ Tue Dec 19, 2006 12:13 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Not a kid?! The horror! Can you drink in the states yet? |
Author: | ZeroPaladn [ Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:24 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I can almost drink in Quebec . (7 more months) |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:46 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Ni. |
Author: | md [ Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
StealthArcher wrote: Ni. As cool as "Ni" is as a wort Ftang is so much cooler. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
In Quebec, the drinking age isn't a law, just more of a suggestion |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Tue Dec 19, 2006 5:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Since when do people follow the law.... You can get anything at any age, And pretty easy too.... |
Author: | md [ Wed Dec 20, 2006 7:35 am ] |
Post subject: | |
So um... you guys all suck (except timmy) because you all slept. Timmy and I stayed up all night waiting for tomorrow, but alas it never arrived. Guess we'll just have to stay up all night again. In other news I have a 40x2 character LCD that I *almost* have wired up! |
Author: | timmytheturtle [ Wed Dec 20, 2006 7:50 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Dammit, where is tommorrow!!! In other news, I don't have a 40x2 character LCD but I want one. But atleast now I have: proper id3 tags for a large portion of my music, 10GB of hard drive space free, and an organized downloads folder. Damn I need something else to do. |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I bet my comp is more organised then yours! |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Dec 20, 2006 5:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
i bet my comp isn't organized!!! |
Author: | Hackmaster [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hah! not one of you would have a bloody chance with my comp in terms of orginization! jeez... lets put it this way. I really didn't get into organization untill I got heavily into programming. you wouldn't believe how many "Track 1: unknown artist, unknown albums" I have!! it's rediculas!! |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
what is rediculas? my computer just died . my key board got up and ran away, and i still can't find it. my cat ate my mouse. at least i still have my cheese with me, May the cheese be with you! |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
md wrote: ...you all slept...
Hah! Haha! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! I most definately did not sleep. |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
gandalf, your hours loged into wolfenstiene are.... welll...... low to my WoW. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
(yea first post on page 6!!!) sooo, how long till this spam filled toic gets locked? |
Author: | Dan [ Thu Dec 21, 2006 9:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
spearmonkey2000 wrote: (yea first post on page 6!!!) sooo, how long till this spam filled toic gets locked?
Only will be locked if some one starts swearing, flaming, insuting some one or mass spaming it. Right now we are just at noraml spam level, with some limited meaning and information in each seeming unrealted post in the topic. |
Author: | md [ Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:54 am ] |
Post subject: | |
What dan is trying to say is that you can be as silly as you want so long as it makes some sense. Just don't flame people in the name of silliness. Oh, and yay for waking up at 1 AM to start the day! |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Fri Dec 22, 2006 3:36 am ] |
Post subject: | |
TokenHerbz, I imagine so... Only, that time includes me falling asleep and not closing the game once or twice. Quote: Oh, and yay for waking up at 1 AM to start the day!
Completely agreed! |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:12 am ] |
Post subject: | |
pfft, I was only going to bed at 1am, then didn't fall asleep till 2 ish so |
Author: | Mazer [ Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
That's nothing. I woke up three times during the night covered in sweat. Wtf illness. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Fri Dec 22, 2006 9:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
completely on topic, how does this look for the next avatar theme? |
Author: | Dan [ Fri Dec 22, 2006 9:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
spearmonkey2000 wrote: completely on topic, how does this look for the next avatar theme?
As in owls, o rly or over sized images for the theme? I think something a bit more creative would be more fun. |
Author: | rdrake [ Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
spearmonkey2000 wrote: completely on topic, how does this look for the next avatar theme? This matter is decided exclusively in the IRC channel. |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Sat Dec 23, 2006 5:40 am ] |
Post subject: | |
oraly? sounds good to me hehehe |
Author: | Mazer [ Sat Dec 23, 2006 3:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Wow... I really don't see an orly theme happening. I can't imagine when that could've been funny. |
Author: | md [ Sat Dec 23, 2006 6:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Me either... though owls (or hooters ) might be more likely... |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
pin up girls? |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:54 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Is it just me or is this topic dying O.o and only on page six, methinks 40 pages was a bit too high of a goal md |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:48 am ] |
Post subject: | |
NEVER!!!!! this thread will never die!!!!! Oh yea, happy new years everyone!!!! omg 2006 went by soo quickly!!! I was reading the turing help file today, and for fun I look at the really really really old posts, from 2002, and i must say things have really changed since then. Soo many poeple asking "can you write my program??" and "I need help!!". the worst part was People actually wrote programs for the slackers. Compsci was a dangerous place back then. Oh i was also looking at the old source codes, mann.. catalyst is an amazing programmer... |
Author: | md [ Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:59 am ] |
Post subject: | |
So um... I have a very large (80MP) image of my desk to share... but there is no way I can host it myself. Anyone got space for a 9MB jpg? |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
9MB JPG?!?!?!!? maybe you should just shrink it down EDIT: Ask Dan, he might do it for you |
Author: | md [ Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
it's 80 megapixels! 9MB is rather good for an 80MP image... |
Author: | rdrake [ Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
As per md's request, here it is. |
Author: | md [ Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I apologize for the poor stitching; I blame it on hugin, and my not wanting to spend 2 hours doing it. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Jan 01, 2007 8:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
pfft, not much of an excuse md |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Jan 01, 2007 8:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
AHHH it crashed my comp!!!! |
Author: | md [ Tue Jan 02, 2007 3:51 am ] |
Post subject: | |
freakman, it's a perfect excuse! And if that crashes your computer... well... sucks to be you |
Author: | TheFerret [ Tue Jan 02, 2007 6:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Here is another pic though it is only 25MP, it is still impressive for what it is of... |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
OMG v3!! and on the first day back to school too. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
yep, we have to make sure this thread lasts as long as it can now I suppose... |
Author: | md [ Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:30 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Damn strait! I want > 30 pages! But hey, just becuase God sucks and all... |
Author: | War_Caymore [ Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Watch what you say there... Something bad could happen... |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Tue Jan 09, 2007 9:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
The all-mighty-smiter just might smite you. since this is a spam topic, what do i do if my path variable gets deleted? |
Author: | md [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 1:14 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
psha! I regularly use the nick "God" on irc and not once has anything bad happened! Besides; I don't believe god exists (at least not in the being able to change things in the universe at will type way). On windows I do not know how to restore your path, linux restores the path as per /etc/env.d (on gentoo) on a reboot, perhaps windows has some way of doing the same? I doubt it... but it could happen... |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 1:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
have you tried googling it? I'm sure there's some sort of set pattern to a PATH variable, check it out. |
Author: | BenLi [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 1:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Quote: I don't believe god exists (at least not in the being able to change things in the universe at will type way).
Why? |
Author: | md [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 2:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
BenLi @ Wednesday 2007-01-10 1:42 am wrote: Quote: I don't believe god exists (at least not in the being able to change things in the universe at will type way).
Why? Why would you believe that there is a "God" who can control everything in the universe and who is aware of everything that happens? On what would you base such a belief? There is no proof that such a being exists, or is required to exist for the universe to exist as it does. I actually consider anyone who does believe in god to be delusional at best, clinically insane at worst. I'm a believer in truth by proof. Things are true because there is scientific proof that they are true. Believing in things which have no scientific proof is just fuzzy thinking; fuzzy thinking which is detrimental to rational thought. Oh, and don't get me started on the fraud that is modern christianity... |
Author: | War_Caymore [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
there is a specific book (i will edit this post when i figure it out) that comes up with a really neat explination of the whole god and satan thing. In the book, one alien came to earth and talked to "jesus" in the desert trying to help him, but he refused help and "jesus" called the aliens "satan" (because thats what the aliens looked like). 2000 years later, they come back but never reveal themselves but remain on the planet for 50 years trying to rid the world of the prejiduce. when they do reveal themselves, they looked like satan. I believe this theory is not fiction |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 4:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Wed Jan 10, 2007 2:11 am wrote: BenLi @ Wednesday 2007-01-10 1:42 am wrote: Quote: I don't believe god exists (at least not in the being able to change things in the universe at will type way).
Why? Why would you believe that there is a "God" who can control everything in the universe and who is aware of everything that happens? On what would you base such a belief? There is no proof that such a being exists, or is required to exist for the universe to exist as it does. I actually consider anyone who does believe in god to be delusional at best, clinically insane at worst. I'm a believer in truth by proof. Things are true because there is scientific proof that they are true. Believing in things which have no scientific proof is just fuzzy thinking; fuzzy thinking which is detrimental to rational thought. Oh, and don't get me started on the fraud that is modern christianity... You are soo close minded. I am atheist, but I am more accepting towards theists. My family is hindu, and I still try to keep up with the traditions and celebrations because it is important. they believe in god, but i still respect them anyway. You cant label someone who thinks differently than you as "delusional", you need to be more accepting. But the one thing I cant stand about religen is this need to convert others. It is wrong, its like saying "our cultre is better than yours, you suck! be more like us!" and it restricts diversity. Modern christianity isnt fraud. I believe it tries to instil good moral values. Santa is a fraud though, he is just some marketing gimmick that prays on the imagination of children. Santa has changed christmas from a day of celebrating Jesus's birth into selfish materialism. Santa has degenerated christmas. He was created by masive corperations to make more money. I'm sure they will try to do the same with other religons like islam,hinduism judism etc. I find using religeon to promote matirealism just disgusting. |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
spearmonkey2000 wrote: ou are soo close minded. I am atheist, but I am more accepting towards theists. My family is hindu, and I still try to keep up with the traditions and celebrations because it is important. they believe in god, but i still respect them anyway. You cant label someone who thinks differently than you as "delusional", you need to be more accepting. did md say that he wasn't accepting? calling them delusional and not accepting them are two completely different things. spearmonkey2000 wrote: But the one thing I cant stand about religen is this need to convert others. It is wrong, its like saying "our cultre is better than yours, you suck! be more like us!" and it restricts diversity. religion isn't about diversity, it's about them and only them, one of the reasons I don't follow any such religion. spearmonkey2000 wrote: Modern christianity isnt fraud. I believe it tries to instil good moral values. ya, after a church takes all your money.. spearmonkey2000 wrote: Santa is a fraud though, he is just some marketing gimmick that prays on the imagination of children. Santa has changed christmas from a day of celebrating Jesus's birth into selfish materialism. Santa has degenerated christmas. He was created by masive corperations to make more money. I'm sure they will try to do the same with other religons like islam,hinduism judism etc. I find using religeon to promote matirealism just disgusting. actually, Santa was not invented by business, perhaps you should read more about that before you start blibbering utter jibberish about something you know very little about. On the whole, I am with md 100%. Many a organized are hoaxes for someone to get rich, or that some delusional person has thought up (read: Jonestown). |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Santa was invented by coka-cola. |
Author: | 1of42 [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
spearmonkey2000 @ Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:49 pm wrote: You are soo close minded. I am atheist, but I am more accepting towards theists. My family is hindu, and I still try to keep up with the traditions and celebrations because it is important. they believe in god, but i still respect them anyway. You cant label someone who thinks differently than you as "delusional", you need to be more accepting.
This is something I find interesting. In our culture, religious beliefs are accorded a sort of automatic respect, and I don't understand (completely) why this is. For example: If I were to go around saying that the sky is red, people would disbelieve me. In fact, most people would challenge me on my belief, and even go so far as to call me delusional. And it would be true. However, if instead of saying the sky is red, I said that I believed in God, or in a more illustrative sense said that I believed that the sky was red because it was my religion, I would be accorded automatic respect by many people - it's a fact, and if you pay careful attention, you'll see this kind of baseless respect of baseless beliefs being accorded all around you. The fact of the matter is, baseless religious beliefs are delusional. The fact that they are "important" doesn't matter - the Earth's flatness was once important, and it didn't stop it from being wrong. The fact that many religions are "traditions" is equally irrelevant - just because a bad/wrong idea has lasted a long time does not mean it's any less bad or wrong. Labelling those who think differently than you delusional can be very correct in certain circumstances (like baseless, unproved beliefes about the world). It is a negative way to get the point across, but it's often quite correct. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Well I dont know much about christianity, but religions such as hinduism,buddism and jainism aren't baseless. These religions were created by ancient sholars, a lot of thought went in to them. There are reoccuring themes within these religions such as the idea of attachment being bad, as it leads to greed and greed leads to suffering of others. There have been many stories within the indian scriptures that supports this thiinking. They belive that everything has a right to life, no one has the right kill anyone (including animals, and gandhi strongly supported hinduism thats why he was passive and a vegetarian). These religions dont have a creation stories, but hinduism does belive in gods. These gods dont have the power to create planets and life, they just have supernatural powers . Their only significance is to express all the themes and morals. These religions believe in reincarnation and karma, which may seem like a hoax now, but back then it made sence to them, as they believe that depending on your karma from your previous life(how good of a person you were) you may be reincarnated into something good or something bad. They saw that some people lived in extreme poverty, while others lived wealthy, so they concluded that everyone wasnt born equally, and some force must be controlling your living condition in life. This idea of an after life brought civil order, and because of this idea of karma, the rich were more corteous towrds the poor. darn it I have to go, we'll continue this later. |
Author: | md [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Before anyone else says that Christianity is about diversity or accepting others (loving thy neighbor etc.) I wish to point to the Bush administration in the states and the "Christian Right" which supports it. Those are modern day Christians, at least in north America, and no matter how much you try and claim that they don't represent every Christian the sad truth is that they represent a significant majority. Now, addressing what you have said spearmonkey2000, spearmonkey2000 wrote: There are reoccuring themes within these religions such as the idea of attachment being bad, as it leads to greed and greed leads to suffering of others. There have been many stories within the indian scriptures that supports this thiinking. Attachment is not bad in and of itself. If no one got attached to people then there would be no families and humanity would die out rather quickly. I'm not even sure there is any harm in attachment at all unless taken to extremes and people who do that generally do it out of illness. Greed is also a bit hard to value; greedy parents are better able to support their kids thus ensuring survival of the species. However too much greed is bad for society as a whole. Again, it's not that greed is bad but that taking it to an extreme is bad.
spearmonkey2000 wrote: They belive that everything has a right to life, no one has the right kill anyone (including animals, and gandhi strongly supported hinduism thats why he was passive and a vegetarian). Believe all they want; I still say that beef tastes good and if I have to kill a cow to get it then get me a gun, 'cause it's eat'n time.
spearmonkey2000 wrote: These religions dont have a creation stories, but hinduism does belive in gods. These gods dont have the power to create planets and life, they just have supernatural powers Razz . God == Gods == supernatual beings. I don't care how much power they are believed to have, they don't exist. There is no rational reason for thinking they exist. Believing in anything that has absolutely zero scientific proof, something which cannot even be proven because "faith" says it to be true and science can't disprove faith; now if that's not delusional then I don't know what is.
spearmonkey2000 wrote: Their only significance is to express all the themes and morals. These religions believe in reincarnation and karma, which may seem like a hoax now, but back then it made sence to them, as they believe that depending on your karma from your previous life(how good of a person you were) you may be reincarnated into something good or something bad. They saw that some people lived in extreme poverty, while others lived wealthy, so they concluded that everyone wasnt born equally, and some force must be controlling your living condition in life. This idea of an after life brought civil order, and because of this idea of karma, the rich were more corteous towrds the poor. darn it I have to go, we'll continue this later. Morals do not require religion. Religion actually hinders morality as usually morality is achieved through fear. "Don't do X, or you'll go to hell" is a very poor motivator for people doing anything. If your going to try and instill morals in someone it's much better to teach them from a young age that your morals are correct because they are the universally accepted rules of society. Religion can be wrong, society as a whole can be equally be wrong; but it's in charge and mob rules always end up mattering most. Oh, and I think you have seriously misread everything having to do with rich/poor. I suggest reading up on the caste system.
Karma on the other hand is a real thing. If you go around treating people poorly they will resent you and treat you poorly. Treat people well and they tend to treat you well. Nothing mystical in that, just plain old psychology. As for religion in general, just because many people over many centuries thought long and hard over something does not make it true. I think about it all the time; but in the last 15 years no matter how much I believe it to be true I still don't own a large yacht, nor am I rich. Thinking does not make truth. |
Author: | neufelni [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I disagree with your viewpoint on God. I believe in God and am a Christian. And why do you dislike Christianity so much. It seems as if today's society teaches to be tolerant of other beliefs and religions, yet it seems to be acceptable to be intolerable towards Christianity. |
Author: | rdrake [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
On another note, I paid $17.99 for 50 DVD-Rs. They are of the "Kodak" brand and run at speeds of up to 16x. Think I got a good deal? |
Author: | md [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Nah, you're paying overhead for the brand name. Plus that's only 205GB. Wait. That is a decent deal... |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
indeed, I would maybe go so far as to say a good deal w00t for md making it to one post from being Tony's clone |
Author: | md [ Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Now I can't post! If do I'll become a clone! Oh noes, this is a post! /me runs around flailing |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ahh, but said post doesn't count toward your total post count |
Author: | md [ Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:17 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Alas, it seems I may actually have to try and help someone... Screw that. |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
aye, it just wouldn't be in your nature now would it? |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
We are soo close to ten pages of spam. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
alas, md actually had to help someone... poor thing. Congrats on Tony's Clone at any rate |
Author: | md [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Hmm, since I am not tony's clone does that mean my face will change so I look like him? 'Cause that would be weird. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
yes, you will eventually turn into a look alike of Tony, much like Gandalf has |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun Jan 21, 2007 6:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
this has died again. 30 pages of spam was wayy too high. :S |
Author: | Delos [ Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Hmm...I wonder if that old bug from V2 still persists - the one that screws up the page numbering with the first new-page post... |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
so i woke up today, pretty early... I went and got my cats some food, got some juice which i drank, along with potato wedges and ketchup. Anyways i played WoW for a large portion of the day since i have nothing constructive to do yet.. I have to go shopping tomorrow, should be ok, i guess... I'd rather sleep. I had dinner today, it was 2 cans of ravioli and an orange. i have a head ache now so im going to go sleep.... Oh yeah, i watched a movie, it was called "The Illusionist", It was pretty good, i recommend it to everyone. Bye now. /sign |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Linux Distro Deathmatch ... Ubuntu ROXORZ ... discuss |
Author: | md [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:24 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Gentoo is better, because I say so. Yay for dating a highschool student at 21! |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You're a lucky, lucky man, md ... and i say Ubuntu is better cuz its easy |
Author: | rdrake [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 3:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Gentoo! FreeBSD too! |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Damn Small Linux is where it's at fools! It's simply run off of the LiveCD. Just throwin it out there for no particular reason. Oh and md, my friends and I have a saying for people like you, but it's not appropriate for the forums |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
linspire is better |
Author: | md [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Pfft, DSL is nice and all... but it's too small. Gentoo has a nice range of size vs. features. Specifically a range of nothing to everything. Oh, and she's 21 too; she's just taking a high school course to get into a program she's interested in, so I am of course taking the opportunity to make everyone think I am a dirty old man. Really I'm just dirty |
Author: | rdrake [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
spearmonkey2000 @ Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:29 pm wrote: linspire is better I sincerely hope you are joking. I have never seen a distro ask me for so much money as I have Linspire. Even Mandriva wasn't nearly as bad for that.
Gentoo has never asked me for a dime, ever. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I was just kidding, I dont know much about linux, just my teacher uses linspire, and thinks we should too. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
so quick to dismiss your own argument about linspire ... i say stick to one distro and never stray, be as faithful to it as Geroge W is to his plan of action. UNFLINCHING Zealots are what the linux community needs! |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 6:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md, DSL is just perfect for a computer with so little memory it can't even open an essay document. I've also finally had the chance to try out a fully functional Gentoo install, and I must say I'm impressed. pfft, you people and your linspire... you should be ashamed of yourself... |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 7:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Who is this sponsor guy? he is in every page advertiseing google |
Author: | md [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
spearmonkey2000 @ Monday 2007-01-22 7:29 pm wrote: Who is this sponsor guy? he is in every page advertiseing google I have no idea what you are talking about. But then I have all google ads (ads in general really... it's amazing how well a few regex's work) blocked. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
no the second post (everywhere) is by a guy nemed sponsor |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
[img]<a href="http://img111.imageshack.us/my.php?image=wewe6rl.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://img111.imageshack.us/img111/19/wewe6rl.th.png" border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us" /></a>[/img] |
Author: | md [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Weird. I definitely don't get that. Perhaps dan has an answer. |
Author: | neufelni [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I get the sponsor too. I think it must be the new advertising to keep the costs down. |
Author: | Amailer [ Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Only if im not logged in do I get the sponsor ads.. |
Author: | Dan [ Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:19 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It should only show if you are not logged in, could you please post a screen shot of the top of the page to the ad, so that i can see you are loged in and seeing the ad. |
Author: | rdrake [ Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Hacker Dan @ Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:19 am wrote: It should only show if you are not logged in, could you please post a screen shot of the top of the page to the ad, so that i can see you are loged in and seeing the ad. I believe the screenshot speaks for itself.
|
Author: | md [ Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:57 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
uh oh... rdrake got into the booze and then discovered ms paint... I think my eyes are burning. |
Author: | Dan [ Tue Jan 23, 2007 10:45 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ummmm, you are loged out in that screen shot.... |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Hmm.. It said on top that I wasnt online, but it said SpearMonkey2000 was. :S |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Jan 23, 2007 6:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
rdrake, if you can't see the person's karma or bits, you are not logged in... |
Author: | Dan [ Tue Jan 23, 2007 6:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
spearmonkey2000 @ 23rd January 2007, 5:00 pm wrote: Hmm.. It said on top that I wasnt online, but it said SpearMonkey2000 was. :S
The whois online block shows users that have been online in the past 5 to 10 mins. So if some how you got logged out it whould still say you where online to every one for the next 5 mins. |
Author: | rdrake [ Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
/me detects a lack of understanding in the sarcasm of his last post. |
Author: | Amailer [ Tue Jan 23, 2007 10:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Lies! your not logged in, I see a white text box behind that black spray. |
Author: | md [ Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
rdrake, leave them be. It's not their fault they are dense... I mean come on... who could possibly see the sarcasm in a screen shot with a badly blocked out login prompt and lots of scraggly text done in ms paint in colors that would kill a hippy on acid? Surely they cannot be faulted for missing that! |
Author: | Amailer [ Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:37 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Your paint writing skill 'z' 'suck' : |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
quite good, quite good, rdrake ... but let me say this in response to your screenie: GET LINUX WORKING AGAIN |
Author: | rdrake [ Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CompWiz333 @ Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:31 am wrote: quite good, quite good, rdrake ... but let me say this in response to your screenie: GET LINUX WORKING AGAIN I wish, I wish. Might purchase a new box and put Gentoo on it. Or alternatively run another project I'm considering working on . |
Author: | md [ Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
rdrake @ Wednesday 2007-01-24 10:45 am wrote: CompWiz333 @ Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:31 am wrote: quite good, quite good, rdrake ... but let me say this in response to your screenie: GET LINUX WORKING AGAIN I wish, I wish. Might purchase a new box and put Gentoo on it. Or alternatively run another project I'm considering working on .Gasp! You're going to write your own OS?! Spiffin! Oh, and I got my G. I am now officially not a bad driver |
Author: | rdrake [ Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:38 pm wrote: Gasp! You're going to write your own OS?! Spiffin! Little far...
md @ Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:38 pm wrote: Oh, and I got my G. I am now officially not a bad driver Looking at the amount of horrid drivers out there, I wouldn't go that far either . |
Author: | md [ Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Well, I am a good enough driver to pass. Which is more then I can say for a couple of the other peopel taking their tests while I was there... one guy managed to hit something and damage his car within a minute of leaving the parking lot; and another went speeding past me prompting my examiner to remark that he was surely speeding. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I was bored one day, so I draw a stupid comic on m$ paint. Please rate.! |
Author: | ericfourfour [ Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
OMG! It all makes sense now spearmonkey2000. |
Author: | md [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 12:03 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Dude, I definitely didn't take 7 days to make the world. 2 tops, and that's cause as soon as there was beer things slowed to a crawl. |
Author: | Dan [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:42 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
spearmonkey2000, the idea is not that there was nothing then everything the idea is that there was everything in one point in space and then that one point of extream mass expoided and spread out. Matter and energy can not be created or destoryed just coverted to each other or moved around. |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
a-like so: |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Darn it CompWiz333 I was about to do that. |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Uh oh! it looks like my picture blew everyone's mind. |
Author: | md [ Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:01 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
no... just that you're clearly wrong. 'Cause being god and all I know it definitely looked more like a giant tree at first. |
Author: | apomb [ Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
it IS a giant tree, but i wanted to give it perspective, so i zoomed out 345,876,212km. Also, the technology for cameras looked much like MSpaint graphics, bu i assure you, those are actual photos taken at the time. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
rdrake wrote: My God Can Beat the Shit Out of Your God discuss. |
Author: | Amailer [ Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
dude - its chris to meg: AHHAA, My dad is better than yours |
Author: | md [ Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Oh yeah? Well your dad totally had sex with your mom and they were all like "Oooh" and "Aaah". And then 9 months later you showed up being carried by some stork! |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Holy ... no way, My God could SO kick your god's ass ... he created your god! |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
My mom could kick your god's ass. My god is Jedi Master Yoda, beat that foo. |
Author: | md [ Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:33 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I did. With a bowl of poisoned soup. Ha! |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Aww man, Yoda you suck! Strong you are not with the force. Satan is my new god, afterall he is the best thing that ever happened to the church;he keeps em' in buisness |
Author: | md [ Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Ahh, but he was silly enough to put his name on the giant wheel! He totally lost his hands to Fry. |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
dammit! I was gonna refrence that episode, then I see page 13, and md beat me to it! damn you md, burn in hell with the human handed robot. |
Author: | md [ Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:53 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I don't think I will... being human I won't go to robot hell. It's worth noting that fry didn't actually trade his original hands with the robot devil either. He traded the ones he got after the T-Rex ate his original ones. |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I thought you were God? (at least that's what you proclaim) guess not oh, and you would most certainly go to robot hell, right beside dan. have fun on your playdate |
Author: | md [ Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Why says I can't be God and human? Beinggod I can be whatever I want! /me turns into a miniature giant space hamster |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Try being satan md. I'm forming my own religion, it's called jedi-ism, who wants to join? We've got free fries and t-shirts! |
Author: | syntax_error [ Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Quote: [quote="md"]
Why says I can't be God and human? Beinggod I can be whatever I want! /me turns into a miniature giant space hamster Ok..................................................................... the reason why you cant be a god and a human at the same time is that ...let use say for whatever reason you wish (insert wish here) you change your self to a human therefore since now your a human you don't have any powers (last time checked human have no supernatural abllites) therefore there would be any god anymore. Subsequently since your a human now you cant change back to a god if you where a human !!! Furthermore all of this depends upon your definition of GOD So there!! |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
oh GOD pun intended here we go on the "definition of God" again jedi is already a religion, spearmonkey2000 ... its only for EXTREMELY awkward, self-proclaimed geeks who shall never contact a female. so, if thats your cup of tea, hey, all the "force" be with you. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CompWiz333 wrote: oh GOD pun intended here we go on the "definition of God" again jedi is already a religion, spearmonkey2000 ... its only for EXTREMELY awkward, self-proclaimed geeks who shall never contact a female. so, if thats your cup of tea, hey, all the "force" be with you. so your saying that within your so called "religion " you have no females ......... lets see then since there are no female there will be no mateing therefore your kind will die out very soon ...... (how many pll do u have 2). |
Author: | rdrake [ Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
syntax_error @ Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:18 pm wrote: Ok..................................................................... Woa, there have been instances where I've run out of breath trying to read a post, but not over one word before. Congrats.
syntax_error @ Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:18 am wrote: so your saying that within your so called "religion " you have no females ......... lets see then since there are no female there will be no mateing therefore your kind will die out very soon ...... (how many pll do u have 2). He's essentially saying that those nerdy enough to say they belong to the "Jedi " religion don't have very good chances with females. There are females that nerdy, but not enough for the entire religion. |
Author: | ZeroPaladn [ Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
rdrake wrote: syntax_error @ Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:18 am wrote: so your saying that within your so called "religion " you have no females ......... lets see then since there are no female there will be no mateing therefore your kind will die out very soon ...... (how many pll do u have 2). He's essentially saying that those nerdy enough to say they belong to the "Jedi " religion don't have very good chances with females. There are females that nerdy, but not enough for the entire religion.
Wait a minute, I thought the "Jedi" didn't beleive in connections such at love. I guess they're all gonna die out soon. Aw well. I'm not gonna miss them. |
Author: | apomb [ Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I should have used more inclusive language, you're right. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ZeroPaladn wrote: Wait a minute, I thought the "Jedi" didn't beleive in connections such at love. I guess they're all gonna die out soon. Aw well. I'm not gonna miss them. You make baby Jesus cry |
Author: | rdrake [ Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Hm... time to light some fires in here... I hate Star Trek. It's boring and painful to watch. Your move. |
Author: | md [ Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I see you're wearing a red shirt... too bad about that |
Author: | rdrake [ Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Not quite. Not too sure what the colour of my shirt is. It's almost like a white colour with a hint of yellow mixed in (no, it's not what you're thinking of). It sure as hell isn't red. On a side note, anybody else ever try LFS? It's quite nice, but takes tons and tons of work. |
Author: | md [ Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
LFS is nice like Gentoo is nice; source based distributions are wonderful. However... LFS has no package management of any kind, which for almost everyone is a pain in the ass. Portage makes the world go round. /me at rdrake with a phaser and hits the plasma conduit behind it, which promptly explodes burning rdrake horribly. If your wearing a white shirt it must be TNG, and you must be a science person on a space station, and they always get hurt horribly. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
This died AGAIN! We're never going to reach 40 pages of spam. |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's not our fault, you silly people must continue to spam here |
Author: | md [ Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
mhen, I tend to visit cs.ca maybe once a day; and then I only look at new posts in the last 24 hours. If people keep spamming though, this thread'll always have a new post in the last 24 hours; so I'll keep seeing it and thus keep posting |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Let's gossip. Gossip Gossip |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
JUUUUISY gossip. Gossip. Gossip |
Author: | Cervantes [ Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
spearmonkey2000: I'm okay with having a thread like this, but if it's going to be stupid posts about nothing, then it might just get locked. The purpose of this thread is not to reach a certain number of posts, but as a place to discuss whatever. Discussing whatever is distinct from spamming, however. |
Author: | md [ Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:23 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It is? I find they become remarkably similar after a while. Anyone got any ideas why a USB HD isn't being recognized on one computer while my other sees it perfectly? I'm hoping it's not a bug in the 2.6.20 kernel; because it happens to fix a lot of other hardware bugs... |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'm having similar problems, but with it not detecting my cell phone when i connect it via USB. |
Author: | Amailer [ Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:51 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Friend had a similar problem with his cell phone too - first time it recognized it, but he had said ignore the hardware or w/e - when he tried it again it kept saying - some corrupt hardware? Anyhow, he just restarted his comp - unpluged/pluged it back in and it worked :/ |
Author: | War_Caymore [ Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I am having a similar problem. My computer has no problem detecting an old USB MP3 player (which is now a junk drive) but when i go to put it on his computer, it pops up on the task bar as uninstalled hardware. The MP# didn't come with any software so it's technicaly flash memory with a USB port. His computer isn't much older than mine (although his is a Dell >.<). |
Author: | jamonathin [ Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I got bored and read the first couple of pages, and all that talk of microsoft and roflcopter got me to listen to Microsoft Sam say: <3 Microsoft Sam wrote: My roflcopter goes soi soi soi soi soi tche tche tche tche tche tche tche tche tche tche tche tche soi soi dfdfdfdfdfdfdfdfe. Microsoft ftw. |
Author: | md [ Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I solved the USB HD problem; apparently my laptop is incapable of providing the required power levels to run the drive properly. My desktop on the other hand has no such troubles. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
How much power does it require to run? |
Author: | md [ Mon Mar 05, 2007 8:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apparently more then 90mA; which seems to be all my thinkpad will source to USB ports. This is the only thing I can think of too... I mean I know hte drive works and I know the thinkpad works, so it's gotta be a power issue. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Would having the power adapter plugged in make any difference (I would imagine not, but I'm just throwing stuff out there ) |
Author: | md [ Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
See while the enclosure has a port for a power adapter I do not know what voltage/amerage it needs to be nor do I have one. Given that this is a laptop drive however it has very minimal power requirements. USB will do it if the USB ports provide the required power as per the USB spec. |
Author: | rdrake [ Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:21 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
As I recall, all devices plugged into a USB port first receive 90 mA from the host. The device can request up to 500 mA if the host supports it. Perhaps your laptop just doesn't like doing that? |
Author: | md [ Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
IIRC it's 100mA at first; but in any case yes it seems that either the laptop is not listening to the requests for more power; or just isn't providing enough even when trying. It's strange; given that the drive spins up and everything... Given that I now have a laptop with plenty of storage however it's not really a big deal at all. |
Author: | rdrake [ Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Well the USB ports combined can be pretty powerful. I believe timmy shared this picture with the channel. |
Author: | War_Caymore [ Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:22 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i need one of those sence my mom won't let me have a microwave in my room, this might actualy be useful... now, to buy 5 USB 2.0 cards to plug into my computer and for someone to make me a hotplate on anohter note... anyone here play WarRock? i wanna pwn someone i know instead of strangers online that keep calling me a noob when kill them |
Author: | Mazer [ Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:55 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Play Galcon, if you have the guts. |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Galcon? interesting... I take it The Baconfish is looking for vengence? |
Author: | War_Caymore [ Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:12 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Galcon? post the URL. Sence everyone knows that i am too lazy to google anything for my life.... |
Author: | rdrake [ Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:46 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Since I actually feel like being nice... it's here. Alas it is also the second result for Galcon on Google. I'd highly recommend you invest some time in looking up the mighty site that is Google, maybe even in Firefox. EDIT: Stupid windows shell... |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Myspace sucks! It's for self obsessed emos who have no friends. Now discuss! |
Author: | md [ Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Or uh, not. Because Invader Zim says so. |
Author: | War_Caymore [ Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:13 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
MySpace is for lifeless emos to communicate. I have one, but have not updated it in 3 years. ...this does not mean i was an emo... |
Author: | rdrake [ Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:31 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I think even I had one of these "myspace" accounts back in the day. Or maybe it was another one... either way I never used it. Facebook is the only thing I would consider using. Thankfully they took away the ability for users to embed music and flashy graphics in web pages, unlike in myspace. Helps out the epileptic greatly. |
Author: | Mazer [ Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:44 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
My older brother once revealed to us that he had signed up for a MySpace account. We still make fun of him for it when the opportunity arises. EDIT: On the topic of social networking, am I alone in not really bothering to use Facebook anymore? I'll usually only sign in when I get an email about something happening. And even then, all I'll do is read whatever was posted or accept whoever added me. |
Author: | rdrake [ Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Usually only sign in when told to myself. Methinks I'll write on your wall to flood your inbox with messages now, Niko. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
sounds like a good plan. Probably the only thing we have to look out for is the Facebook Nazis who take things a way too seriously |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Wow I haven't heard of facebook until. I'm realllly out of the loop. |
Author: | War_Caymore [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
OK, seriously... why would anyone want to use Facebook, or anyother one of those "friend" sites. all i see is a way for stalkers or pedifiles to get to people.... yet i get about 2 e-mails a day from people saying to join and that they added me (even though i don't have an account) and so forth. I refuse to be part of anyone of those sites... I like my Internet Privacy... if theres such thing... EDIT: BTW Codemonkey2000... it's "All [username:307b4389f8]'s base AREbelong to me" |
Author: | Andy [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
War_Caymore @ Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:51 am wrote: OK, seriously... why would anyone want to use Facebook, or anyother one of those "friend" sites. all i see is a way for stalkers or pedifiles to get to people....
They're for people who actually have friends, and make an effort to keep in touch with them. Don't bash something if you've never tried it before. |
Author: | Cervantes [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's a social networking site, as well as a good place to host pictures. It really is a brilliant idea. No where near as cool as last.fm, but still. By the way, what's the possessive of Cervantes? Is it Cervantes', or is it Cervantes's? I've seen it done both ways. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 4:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Cervantes' Your nick ends in an 's', and any noun ending with 's' is followed by an apostrophe in possessive form. And yes, Facebook rules. |
Author: | md [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Andy @ 2007-03-20, 1:14 pm wrote: War_Caymore @ Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:51 am wrote: OK, seriously... why would anyone want to use Facebook, or anyother one of those "friend" sites. all i see is a way for stalkers or pedifiles to get to people....
They're for people who actually have friends, and make an effort to keep in touch with them. Don't bash something if you've never tried it before. I have friends, and I keep in touch with them. Perhaps you should be a little less condescending, that way people will take longer to smoke out that you're an ass. |
Author: | richcash [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Freakman wrote: and any noun ending with 's' is followed by an apostrophe in possessive form
If it's singular possessive ending with an s, you can add an ('s) or just ('). eg. boss's OR boss' Cervantes's or Cervantes' If it's plural possessive ending with an s, I believe you don't have an option, you must only add ('). eg. bosses' dogs' I, like Freakman, never add an s in either case, but I'm pretty sure it's optional. There are some sources, however, that argue one way or the other for singular nouns. So, Cervantes' or Cervantes's. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
meh, I prefer to use Cervantes' over the other simply because it looks nicer |
Author: | agnivohneb [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CodeMonkey2000 wrote: Myspace sucks! It's for self obsessed emos who have no friends. Now discuss!
I was on myspace a lot (like 3 years ago since last time on) then i lost interest to many emos and way to much black. on mine i think i had a very brite background. anyway, YOU MYSPACE! myspace should im glad i got that out of my system |
Author: | ericfourfour [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I've always been taught to use ' not 's if it ends with s. 's is the US version. Cervantes' = Canadian Cervantes's = US It all really depends on your nationality. |
Author: | Andy [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:35 pm wrote: I have friends, and I keep in touch with them. Perhaps you should be a little less condescending, that way people will take longer to smoke out that you're an ass. right, and how many of them are there? I have over 250 friends on facebook. Try to keep in touch with all of them through email/im. |
Author: | md [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Andy @ 2007-03-20, 8:16 pm wrote: md @ Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:35 pm wrote: I have friends, and I keep in touch with them. Perhaps you should be a little less condescending, that way people will take longer to smoke out that you're an ass. right, and how many of them are there? I have over 250 friends on facebook. Try to keep in touch with all of them through email/im. I find it exceptionally difficult to believe that you are friends with 250 people. You may know 250 people, but an acquaintance != a friend. |
Author: | Andy [ Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You may be right, but I try to make an effort to keep in touch with at least a hundred of them. Oh and I know I'm an ass, but actually care. |
Author: | ZeroPaladn [ Wed Mar 21, 2007 9:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i got a crippy site on Piczo (thank the girlfriend, she did it.), and i do beleive i signed up for a myspace account, but never used it. Also, I thought that the whole "All of [username:976ffbaa2c] bases are belong to us" thing was just scripted, but since my bro saw codemonkey's sig with me on it, im starting to wonder... care to explain codemonkey? |
Author: | agnivohneb [ Wed Mar 21, 2007 3:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I used to have a piczo site but then i got tripod site then i got freewebs site then i just said it ill host my own with no restrictions. I got a much better site than i ever dreamed of (without having to pay for anything) |
Author: | Mayday [ Wed Mar 21, 2007 3:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i like shiny things ....... and muffins, Muffins are good ..... and candy, Candy is made out of Sugar, Sugar was first harvested in southamerica, South America is where Hati is Located, Hati was the first Black ran Country. (Hati was also the first gateway into the slave trade and when the Population of Blacks suceeded the Population of Whites the Black ppl uprised and Took control and where the first to do so, However because they were the First Black ran country, and all other countries around them were still under Slaverey, Hati was cut off from the rest of the world and was led into Poverty were it still is today going on a fast track to no-where) Alot of Rappers are black, Rappers where Bling Bling, Bling Bling is shiny .............. I like Shiny things (so remeber, Muffins Can be shiny if you know how hard to look) |
Author: | agnivohneb [ Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
That is just CRAZY |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Mar 21, 2007 7:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ZeroPaladn @ Wed Mar 21, 2007 9:13 am wrote: i got a crippy site on Piczo (thank the girlfriend, she did it.), and i do beleive i signed up for a myspace account, but never used it. Also, I thought that the whole "All of [username:082baac018] bases are belong to us" thing was just scripted, but since my bro saw codemonkey's sig with me on it, im starting to wonder...
care to explain codemonkey? It's a HaX!!! Run for your life!!!! |
Author: | ZeroPaladn [ Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
By Golly! This thread sure is nice! Too bad I said something stupid about someone else and a mod edited my post. Yup; too bad entirely. |
Author: | War_Caymore [ Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Rest assured that this reply was angry and warranted; but as the post which it was in reply to was seemingly made to go away now it's not. Also, War_Caymore finally figured out that [ username] tags abound! This post was last edited by [username:f272346e67]. Or not. |
Author: | rdrake [ Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
What in the hell are you kids talking about? War_Caymore @ Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:12 am wrote: Whee! I like Stuff! Certainly you do!
md, I'm tempted to lock this. [md edit] Fixed! |
Author: | Mayday [ Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ZeroPaladn wrote: I await your responses, either to jusify my idealisms, or your own, or to just completely disregard this whole rant and skip on to something even more random and pointless. Like Winnie the Pooh? I can simply Justify everything i have said, AND can come to Logical Points and Arguments, and to You I reply ......... P-A-N-C-A-K-E, ( I AM THE KING OF RANDOM >>>> MUHAHAHAHAHAHA, [and yes i do realize that it was ripped off a CAD comic] MUHAHAHAHAHA, and the world will belong to those who like to watch the monkey Dance on Tuesday ..... MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.................................... im cold) |
Author: | Amailer [ Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Did anyone know that during the Cricket World Cup, the Pakistani head coach was found DEAD in his hotel room? And no, the xbox accounts were NOT HACKED |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Did the police ever find out what happened to him? Oh, and the point of this thread is to post about random topics. Spamming it with complete nonsense will result in the locking of this thread, this is the last warning. Keep the Off Topic talk On Topic will ya? |
Author: | Mazer [ Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Mayday @ Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:06 pm wrote: [and yes i do realize that it was ripped off a CAD comic] MUHAHAHAHAHA, and the world will belong to those who like to watch the monkey Dance on Tuesday ..... MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.................................... im cold)
You lost my interest when you admitted to taking funny from CAD of all places. PBF Rob and Elliot xkcd Cyanide and Happiness Pick one |
Author: | md [ Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
xkcd is awesome, though occasionally not very funny. If only there were a way to get it emailed to me when there was a new one... |
Author: | Mazer [ Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:41 pm wrote: xkcd is awesome, though occasionally not very funny.
Today's (yesterday's?) was a little disappointing. Quote: If only there were a way to get it emailed to me when there was a new one...
RSS? |
Author: | md [ Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I dunno, I never really used RSS. What little I have used seems to show promise, but it's not really what I'm looking for in this case. Something like Daily Dilbert would rock. |
Author: | Mazer [ Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I know not of this Daily Dilbert. But if you're using gmail I think you can get an RSS thing up in there. If not, and you happen to not be lazy I suppose you could write a program to periodically check the feed and then send you an email when a new comic is up. RSS and Google Reader is all that stops me from loading up a folder full of webcomics in tabs every half hour out of habit. |
Author: | Mayday [ Fri Mar 23, 2007 1:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i am actually in the process of making my own web comic, I have the Artitic and Comedic flare needed and an orginal idea ...., but unfortunatley i do not have the funding, Nor the Resources to make a webpage. its a shame that "Merc -N- Merc" will have to wait see the web, But for nor ill continue to draw them and use Photoshop to make them Pretty, and then print them and sell them to the local comic book store where about 10 kids actually buy the dame thing..... and i am sorry for being so random before, But thats what i thought this thread was for. |
Author: | Amailer [ Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Mayday, talk to me I think I could help you with the other stuff. When I say talk, I mean PM XD |
Author: | Mazer [ Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't it cost less to set up a website than it would to buy Photo-- Ohhh... Anyways, check out Keenspot. I'm pretty sure they offer free services for hosting webcomics. |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You're a smart one you are Mazer |
Author: | Mayday [ Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
and You might be right about it costing more to Print my Comic rather than host on the net. (Well, Thats if your Brother dosent work for a Printing company, and will do it for free to use up excess paper and ink, so the factory dosent have to pay for its own Emissions) and i think im going to go with "Am" here ... cause he is more than willing to help, And i am MORE then happy to do it. |
Author: | md [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You know... this topic is awesome; at least in the beginning. And since it's still not the longest topic on cs.ca (and thusly I am not famous for instigating it) I say it shall be revived! so to recap md wrote: What's the best gaming console ever?
Linux Distro Deathmatch Why Counter-Strike Sucks First Person Shooters Are Gay! Why turing is the best language ever! Why turing is the worst language ever! Turing isn't just a bad language... it'll cause kids to go out and club baby seals! Myspace sucks! LOL is not a word, and nor is rofl. Though the ROFLCopter rocks! Windows is stable as a brick. Windows bricked my computer. I threw a brick at my screen 'cause I got drunk and hi and my name is bob. And I shall add the following topics: Gentoo is awesome 'cause I get to compile everything! Ubuntu is awesome because I don't spend my life compiling everything! Computer Scientists are hippies! Engineers are jealous of the Computer Scientists because they <insert reason here> V3 sucks! Bring back V2! Winter is evil because of all the damned snow Winter is awesome because of all the damned snow Clayton may/may not like men Clayton may/may not like women Clayton may/may not have shot both Your mother was a hamster and your father smells of elderberries! xkcd is awesome and if you don't read it you should die. I don't get it. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I don't get this thread. This thread has been officially renamed "It". |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: Clayton may/may not like men
Clayton may/may not like women Clayton may/may not have shot both I may/may not resemble those comments. You ass. md wrote: V3 sucks! Bring back V2!
Actually... Go V2! |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:01 pm wrote: You know... this topic is awesome; at least in the beginning. And since it's still not the longest topic on cs.ca (and thusly I am not famous for instigating it) I say it shall be revived!
so to recap md wrote: What's the best gaming console ever?
Linux Distro Deathmatch Why Counter-Strike Sucks First Person Shooters Are Gay! Why turing is the best language ever! Why turing is the worst language ever! Turing isn't just a bad language... it'll cause kids to go out and club baby seals! Myspace sucks! LOL is not a word, and nor is rofl. Though the ROFLCopter rocks! Windows is stable as a brick. Windows bricked my computer. I threw a brick at my screen 'cause I got drunk and hi and my name is bob. And I shall add the following topics: Gentoo is awesome 'cause I get to compile everything! Ubuntu is awesome because I don't spend my life compiling everything! Computer Scientists are hippies! Engineers are jealous of the Computer Scientists because they <insert reason here> V3 sucks! Bring back V2! Winter is evil because of all the damned snow Winter is awesome because of all the damned snow Codemonkey may/may not like men Tony may/may not like women StealthArcher may/may not have shot both Your mother was a hamster and your father smells of elderberries! xkcd is awesome and if you don't read it you should die. I don't get wtd. Fixed. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You know... trying to be cool doesn't make you so. |
Author: | md [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yeah, seriously. Stop cramping our style (or lack thereof). |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I never said I was cool, I've always admitted to being quite the opposite. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I meant within the community. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'm not attempting to be cool here either. If you hate my humor say it, quit assuming I'm attempting, this "cramping of thine style" as you say it. |
Author: | Mazer [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
**** you and **** your xkcd love. It's a great comic. Let it be. Stop shoving it down my throat, alright Digg? You too, reddit, you *******. Cut it out. Edited by dan: Less swearing please. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Do I detect a bit of over-zealous hatred? |
Author: | md [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I think someone hasn't had their rum today |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Aye, the vikings took it all with their raping and pillaging and such. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
But where's the rum GO*gets shot by Clayton* |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I told you... the vikings took it. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
In the endless battle between pirates and ninjas, their illegitimate children, Vikings ever rule. |
Author: | Nick [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
what about samuri? |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
They get owned by a Grue. |
Author: | Mazer [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
momop @ Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:28 pm wrote: samuri?
http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q=define%3A+samurai&btnG=Google+Search Clayton is correct in not underestimating the danger presented by the grues. If you wander into a pitch black room either find yourself a light or, if possible, turn back. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I say we revive the person above me thread. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Let's not and say we didn't. |
Author: | Dan [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
^ thinks it is a bad idea. |
Author: | md [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
what, not reviving it is a bad idea? Or are you being ironic. I hope you get eaten by a grue! |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
^gets eaten by a grue |
Author: | Mazer [ Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
C'mon, let's come up with ways to be more lame. Oh, I know! www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0 HAY GUYS CLIK ON DAT LINK IT IS SO AWESOME LOLO |
Author: | Dan [ Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Mazer @ 3rd December 2007, 11:03 pm wrote: C'mon, let's come up with ways to be more lame.
Oh, I know! www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0 HAY GUYS CLIK ON DAT LINK IT IS SO AWESOME LOLO Lets... I bet i can make this topic much more anyoning |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:29 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
haha reminds me of xkcd |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Mazer @ Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:03 pm wrote: C'mon, let's come up with ways to be more lame.
Oh, I know! www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0 HAY GUYS CLIK ON DAT LINK IT IS SO AWESOME LOLO I think I just died a little inside. EDIT: Dan, I hate you. |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
momop @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:29 am wrote: haha reminds me of xkcd
also like this |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:35 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
(Too pointless and annoying not to post.) Ouch, We've all beend DAN'D. |
Author: | md [ Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You know dan... I think that may be grounds for a ban |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Dan banned... is that possible? |
Author: | Dan [ Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
momop @ 4th December 2007, 3:16 pm wrote: Dan banned... is that possible?
It should not be. All the warning, ban, yellow card, black card, post report, ect buttions do not show up on my posts. Also the system should not let any one ban me threw the ban controls in the super mod or admin cp. In the case some one does it threw the database the site should auto unban on the next page load |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Dan @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:19 pm wrote: momop @ 4th December 2007, 3:16 pm wrote: Dan banned... is that possible?
It should not be. All the warning, ban, yellow card, black card, post report, ect buttions do not show up on my posts. Also the system should not let any one ban me threw the ban controls in the super mod or admin cp. In the case some one does it threw the database the site should auto unban on the next page load I'll break it just for you Dan. |
Author: | Mazer [ Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:34 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
L O L GUYS GUESS WHAT YOU KNOW HOW PEPLE LIKE RPOGRAMMING IN RUBY CUZ I GUESS THAT IS A OK LANGUAGE MAYBE. WELL XKCD THINKS THAT ACTUALLY IT IS PYTHON IS AN AWESUM LANGUAGE IM GOING TO GO POST THIS ON DIGG AND REDDIT PLS DIGG FOR ME IS GOOD Great news it's already there oh daaaaaaamn boi |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:26 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
There's a pill for that. |
Author: | md [ Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:03 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
No... I don't think there is a pill for Mazer... a shotgun might work however |
Author: | Mazer [ Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:48 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I prefer revolvers. Or, like, a Kill-O-Zap or something. |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Kill-O-Zap you say? Good thing I have this human-sized model so handy. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
OMFG I TOOK IT TOO THA NEXT LEVWL!!!!111!!!oneoneoneone!!! |
Author: | Dan [ Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CodeMonkey2000 @ 5th December 2007, 11:17 pm wrote: OMFG I TOOK IT TOO THA NEXT LEVWL!!!!111!!!oneoneoneone!!!
I blame mazer for lowering the standars of even the "pointless" thread....... Also it is so much cooler when you have it autoplay but that has been done Lets try to keep this on the right off topics: Quote: What's the best gaming console ever? Linux Distro Deathmatch Why Counter-Strike Sucks First Person Shooters Are Gay! Why turing is the best language ever! Why turing is the worst language ever! Turing isn't just a bad language... it'll cause kids to go out and club baby seals! Myspace sucks! LOL is not a word, and nor is rofl. Though the ROFLCopter rocks! Windows is stable as a brick. Windows bricked my computer. I threw a brick at my screen 'cause I got drunk and hi and my name is bob. ........ Gentoo is awesome 'cause I get to compile everything! Ubuntu is awesome because I don't spend my life compiling everything! Computer Scientists are hippies! Engineers are jealous of the Computer Scientists because they <insert reason here> V3 sucks! Bring back V2! Winter is evil because of all the damned snow Winter is awesome because of all the damned snow Clayton may/may not like men Clayton may/may not like women Clayton may/may not have shot both Your mother was a hamster and your father smells of elderberries! xkcd is awesome and if you don't read it you should die. |
Author: | md [ Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:58 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I am fed up with the cold and snow already; someone build a dome over ottawa so I no longer have to suffer the horrors of winter. Or, get me more green house gasses. Either one will work; and global flooding might bring the sea even closer to ottawa... which means better weather and better sailing! |
Author: | Nick [ Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:01 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
also build a dome over the GTA and Clayton likes men |
Author: | Mazer [ Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
momop @ Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:01 am wrote: and Clayton likes men
Maybe, but he still isn't going to go out with you. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Codemonkey2000 likes attractive women. He also tends to speak in third person. |
Author: | md [ Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CodeMonkey2000 @ 2007-12-06, 12:41 pm wrote: Codemonkey2000 likes attractive women. He also tends to speak in third person.
So you like mazer then? |
Author: | Mazer [ Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Prediction CodeMonkey2000 wrote: Codemonkey2000 said attractive women 8)
Wow, well played. It's great. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:56 pm wrote: CodeMonkey2000 @ 2007-12-06, 12:41 pm wrote: Codemonkey2000 likes attractive women. He also tends to speak in third person.
So you like mazer then? mazer is a human? Wait you think mazer is attractive!!!??? That thing is fugly. |
Author: | md [ Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I have come the realization that free beer and pizza really does make the world go round. Fortunately I also have a strategy for getting said beer and pizza without en curing more work. Definitely a skill required by all! |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Girls only want guys with great skills after all. |
Author: | MrHippo [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 12:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Pizza is bad for you =( |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:20 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Well, if you're not going to eat it.... more for me! |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 12:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Wrong, tacos are bad for you. To much habanero is never a good thing. |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
On a slightly unrelated note: Purple Monkey Dishwasher. |
Author: | apomb [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
WHERES V4! ive been waiting 4 YEARS already!! and, as a side note, flowery turtle mailbox |
Author: | Nick [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
always remember bob's your uncle |
Author: | md [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Actually, I think V4 should move away from phpbb entirely; it's WAY too bloated. Also... I wish this quick reply box was a) wider and b) had it's buttons on the side or top. Scrolling down just to hit "Quickpost" is annoying! |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
PunBB is rather nice, I must say. I think we should coerce Dan into using it for V4 Also, a wider quick reply box would be much nicer, especially as it would push the stupid ads right down to the very bottom of the page. |
Author: | apomb [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
what ads? |
Author: | Nick [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
underneath the posts ads by Google wrote: |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Well spotted. |
Author: | Nick [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
also if you are not signed in there is another ads by Google at the top of tho main page and sponserships usually at the second post of a thread am i missing any? |
Author: | Dan [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
The plan for V4 is totaly remaking the system from sratch and not based on any existing fourm software. We whould likey do this in RoR and make it all AJAXy and web 2.0ish. As for ads they are displayed based on if you are singed in or not and how you got to the site. If you are refered here directly from google there will be a big banner at the top of the site. If you are no logged in there will be one sponsered fourm post with an ad per page. There is allways an add at the bottom of the viewtopic pages. We are condering other ways to place ads, we whont to show ads to users that are most likey to click on them and hidden them from users that will not. |
Author: | Nick [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
how about links to C++ pages in C++ section links to java in java section etc... |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I did it! |
Author: | md [ Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Dan @ 2007-12-07, 7:42 pm wrote: The plan for V4 is totaly remaking the system from sratch and not based on any existing fourm software. We whould likey do this in RoR and make it all AJAXy and web 2.0ish.
As for ads they are displayed based on if you are singed in or not and how you got to the site. If you are refered here directly from google there will be a big banner at the top of the site. If you are no logged in there will be one sponsered fourm post with an ad per page. There is allways an add at the bottom of the viewtopic pages. We are condering other ways to place ads, we whont to show ads to users that are most likey to click on them and hidden them from users that will not. Why web2.0 and AJAX? It's a forum! Making things overly complex when it's not needed never made anything better (see phpbb, Windows, etc.) |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
yeah, really... i think we should look at other forum sites like 4chan, y'know, go all minimalist and such. |
Author: | Dan [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:32 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
AJAX is hardly complicated, esptaly when using RoR. In any case AJAX was just an idea for V4 we are not even finshed fixing V3, it is a bit early to start making plans for V4. Edit: Just looked at 4chan, you realy whont somthing like that??? I should make a version of the site like that and force you and md to use it just for kicks (including the oversized images everywhere and mass amounts of spam). |
Author: | md [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:48 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
V4 plans must start immediately! V3 is pretty bad; clearly we need to move towards a new version. Also, the V3 thread god pretty damned big. A V4 thread should be even bigger! And since we're starting at 22 pages... |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:33 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Correction, 23 pages! |
Author: | md [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:16 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Goodbye everyone, You people all absolutely disgust me. I no longer feel welcome here, or that kinship I was searching for. well you're not better than anyone, everyone makes mistakes and has problems, none of you know my mom, and can judge her like that. I've enjoyed my time here...meeting a lot of you, but I simply find this community's rules too restrictive, and since I write what I feel, without regard to content (Is it sexist? Is it parental? Is it political? Is it, God forbid, all three??), this community will only end up stifling my originality, and I have no intentions of letting myself be censored in this way. Be happy with your commuinty of bitches, since you are the queen of them. this community would be much better if you didnt jump down every persons throat on almost every damn post. I hope all you fat cows die. I will never post here again. Die in a fire Suckers! http://springs1.0catch.com/goodbye.html |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:29 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'm with md on this one. Goodbye everyone, it's become clear that I can't post anything in this stupid forum without being the subject of ridicule and persecution without anyone even bothering to stop and wonder if they're being worse than the fluffies they pretend to despise. After the last few weeks or so of posts (and the often aggressively and needlessly snarky comment storm that accompanies several of them), I feel that I must leave this community. NONE OF YOU CAN READ HIGHER THAN A FOURTH-GRADE LEVEL! Since I'm a hacker, I swear to Goddess you people and your stupid forum will be down tonight and never come back. |
Author: | Mazer [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:46 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Goddamn I wish you guys were serious. But yeah, I'm out. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
My Glock is ready. Goodbye. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You have failed to see the point. Goodbye. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Actually, I was leaving with you... Goodbye. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
can - can I take their place as mods ? |
Author: | Amailer [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
weee party! however Goodbye everyone, I no longer feel welcome here, or that kinship I was searching for. Well I tried pleasing everyone and it's just waisting my time. this community would be much better if you didnt jump down every persons throat on almost every damn post. i'm out of here. i am not sad about it either. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Am I that repulsive? |
Author: | HeavenAgain [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Goodbye EVERYONE, You people all absolutely disgust me.!!!!1!1 I NO longer feel welcome here, or THAT KINSHIP I WAS SEARCHING for.!!1!!!1 Well I tried pleasing everyone and it's just WAISTING MY ******TIME.*****!1!1111! I'VE ENJOYED my TIME here...meeting!1111!!1!1!!11!! a LOT of ******YOU******** BUT I simply find ****THIS***** COMMUNITY'S RULES TOO restrictive, AND since I ****WRITE****** what I feel, without ****REGARD****** to content (Is IT SEXIST????!! IS ******IT***** parental??!!!! Is it POLITICAL??!?!?! IS IT, GOD forbid, all THREE??),??!!???!!?!?? THIS community will only end up STIFLING my originality, AND I have no INTENTIONS of letting MYSELF be censored in THIS way.!1!1!!!!! You don't feel CREATIVE???!!??!!? Are *******YOU******** FRIENDS changing??!!!??!?! MAYBE LIFE ******IS***** different.!1!!!!!! Maybe that's good.!111!!!1! Maybe ****YOU***** NEED to spend *****A***** FEW years alone.!!11! I hope ******YOU******** fall off ********YOU******* soap box ****SOMEDAY**** and bust *****YOU***** ASS.!!!1111! I am soooo outta here.!111!! I left highschool a long TIME ago i DON'T need TO be BACK there!!1!!11!1 Life SUCKS, GOOD bye crule WORLD!!1111!!! sorry i just have to let it all out, specially the soap box part |
Author: | md [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's almost like some people didn't even notice. How sad Though, good on amailer methinks! |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
yes. goodbye |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You have failed to miss the point also. You are the weakest link, goodbye. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Goodbye Mr.G Bye |
Author: | md [ Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:09 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'm bored; and I should sleep. Someone entertain me on IRC. OR ELSE! |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Wow Bhuto just died. Well that was expected. She was foolish to go back. |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
she didnt just die, she was assasinated... have some compassion. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Is there any hope for a democratic Pakistan now? I highly doubt it, but thats just me. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Fri Dec 28, 2007 8:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
yes she was killed but she knew waht she was getting into no? from teh day she got into pakistan there have been pll trying to kill her as for there being any hope well...... if the party keeps it ideals and taken in a new leader sure there maybe |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I believe the microeconomics of southern Asia and surrounding areas should be governed by one figurehead in order to keep the residents out of an inevitable economic depression due to western suppression of fossil fuels in Eastern Afghanistan. |
Author: | Dan [ Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CompWiz333 @ 2nd January 2008, 1:11 am wrote: I believe the microeconomics of southern Asia and surrounding areas should be governed by one figurehead in order to keep the residents out of an inevitable economic depression due to western suppression of fossil fuels in Eastern Afghanistan.
I am not shure if you are just trying to be funny or not but i think that is an exteramly bad idea for a number of reasons. 1. Figureheads don't govern, thats why they are figuerheads, i am assuming you mean some kind of asin uion like the eurpoean union. 2. The asain countrys are not in an inevitable economic depression, if anything they are going to go in to a boom cycle with countrys like chian turing more and more to a caplistic type system and the U.S. encomeny going down creating more room for them to move in. (Weather chain being more caplistic is good or not for things other then ecomnic reason is for another debate). 3. Assumning that such a depression was coming to the asiain countrys, a collective goverment whould not change anything at all for the postive, just having a bigger goverment (area wise) does not some how automaticly fix things. 4. Most asain countrys are doing trading with eurpe and north armarica, having free trade between asain countrys is not going to help much at all as there is litte imports or exports between them, also many of thess countrys are very agisted open borads so any befite that this could have is mostly negated. 5. World goverment is not a good idea (have you ever read 1984?), this whould be 2/3 of the way to having 3 magor governing bodys controling the world (european union, asain union and amaerian union) whoes goals whould be emonical and not social. This also desotrys all of the indepence of countrys and there clutercher making the hole world in to one big mealting pot of conformity. 6. If anything is going to be having a masive effect on fossil fuels it whould be iraq and not afghanistan as iraq has one of the bigest oil suplies in the world, all of witch realy is under US control. However the benfite this is giving the USA is deminsing every day as many other big oil producing contrys are coverting to the euro and the USA is burning billions just keeping the oil feilds in iraq. In fact one of the reasons why the US whent in to iraq was probly becues husain was going to covert to selling oil in the euros witch whould have totaly desotryed the US encomney (and ironcly going in to iraq has acomplisted this any way). So how does creating a wider area econmoic governing body help an area where the trade and imports is mostly to and from outside of that area? |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
every word in that sentance was 100% unadulterated satire. but great reply dan |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i just skimmed threw this, and wanted to be apart of this epic thread, my two cents would be, work sucks! |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
This thread is not epic yet. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
its quite the pointless and contentios thread, actually... and might i add something that has been on my chest for a long time: Paladin, PVP, melts faces! |
Author: | md [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
WoW sucks ass. Go suck a lemon! |
Author: | Dan [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CompWiz333 @ 7th January 2008, 8:15 pm wrote: and might i add something that has been on my chest for a long time: Paladin, PVP, melts faces! Althought i strongly dislike WoW i do blive that presits tradtionaly melt faces and not paladins. Not to say that one is better at PvP or not just that the conspect of face melting belongs to the shadow predsits like back stabing belongs to roges. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:24 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I object! Back stabbing belongs souly to assassins! I might also add that I too dislike WoW although I haven't played it, there are similiar games out there for free |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I believe there is a thread on the WoW forums that someone linked to, where virtually every single post was "Priests melt faces" This went on for roughly 80 pages. |
Author: | md [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You know what melts faces? Boiling water. Know what else? Sulfuric acid. Stick that in your pipe and OMGWTFBBQ A TREE! |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
And Grass! I hate rain in January. |
Author: | md [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
We still have lots of snow here despite three days of 8+ degree weather and rain. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
2 nights of rain and 4 1/2' of snow is now gone. |
Author: | HeavenAgain [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
global warming???!!! this is sad... it used to be cold all the way till Feb. and now in mid Jan is rainning.... sigh.... (lets take a deep moment here) maybe we should have a world-wide-no-computer-day or something |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You mean like this? Offtopic: Wow... I didn't realize that was from March... |
Author: | md [ Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:11 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Why would I shut down my computer? That's just silly! The real solution is to increase greenhouse gas output so that winter disappears entirely. Anyone who disagrees has clearly never lived in ottawa. |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:11 am wrote: Why would I shut down my computer? That's just silly!
The real solution is to increase greenhouse gas output so that winter disappears entirely. Anyone who disagrees has clearly never lived in ottawa. Or Northern Ontario... I now live in Niagara, and the amount of snow here is nil compared to back home in the Sault... its indeed an interesting question of whether this is, in fact due to greenhouse gas emissions, though. oh, again, in response to my previous post, which, again was complete garbagio, since i havent played WoW a day in my life but thanks for the comments regarding it. I was, indeed refering to the WoW message board thingy that went for like 80 pages. |
Author: | petree08 [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:12 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Greenhouse gases are caused by WoW. Them damm blood elves |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Wrong, Tauren, cow farts. |
Author: | md [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
STFU about WoW. No one cares, it's a horrible crappy game. Much more interesting is the fact that family guy is awesome. Also, I _really_ need to clean my room soon... it's getting hard to see the floor through the dirty laundry again |
Author: | Nick [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
haha md I know what you mean I cleaned my floor today cause I was tired of walking on clothes |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
NOTE: Spending lots of money on a special someone's birthday brings good results |
Author: | md [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yes... IRC demands an update! Hopefully you got her something nice to wear too |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
pix plz |
Author: | md [ Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
See, I was *going* to post that... but I figured better results would be had on IRC |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Really? Too bad, it's all over |
Author: | apomb [ Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
aawe thats to bad, well at least you had fun while it lasted, eh, Clayton |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
That's not what I meant... jeeze |
Author: | md [ Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I believe the correct spelling is "Geez". Geez. |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Since quotes seem to be broken: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=jeez |
Author: | md [ Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Pfft, your totally wrong. My gut tells me so. And the SQL errors are entirely your fault. |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I know they are, I already owned up to them in IRC: Wait... dammit! Why hasn't X-Chat been logging! NOoooooooooooooooooooooooOOOoooooooooOOOOoooOOoooOoOoo |
Author: | apomb [ Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
because you broke it |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
This thread is still going? I guess I'll just break the layout of this page. There, hope that does it. |
Author: | apomb [ Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? why? |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Looks like you both fail. Good luck with life, if you make it that far. |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'm going to break the layout! Edit by Clayton: That's getting really old. Just stop. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I broked it bigger! Before Freakman edited it. |
Author: | md [ Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:01 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I broke your mind. And then I did some very interesting things with computers and got OS X running! Alas... the hardware it's on isn't very good... though it should get better as soon as I invent a modicum of money in another SATA controller. |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I am, dun dun dun..... making you read this.... 3v3BGH <Click Here> what game is that? |
Author: | md [ Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:28 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
So, my current SATA controller died and in the process it trashed both my RAID5s taking out aproximately 900GB of data. I have al of the msot important bits backed up, at least until november... but some on the laptop as well. It seems that everything else survived just fine too thankfully. On the other hand, I am down 900GB. That's all of futurama and family guy and south park and Stargate and Stargate: Atlantis and House and Jericho and Invader Zim and about 15 other TV series. And aproximately 300 movies. And 14K songs. And uncounted ISOs for misc. software, like every version of windows (legic ISOs too) and OS X (not quite as legit) and many many games. Three years worth of data, carefully labeled and sorted. Gone. Damn I wish I had more beer. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ouch |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md, i feel for you. though, i had my laptop drive die, and that was only 3 MONTHS worth of data... id hate to think what kind of feeling it would be losing 900Gbs of data >.< |
Author: | md [ Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Really, it's not a huge issue as I can get most of the things I've lost again if I really want them. It ends up being a huge hassle (and it'll take a long time to download it all no matter what...). Oh, and it was actually closer to 1TB, a few GB short it seems. I have all my own pictures and documents and stuff backed up (last one was in november) and most of the things that are new since that backup were duplicated on my laptop. So I'll mostly be fine. Bad news: Lost stuff, had to spend money on a new controller, there may be more damage done to hte computer that I do not know about, temporary drop to ~150GB of total storage space. Good news: I can finally fix the damned RAID arrays so they are made of like sized drives. Very good for making them easy to manage and replace bad drives. I also get to forget about going through movies and music and deleting all the useless crap that has accumulated over the years. |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
hmm wanna hear what happened to me? Well as i was listening to music and stuff, i have a sharp-ish knife i was using to cut my steak which doesn't work well,.. --knife info-- its not jagged, its just a crappy flat blade.. i don't know what they're called. so i picked it up not paying attention, placed my left pointer finger on the top to cut my meat, and WHAHLAHH!!! knife upside down, awsome... Anyways @ MD, 900GB's, ouch.. Edit: add info about knife lol.. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
dam that coulda been close also... /me backs up data |
Author: | apomb [ Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
/me hears some eerie noise coming from his desktop... and quickly backs up his data... also, i need something to show my naive friend who is deadset that MS is the be-all and end-all of the computer world... i do not wish to make him a linux zealot, just that he loosen his grip on the notion that Microsoft rules the world. |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Tue Dec 12, 2006 3:24 am wrote: I threw a brick at my screen 'cause I got drunk and hi and my name is bob. got my name wrong! |
Author: | Dan [ Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CompWiz333 @ 25th January 2008, 6:08 pm wrote: also, i need something to show my naive friend who is deadset that MS is the be-all and end-all of the computer world... i do not wish to make him a linux zealot, just that he loosen his grip on the notion that Microsoft rules the world.
Well what whould imperss him? As far as i can tell most web servers and porbly the magority of servers in general (other then game ones) run a *nix based OS (unfronly i could not find any unbasied studys with some simple google searchs, so i could be wrong). Also linux is free and open score, that alone is enought reason for it to be imporenent. There is also the increased use of *nix based OSs as desktops, proof of this is in dell shiping some laptops with linux perintalled and apple computer witch uses a nix based operating system (OSX). There is also almost an open socre and free version of every common application that there is for windows. That means you can have a comple desktop that is complied from socre and compltey free and has all the functionality of a windows desktop and the applications that you whould pay $100s for on windows. Of corse it is hard to pysicaly show this to some one with out forcing them to install linux on there computer, and if they are a windows zealot i don't know if there is anything you can do. |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Just show them your decked out Linux install and rub it in their face |
Author: | apomb [ Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:38 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I actually showed him my linux install he asked "so do all the programs you buy for windows work on that?" i just laughed and explained that its open-source and everything... i found it hard to believe that him professing to be a computer enthusiast yet not ever having experienced linux. anyway, i need to remedy this failing harddrive but luckily all my media is on my other drive. so hopefully it will be a quick re-install. |
Author: | md [ Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
The thing is that most people have never heard of linux; they know mac and they know windows. They also know that the two are not compatible and you have to pay for either. Linux just doesn't even enter into their minds. Heck, I've shown people linux on my laptop and they always think it's just a theme of some kind. Lately it hasn't been as bad... but there are still a lot of clueless people out there. [edit] Oh! Updates! SATA controller is fine (though I now have a second one anyways) and the RAIDs have been remade; the data is still all gone. Fortunately highspeed internet means never having to stop downloading |
Author: | apomb [ Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Very nice, md ... as you know, im working on enlarging my storage capacity at the moment as well... and hve been working from my macbook for a while while my drives are being built and whatnot. Is your storage still 1Tb+? |
Author: | md [ Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
it's been decreased to 1.2T, as I changed the drive configuration. Right now I have a 4*320 RAID5 and a 2*250 RAID1. That allows me to replace the 250s with 320s when I get some spare money/run out of space. |
Author: | apomb [ Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
nice! i saw droolworthy 1TB Western Digital myBook that i was tempted to drop 399.99 on, but i need not an external drive, so i settled for the internal 320Gb Seagate |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Don't buy from Western Digital! There are rumors, that soon they won't allow you to transfer media files from the hard drive once they are there. Some crap to try and stop piracy. They have some sort of contract with the MIAA. This is a rumor of course. |
Author: | apomb [ Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:43 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
woah, well thanks for the heads up... so far, i have two seagates and one maxtor that is on the fritz... so im safe |
Author: | ericfourfour [ Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:59 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Do you have a link Mackie? If Western Digital did that, they would lose the anti-DRM consumers. I thought DRM was dying off anyway. |
Author: | md [ Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ericfourfour, it was on slashdot a month or more ago; and it's confirmed. If you copy media files to the drive they are only visible to that user; even if all files are set to be shared. |
Author: | ericfourfour [ Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I did a little searching and found this article: http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/12/western-digital.html and it has a link to the extensions it cannot share: http://wdc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wdc.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=1495. This is retarded. Why would they block ogg? |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
This is a feeble attack on piracy. It won't help, and Western Digital will only lose customers. Besides, there are ways around these things. Can you archive them and then transfer them? DRM is on it's way out. No matter what the MIAA/MPAA do. And what do they think we will fill up our 1TB hard drives with? Word document and spread sheets? |
Author: | ericfourfour [ Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
This is what I don't understand. The anti-DRM consumer is generally the type of consumer who buys HDDs individually. For the RIAA, the people who buy their CDs generally could care less about DRM. I don't think the files are blocked at the hardware level. I believe the article said you had to install a client application instead of samba. So you won't have to circumvent DRM if you don't install Western Digital's client. They just try to make it very clear that the client is required (which it isn't). By the way MIAA is not a media related organization. I think you mean either MAFIAA or RIAA. |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Oh wow I suck at acroynims . |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:30 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Quote: LOL is not a word, and nor is rofl. Though the ROFLCopter rocks!
http://onemorelevel.com/game/roflcopter WOOT!!!! |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
roflecopter is destroying North America, its causing kids to not pay attention. DO NOT POST LINKS TO EVIL GAMES |
Author: | michaelp [ Sun Feb 03, 2008 9:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I think this is my first post here, hi! And what about "lolerskates?" |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
What about them? The real question is why hasn't Cervantes showed up in the IRC channel in ages? |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Because a guy named Asimir raped him once and he'll never return. |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ill show you raep... |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
omg look out here comes the "raep"ing |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
how did my post come onto this page? it was at the bottom of page 28 before... |
Author: | md [ Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clearly you were wrong. Also, I demand more adventures! Preferably involving scantily clad women. |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Feb 06, 2008 4:24 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
indeed. these adventures sound fun. something that isnt fun is falling asleep at 11pm, waking up at 2am and not being able to get back to sleep... I have class at 830 as well... fuck ma life |
Author: | Nick [ Wed Feb 06, 2008 5:03 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
now you know how my life is (that happens to me almost everyday) I've learned to accept the fact and now go to bed earlier (around 7ish) that way I atleast get some sleep |
Author: | md [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Since this thread is hte 5th longest and the 9th most viewed I think a concerted effort to post more is required. I hereby challenge every user to post at least once in the next 24 hours. Double the points each time the number of posts you've made equals a power of two! |
Author: | Nick [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I am posting for the sake of md!!!! |
Author: | BigBear [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: Double the points each time the number of posts you've made equals a power of two!
Does this only apply to this thread? Anyway here is me fulfilling my requirement. |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
yes, this thread breaks all the rules of the board, and therefore this thread is much like that crazy one-dimensional thread that is supposed to be able to break through most of the universe... since this thread is also one-dimensional. My post count was a power of two not too long ago. |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I believe md meant only for this thread. Either way, I'm only 6 posts away from 2^11 posts. Do I win a prize? |
Author: | Nick [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
no... do I? |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yes. -1337 bits to be exact. |
Author: | md [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Prizes for everyone! Except clayton, 'cause he's 6 points off |
Author: | Nick [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
yea not only do I get a prize but I am anti 1337 I hate those 1337 noobs |
Author: | syntax_error [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
meh, hate a strong word; maybe you really like them thus why you hate them? you need them to enjoy; yourself. |
Author: | Nick [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
uhhhh yea let's go with that? or not! I can hate who I want and in a world without "1337" noobs I can finally get my coding done |
Author: | syntax_error [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
do not blame others, for your own downfall. |
Author: | Nick [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I am not I am only saying they are annoying |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
kepp up the personal flames! yeah. momop: your avatar looks like a rotten tomato if viewed quickly and with little regard for actual brain-function. |
Author: | Nick [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
you dislike Vincent!?!?!?! I have no friend named CompWiz333 |
Author: | Mackie [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Vincent is awesome. |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
never said i dont like it, i said it looks, if you are not paying attention to it, like a rotten tomato. its an optical illusion. thats all. lol i do not know who this vincent you are talking about is, however. |
Author: | Mackie [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
From Final Fantasy 7. |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Final what? |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Not every one is a Final Fantasy fanboy. |
Author: | Mackie [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I figured if i supplied him with a key word he could at least search it if he didn't know. I have almost never played Final Fantasy. |
Author: | ericfourfour [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I dislike Vincent the awesome rotten tomato from Final Fantasy 7 when I'm not paying attention. |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
On a slighty different note, ROFLCOPTER! |
Author: | Mackie [ Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
That's epic. |
Author: | apomb [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ericfourfour @ Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:25 pm wrote: I dislike Vincent the awesome rotten tomato from Final Fantasy 7 when I'm not paying attention.
how wonderfully eloquent |
Author: | md [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Final Fantasy sucks ass. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clearly wrong. Also, #idlerpg is friggin awesome! Best game I've ever played Thirdly, I think I need a new title... I'm thinking "Classhole". |
Author: | Mackie [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'm level 17 in #idlerpg. My Class is PooPooHead |
Author: | Nick [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
speaking of #idlerpg I've got a bone to pick with Dan... because of him and that game my x-chat broke |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i had a crappy valentines day |
Author: | Mackie [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Poor muffin. |
Author: | md [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Huzzah! Oh how I love my new title. It just fits so well... |
Author: | Mackie [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:34 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I agree. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 1:51 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I agree to disagree to agree to disagree with your agreement's disagreement. |
Author: | Mackie [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:13 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
My agreement doesn't have any disagreements. Duh! I'll let that obvious error go this time Clayton. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:21 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You obviously don't get it. You're cut. |
Author: | Mackie [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:24 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton, Clayton, Clayton... Stop making excuses. You know what you have done. |
Author: | apomb [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:38 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
whats my title? ah Kick ass Hacker, right on. |
Author: | BigBear [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I want to change my title |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Mackie @ Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:24 am wrote: Clayton, Clayton, Clayton... Stop making excuses. You know what you have done. Stop trying to pretend you're cool. |
Author: | md [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Only cool people like me who are hated equally by all get to have wicked awesome titles. That's why Clayton's got one too |
Author: | md [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
DP! Since I'm too lazy to click edit... My new cart is teh borked again When it's colder the -15 degrees the radio acts very very erratically until the car's warmed up. Big issue? No. Annoying as hell? YES! Under warranty so it damned well better get fixed for free? Of course! Thusly I am very very happy I bought myself a new car instead of a used car. There's nothing quite like a factory warranty to make things better ('Course having to take my car in means I can't drive it... so I'll drive my parents new Smart car instead ) |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:48 pm wrote: Only cool people like me who are hated equally by all get to have wicked awesome titles.
That's why Clayton's got one too I'm glad someone else noticed |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I claim "Super Paper Programmer" as my title so until I am an old enough member of compsci I demand no one take that title or else there will be hell to pay |
Author: | BigBear [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
So it depends on age (posts I am guessing) Well how old do I have to be until they call me igbear! Nah! Who would want a silly title like that. Just kidding Tony. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 5:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You guys are missing the point... |
Author: | md [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
What's different between those with titles and those without... hmm... I wonder... |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
well nothing is diffrent because of the title but they the is diffrent because of the people pretty much if you have a custom title... chances are you're a veteran member |
Author: | md [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's almost like they don't pay any attention at all... I guess I'll just go delete their posts. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Sounds like a good idea, can I help? |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
gimme mod abilities I got some spare time |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's really not as exciting as you think. |
Author: | md [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Heck, I think I've moved or locked one post this month and that's it. Maybe if I was a turing mod I'd have a more interesting life... as is I just need to keep shooting for setting records with this thread. |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: as is I just need to keep shooting for setting records with this thread.
that's why I keep responding to you guys when I clearly have no useful input |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
*insert pointless, contentious crud here* |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
momop @ Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:39 pm wrote: md wrote: as is I just need to keep shooting for setting records with this thread.
that's why I keep responding to you guys when I clearly have no useful input Have you ever? |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
why there was that one time I - oh no wait that was pretty useless... |
Author: | apomb [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:20 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
damn too many posts, i leave the thread for a couple hours and im not even on the page anymore!! |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:26 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yeah, you got owned. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton @ Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:54 pm wrote: momop @ Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:39 pm wrote: md wrote: as is I just need to keep shooting for setting records with this thread.
that's why I keep responding to you guys when I clearly have no useful input Have you ever? Clayton is the coolest person alive. High five! |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:35 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Man porn == cool. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:42 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
StealthArcher, you're slightly cooler now. momop... just get out. |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:44 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
you're using mod powers for evil proof : Quote: StealthArcher, you're slightly cooler now.
SA isn't cool!!!! |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:15 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Heh, StealthAcrcher != cool. By any extent of the imagination. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:54 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Say the people that have been here for only a few months at most :O |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:01 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Say's the person who is never in IRC. :O |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:29 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Says gradient boy. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Mackie @ Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:01 am wrote: Say's the person who is never in IRC. :O
I do believe I have spent far more time than you have in IRC. Also, I tend to spend some time away from the computer during the week. Plus, it's full of people like you talking about nonsense all the time. It's rather unappealing for me to be in there anyways. |
Author: | md [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
/me vouches for clayton's time spent idling on IRC. Besides, he's in other channels on other servers. And I've spent more time on IRC then anyone else. So no complaining. |
Author: | ericfourfour [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 1:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
This forum argument over "who spends more time on IRC" seems very similar to the real world argument over "who has the biggest balls". Am i correct in saying: IRC time = ball size? |
Author: | md [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
No, ball size == ball size; I win there too |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Let's not even go there. |
Author: | md [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Why not? You must admit that it's both pointless AND contentious. Also, Across The Universe is an awesome movie, provided you watch it with the one you love. Otherwise it just plays with your emotions. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's also non-PG EDIT: And where's my points for having 2^11 posts?! |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 5:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
But 2^56 of them were idiotic and and meaningless. |
Author: | ericfourfour [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 6:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I wonder if 2^32 + 1 posts will break anything. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 6:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I dunno. I think it's the same thing with bits. If I add 9999999999999999999999999999999999999 bits to your total, I believe that you just have a total of 2^32 bits. |
Author: | md [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
/me gives clayton 6000 points. Just don't spend them all in one place... however one spends points. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Actually, you technically have 2^11.21613955642513461832275382119 posts. Hence, you can have 6001 points. Go You. |
Author: | md [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I actually have way more posts then that methinks; but I can't search for them since apparently searching for users with two letter names doesn't work |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Aye, me too. Give yourself a cooler name then, one that contains more than 2 characters. EDIT: As a note: 2420 posts. |
Author: | md [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
No can do; it's impossible a) for me to change my own nick and b) to find one cooler |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
sure ya can: Nick |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
What was wrong with cornflake? |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
cornflake? |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Unless things have changed, you can change your name in the shop for 100 bits. EDIT: Damn! Seems things have gone awry and the shop no longer exists. We must speak to Dan about this. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
momop @ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:25 pm wrote: cornflake?
You weren't here a few years ago |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Neither were you. |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I wanna change my name for 100 bits! |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton @ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:30 pm wrote: Neither were you.
Actually I was, I just never signed up. |
Author: | md [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
there's nothing wrong with it, I simply prefer md. Actually I prefer md over minor_deity, which I prefer over God, which I prefer over cornflake. All four I use as pseudonyms online. And anyone who spend the last three or more years idling on IRC would know that |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I knew the minor_deity (idlerpg ) never seen you use God though and I saw refrences to cornflake on older posts |
Author: | apomb [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i want mine to be apomb... and ive been here friggin looong... almost 5 years |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Whine at Dan. He might do it for you. Or Tony, he's cool too. |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I don't know if whining is a good idea but ask for it (whining may lead to a nEWB cAKE title) |
Author: | md [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
IIRC both are away for the next week; making me the man in charge (Muahaha). Also, DO NOT LEAVE LAPTOPS IN CARS OVERNIGHT. Not only do you run the miniscule risk of them being stolen, but this time of year it gets cold. Apparently cold enough to either stop batteries from working, or I dunno what; but the CMOS got wiped. Not a major issue... except I have to hack it in order to use my wifi, and now I have to either disassemble it or find another way of hacking it again. [edit] Huzzah! Fixed! |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 11:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
._. I think I'll keep that in mind. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 11:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I was internetless for one week, and BAM! This thread hits 35 pages. Anyway, way would you leave your laptop in your car overnight? |
Author: | md [ Sun Feb 17, 2008 11:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
it was in my bag; which I left in my car during work and forgot to take in when I got home. Leaving things in my car for work is always a good idea since I park in a fenced compound in the summer; and right by the door where everybody walks by and watches in the winter. I think the problem may have been the -25 (or colder) temperature. |
Author: | rdrake [ Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:25 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Recently overheard in the channel: The Channel wrote: <apomb> why is compsci down?
<md> no idea <rdrake> Not for I. <md> it's not is why <md> http://compsci.ca/v3/viewtopic.php?t=14446&start=510 <md> spam it! <md> for the love of god! |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
HAHA and HOW |
Author: | md [ Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:32 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I think that this thread is going places! Well, not really; but at least it's the second most replied to thread on CS.ca. We only need to *double* it's size to reach spot #1. |
Author: | rdrake [ Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:48 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
What's the top thread? That "the person above me" one? |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:40 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
check for yourself http://compsci.ca/v3/statistics.php |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Jan 2004 saw the most activity! wow... |
Author: | BigBear [ Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Neat to see how many people join in January at end of semester. I am one of them. |
Author: | Nick [ Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:42 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Quote: What's the best gaming console ever? now manny people will kill me for saying this but PS2 was unmatched for it's time, when it first came out nothing was as great as PS2, everyone had one, it was the console to have. now PS3 apprently made some mistakes (I don't really pay attention to it) but that doesn't mean PS2 (or PS1 for that matter) should be looked down upon, it's like saying Windows sucks because Windows ME, no Windows sucks because it's Windows.
The PS2 had everything, top of the line first person shooters, the best RPG's I've ever seen, new and exciting gameplay, the first console to have onlin play. Let's face it, it was revulutionary. If you think I'm wrong please post your suggestion but remember things like "XBOX360 owns cause it has Halo3 zowg look at the graphics!" don't count casu graphics shouldn't matter as much as the gameplay and Halo 3 is only one game and Halo 2 was better so please think about stupid stuff like that before you argue. |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:02 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
momop, are you trying to fake trying not to be stupid? because its working... my vote without basis is the PC is the best gaming console. oh and saying PS2 is the best, even today because "it was good for its time" is bullshit. the 360 IS better than the PS2 because of the number of games, read: The Orange Box, Call of Duty 4, Halo series etc. |
Author: | BigBear [ Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I have to admit I brought the original Xbox and always thought PS 2 was stupid. However it had many great games and separate software was available like a browser. Unlike the original Xbox PS 2 had guitar hero and DDR and new games are still being made for it. The original Xbox was dead when the 360 came out. I love the Halo series and love Xbox live but I truly believe PS 2 was the best console. The only flaw I find with the console is the weird controller configuration ; the two joy sticks are beside each other and lower the xbox controller is the best made controller because it fits all hands not just little kids hands like the Game Cube. My two cents. |
Author: | ericfourfour [ Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
BigBear @ Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:08 pm wrote: The only flaw I find with the console is the weird controller configuration ; the two joy sticks are beside each other and lower the xbox controller is the best made controller because it fits all hands not just little kids hands like the Game Cube.
My two cents. One of the flaws I find with the X-Box console is the weird controller configuration. The two joy sticks are asymmetric requiring extra coordination. It is big and doesn't fit all hands: the smaller the hand, the more difficult to use. The PS2 controller follows a symmetrical design minimizing the learning curve for everyone. It is also small and can, therefore, fit smaller hands. People with big hands might have more difficulty using it though. |
Author: | BigBear [ Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
OK I understand but I still think it is just more comfortable but yes I agree. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Prefer ps2 over everything because of the metal gear solid series, naughty dog games like jak2, insomniac games like ratchet and clank, most games by squareenix, god of war and resident evil 4. Ps2 still has one of the best library of games for consoles. Apparently the ps2 is currently out selling the 360 and the ps3. Ps3 is too dam expensive for me and I prefer the wii. But I really want MGS4. I love the series. EDIT: Speaking of consoles, HD DVD lost the format war. Does this mean that the 360 is obsolete? |
Author: | BigBear [ Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Interesting.. I don't know any one who used ti for HD DVD's but people will still use it for DVD's So no I don't think it will be obsolete but maybe less popular. |
Author: | rdrake [ Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CodeMonkey2000 @ Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:24 pm wrote: EDIT: Speaking of consoles, HD DVD lost the format war. Does this mean that the 360 is obsolete? I hate to break it to you, but the 360 only has a HD DVD drive as an add-on only. It comes with a regular DVD drive and no, it is not obsolete. |
Author: | BigBear [ Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I agree. |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
me too! |
Author: | md [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:01 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
BD is probably going to be short lived too; DVDs lasted how long? 10 years? 15? With any luck internet connection speeds will greatly increase over the next few years; negating the need to have a "disk" at all. |
Author: | Mackie [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:07 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i like disks |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 3:06 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
you WOULD like DIsKS ... to soon? I like the internets myself |
Author: | BigBear [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
PS 3 talked about only selling games from their console and downloading them from the internet. I believe internet speed will increase and the time it takes will not an issue. But what about people without internet or dial-up. Also people like me who have minimal internet usage like 2 gigabytes will not want to pay extra fees for games. I see virtual games being very popular in the future like Roms. But I enjoy seeing collections of physical CD's etc. It also makes games less personal; I can hold my Cronno Trigger cartridge my Dad gave me when I was little or the marks where I tried to take the silly sticker off. etc. |
Author: | md [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
People without good internet connectivity are very quickly becoming have-nots. It's a sad fact of life that there are different classes of people; but then no one ever said life was fair. |
Author: | BigBear [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
On that note I think who ever has a different title you just edit the wiki page on ranks. http://wiki.compsci.ca/index.php?title=Ranks |
Author: | md [ Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I would, but I am lazy. |
Author: | BigBear [ Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Why not everyone is doing it. Actually a kid in my class handed in a assignment and my teacher asked him why random words were underlined and he didn't know. The next day my teacher figured out the entire project was copied from wikipedia and the underlined words were links. He told him to redo the project because he clearly plagerised but he told my teacher he wrote it on the wikipedia page so it was his words he copied. reluctancy he accepted it. Sounds like a back door to a lot of projects though I don't suggest it. |
Author: | md [ Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
That case could actually be verified. It's also highly unlikely for an entire project to be a single page on wikipedia. Furthermore if the student claimed not to know why words were underlined then he is attempting to show that he doesn't know anything about the internet; a far cry from someone who is writing wikipedia articles. Were I the teacher I'd have given him a 0, and possibly booted him from the class. The problem is that many things which are fair use are called "plagiarism". There are also only so many ways to say some things, all of which are likely to have been used before. The end result is that it's getting harder and harder to write a unique piece of work, or even write something taking advantage of fair use/dealings and not get branded with plagiarism. |
Author: | BigBear [ Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I agree because by not knowing why words were underlined sort of implies that he didn't want the teacher to know he copied it. Someone could simply copy an older wiki page from History and it would be harder to find. His source for his work was another link with 4 sentences on the topic. Guess what I discovered when changing the color of text you can right whatever you want including light and dark neat.LIKE THIS Dark orange |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Feb 26, 2008 6:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I have an interview for a summer programming position at the Ontario Lottery Corporation, is this awesome!? Y/N |
Author: | syntax_error [ Tue Feb 26, 2008 6:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
well depends... what are you going to do for them? .. and how much can you help us out =P |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Feb 26, 2008 6:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Position Summary: Under the direction of an Architecture Technical Specialist, the Technology Assistant will gain experience in system architecture of enterprise software and/or hardware. As the Technology Assistant you will help evaluate and determine how information technology can help the enterprise achieve a competitive edge and reduce costs. Technology areas may include; Platform, Network, Security, Software Application and Information Management. This position will also assist with research, defining processes, testing & analysis as well as administrative tasks and data collection activities. Major Responsibilities: - Assist with the review of vendors and related technologies to support architectural decisions and standards. - Work on projects relating to hardware and software deployment, network infrastructure and database management systems. - Assist in defining procedures and policies relating to new technology standards. - Produce technical documentation, reports and diagrams. - Complete hardware/software research, testing and configuration. - Complete daily administration tasks. - Assist with maintenance of a lab environment. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Tue Feb 26, 2008 6:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
seems kool like a think tank; type person job -- if that makes sense. |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:43 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
interview went swimmingly, details to come! |
Author: | apomb [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
in order to bump this, i say, let the contentiousness continue with a question: how does compsci like their steak? me: Medium-Medium Rare |
Author: | Ultrahex [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Well Done, personally... but i am gonna change what you said... every person that posts has to answer a question from the previous poster . What is your favorite desert? |
Author: | technograff [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Mm, Ice Cream, it be delicious. What is your favourite sport? |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Football, and not the chunk of crap with a monochromatic ball that somehow through it's retardation thought itself worthy of the name. Why is the wold round? ._. [edit by md] You sir are hurting my mind. I think maybe you should marinate your eyes in vinegar. Then BBQ them to a nice medium-rare and serve with rice and/or potatoes. Also, you all suck! Err... hi. |
Author: | michaelp [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I like baseball. I'm a pitcher. :O |
Author: | apomb [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
and your question? |
Author: | michaelp [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Who else likes baseball? |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
drinking... and stuff Yes... it is a sport, i do it for fun, recreational, so... whats good? |
Author: | michaelp [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Let me answer your question with a question: What isn't good? |
Author: | technograff [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
My score on the CCC. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
StealthArcher @ Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:21 pm wrote: Football, and not the chunk of crap with a monochromatic ball that somehow through it's retardation thought itself worthy of the name.
Why is the wold round? ._. [edit by md] You sir are hurting my mind. I think maybe you should marinate your eyes in vinegar. Then BBQ them to a nice medium-rare and serve with rice and/or potatoes. Also, you all suck! Err... hi. It's supposed to md, the making of sense, verily none, is one of the finest points of contenbtion in the world, theres also religion. And personally I'd go with fried potatoes. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Mar 02, 2008 4:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
This reminds me an awful lot of the Person Above me Thread |
Author: | md [ Sun Mar 02, 2008 5:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I have returned from the land of the South! IT was warm and sunny and almost free of snow (and noticeably not free of my GF). Now I am back in the land of the North, where there is lots of snow (and a distinct lack of my GF). I wish I didn't have to come home. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
why not live in teh SOuth? |
Author: | md [ Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:51 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
a) lack of funds and b) the school of my (current) choice happens to be north c) my employer who pays be ridiculous amounts for the work that I do is here d) by clients (consulting) who also pay be, but not as ridiculously are here. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:08 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
methinks you need to learn where the 'm' key is on your keyboard md. |
Author: | md [ Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:57 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I do? Where are my mistakes? It's worth pointing out that I wrote that post just after getting out of bed... methinks you need a haircut. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Mar 03, 2008 4:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Sun Mar 02, 2008 5:38 pm wrote: I have returned from the land of the South! IT was warm and sunny and almost free of snow (and noticeably not free of my GF).
Now I am back in the land of the North, where there is lots of snow (and a distinct lack of my GF). I wish I didn't have to come home. I have the exact opposite set of circumstances... i am back SOUTH and am loving this mild, sunny weather. i was in the land of the north for reading week |
Author: | TokenHerbz [ Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I always type me as my... Anyways.. I like the crisp cold fresh air of bugles environment... Summers nice too though, but i think its win win where i live... Anyways its 1am, and i work at 7am... I for-tell and awful problem come morning... NIGHT! |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: I do? Where are my mistakes? It's worth pointing out that I wrote that post just after getting out of bed...
methinks you need a haircut. md @ Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:51 am wrote: a) lack of funds and b) the school of my (current) choice happens to be north c) my employer who pays be ridiculous amounts for the work that I do is here d) by clients (consulting) who also pay be, but not as ridiculously are here.
See? And why do I need a haircut now? |
Author: | md [ Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:24 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Ahh, right right. And you obviously need a haircut... 'cause it'll soon be spring. And 'cause bob's your uncle. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Well you've got me there. Damn you sir. |
Author: | md [ Sun Mar 09, 2008 4:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I _HATE_ shoveling snow. Someone invent a snow melter! |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Mar 09, 2008 4:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
it's called fire like it? I open sourced it |
Author: | syntax_error [ Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
even better DNT |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yeah, I had to shovel my entire drive way. It took me all day, and I'm still not done. The snow was nearly waste deep, and the snow banks are bigger than me. This was a bad year. Oh well this week is going to be around 6-10 degrees. |
Author: | md [ Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Fire does indeed work for melting snow, unfortunately is also sets plants, fences, buildings and cars alight at the same time. All acts that I would rather avoid. |
Author: | Nick [ Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:29 pm wrote: Fire does indeed work for melting snow, unfortunately is also sets plants, fences, buildings and cars alight at the same time. All acts that I would rather avoid.
you hafta take a risk sometime |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
one risk i dont want to take is letting this thread die. |
Author: | Nick [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
indeed!! post people post! |
Author: | Mackie [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I hate when people say 'Indeed'. |
Author: | A.J [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I don't think you should ever go to England, Mackie |
Author: | Nick [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I indeed say indeed quite a bit I do say indeedily... sorry Mackie |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
oh, wow... rotten tomato, you need to calm down |
Author: | Nick [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
what's wrong with rotten tomatoes? |
Author: | Mackie [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
They're gross. |
Author: | md [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
you know... at one point this thread was going places now... pc++ |
Author: | Nick [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I have no idea what you're talking about md what is this pc++ and before you say JFGI http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=pc%2B%2B&btnG=Google+Search&meta= |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
lol sage++ I think thats a subliminal message by md? |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
momop just when I thought that this topic couldn't get any stupider.............. |
Author: | rdrake [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
momop @ Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:59 pm wrote: I have no idea what you're talking about md what is this pc++ and before you say JFGI
I would imagine he's saying Post Count++, but hey, maybe I'm crazy. Another valid answer would be incrementing the program counter.http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=pc%2B%2B&btnG=Google+Search&meta= |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
That's a terrible lie rdrake. On another note, more snow! |
Author: | md [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I hate snow. But at least we're that much closer to the record (at least here in ottawa). |
Author: | md [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
DP! pc == post count pc++! |
Author: | Nick [ Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:53 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
this is an off topic thread where posts do not add to post count so why would someone spam here for pc? I'm spamming for the sake of this thread's record beating ability |
Author: | md [ Fri Mar 14, 2008 10:22 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Because eventually dan will bow to our superior logic and give in to my demands that posts in off topic be counted towards post counts. That or another update will get them counted. |
Author: | Nick [ Fri Mar 14, 2008 10:53 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
on a side note does my pic look fuzzy? it looks fuzzy to me anyways I do understand what Dan is saying when he says off topic does not nessacarialy relate to comp sci however... I want more posts! |
Author: | Mackie [ Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:41 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It only looks fuzzy because the white part is gone now. That added more contrast. |
Author: | apomb [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 11:51 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
how would an update get them counted? |
Author: | rdrake [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 12:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CompWiz333 @ Sat Mar 15, 2008 11:51 am wrote: how would an update get them counted? Dan did it before... he accidentally synchronized the post count. |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 12:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'd have 605 well 606 posts if that happened... sweet |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Sigh... Spammers, you should all be ashamed. I'm pretty sure this is my first post in this topic? |
Author: | Mackie [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
As long as they don't count it's ok. |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Alright, alright, first post since 2006 anyway. Didn't realize this topic had been around that long. |
Author: | md [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's apparently hard to get a) a good discussion going and b) have it last >40 pages. [edit] Also, welcome back! |
Author: | apomb [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i think i started talking in this thread about a year or so ago... |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
so how about some more topic ideas for this thread? |
Author: | Mackie [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Crazy hats? Popcorn flavoring? Clogged Toilets? |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
what's with you and crazy hats and popcorn flavors? |
Author: | Mackie [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
There hobbies. |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
what do you do? eat flavored popcorn while clogging toilets and wearing crazy hats? |
Author: | Mackie [ Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
That's ridiculous! I unclog toilets. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:56 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md, when you look around carerfully at the people you are trying to have a (relatively) intelligent conversation with, you really can't wonder why it's not working (myself not included). |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:41 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
/me is not included either... right? RIGHT!? |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Mackie @ Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:25 pm wrote: There hobbies.
oh and its "they're" |
Author: | nastynika [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CompWiz333 @ Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:41 am wrote: Mackie @ Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:25 pm wrote: There hobbies.
oh and its "they're" u suppose to be an english teacher or something j/k no offence man |
Author: | md [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:49 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton I agree. News! I'm thinking of starting a hosting business! |
Author: | rdrake [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CompWiz333 @ Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:41 am wrote: Mackie @ Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:25 pm wrote: There hobbies.
oh and its "they're" |
Author: | Nick [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md some details? |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I hear hosting costs lots of money. For all the bandwidth, and stuff. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Just like anything else, that would completely depend on the activity on the server. EDIT: Question: Are you going to buy a new server to use (assuming this gets off of the ground), or are you going to use your current workstation as the server and use an older computer as a workstation? |
Author: | md [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton @ 2008-03-17, 3:16 pm wrote: Just like anything else, that would completely depend on the activity on the server.
EDIT: Question: Are you going to buy a new server to use (assuming this gets off of the ground), or are you going to use your current workstation as the server and use an older computer as a workstation? I would buy one or more new servers to be hosted in a data-center somewhere, Windsor is looking nice at the moment. The business plan would be built around offering virtual servers (user mode linux), with cost based upon actual usage. Right now I'm in the development/feasibility study phase. As soon as I get a working model I'll do some private testing on my workstation for selected individuals, and if that turns out ok then I may get a 1U server and get it up and running. Rates would probably be a bit higher then the equivalent host in the states due to higher costs in Canada, however that should be more then offset by the benefit of hosting in Canada where there aren't insane laws like the DMCA. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
So this will not affect any existing accounts at in any negative manner? |
Author: | A.J [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'm going to start a quoting competition: the person who quotes the longest chain of quotes wins For example: rdrake wrote: CompWiz333 @ Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:41 am wrote: Mackie @ Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:25 pm wrote: There hobbies.
oh and its "they're" is a chain of 3 have fun guys:D |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
absolutely not, besides, the staff are currently winning with a chain of ~200 |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I have a head-ache. I blame this awful thread. |
Author: | md [ Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton, I do not know what you are talking about. I certainly do not allow others to use my workstation... no... not at all. /me gets out his axe |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 1:03 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md sounds like a good idea! we need more Canadian hosting... stupid DMCA @quote competition that's a horrible idea |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I hate the "Most CompSci.ca members cannot post here." thread. It's in my face laughing at me every time I log in. |
Author: | A.J [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
sry CodeMonkey2000, but i gave him the idea........ I feel so guilty, will you please forgive me |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
you gave him the idea? I think my Mackie can't post thread is what brought original ideas |
Author: | A.J [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
no...if you look in that thread you'll find the post that said: Quote: Mackie, they probably start a new topic in the VIP: "Most of compsci.ca users can't post here!" |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
but you got the idea from me so technacally it's my oriinal inspiration |
Author: | A.J [ Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
no..I just humored you |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:34 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
well if posts in offtopic counted, i would DEFINITELY be able to post there... ive been here for almost 5 years, that should count for somethign |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
rdrake @ Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:49 am wrote: CompWiz333 @ Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:41 am wrote: Mackie @ Sat Mar 15, 2008 10:25 pm wrote: There hobbies.
oh and its "they're" son of a... how could i have missed that!? haha nice one rdrake. |
Author: | Nick [ Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CompWiz333 @ Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:34 am wrote: well if posts in offtopic counted, i would DEFINITELY be able to post there...
no you wouldn't |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:50 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
dont sass me, you rotten tomato... prove it to me |
Author: | Nick [ Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:00 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
http://compsci.ca/v3/search.php?search_author=CompWiz333&showresults=posts note the total results |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CodeMonkey2000 @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:02 pm wrote: I hate the "Most CompSci.ca members cannot post here." thread. It's in my face laughing at me every time I log in.
Yes, well, it's humoring us that can post there, is that such a bad thing? |
Author: | nastynika [ Wed Mar 19, 2008 8:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton @ Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:40 am wrote: CodeMonkey2000 @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:02 pm wrote: I hate the "Most CompSci.ca members cannot post here." thread. It's in my face laughing at me every time I log in.
Yes, well, it's humoring us that can post there, is that such a bad thing? Not for u guys it is fun for u but for those of us that dont have the expirence it drags us down and is insulting |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
In utterance of moles. I state the truth and Legacy. Of Pythons and Bosses. Yes. If anyone cant get it, I just finished playing MGS3 yesterday. |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
nastynika @ Wed Mar 19, 2008 8:23 am wrote: Clayton @ Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:40 am wrote: CodeMonkey2000 @ Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:02 pm wrote: I hate the "Most CompSci.ca members cannot post here." thread. It's in my face laughing at me every time I log in.
Yes, well, it's humoring us that can post there, is that such a bad thing? Not for u guys it is fun for u but for those of us that dont have the expirence it drags us down and is insulting So post more? |
Author: | Sean [ Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Do what Clayton does, fill this thread with +1 post count post! And, you won't be mocking all of us soon! But still, the thread is hilarious, it gets me worked up to actually post now these days. |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
nick @ Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:00 am wrote: http://compsci.ca/v3/search.php?search_author=CompWiz333&showresults=posts
note the total results you have a point... i thought it didnt count multipul posts per thread though... ohwell |
Author: | jernst [ Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Sean @ Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:34 pm wrote: Do what Clayton does, fill this thread with +1 post count post!
And, you won't be mocking all of us soon! But still, the thread is hilarious, it gets me worked up to actually post now these days. I don't really have anything constructive to say, but this looks like an opportunity to increase my post count haha |
Author: | nastynika [ Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
alright well i geuss its time to start posting more lol any one have any reccomendations for new Xbox 360 games? |
Author: | jernst [ Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
nastynika @ Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:54 am wrote: alright well i geuss its time to start posting more lol
any one have any reccomendations for new Xbox 360 games? I don't have a 360 so I don't know if this game is good on 360, but i would recommend team fortress 2. I have it for pc and its great. Been hooked on it since it came out a few months ago. |
Author: | nastynika [ Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
jernst @ Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:56 am wrote: nastynika @ Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:54 am wrote: alright well i geuss its time to start posting more lol
any one have any reccomendations for new Xbox 360 games? I don't have a 360 so I don't know if this game is good on 360, but i would recommend team fortress 2. I have it for pc and its great. Been hooked on it since it came out a few months ago. looks good thanx |
Author: | nastynika [ Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
hey clayton these scrolls of a thousand posts sound interesting how do u get one |
Author: | md [ Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:46 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
This thread is going places! Probably strait to hell. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:48 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
So after 50 pages will this thread get locked? You know from the overflow of spam. |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Thu Mar 20, 2008 12:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
One can only hope... |
Author: | md [ Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Of course not. And we're more then half-way the record anyways! Tacos! |
Author: | Sean [ Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
nastynika @ Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:54 am wrote: alright well i geuss its time to start posting more lol
any one have any reccomendations for new Xbox 360 games? Hmm, well since I don't know what you've played, and the fact that I don't have a Xbox 360, but have heard some rumours and played them at a friends, but I still have a list: - Assassin's Creed - Bioshock (I've got this on PC Version) - Gears of War - Call of Duty 4 - Devil May Cry 4 - Mass Effect |
Author: | nastynika [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Sean @ Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:34 pm wrote: nastynika @ Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:54 am wrote: alright well i geuss its time to start posting more lol
any one have any reccomendations for new Xbox 360 games? Hmm, well since I don't know what you've played, and the fact that I don't have a Xbox 360, but have heard some rumours and played them at a friends, but I still have a list: - Assassin's Creed - Bioshock (I've got this on PC Version) - Gears of War - Call of Duty 4 - Devil May Cry 4 - Mass Effect all good suggestions havent played devil may cry 4 yet i think i am off to go get it lol |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:28 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Can someone please merge the Zombie Juses day thread with this? |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:55 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
No. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:06 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Can someone, send us a Wootbeer case. Full of Pain, and End. Mabye some Fury and Fear, and Joy, meh. |
Author: | md [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
There need to be more zobie celebrities. Also, did anyone else remark that if the Killer Bunny from Monty Python's Quest for the Holy Grail was actually responsible for jesus' death, then the whole zombie thing suddenly makes a whole lot more sense. As does Easter + bunnies. |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Thats one awesome stretch of the imagination md. not too far, and just relevant enough to be funny. It does make sense. |
Author: | nastynika [ Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
aww yes Monty Python's Quest for the Holy Grail good movie |
Author: | BigBear [ Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
So anyone play COD 4 online? |
Author: | Nick [ Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I do for the PS3 |
Author: | BigBear [ Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
OK do u think the sniper kills are some what silly because if you watch the kill cam they are not aimed on you? |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Idlerpg! |
Author: | md [ Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Play on afternet, Play on Freenode, Play on Slashdot! Also, you know what tomorrow is. Do the forums proud and get pictures. |
Author: | nastynika [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
BigBear @ Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:43 pm wrote: So anyone play COD 4 online?
yea i have it for 360 and online is alot of fun i enjoy being able to upgrade your weapons |
Author: | Doug101 [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
im bored does anyone here play crysis |
Author: | Doug101 [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
you should its fun |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:07 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Has anyone else noticed the distinct lack of April Fools jokes on /. and Ars. I haven't checked anywhere else... but it's getting disturbing. I'm concerned that maybe April Fools was canceled! |
Author: | BigBear [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
April fools will always be around even if you are not involved in pranks. Someone should have made it an event with reply about previous pranks and stories. The first prank april fools did was create to day 1's in a row (class order depends if the number of the month is even or odd) Also at my school the administration gave parking notices about new stupid rules. However the first character of each line spelled "april fools" There were some announcements about teachers in beauty pageants and one kid placed a cell phone in the desk of another and called it getting him sent to the office but was told the joke before he got there. It is always fun to go around your house adjusting several things like turing the lid of the juice jug side ways, changing all the remotes to like AUX and putting in dead batteries, unplugging one phone, moving the toilets nossle to fill up the back tank to spray people when they flush. Well there are so many more but this is getting to be a rather heavy post. |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
xkcd, questionable content and dinosaur comics all switched places! haha |
Author: | A.J [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
yeah, I noticed that too |
Author: | btiffin [ Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
http://www.google.com/virgle/index.html |
Author: | Nick [ Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:29 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
heh my teacher showed me that, my favourite part is the open source world |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
blah |
Author: | Nick [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 1:51 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
halb |
Author: | jernst [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
b l a h |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:57 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
dfpel |
Author: | A.J [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
lepfd |
Author: | Mackie [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:28 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. | ||
|
Author: | Nick [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
speaking of watermelons, did you see that blimp in the ground? |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
This thread is hopeless... ...desperation being the ratio of hopeless posts to contentious posts. Note: no real calculations were done in the making of this post. |
Author: | A.J [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
bored........... |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Gandalf @ Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:40 pm wrote: This thread is hopeless...
...desperation being the ratio of hopeless posts to contentious posts. Note: no real calculations were done in the making of this post. Maybe. However, until other members that post in this thread are quick-witted enough to catch on to what's going on, then it's going to follow that trend. Otherwise, all will be well EDIT: [Gandalf]'s nick breaks the quote system. |
Author: | Mackie [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I hate people who want special treatment because they have children, I get that all the time at work. >.> Your not special! Tons of people have children! |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I have 3! I'm three times more special than Mackie |
Author: | apomb [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
FRIGGIN HECK HOLE i havent talked to any of you in a while ... ill let you gueess why |
Author: | md [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You got locked up for ******************? That's pretty nasty man... you shouldn't do things like that. I dislike having a snowbank that is STILL taller then me. Edit Dan: PG13 in off topic md...... |
Author: | MihaiG [ Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
really md? i thought he got locked up for ****************? hmm maybe i was wrong well, i think md may be right on this one, well who knows all the snow is tiny piles here, went biking in a tshirt and shorts yesterday it was warm |
Author: | md [ Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:36 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Right O, sorry dan. It's fairly nice here too - got up to 13 yesterday. But the snow is so hard packed and there is so much of it that it just can't melt fast enough. It would take weeks of +10 and solid rain for it to make a difference. |
Author: | apomb [ Sun Apr 06, 2008 4:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I havent seen a snowbank in a week and no, i havent been locked up for ... whatever it is you said |
Author: | md [ Sun Apr 06, 2008 4:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I said it was for ****** your ***** with a ***** in a ******* rubber ******** ***** ******** cat ****** ****** with ******* through ********* ******** *******. Which really aught to be legal. |
Author: | apomb [ Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I do believe you spelt "ought" wrong md. |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
man that's rough apomb, and md, it is legal as long as it's withouh a cat |
Author: | DaveAngus [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
What is the best game console ever? All of the early consoles were great because all of the games had fanominal game play. THey werent so focussed on who has the best graphics but were focused on the gameplay. BRING BACK THOSE GAMES!! hahah Who agrees with me/. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
The console war is so old, that it doesn't even need to be brought up. If you want to start yelling and screaming for 300+ pages about what console was the best over history, go to gamespot or something. Also, DaveAngus, could you please change your signature? It's rather distracting, and the general policy that only small images are appropriate in signatures here. |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You know what really sucks? I wrote an entire proof about airplanes and treadmills and seemingly no one took the time to read it and laugh their asses off! Next time I'll just call people idiots as per tradition instead if giving evidence of why they are wrong. |
Author: | Mackie [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I read it, i just didn't want to say something pointless, that doesn't add anything to the conversation. Good work though. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:04 pm wrote: Next time I'll just call people idiots as per tradition instead if giving evidence of why they are wrong.
I thought that's what was what we were supposed to do |
Author: | MihaiG [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
WWMDD? call everyone who doesn't agree with him an idiot very classy MD i applaud you |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Of course I'm classy. I'm a CLASSHOLE! |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'm sure you all noticed this long ago, but I just had a good laugh at the massive language war that Tony's blog article has become: http://compsci.ca/blog/if-a-programming-language-was-a-boat/#comments Nice article though, and with 171 responses too! Edit: Uh oh Tony, it seems like you've got the PHP programmers rallied against you! Quote: Since we are PHP Programmers, we cannot tolerate its insult. We find it a very good programming language, probably the finest. Damn other languages. ... DONT DARE INSULT PHP. |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's like no one even reads previously posted comments either! |
Author: | BigBear [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
/\ I agree. People + switching their names = me conused. At first I saw Nick's signature and thought ooo another clever small print however it was the same as... wait did Nick change his name or just his avatar. |
Author: | Mackie [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Momop, changed into nick, he also soon changed his avatar, and his rank. It was emo theme week for him. |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
how did he get that rank? |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
He bitched and complained until he got what he wanted. |
Author: | A.J [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I never expected such OUTRAGEOUS language from a mod such as you, Clayton |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Heh heh, how do you think Clayton got his position as moderator? |
Author: | Nick [ Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:21 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
lol actually Mackie asked dan if he could change it, I wasn't really consulted until dan was ready to cange it |
Author: | DaveAngus [ Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:08 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I threw a brick at my screen 'cause I got drunk and hi and my name is bob. True story. |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:55 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
seems like you're very intelligent and full of great ideas. True story. on the other hand, I got the job i was talking about around 6 pages ago... i found out about it a good 2 and a half weeks ago. I'm pretty stoked about working for the Ontario Lottery, helping develop new backend systems. |
Author: | md [ Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:41 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb, be sure to let us (and by us I mean me) know about all the flaws in hte number picking algorithms. Also, anything else I can use to increase my chances of winning. I promise to share my winnings with you when you quit |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i cant confirm nor deny my involvment with the actual algorithms, but meet me in ******** to discuss this issue more privately. i dont want to get fired before even starting. to decypher the *s, pm me dont actually pm me, this is all a joke |
Author: | nastynika [ Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
wow this thread has lasted awhile hurray for pointless and contentious on another note it seems holtsoft has gone under |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:32 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It hasn't lasted long enough though. We need more useless crap to be posted, get going! |
Author: | nastynika [ Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
well looks like we are losing a couple members becuz the the disgusting behaviour that is now part of this site made by other users and mods |
Author: | donkey [ Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i guess clayton has gone corrupt with his powers tony dan if u r reading this wut should we do even though they are mods we should not have to take this abuse |
Author: | md [ Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:33 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I feel the need to point out that only one person has said they are leaving, and furthermore the other people who could become mods were Clayton and I to leave were also behind it (not that it was right). Incidentally, a lot I'm thinking we need a poll. |
Author: | apomb [ Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
OH boy, im not a mod, im a user who believes in true freedom of speech and individualism, and even i dont think what has transpired indicates a need to sack any mods, come on people... if you think md is an asshole, just know that it is supposed to be funny, it isnt meant to piss you off. I learned early on that words on a forum are not worth getting truly upset over. Realise that this is
a computer programming forum not your answer key to hard questions not your parents kids around the same age |
Author: | DaveAngus [ Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
donkey @ Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:03 am wrote: i guess clayton has gone corrupt with his powers tony dan if u r reading this wut should we do even though they are mods we should not have to take this abuse
I am the one one who has said Im leaving. But i have also said that I will stay if we can all come to a collective agreement. They havent gone currupt. Their good dudes. Just had bad days. Needed to unleash their anger. It happens even to the best of us. I lost my cool too. Everyone needs to start fresh. |
Author: | md [ Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I would REALLY like you to start using paragraphs. There is nothing I dislike slightly less then atrocious spelling or a complete lack of understanding of the English language then an in-ability to use proper sentence structure (of which paragraph forms are). Incidentally, apologies to everyone who's posts I edited to remove stuff. Just remember the good times and all is well (you ********* ****** * ruber ******* cat ******* ). |
Author: | md [ Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Incidentally... has this donkey character made any other posts, aside from ones criticizing us mods RIGHT after posts made by nastynika? I'm not declaring shenanigans just yet - but it's VERY suspicious. |
Author: | DaveAngus [ Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md, if you have in your mind that that is me...its not. haha I have no need or desire to rip on you (or mods). |
Author: | syntax_error [ Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
DaveAngus wrote: donkey @ Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:03 am wrote: i guess clayton has gone corrupt with his powers tony dan if u r reading this wut should we do even though they are mods we should not have to take this abuse
I am the one one who has said Im leaving. But i have also said that I will stay if we can all come to a collective agreement. They havent gone currupt. Their good dudes. Just had bad days. Needed to unleash their anger. It happens even to the best of us. I lost my cool too. Everyone needs to start fresh. pardon my language here but ***************breathe******* are we talking bout like harden criminals here ?? |
Author: | gitoxa [ Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:24 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'm in your thread, licking your words. That aside, what would a 17 year old want for his birthday? |
Author: | btiffin [ Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Pointless information with nothing whatsoever to do with previous entries. It's 5am and I feel like telling a joke. Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia - Fear of long words. "Yes, it seems you suffer from hippopotomontroses ... hey why are you running away??? I'm only here to help..." Cheers |
Author: | btiffin [ Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:10 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Ok, two jokes. Why does the Easter Bunny hide the eggs? He doesn't want anyone to know he has sex with chickens. |
Author: | md [ Sat Apr 12, 2008 9:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
gitoxa @ 2008-04-12, 2:24 am wrote: I'm in your thread, licking your words.
Hookerbots clearly! The question is 10 $100 hookerbots, or 100 $10 hookerbots?That aside, what would a 17 year old want for his birthday? |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
100 $10 ones for sure! |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
The $10 ones are dosed up on crack, and have bowel control issues. Are you sure you want a hundred of those? |
Author: | md [ Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Your thinking $1 hookers. These are $10 and they are hookerBOTS. They're all jacked up on electricity. |
Author: | A.J [ Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: Your thinking $1 hookers. These are $10 and they are hookerBOTS. They're all jacked up on electricity. wow.......u guys must be bored...................... |
Author: | DaveAngus [ Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Id like 10 $100 hookerbots. If you think about it, it would probably be much better. 10 AMAZING hookerbots or 100 terrible ones. Man that is actually a hard decision. I guess youd have to see if they were clean or not. 100 $10 infected hookerbots is not as good as 10 $100 clean hookerbots . If the 100 $10 hookerbots were clean then thats a whole different ball game. We need to investigate to see if the 100 $10 hooker bots are clean or infected! |
Author: | md [ Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
A.J @ 2008-04-12, 10:30 pm wrote: md wrote: Your thinking $1 hookers. These are $10 and they are hookerBOTS. They're all jacked up on electricity. wow.......u guys must be bored...................... And thusly we separate those who watch pop-culture icons like Futurama from those who don't know Gir. Sometimes I really have to wonder about our future generations. |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I got it another good episode, what if machine (well it's more than one but whatever) |
Author: | DaveAngus [ Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:06 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I've never watched futurama. Is it any good? |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:11 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Thats a joke right? RIGHT?!! |
Author: | DaveAngus [ Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:15 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yes...Right....lol who hasnt watch a full episode of Futurama...geeze! |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Apr 13, 2008 12:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
even unborn children have matched Futurama |
Author: | gitoxa [ Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yay, I is 17 now. I'll take 100 hookerbots please, kthx. And nick speaks the truth. Have you ever tried lowering the frequency of an ultrasound? |
Author: | md [ Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
We demand proof of Furutama knowlege! What is the robots name? What is Fry's favourite drink? What color does Fry's other from the alternate dimension have? Who is the greatest TV host? All these questions must be answered! |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Bender I forget the name, damnit! err don't know fry's but bender's gold, liela's hair is pink or red or some color like that, the professor took out his brain and put it back in (is that enough?) that guy from urmacron percia 8 |
Author: | gitoxa [ Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Bender Slurm Black hair, and married to Leila Morbo! "All humans are scum in the eyes of Morbo!" The guy from Omicron Persi-eye (spelling, lmao) 8 is the king of the planet, not a tv host |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Meh robot chicken is the best. And what's Furutama ? |
Author: | md [ Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You people ruined it. Now Dave doesn't have to prove a thing. I'm disgusted. CodeMonkey, Robot Chicken is definitely awesome - however it's not the end-all be-all of everything. Not even half as good as Futurama is. |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun Apr 13, 2008 10:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Corner Gas FTW. |
Author: | nastynika [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:10 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
death by snew snew for all lol Futurama rocks |
Author: | md [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:28 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Incidentally, Hipnotoad (sp?) is the undisputed king of TV hosts. All glory to the Hipnotoad. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:22 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
HYP NOTOD! LOL CONTENTION FTW And all that good stuff, about 700 more posts to go to become the greatest. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:27 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Does anyone watch MXC (most extreme elimination challenge)? That show was so hilarious. I wish that they still showed it. |
Author: | md [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
That's a horrid show! |
Author: | jernst [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
lol what? MXC is great! |
Author: | Dan [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I would realy like to see a real dub or real sub of the show MXC uses. When ever i watch it i am allways trying to figger out what the real show is about. Tho i do hate MXC.... |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Has anyone seen JPOD? |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
that show was funny when i was about 13. i would hate to have to sit through another episode nowadays though. I'm partial to Iron Chef: America though, a child of the formerly dubbed, and albeit more intense "IRON CHEF". |
Author: | md [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Dan @ 2008-04-14, 5:12 pm wrote: I would realy like to see a real dub or real sub of the show MXC uses. When ever i watch it i am allways trying to figger out what the real show is about.
Tho i do hate MXC.... I agree, it might be interesting to see ONE show where there are real subtitles. However I have a feeling that in reality it's just as inane and stupid. |
Author: | Dan [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ 14th April 2008, 5:55 pm wrote: I'm partial to Iron Chef: America though, a child of the formerly dubbed, and albeit more intense "IRON CHEF". I loved the jappnes version, the american one is kind of lame with the food network "iron" chefs. I hate bobby flay so much, and don't even get me started on what they call "iron chefs" now. Tho i do realy like the anouncer on the american one. |
Author: | zylum [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Dan @ Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:32 pm wrote: apomb @ 14th April 2008, 5:55 pm wrote: I'm partial to Iron Chef: America though, a child of the formerly dubbed, and albeit more intense "IRON CHEF". I loved the jappnes version, the american one is kind of lame with the food network "iron" chefs. I hate bobby flay so much, and don't even get me started on what they call "iron chefs" now. Tho i do realy like the anouncer on the american one. Wow that is exactly the same way i feel. Especially "I hate bobby flay so much" |
Author: | Nick [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I haven't seen it in forever but I loved it, watching late at night when I was starving, that comedian is right, food network is like porn for fat people (except I'm not fat) |
Author: | syntax_error [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I disagree, I personally do not feel the need to feed myself after watching food network. imho. of coursse. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
SUMWUN IS A TOOL CONTENTION UPSTARTS FTW. alright, let's get some going. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
zylum @ Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:54 pm wrote: Dan @ Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:32 pm wrote: apomb @ 14th April 2008, 5:55 pm wrote: I'm partial to Iron Chef: America though, a child of the formerly dubbed, and albeit more intense "IRON CHEF". I loved the jappnes version, the american one is kind of lame with the food network "iron" chefs. I hate bobby flay so much, and don't even get me started on what they call "iron chefs" now. Tho i do realy like the anouncer on the american one. Wow that is exactly the same way i feel. Especially "I hate bobby flay so much" I couldnt have put it better myself. I do like morimoto and batali... Cat Cora was pathetic and bobby flay is just bad. edit the post above me... wtf? |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Sakai FTL Seriously, he had the WORST record. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:10 pm wrote: edit the post above me... wtf? Contentious thread, just helping it along, therefore not helping at all, oh the confusion. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
oh to be a mod right now... |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Of course, always revert to the abuse of me. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
please elaborate |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Everytime people dislike my posts, the first frikkin reply is always, "mod u lol >". |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
didnt not like your post, i just didnt like your DOUBLE post |
Author: | md [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Double posting is bad. |
Author: | md [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Mkay? |
Author: | apomb [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:19 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
smooth md, smooth |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:48 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
lmao nice one md |
Author: | gitoxa [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
wtf md, u duble postd to!? y wood u do that, r u trying 2 luk dum?? gosh, ppl thees days Also, VELOCIRAPTORS |
Author: | nastynika [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
any one hear heard of Cowboy Bebop |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
gitoxa @ 2008-04-15, 7:24 am wrote: wtf md, u duble postd to!?
y wood u do that, r u trying 2 luk dum?? gosh, ppl thees days Also, VELOCIRAPTORS I believe you are the one who looks dumb after that post. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
lmao first, e double posted as a joke (mocking you) second that post you made is uhh.... no words come to mind besides hideous |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 3:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
MD is a zombe! He eatz velociraptors with his awesomeness! He is ZOMBEGOD!!! |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 3:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
This is getting slightly ridiculous. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton:No it isn't. Md(ZOMBEGOD):Yes it is. Clayton:No, this isn't an argument, this is just contradiction! wtd:No it isn't. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
md @ Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:58 am wrote: The point of this thread is to spawn the longest discussion about nothing that compsci.ca has seen. It should ideally get to say 40 pages.
Ducks are made of wood, which burns; so logically they are witches! *cough* We underestimated *cough* Also, that reference still makes me chuckle. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I think SA is the cause of the ridiculousness |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
My part of purpose in life. Not. Whatever, I say, the point of this thread is it not? |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Holy crap 53 pages of utter garbage. And 90% of it belongs to StealthArcher. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Not quite, read through it all. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I was about to say... I didnt even start in this thread till page 46 or so... |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I believe I have the most posts in this thread; but I could be wrong. I had a most enlightening discussion about god today - I shall have to recount it later. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 5:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Was it with a creationist? It always funny to hear their views on science. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 5:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:50 pm wrote: I believe I have the most posts in this thread; but I could be wrong.
I had a most enlightening discussion about god today - I shall have to recount it later. I'll talk to you around 9:00 pm, you'd better be there so I can talk to you! (The channel that is). |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 5:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton, righto. The conversation was about God, and how it can be both omniscient and omnipotent and yet how humans can still have free will. I was arguing that an omniscient God precludes free will - the people I was talking to were trying to argue the opposite - mostly by attempting to skirt the issue. Specifically by arguing that knowing what someone will do is not the same as being responsible for what they do; though they were arguing it in such a way that there were a whole lot of side tracked discussions. Most of which involved violence happening to people. I think they had issues. Incidentally I just thought up a counter point to their example. If only I had a means of continuing the discussion |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ 2008-04-15, 5:41 pm wrote: If only I had a means of continuing the discussion
Perfect, start another Evolution vs Creation thread! We can bet on if it will reach 100 pages faster than this thread. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Let's not, but discuss it here! |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I was originally going to post a lengthy proof against certainly commonly held (or supposedly held) religious beliefs. However, upon reflection I don't feel that I would do it justice. So, instead I won't argue it. I'll just say that anyone who believes in a omniscient, you're wrong! Haha, suckers! What md was going to say wrote: I agree. This thread is the perfect place, so long as it remains a polite discussion. I WILL be forced to delete people's posts and/or kick them (making it even harder to beat the record) if things go down hill. My position is that there is no God, and that most proposed Gods would be both counter to the teachings of the religion, and logically impossible in and of themselves. Take the Christian God for example. It is (he/she is hard) omniscient and omnipotent. Now, Christianity has two major schisms, one espousing free will and one which denies it. The former is the larger, and the one I shall tackle first. Now, we humans have free will. And yet God knows what we are going to do before we do it (omniscience). This is a logical contradiction, as if I have free will I am able to change my mind at any point in the decision making process; and if I can change my mind how can God know what I am going to do? If God DOES know what I am going to do, then how can I make any decisions? Either God is omniscient and I do not have free will, or God is omniscient and I do have free will. Furthermore, if God is omniscient then it must know everything, including everything there is to know about God - such as what God is going to do next. If God knows what God will do next, then the same problem that applies to humans applies to God as well - it cannot make decisions, as it already knows what will happen (If god does something else, then it wasn't omniscient which violates the assumption). Thus, an omniscient God logically excludes free will. The second schism suffers from an equally disastrous flaw. Suppose God IS omniscient, he must therefor know what we are going to do, and thus we lack Free will. We must also assume that God must follow the laws of physics - as shall be shown later. Humans are made of atoms, which are in turn made of electrons, protons and neutrons. These particles are made of quarks (which may or may not be indivisible). Quarks, and everything upon which they are built follow the laws of quantum dynamics - of which the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal is one (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle). The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal basically states that locating a particle in a small region of space makes the momentum of the particle uncertain; and conversely, that measuring the momentum of a particle precisely makes the position uncertain. In effect, you cannot know where a particle is and where it is going; implying that you cannot predict where it is going either - there is always a measure of uncertainty (or randomness). Since we are made up of particles (built of particles), and our functioning is based upon the interactions of these particles, there must therefor be some element of uncertainty (or randomness) in our thought processes. This in turn implies that no decision is certain, until such time as it is acted out. Thus, Quantum Mechanics implies Free Will, which is a contradiction of our assumption of God being omniscient. Thus God cannot be omniscient. God can also be shown to be Carry on as you wish. |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Oh, bugger it all. I really need to learn not to get into debates with religious people. It always screws you up for a while afterwards. So instead, Yay for double posting! |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Hmm... I need a way to post as md, and force him to triple post! |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
pfft, like you |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
could |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
do that! |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
could |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
try |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
to |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
be |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
as |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
cool |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
as |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
you |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
not... |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
The Horror! Never again must such things happen. Ever. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
And why not? I see no damn problem with it at all! |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Dang, i posted late, I was gonna make mine go right after your "could" |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You sir, got owned, by my deca-posting mayhem. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
"Owned"? Pish tosh my good man, your posting of the tens is powerless against My SPAM POWURD VIKINGS. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I think I just threw up in the back of my throat. |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Could've been worse - you could have thrown up in someone else's throat. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Hmm... you make a fair point. A fair point indeed. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
A fair point for the vikings to feast upon! Go my SPAM POWURD VIKINS Anyhoo, what now? Kill'm off? |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Just kill you off is fine. |
Author: | md [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
enough with the very poor monty python references. Half of their humour is that it's so unexpected; you're both predictable and dull. Ftang. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
But where has all the Humor gone? |
Author: | gitoxa [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:59 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
StealthArcher wrote: But where has all the Humor gone?
What humor? And about getting into religious debated with religious persons, it's hard to win when they can quote their god/religious text, you know, the very think you're questioning. Seriously, it gets old. |
Author: | OneOffDriveByPoster [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
gitoxa @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:59 am wrote: And about getting into religious debated with religious persons, it's hard to win when they can quote their god/religious text, you know, the very think you're questioning. Why is it suddenly so popular to use "think" like this on this forum? Do you mean "thing" or are you not so subtly referring to doublethink and newspeak? |
Author: | btiffin [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:37 pm wrote: Now, we humans have free will. And yet God knows what we are going to do before we do it (omniscience). This is a logical contradiction, as if I have free will I am able to change my mind at any point in the decision making process; and if I can change my mind how can God know what I am going to do? If God DOES know what I am going to do, then how can I make any decisions? Either God is omniscient and I do not have free will, or God is omniscient and I do have free will. Furthermore, if God is omniscient then it must know everything, including everything there is to know about God - such as what God is going to do next. If God knows what God will do next, then the same problem that applies to humans applies to God as well - it cannot make decisions, as it already knows what will happen (If god does something else, then it wasn't omniscient which violates the assumption). Thus, an omniscient God logically excludes free will. I have to contend this argument. Knowing something is going to happen and influencing what is going to happen are two different things. We can all have free will and omniscients can know the outcome. No logical exclusion there. You are entangling your free will with the theoretical higher power's ability to foresee the outcome. It is not the theoretical higher power's free will at the point of argument, but that of a human. The only aspect of pre-destiny at issue is solely the domain of the higher power's. Nothing exclusive here, from a human point of view. md @ Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:37 pm wrote: The second schism suffers from an equally disastrous flaw. Suppose God IS omniscient, he must therefor know what we are going to do, and thus we lack Free will. We must also assume that God must follow the laws of physics - as shall be shown later. Neither of those prepositions stand when discussing a theoretical higher power. The higher power knowing what you are going to do has nothing to do with what free will you have. As long as said higher power does not influence what he knows is about to happen, no breach of free will occurs. In that context, the only free will that is restricted is that of the higher power. They are not free to exert influence. An omnipotent, omniscient higher power cannot be assumed to be bound by the laws of physics; by definition of omnipotence. I pointlessly protest sir. Cheers |
Author: | md [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:40 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I agree, my line of argument is flawed. And really so is any other line of argument based on the fact that god is not a physical being upon whom hte laws of physics apply. That makes it rather hard to disprove him (and incidentally equally hard to prove he exists). Arguing god just isn't fun. Oh, but your wrong. If someone else (God) knows what choice you will make, before you make it, then there isn't really a choice - you must do what God knows you will do - or God would be wrong, and not omniscient. This line of reasoning implies that no one has free will, nor have they ever had free will. God is therefor responsible, by way of being the creator of the universe and thus responsible for it's particular configuration - where Alice is going to shoot Bob; because God knows it will happen. "We can all have free will and omniscience can know the outcome." Is a HUGE contradiction. Either we have free will, in which case we can change our minds at any point - in which case only the probability of any particular outcome can be known. Or, God knows what we are going to do (100% certainty) and we DO NOT have the ability to change our minds. You cannot have it both ways. |
Author: | btiffin [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:40 am wrote: Oh, but your wrong. If someone else (God) knows what choice you will make, before you make it, then there isn't really a choice - you must do what God knows you will do - or God would be wrong, and not omniscient.
Disagree. A theoretical God could know what the free willed humans are going to do in advance. Two separate issues. An omnipotent, omniscient higher power doesn't even play on the same field. The only restriction to free will in that argument rests solely on the higher power to not meddle. Again, the pre-destiny problem is not a human problem. We wouldn't and couldn't know. But the higher power can know whatever they know to be coming without any effect on our free will. You're mixing playing fields. Not fair. md @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:40 am wrote: This line of reasoning implies that no one has free will, nor have they ever had free will. God is therefor responsible, by way of being the creator of the universe and thus responsible for it's particular configuration - where Alice is going to shoot Bob; because God knows it will happen. Disagree with the first part, agreed with the second. Once stirred the only restriction to this thought experiment is the higher power can't meddle. Even though they know from the first stir what is going to happen. Doesn't influence our decision making process at all. md @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:40 am wrote: "We can all have free will and omniscience can know the outcome." Is a HUGE contradiction. Either we have free will, in which case we can change our minds at any point - in which case only the probability of any particular outcome can be known. Or, God knows what we are going to do (100% certainty) and we DO NOT have the ability to change our minds. You cannot have it both ways. Oh come on, I'm being pointless and contentious. And yes you can have it both ways. Two different games being played. Omni and Human. Human, by definition of the rules we are arguing, can't know the mind of the Omni; not so the other way round. Only the Omni is saddled with the problem and paradox of pre-destiny. And being omnipotent, paradox is a cake walk. Remember no one on the human team is allowed omni powers so we can pick and choose our course as we see fit and Bob still gets shot. Bob (or Alice) won't know until it's too late. Bob deserved it anyway. Cheers |
Author: | md [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:24 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
And that's why I hate arguing about God I simply cannot win, as God trumps all. It truly is the most pointless argument ever |
Author: | btiffin [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:24 am wrote: And that's why I hate arguing about God
I simply cannot win, as God trumps all. It truly is the most pointless argument ever Well then, let's discuss paradox. Can a real universe support paradox? Quite pointless and more restraining than adding omnipotent to the mix. Omni powers no longer count as an argument. Are black holes real or do they go event horizon imaginary, out there in the void of space, where no one can hear you scream ... THIS (singularity) IS POINTLESS! Cheers |
Author: | md [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I vote we go back to more inane things; that way the thread keeps going strong and Dan won't have to lock it. Today is the 3rd anniversary of the beginning of my relationship with my GF. Three years! I couldn't be happier |
Author: | btiffin [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:30 pm wrote: I vote we go back to more inane things; that way the thread keeps going strong and Dan won't have to lock it.
Today is the 3rd anniversary of the beginning of my relationship with my GF. Three years! I couldn't be happier Agreed; thought maybe I bored everyone away Congratulations. I'll be hitting the 20 years married mark soon, well in 15 months. |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Congratulations md! Thats quite the commitment, though i am jealous of you lol. P.S. PAGE 57! |
Author: | md [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Only 43 pages to go! |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
One more go toward! We won't be having much fun in pointlessingrad, will we? |
Author: | OneOffDriveByPoster [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
In A.D. 2101, war was beginning. |
Author: | Dan [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ 16th April 2008, 10:30 pm wrote: I vote we go back to more inane things; that way the thread keeps going strong and Dan won't have to lock it.
Well if you want you or any one eltes can start another topic in off topic (or maybe the user loundge if you don't want it locked) about relgion and i will let it go on intill it gets out of control (or godwin's law is encated). |
Author: | md [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 7:34 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Perhaps later. Or maybe I'll start a thread about nazis, then Godwin's law doesn't apply! Muahaha. |
Author: | nastynika [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 7:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
does any one know it htere is another guitar hero coming out |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yes, by July. Guitar Hero 4 |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Guitar Hero is an annoying fad that will (hopefully) go out of style soon. |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Take that BACK! Guitar hero is a good game and you know it! |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It was a good game. But now it's boring, there isn't enough depth to it to give it replay value. |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
REPLAY value? ... theres so many songs to play, and the different difficulties... maybe i havent played it enough, but i could certainly play that game for a very long time and coninue to enjoy it. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 5:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'm not one for rock music, or country, or punk, or techno, rap, metal,....... well you get the picture. |
Author: | rdrake [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
My vote goes towards "Guitar Hero is amazing." Enough of the hatred towards it, you people just can't play . |
Author: | Nick [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I agree with rdrake, learn to play! |
Author: | Mackie [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I play on hard... sometimes... |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Bah it's too frustrating. I can barely beat through the fire and flames on expert. The best I got was 79%. I just can't do any better. I can barely survive the solos. GH was great for the first few months I was playing, but now I'm into Brawl. GH is nothing compared to Brawl. |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:33 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
So... you're claiming that just because you can barely pass the hardest song in GH3 on expert, that it's stupid? I'm not so sure I understand. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:51 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I find it non-enjoyable for other reasons. |
Author: | md [ Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I find it horrible. Mostly by virtue of having less then no musical tallent... and no Wii. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Apr 19, 2008 9:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I demand more nonsense! |
Author: | Nick [ Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonsense I got that from googling nonsense, first result |
Author: | rdrake [ Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Genius. Pure Genius. |
Author: | gitoxa [ Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It was obligatory, sorry. |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Apr 20, 2008 1:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
[img=left]http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/4788/1145172197150eg9.jpg][/img] |
Author: | tenniscrazy [ Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:05 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
haha, why you guys talk about guitar hero. Rock band is way better |
Author: | Nick [ Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I bring a new topic to this thread: optical illusions |
Author: | syntax_error [ Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I dont see it. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Too bad for you then, cause it's soo awesome, It's sheer awesomeness will make sex look like church (in a way, but not really). |
Author: | Nick [ Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CodeMonkey2000 @ Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:59 pm wrote: Too bad for you then, cause it's soo awesome, It's sheer awesomeness will make sex look like church (in a way, but not really).
yea I thought it was cool too |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
nick @ Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:02 pm wrote: CodeMonkey2000 @ Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:59 pm wrote: Too bad for you then, cause it's soo awesome, It's sheer awesomeness will make sex look like church (in a way, but not really).
yea I thought it was cool too UH OH, get out the awards, NICK thinks something is cool! it HAS to be the best thing ever lol just playin Nick. |
Author: | Nick [ Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
that's so random |
Author: | apomb [ Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
blame it on exam stress. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:36 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
pfffffffffft, I wish that worked every time |
Author: | nastynika [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i have one exam left thank god how about the rest of you |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 2:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
One left tomorrow! WOOHOO! |
Author: | md [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I be done! And I have my first mark - 98% |
Author: | Nick [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
congrats md |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Epic Fail. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Epoch Phail. |
Author: | md [ Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton @ 2008-04-23, 4:59 pm wrote: Epic Fail. Bwa? |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:55 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
My first mark: 99% |
Author: | Tallguy [ Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:05 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
yay right |
Author: | md [ Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Tallguy @ 2008-04-24, 8:05 am wrote: yay right
Getting high marks is apparently not hard - were it not for the fact that anything over a 90% is an A+ I would have 105% in math. But because it doesn't matter... I'm going to have to settle for 97% or so. |
Author: | btiffin [ Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:25 am wrote: Getting high marks is apparently not hard - were it not for the fact that anything over a 90% is an A+ I would have 105% in math. But because it doesn't matter... I'm going to have to settle for 97% or so. Umm ?? 105% eh? In math.
Just kidding, I know what you mean. I scored 11 out of 10 on my first 6809 assembler assignment at Waterloo. Sadly the assignments were "returned" by piling them on the TA's desk in the basement of the MC building. Some competitive soul scooped my papers so I've never been able to prove it to anyone that didn't see the mark sheet. By the way, back then; when you rewrote the hexadecimal output library routine, you got bonus marks. Oh, and congratulations on the awesome marks by the way. Cheers |
Author: | md [ Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Well yeah... 105% through bonus marks - it is the way to go Also, having completed every lab well before hand and getting perfect on them got me out of doing the last one, which was providing proof you retained all your work to study from. Good thing too... 'cause I didn't. |
Author: | Tallguy [ Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ok, i can see it in that light, srry, i thought u were making it up, but i see wat u mean, srry i apolgize |
Author: | apomb [ Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:50 pm wrote: Well yeah... 105% through bonus marks - it is the way to go
Also, having completed every lab well before hand and getting perfect on them got me out of doing the last one, which was providing proof you retained all your work to study from. Good thing too... 'cause I didn't. Exactly my position as well |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Apr 27, 2008 6:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Except all that matters is I'm me. |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
no you're not! |
Author: | apomb [ Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I believe he is... but i am also me. So we have a problem |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Problem is you, where me is you, because with n and me and you, we can make money, and it is the root of a;ll problems. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
nick @ Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:06 pm wrote: no you're not!
I'm not? I could've sworn I had you under lock and key not to say anything. Ah well, guess I'll just have to grab my banhammer. |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
no, that was to not listen to Mihai... and have I? |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
That too. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Wow Clayton you have the most views on this thread. Does this thread mean that much to you? |
Author: | Nick [ Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I did not think I'd come third on this matter... |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CodeMonkey2000 @ Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:39 pm wrote: Wow Clayton you have the most views on this thread. Does this thread mean that much to you?
I do? Maybe it has something to do with me posting on every single page for what... a year and a half now? |
Author: | Tallguy [ Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:33 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
*sigh* have you nothing better to do???? |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Other than make sure the sunburn on my arm reaches no more than 3.94 x 10^-2.3 km in length, no. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:22 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I less then three, witty humor; its the best kind. |
Author: | nastynika [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
has anyone hear seen the new Harold and Kumar Movie????????????? |
Author: | apomb [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yes and its effing hilarious! sure there were some dumb parts, but theres no getting aound how funny the rest of the movie is. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It was utterly, LOI; serly. Even if its rated R or 18A, sneak in. |
Author: | iluvchairs112 [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I saw Harold & Kumar! It was rated 14A though I thought it definitely should've been rated at least 18A. It was ... interesting. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
If I recall correctly, in Canada 14A is the American R(18 A). I thought the original was better, but meh. |
Author: | btiffin [ Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I just tried http://beta.searchme.com/Initial.html I find it pointless. What? people can't read? Reminded me of the poor old Russian bear; Tetris, tetris, tetris. Whatever happened to the unicycle ... or the ball! |
Author: | nastynika [ Thu May 01, 2008 7:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i dont have to worry about sneaking in i turn 19 a week from saturday and if it is that good i think i know wut i am doing this weekend |
Author: | A.J [ Thu May 01, 2008 9:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I like pie!!! |
Author: | Mackie [ Thu May 01, 2008 9:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
stfu |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu May 01, 2008 10:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Word Whomp! |
Author: | btiffin [ Thu May 01, 2008 11:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Marvel is sooo much better than DC. |
Author: | apomb [ Fri May 02, 2008 2:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
btiffin @ Thu May 01, 2008 11:47 pm wrote: Marvel is sooo much better than DC.
I concur! |
Author: | gitoxa [ Sat May 03, 2008 2:04 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'm indifferent. Wait, I forget, is that the right word for they both suck? |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat May 03, 2008 9:33 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
No, it just means you have no opinion on the matter. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sat May 03, 2008 11:45 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Guys which is theory is better, sex theory or stork theory? |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat May 03, 2008 3:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Is that a rhetorical question? |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sat May 03, 2008 8:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
No. |
Author: | A.J [ Sun May 04, 2008 10:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I thought that WAS a rhetorical question |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Sun May 04, 2008 8:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Author: | apomb [ Sun May 04, 2008 10:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I start my job at the Lottery tomorrow!! im jacked |
Author: | syntax_error [ Mon May 05, 2008 3:55 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
lucky. |
Author: | nastynika [ Mon May 05, 2008 8:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ Sun May 04, 2008 10:52 pm wrote: I start my job at the Lottery tomorrow!! im jacked
so r u going to be able to help us win the lottery then lol |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 05, 2008 6:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
LOL i love how everyone just assumes that i know no one honestly thinks that i can, its just always the first question people ask. I enjoyed my first day, I have my own cubicle and have already started introductory tasks involving coding and testing systems. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Mon May 05, 2008 8:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
where do you work? |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon May 05, 2008 8:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
At the lottery. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Mon May 05, 2008 8:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
no really? I could never read the post above. Thank you for making it so much more clear. Really. |
Author: | Nick [ Mon May 05, 2008 9:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
flying around in your ROFLCOPTER just isn't cheering you up anymore? not to worry, here's the OMGWTFBBQ! |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 05, 2008 10:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
syntax_error @ Mon May 05, 2008 8:13 pm wrote: where do you work?
I work in the Architecture Dept. Its basically the research and development team for the computer systems in the entire building. |
Author: | nastynika [ Tue May 06, 2008 8:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
sounds like it would be alot of fun |
Author: | Carey [ Tue May 06, 2008 3:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I wish i had a computer-related job. I'm a lifeguard. For now. It's not bad for a student. |
Author: | Aziz [ Tue May 06, 2008 3:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I do co-op through my college so right now I work as IT Support / Network technician / admin for a small manufacturing company. It's pretty just me and my manager, who's also new here from a company that was bought out along with this one. The servers and network setup here is really low quality and so its kind of cool bringing it all up to speed and getting it back on track. |
Author: | btiffin [ Tue May 06, 2008 3:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Carey @ Tue May 06, 2008 3:00 pm wrote: I wish i had a computer-related job. I'm a lifeguard. For now. It's not bad for a student.
No guarantees or anything, but check out the SaaS employment opportunities post. (Sorry, too noob to tag an inner link to a forum post, so the full url is http://compsci.ca/v3/viewtopic.php?p=160631&no=1#160631 (and even that may have my login associated with it. Frikkin noobs.)) Anyway, Qtask is not against part-time over the net remote workers that can prove themselves as reliable and good. Testing, coding little bits, media work, art, hey even the dreaded Sales and Marketing. Or, another great way of getting into the biz. Get a GNU/Linux box (well two actually), a high speed connection and start a web hosting service. You'll learn bags and may even make a buck or twelve. Please note; if you do, do yourself a huge favour and read up on Security and hot swap backups with rsync. I'm a Debian, and debian.org is a wealth of information in this regard. You may spend more time going through all the options (spoilt for choice) than actually configuring the site, finding a niche, and snagging customers. Also note; Careful who you pick for a provider. For example, Rogers has fine print that disallows any form of "serving" from most user accounts, and they can boot you if you do and they feel like it. Unlikely sure, but it is in the fine print. Cheers. And and to make it contentious; Debian RULEZ. |
Author: | apomb [ Tue May 06, 2008 5:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
LOL im a fedora fan meself... im about to embark on a journey into the world of OpenVMS tomorrow!! wish me luck. |
Author: | md [ Tue May 06, 2008 5:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Speaking as one who has considered hosting... Don't. Unless you can devote significant capital to it and are willing to lose it all (and end up with two rather powerful rackmount servers) then it's not worth it. |
Author: | nastynika [ Wed May 07, 2008 7:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i goingt to be starting as customer service at stream soon |
Author: | btiffin [ Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ Tue May 06, 2008 5:09 pm wrote: LOL im a fedora fan meself... im about to embark on a journey into the world of OpenVMS tomorrow!!
Luckee! OpenVMS is an excellent operating system. Worked with it for 14 years. EVE is by far my favourite editor, DCL is awesome command language, just nice. Well ... professional ... making it nice.
wish me luck. Cheers apomb |
Author: | apomb [ Wed May 07, 2008 11:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Thanks btiffin, I didnt get to actually work on the server today, because testing of facial recognition software was going on... and tomorrow is a full day of HR training I hope to actually start the install on Friday. |
Author: | btiffin [ Thu May 08, 2008 12:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
That's kinda funny. I was going to ask if you'd get a chance to work with the FACEIT system. I guess you will. Cool tech that. You'll have to fill us in if the casinos use it skew machine probability curves. Just kidding. Casinos don't manipulate the odds or people or anything. And even though you may want to, don't play into my teasings ... (don't affirm or deny). I can only assume you've signed, or soon will sign, non-disclosure, declaration of secrecy or oath to the queen documents. Those are good to have under your belt and one slip can cost, even if in jest. Once again, cheers |
Author: | btiffin [ Thu May 08, 2008 1:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Tue May 06, 2008 5:15 pm wrote: Speaking as one who has considered hosting... Don't. Unless you can devote significant capital to it and are willing to lose it all (and end up with two rather powerful rackmount servers) then it's not worth it.
That is an issue. In my case, I have grand long term plans, so the investment is slow and steady. I guess I should have skipped that advice. |
Author: | nastynika [ Thu May 08, 2008 8:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
even if it is a long and expensive process keep your eyes on the prize |
Author: | apomb [ Thu May 08, 2008 9:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
btiffin @ Thu May 08, 2008 12:52 am wrote: That's kinda funny. I was going to ask if you'd get a chance to work with the FACEIT system. I guess you will.
Cool tech that. You'll have to fill us in if the casinos use it skew machine probability curves. Just kidding. Casinos don't manipulate the odds or people or anything. And even though you may want to, don't play into my teasings ... (don't affirm or deny). I can only assume you've signed, or soon will sign, non-disclosure, declaration of secrecy or oath to the queen documents. Those are good to have under your belt and one slip can cost, even if in jest. Once again, cheers I indeed have signed all of that. lol Today was my orientation on corporate policy, so yah, there will be no disclosure of any real work i do, even though most of the stuff im working on is non-production, it may be one day, so i have to stay hush hush mostly. |
Author: | nastynika [ Fri May 09, 2008 8:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
19 tommorrow hurah its about time |
Author: | Nick [ Fri May 09, 2008 2:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
congrats and happy birthday |
Author: | apomb [ Sat May 10, 2008 2:09 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
what has he done to deserve a congrats? i say happy birthday, hopefully you're lucky enough to see your 20th. |
Author: | btiffin [ Sat May 10, 2008 2:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Ok, I'll admit it, living with a 4-year old, I see far too much tvokids, but ... Why did the tomato turn red? They saw the salad dressing. Cheers |
Author: | md [ Sat May 10, 2008 6:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
That's horrid... I'm totally telling it to my girlfriend |
Author: | nastynika [ Mon May 12, 2008 8:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Anyone have any big plans for may 24 |
Author: | md [ Mon May 12, 2008 9:12 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Work. Always Work. |
Author: | jernst [ Mon May 12, 2008 12:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
nastynika @ Mon May 12, 2008 8:05 am wrote: Anyone have any big plans for may 24
working on my thesis :S |
Author: | petree08 [ Mon May 12, 2008 1:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
drugs, women, beer, women, clinic In that order |
Author: | Nick [ Mon May 12, 2008 2:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
maybe Anime North, maybe, and that's only cause I'll be with chicks all day... why? |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 12, 2008 2:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
he's totally stalking you. |
Author: | Nick [ Mon May 12, 2008 3:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
kinda figured |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 12, 2008 5:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
the what what what? |
Author: | Nick [ Mon May 12, 2008 7:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
huh? |
Author: | md [ Mon May 12, 2008 8:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
So today some of the electronics I ordered arrived! Alas they were not the parts I needed Soon hopefully I'll have me a GPS! Or maybe just a free peice of electronics that looks like a GPS and used to be a GPS. |
Author: | nastynika [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton @ Mon May 12, 2008 2:31 pm wrote: he's totally stalking you.
maybe mabye not j/k just seeing if anyone had anything exciting going on this weekend |
Author: | jernst [ Tue May 13, 2008 10:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
update, i am now having a bbq and party yay for no boring thesis this weekend lol |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue May 13, 2008 10:49 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'm camping all weekend |
Author: | md [ Tue May 13, 2008 11:48 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I need to find somewhere to go camping relatively close to ottawa so that I may do some camping this summer. Also, I got my now working car back! Airbags are great and all... but only when they don't have the risk of going off at any time. |
Author: | jernst [ Tue May 13, 2008 12:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
nice, camping = very fun you going with friends and stuff or the family? |
Author: | petree08 [ Tue May 13, 2008 1:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
http://www.sas.usace.army.mil/lakes/thurmond/images/camping%20at%20clark%202.jpg ... i love to camp |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue May 13, 2008 2:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
@jernst, friends. |
Author: | isaiahk9 [ Tue May 13, 2008 3:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
just asking, but how long is this post gonna be going for? Looks just like a chat room to me . . . |
Author: | Mackie [ Tue May 13, 2008 3:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
As long as people are willing to spew nonsense. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue May 13, 2008 3:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
isaiahk9 @ Tue May 13, 2008 3:09 pm wrote: just asking, but how long is this post gonna be going for? Looks just like a chat room to me . . . 'Til the end of time of course. |
Author: | isaiahk9 [ Tue May 13, 2008 3:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton, I think that is debatable. When do you think armagedon is coming? |
Author: | apomb [ Tue May 13, 2008 3:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
armageddon is not the end of time... this thread will live LONG after armageddon my friend... LONG after |
Author: | isaiahk9 [ Tue May 13, 2008 3:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Some people think that human life will never end. When earth is about to die, well just move to a different planet, and when our universe dies we'll just jump in a black hole and go into an alternate universe. Humans will just keep on repeating this, and never die. i don't believe this, but if we do . . . this will be one long thread. |
Author: | md [ Tue May 13, 2008 4:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
More likely this thread will just continue for as long as cs.ca remains a viable community. Or, if we decide to move it to another forum... even longer still |
Author: | syntax_error [ Tue May 13, 2008 4:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
why would you want to move? |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Tue May 13, 2008 5:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
My theory is that the thread will either die at 80 posts or the universe will implode. Proof: md wrote: The point of this thread is to spawn the longest discussion about nothing that compsci.ca has seen. It should ideally get to say 40 pages.
If the thread more than doubles this amount the life will become negative which is, of course, impossible. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue May 13, 2008 5:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
hard to debate that logic |
Author: | isaiahk9 [ Tue May 13, 2008 5:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ha ha |
Author: | isaiahk9 [ Tue May 13, 2008 5:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ha ha. i go with the universe imploding |
Author: | Insectoid [ Tue May 13, 2008 5:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
We are a bunch of nerds, aren't we? But not geeks...well, not all of us... Now some may say that this is completely off topic, but I say, everybody else is doing it! why not me? And isn't off-topicness the point of this thread? Actually, I just wanted to get to my 100th post. Huzzah! I'm a hundred post-member! (do I get loyal customer benefits?) |
Author: | md [ Tue May 13, 2008 6:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Given that this thread is well in advance of 80 posts... Actually, the longest thread is somewhere in the nature of 78 pages - so we're at least 18 pages short. |
Author: | Zampano [ Tue May 13, 2008 6:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I will do my civic duty and help the universe implode. |
Author: | md [ Tue May 13, 2008 7:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I would actually prefer if the universe didn't implode. I'm kinda partial to the universe as it is right now... you know... in a state of functioning. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue May 13, 2008 7:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
as am I and if the universe implodes, I will personally kick your ass |
Author: | apomb [ Tue May 13, 2008 7:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
If we die, ill kill you all! |
Author: | syntax_error [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
sure, if we die you will kill us, makes so much sense. |
Author: | Mackie [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It doesn't have to make sense. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
you make no sense! |
Author: | Mackie [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Neither did your mom. |
Author: | btiffin [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Tue May 13, 2008 11:48 am wrote: I need to find somewhere to go camping relatively close to ottawa so that I may do some camping this summer.
We used to head toward Calabogie for camping. You'll want to talk to someone in the know, but there is boat loads of crown land not too far off 17. I didn't grow up in Ottawa, so I was never "in the lead". I never cared to figure out exactly where we going; just a follower in the campin' convey. If you can find someone that grew up between Ottawa and Renfrew, I'm sure they will be able to fill you in on exact co-ords, and on-site issues like bugs and avoiding (or seeking) current hideout drinkin holes.
Also, I got my now working car back! Airbags are great and all... but only when they don't have the risk of going off at any time. Cheers |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Here's my post for the page. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Mackie @ Tue May 13, 2008 8:07 pm wrote: Neither did your mom.
to me thats like bring Hitler into this, your admitting defeat. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Wow, it only took 67 pages for Godwin's Law to be evoked. Bravo. |
Author: | Dan [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Refuring to Godwin's Law does not evoked godwin's law :p. His comprason was to that stament being like godwin's law but he did not compare him to a natiz so it does not count. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It also refers to Hitler. EDIT: From Wikipedia: The Wiki! wrote: "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
Which has been expanded to cover: Wikipedia wrote: ...the law is now applied to any threaded online discussion: electronic mailing lists, message boards, chat rooms, and more recently blog comment threads and wiki talk pages.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law |
Author: | Dan [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Godwin's law is about the comprason of some one with hitler, not mearly saying the word hitler in a post. The idea is that they are invoking a logical falciy by iuslating or compraing the debater to hitler rather then attacking there points. Edit: the comprason above was not to hitler but to godwin's law even tho he did not aucatly type out godwin's law. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
But it is a comparison to Hitler. He's making reference to the fact that Hitler lost. It's a comparison dammit! |
Author: | Dan [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
No he is making a comparsion to the fact that most peoleop say you lose the debate if you invoke godwins law. Thus the comprason is to godwin's law and not hitler. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Nowhere in his post is he referencing Godwin's Law, indirectly or otherwise... |
Author: | Dan [ Tue May 13, 2008 8:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
No he is refercing it indirectly, if you read it you will see the comprason is dierectly to "bring Hitler into this" and not to just "hitler". so his logic is "bring Hitler into this" -> defated the logic of godwin's law with the exension that you lose if you envoke it is the same. Thus it indrectly references it. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue May 13, 2008 9:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
1000th post! |
Author: | md [ Tue May 13, 2008 9:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
bwa? I hearby invoke md's law. "Any contention which threatens to derail the thread shall be liked to niko and thus cease." Hitler is like niko, covered in oil paint and with a sexy German accent. Ha! Wait... |
Author: | apomb [ Tue May 13, 2008 9:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
And how |
Author: | Nick [ Tue May 13, 2008 10:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I had the 1000th post in this thread |
Author: | apomb [ Tue May 13, 2008 10:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
did you count them all yourself, is that why you're so proud? |
Author: | Nick [ Tue May 13, 2008 11:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
look below <.< |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed May 14, 2008 8:33 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Pfft. |
Author: | nastynika [ Wed May 14, 2008 8:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
wow the way this thread is going md ur going to break a record or something for longest thread |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed May 14, 2008 8:48 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Considering that was the point... |
Author: | nastynika [ Wed May 14, 2008 8:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i realzie that clayton i was just surprised that it has lasted so long is all |
Author: | md [ Wed May 14, 2008 10:45 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
it lasts because we won't let it die! It must reach the end! And, when we break the record for longest thread there is a new challenge! Break phpbb's posts-per-thread limit! |
Author: | rizzix [ Wed May 14, 2008 11:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Wed May 14, 2008 10:45 am wrote: Break phpbb's posts-per-thread limit!
Which can always be increased if necessary... |
Author: | petree08 [ Wed May 14, 2008 12:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Hey I just finished my animated gif, It's sort of my logo, Shame my user name is petree08 , Hey if any admins are reading this is there a way to change user names? |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Wed May 14, 2008 4:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
By now this happened pages and pages ago, but... md @ 2008-05-13, 6:24 pm wrote: Given that this thread is well in advance of 80 posts...
Actually, the longest thread is somewhere in the nature of 78 pages - so we're at least 18 pages short. I meant 80 pages, typo. So there's only one satisfactory result, one more page than the current record, and one page less than the not unimpossible limit: 79. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Wed May 14, 2008 4:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Fun times this thread has given, shown us compassion, for our nuts, and balls. Go away, this is not for you brains. I keep the pointlessness level up. (Current: Pointlessness: 45% of max Contention:23% of max ) Work softer! |
Author: | apomb [ Wed May 14, 2008 4:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I believe you are drunk. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Wed May 14, 2008 4:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I have never been, nor do I ever plan to be so. I simply aid the thread to go in it's desired direction. |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed May 14, 2008 5:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Gandalf @ Wed May 14, 2008 4:23 pm wrote: By now this happened pages and pages ago, but...
md @ 2008-05-13, 6:24 pm wrote: Given that this thread is well in advance of 80 posts...
Actually, the longest thread is somewhere in the nature of 78 pages - so we're at least 18 pages short. I meant 80 pages, typo. So there's only one satisfactory result, one more page than the current record, and one page less than the not unimpossible limit: 79. Excellent, we'll get right onto that. When you can, could you please let me know exactly how many pages that is? EDIT: As before, [Gandalf]'s name breaks the [quote] tags. |
Author: | Nick [ Wed May 14, 2008 5:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
the person above me is only 75 pages, 7 more to tie! |
Author: | Mackie [ Wed May 14, 2008 5:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
o rly? |
Author: | Clayton [ Wed May 14, 2008 5:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
yarly |
Author: | Nick [ Wed May 14, 2008 5:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
what he said ^^ |
Author: | md [ Wed May 14, 2008 9:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I dislike the "new posts" feature. Mostly because it doesn't work. How are posts new if I have posted 6 times since they have been made?! Why oh why do we have to use such crappy forum software when there is infinitely better stuff out there. PunBB for instance. Heck - even writing our own would be better then phpbb. I hope it dies, possibly even in a fire. |
Author: | Nick [ Wed May 14, 2008 9:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
we might be starting the fTeam, you're in luck |
Author: | Mackie [ Wed May 14, 2008 9:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
fTeam FTW |
Author: | apomb [ Wed May 14, 2008 11:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i need somewhere to go on this forum, ive been here for almost 5 years, and yet i have diddly squat for privelages while other newbs are made mods just because they nag. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Thu May 15, 2008 12:07 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
and these newbs would be..? |
Author: | Dan [ Thu May 15, 2008 3:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ 14th May 2008, 11:19 pm wrote: i need somewhere to go on this forum, ive been here for almost 5 years, and yet i have diddly squat for privelages while other newbs are made mods just because they nag.
Every mod so far has been on the site for at leats a year, also none of the users that where recelty pormoted to mods naged me for it at all. For clerfication nick and Mackie are not mods. Tony and my self are working on a more demcoratic way of picking mods in the futtuer but the plans have not be finalized. This time many factors where considered when picking mods and we had a much longer list of users we wanted to make mods but sadly not every one can be a mod and there was a finite amount of new mod postions aviable. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Thu May 15, 2008 9:27 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
edit: To Heck with that last post, not needed Even electronic brain pancake crystal elderly. +5 pointlessness |
Author: | md [ Thu May 15, 2008 12:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Being a mod really isn't all it's cracked up to be... especially now that I can't edit posts here |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu May 15, 2008 3:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Well done md, well done. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu May 15, 2008 3:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Thu May 15, 2008 12:40 pm wrote: EDIT: I like Dan with his pants down. Huh? |
Author: | apomb [ Thu May 15, 2008 5:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
haha i love starting the mod wars also, to clarify, i dont actually care about not having powers, i just wanted to start an explination cycle of why some people get powers and others dont. |
Author: | rizzix [ Thu May 15, 2008 5:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
We're mods for a reason. [kick!] Edit: Umm... I've kicked him, I have no idea what that means... Can it be undone? heh |
Author: | Nick [ Thu May 15, 2008 6:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
my name is Nick |
Author: | Insectoid [ Thu May 15, 2008 6:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Hi Nick! Dan with his pants down? *dances his happy dance* |
Author: | md [ Thu May 15, 2008 6:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
IIRC the reason why people are mods is mostly because they know what their subject of mod-ship is quite well; and are fairly active. It might also have a wee bit to do with being on IRC when dan was looking for new mods, but that's a vrey small contributing factor. |
Author: | Dan [ Thu May 15, 2008 7:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Some of the factors we look for are:
Being on the irc room can help as we will get to know you better and that helps for the trust part but it does not mean you will be a mod for sure. Also there where serveral other users consdiered for being mods but as i side we just don't have need for all of them to be mods even tho many are both deversing and qualifed. It's not an easy desion to remove inactive mods from the mod list and to pick witch users to replace them with, esptal this time with some many strong canindates. As i metioned befor we would like to have more user input in feutter desions rather then tony and myself and this will like take the fourm of the admins and senior staff nomniation a list of users and leting the comunity vote on who they want to be a mod and mods needing to be reelected each term. This plan is not finalized but when more detials are avaible i will post information realting to it, to the news fourm. Also just becues you did not get picked this time does not mean you are not an imporent part of the comunity and it does not mean you will not be picked in the futtuer to be a mod. |
Author: | rizzix [ Thu May 15, 2008 7:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Nasa seeks pest control |
Author: | syntax_error [ Thu May 15, 2008 7:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Quote: "These ants are raising havoc," |
Author: | Insectoid [ Thu May 15, 2008 8:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Ants + lens + sun = no more havoc! Facebook is for panzies! |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu May 15, 2008 9:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
rizzix @ Thu May 15, 2008 5:54 pm wrote: We're mods for a reason. [kick!]
Edit: Umm... I've kicked him, I have no idea what that means... Can it be undone? heh Means he can't post in the thread again. I've un-kicked him however. |
Author: | rizzix [ Thu May 15, 2008 9:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Oh that's a fancy feature. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Thu May 15, 2008 10:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Dan @ Thu May 15, 2008 6:06 pm wrote: Some of the factors we look for are:
As i metioned befor we would like to have more user input in feutter desions rather then tony and myself and this will like take the fourm of the admins and senior staff nomniation a list of users and leting the comunity vote on who they want to be a mod and mods needing to be reelected each term. This plan is not finalized but when more detials are avaible i will post information realting to it, to the news fourm. Was this initiated by my post in md's [Corruption] Thread? If so, Yay, I contributed something! |
Author: | md [ Thu May 15, 2008 11:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I dunno if it was or wasn't... but one thing is for sure, Corruption for all! Ug. And the "New Posts" feature is STILL broken - and it's something I use all the time |
Author: | rizzix [ Thu May 15, 2008 11:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Those Ant's are amazing! article wrote: ?The Russians are concerned,? Mr. Michel said. ?I got a call from Moscow wanting to know if NASA was safe.?
Heh.?I reassured the Russians we?re O.K.,? he said. |
Author: | nastynika [ Fri May 16, 2008 8:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ants casusing problems bring in the pesticide |
Author: | md [ Fri May 16, 2008 9:44 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
They are resistant to pesticides, so that's not a very good solution. You might be able to kill many of the ants (but not all) by spraying so much pesticide that people and animals are poisoned too; but you'd still be left with - now immune - ants; conveniently with fresh humans and animals to eat and rebuild their numbers. A much better solution is to nuke them from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Fri May 16, 2008 10:22 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
One solution to solve it all: Chainsaw/Flamethrower >:D>:D |
Author: | petree08 [ Fri May 16, 2008 1:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
you could bring in ant eating beetles, then once the ants are gone you can bring in beetle eating birds, once the beetles are gone you can bring in cats to eat the birds, to get rid of the cats just give them to your local crazed old lady... the food chain solves all |
Author: | md [ Fri May 16, 2008 5:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Arg! Parts that would suit my GPS project have arrived, but alas I do not have any 0.1uF capacitors which they require. Furthermore all the stores are closed tonight I hate waiting until the next day to get anything done, especially when I have been waiting weeks. |
Author: | isaiahk9 [ Mon May 19, 2008 10:21 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
The ants should just be killed with sonic. I heard about it 2 years ago, where a sound wave really powerful is generated that will instantly kill insects within its range. Now, somebody would just have pick up all the bodies. And the sonic method costs approx 2 mill . . . |
Author: | Nick [ Mon May 19, 2008 11:22 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
wow... all this talk about ants brought up an ad "How to kill ants" |
Author: | md [ Mon May 19, 2008 4:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yay me! Just finished a hard day's work; I actually even got some useful things done |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 19, 2008 5:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
No work for you! |
Author: | Nick [ Mon May 19, 2008 5:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
4 pages to go |
Author: | michaelp [ Mon May 19, 2008 6:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
To do what? And I'm starting to learn Python. |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 19, 2008 6:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
/me notes sony makes terrible computers. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 19, 2008 6:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
me posts his obligatory post in this thread |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 19, 2008 7:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
/me pokes Saad in the eye. |
Author: | gitoxa [ Mon May 19, 2008 9:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
/me jiggles the flab of gum dislodged by his wisdom tooth with his tongue. o hai guis |
Author: | nastynika [ Tue May 20, 2008 8:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
yet another long weekend gone |
Author: | apomb [ Tue May 20, 2008 12:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
back to the grind today... i lost my server like i cant ping it anymore. its gone! |
Author: | Insectoid [ Tue May 20, 2008 3:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
/me is wondering if anyone else noticed that this doesn't work outside the chatroom (unless it's just insectoid's computer...) My chin's on fire! |
Author: | apomb [ Tue May 20, 2008 3:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
wow... seriously? /me didnt know that and god news: my server is back up! i found it by unplugging then plugging it back in. I can now ssh into it, ping it, and do other boring things. OpenVMS is quite boring. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue May 20, 2008 5:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Boring is good. It usually means something is functional. |
Author: | apomb [ Tue May 20, 2008 5:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
heh... its functional, but it basically does nothing, i JUST got TCP/IP installed... and trust me, that was FAR from boring. |
Author: | Insectoid [ Tue May 20, 2008 7:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's just like that episode of south park where the whole internet crashes. The world goes insane, everybody goes to the california internet refugee camp for their share of the 4 minutes of net per day. Kyle went over to the internet (a giant modem), unplugged it, plugged it back in, and then it was back to normal. Great episode! toenails are for chumps. |
Author: | nastynika [ Wed May 21, 2008 8:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
that was a funny episode |
Author: | Insectoid [ Wed May 21, 2008 7:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yes, most of them are, I thought that was clear. |
Author: | gitoxa [ Wed May 21, 2008 7:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
What's South Park? Oh, and apparently, you can be bad at sarcasm. I didn't know that was possible. You just say something bizarre and laugh when people believe you. Serious business, no? |
Author: | rizzix [ Wed May 21, 2008 8:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Oh hell we're doomed: Honeybees dying at record levels |
Author: | md [ Wed May 21, 2008 9:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I never really are honey, so I might be missing something there... but of much more importance is that bees are the key pollinators of almost all plants which are used for food. Heck, I know of greenhouses which have hives inside to do just that. I for one shall miss our honey-bee overlords. |
Author: | rizzix [ Wed May 21, 2008 11:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Wed May 21, 2008 9:47 pm wrote: I never really are honey, so I might be missing something there... but of much more importance is that bees are the key pollinators of almost all plants which are used for food.
You've missed nothing. If this trend continues, it's the end of the world -- as we know it. |
Author: | nastynika [ Thu May 22, 2008 7:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
as long as the end of the world does not happen in our lifetime then we should be fine |
Author: | nastynika [ Thu May 22, 2008 8:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
so how much longer till you break the record md? |
Author: | btiffin [ Thu May 22, 2008 8:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ Tue May 20, 2008 3:30 pm wrote: wow... seriously? /me didnt know that
and god news: my server is back up! i found it by unplugging then plugging it back in. I can now ssh into it, ping it, and do other boring things. OpenVMS is quite boring. apomb; tsk tsk How can you say that? OpenVMS rocks. You haven't delved into System Service programming yet I'd guess. Any properly engineered OS is far from boring. I requested permission to stay after hours and play with BLISS and MACRO. Good for the soul my man, good for the soul. But yes, compared to the whizz bang of "personal" computing, work horse machines are a lot more like, umm, work; but not if you dig into $ HELP SYSTEM_SERVICE. And a warning; if you have god privs beware of the memory management services with PMAP in the name. The P does not stand for Paged as the docs would originally allude. It stands for Physical, so when you code using that service and think you are hitting virtual mapped page 0, you are really hitting physical page 0. It was the only time I ever hard crashed our Dev machine Then I heard other guys on the team about to do the same thing a few days later ... it turns out those manual pages have to be read very carefully. <rant> Anyway; you may actually come to the same belief system /me've had since my early days. PC's are chump toys (with useless eye candy) compared to real computers. Anyone here that thinks differently - compare the fiscals for MS and IBM. Real men use real computers. The rest of us get to play on little toy machines under the control of mickey mouse operating systems. Then again, personal computers and the Internet are a lot more "fun", but otoh, as Red says, "It's work. If it wasn't work, they'd call it 'happy happy fun time'"</rant> Cheers and big smilies |
Author: | btiffin [ Thu May 22, 2008 8:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ Tue May 20, 2008 5:30 pm wrote: heh... its functional, but it basically does nothing, i JUST got TCP/IP installed... and trust me, that was FAR from boring.
Now that's more like it. Techie bits are a blast. Almost as much fun as youtube and orders of magnitude more satisfying. Cheers again. |
Author: | md [ Thu May 22, 2008 9:28 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I dunno, does it really matter what the record is? I mean this thread won't stop... it's perpetual now! |
Author: | syntax_error [ Thu May 22, 2008 12:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I highly doubt that |
Author: | md [ Thu May 22, 2008 1:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I doubt you! |
Author: | Sean [ Thu May 22, 2008 2:25 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. | ||
rizzix @ Wed May 21, 2008 8:43 pm wrote: Oh hell we're doomed: Honeybees dying at record levels
This is a serious issue, and if the numbers keep continueing the Human Population will no longer be supported on earth. However, there is still time for corrections in what we do to stop killing them and that.
A small program in Turing to represent a basic equation of what we need to live. However, I think we are smart enough to fix this issue. |
Author: | zylum [ Thu May 22, 2008 2:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
unless Pollination_of_Flowers starts off at 0 (in which case we are already doomed) then "Say goodbye" is never reached. So I guess all is good if your program is true |
Author: | Insectoid [ Thu May 22, 2008 4:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
gitoxa wrote: What's South Park? South park is a very funny TV show involving anything and everything and lots of swear words (The movie holds the world record for most swear words in a movie) rizzix wrote: it's the end of the world -- as we know it. There's a song about that, it's called 'The end of the world as we know it'[/quote] |
Author: | Clayton [ Thu May 22, 2008 5:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
There's a song about every imaginable issue. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Thu May 22, 2008 5:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Thu May 22, 2008 1:42 pm wrote: I doubt you!
I am glad you do not trust stranger. Proud indeed, I am. |
Author: | apomb [ Thu May 22, 2008 5:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i have a throat and eye infection |
Author: | syntax_error [ Thu May 22, 2008 5:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ Thu May 22, 2008 5:45 pm wrote: i have a throat and eye infection
Enjoy the sick leave? |
Author: | nastynika [ Fri May 23, 2008 8:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
long live this thread |
Author: | apomb [ Fri May 23, 2008 9:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
syntax_error @ Thu May 22, 2008 5:48 pm wrote: apomb @ Thu May 22, 2008 5:45 pm wrote: i have a throat and eye infection
Enjoy the sick leave? Not really, I had to do my G road test with a swollen eye. also eating was torture. |
Author: | Insectoid [ Fri May 23, 2008 9:13 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Really, is it that bad? Try having cluster headaches (google it). Most annoying, inconvenient, and f**king painful thing in the world. |
Author: | btiffin [ Fri May 23, 2008 9:39 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb; get well soon. insectoid; sounds like that blows. Best of. The little one here turned five yesterday; then last night fell wicked sick. She's still sleeping, but I'll get to spend a fair chunk of today in a clinic it looks like. Not complaining; what you gotta do, you gotta do. Cheers |
Author: | Insectoid [ Fri May 23, 2008 9:43 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Good man. |
Author: | md [ Fri May 23, 2008 10:04 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yay for not being sick - and double yay for not having evil little children to take care of. Best of luck to everyone else though... suckers. |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri May 23, 2008 1:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Little md's?! The day such a thing happens is a bad day for humanity indeed. |
Author: | apomb [ Fri May 23, 2008 2:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
and indeed they would be evil... but not too evil |
Author: | md [ Fri May 23, 2008 4:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ 2008-05-23, 2:46 pm wrote: and indeed they would be evil... but not too evil
How wrong you are! You forget that they will get half of their evilness from me, and half from my GF (also remarkably evil). Let me tell ya, a troop of little md's would cause more strife then Germany! Worry not though; such things are clearly so foul that no such minions will ever be created. At least not on purpose; accidents do happen however... and given... yeah... rabbits are slow. On a more useful note, does anyone know of a good 68k emulator for linux? It'd be great to be able to do assignments at home. |
Author: | rizzix [ Fri May 23, 2008 4:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/status.html |
Author: | Clayton [ Fri May 23, 2008 5:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md wrote: At least not on purpose; accidents do happen however... and given... yeah... rabbits are slow.
*censored for the betterment of the community* |
Author: | btiffin [ Fri May 23, 2008 8:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Fri May 23, 2008 10:04 am wrote: Yay for not being sick - and double yay for not having evil little children to take care of.
Best of luck to everyone else though... suckers. Oh, md, md, md. I have no doubts you'd be the type of Dad that would dote, and use words like cute and precious and then headbutt anyone that thought or said different. |
Author: | apomb [ Sun May 25, 2008 10:45 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I want to tell anyone and everyone who still thinkgs turing is a viable programming language that is worth making shitty GUI libraries for and pretending like by doing so you have saved the world from a terrible evil. --you people make me sick. NO ONE CARES ABOUT TURING PAST GRADE 10!. get over it. thank you. |
Author: | tenniscrazy [ Sun May 25, 2008 2:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
haha our old computer science teacher got sick and had to leave, and the new guy hes straight out of university and all he has studied is turing. And we're doing java |
Author: | Nick [ Sun May 25, 2008 2:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
22 more posts to go! |
Author: | btiffin [ Sun May 25, 2008 3:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ Sun May 25, 2008 10:45 am wrote: I want to tell anyone and everyone who still thinkgs turing is a viable programming language that is worth making shitty GUI libraries for and pretending like by doing so you have saved the world from a terrible evil. --you people make me sick.
NO ONE CARES ABOUT TURING PAST GRADE 10!. get over it. thank you. apomb is becoming immersed in the world of work. Real men use real computers. I'm of two minds on this one apomb. Yes industrial and core business applications should be with real tools and not really on PC's. When someone invents the laptop Business Computer, the <insert Canadian Inventor name here> BC, I'll rethink that stance, but not until then. But, to be honest ... all programming is ok. I've got professional pals that still make a living with VB. As long as we never have to get on an airplane with Turing avionics it all should work out. The 'net is making it so coders can make a living in just about every language under the sun ... again, as long as these are just webpage backends, entertainment or "productivity tool", 'sall good. And hopefully the up and coming Global Enterprise CTO's from compsci.ca will realize that industrial apps are not built with teaching lingos. As a professional you may bump into this more and more. Programmers making systems based on mickey mouse tools, but yet when you look; they get paid and paid well and the companies even thrive. Doesn't really make sense, but it is the reality. Cheers |
Author: | apomb [ Sun May 25, 2008 3:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
tenniscrazy @ Sun May 25, 2008 2:11 pm wrote: haha our old computer science teacher got sick and had to leave, and the new guy hes straight out of university and all he has studied is turing. And we're doing java
i'm sorry for the death of that man's dignity right there... on a side note, I am definitely seeing the benefits of real world Operating systems, programming languages and learning techniques. I have hard time accepting that any full time pure programming career is worth getting paid well for... i am of the midset that real work involves more than just being able to type out a set of instructions. but of course, im not opposed to it, its just taking some getting used to. as for me not taking turing seriously... i'm over it. I concede to not go into the turing forums in fear of flaming some grade 10 kid who believes that his new turing program is revolutionary. |
Author: | btiffin [ Sun May 25, 2008 3:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Author: | Insectoid [ Sun May 25, 2008 3:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Pfft, I've made plenty of revolutionary programs in the two months I've used turing, there's: -The bank machine -A restaurant -A trivia -Pong -PacMan -Several other pointless games I used to think were cool |
Author: | tenniscrazy [ Sun May 25, 2008 4:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
haha, anything is cool if you make it yourself...until the novelty wears off |
Author: | Insectoid [ Sun May 25, 2008 4:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's like painting miniatures, the first one you do is always amazing...until the second one. |
Author: | apomb [ Sun May 25, 2008 7:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
insectoid @ Sun May 25, 2008 4:23 pm wrote: It's like painting miniatures, the first one you do is always amazing...until the second one.
but when you try showing other people you get a punch to the gut because they dont care lol |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Sun May 25, 2008 7:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ 2008-05-25, 3:23 pm wrote: I concede to not go into the turing forums in fear of flaming some grade 10 kid who believes that his new turing program is revolutionary.
And that's all we ask of you. |
Author: | apomb [ Sun May 25, 2008 7:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Gandalf @ Sun May 25, 2008 7:29 pm wrote: apomb @ 2008-05-25, 3:23 pm wrote: I concede to not go into the turing forums in fear of flaming some grade 10 kid who believes that his new turing program is revolutionary.
And that's all we ask of you. lol it really is for the continuing ignorant bliss of the turing community *EDIT ... and my own continuing sanity damn your name and breaking the quote system... you're lucky i caught it on only my first edit. |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Sun May 25, 2008 7:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Muahaha, no one quotes me and walks away unscathed! Or at least, slightly annoyed... |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sun May 25, 2008 7:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Gandalf @ Sun May 25, 2008 6:44 pm wrote: I is quote breaking douchebag, bow in terror and fear of kittens much.
I'll pass thanks. |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Sun May 25, 2008 7:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Now now, no reason to be mean. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sun May 25, 2008 8:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's meant as a joke... I mean seriously, kittens? |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun May 25, 2008 8:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Gandalf @ Sun May 25, 2008 7:44 pm wrote: Muahaha, no one quotes me and walks away unscathed! Or at least, slightly annoyed...
It's just second nature now to remove the brackets from Flagnod's name whenever I quote him. It's weird though, didn't it work in V2? |
Author: | md [ Sun May 25, 2008 8:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
So close, and yet so far... |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
/me demands chicken |
Author: | Nick [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
imitating Saad are we? |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Nope, Saads mom. + I really want chicken. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
"Why does he keep calling me a chicken" |
Author: | Nick [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
lmfao |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Wow I win |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
or do I? |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Maybe this one? |
Author: | md [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Wheeeee! |
Author: | md [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Oh, damn. The stats are apparently not real-time. |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Stats real of time and points points of lessness, lessness of time, thus this thread lives on. |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Wow that was one failure of a post. |
Author: | Nick [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
now 4 more pages till the world implodes... should we stop posting? |
Author: | Clayton [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Only if you promise to leave CompSci.ca |
Author: | syntax_error [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
couldn't he just come back with a different name? |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton @ Sun May 25, 2008 8:16 pm wrote: Wow that was one failure of a post.
Up yours, it's the point(yeah right) of this thread. |
Author: | md [ Sun May 25, 2008 9:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Damn, I wonder who got the winning post... |
Author: | syntax_error [ Sun May 25, 2008 10:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
of what? |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Sun May 25, 2008 10:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Beating the old, "most posts" thread. |
Author: | Nick [ Sun May 25, 2008 10:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Sun May 25, 2008 9:58 pm wrote: Damn, I wonder who got the winning post...
Mackie did |
Author: | syntax_error [ Sun May 25, 2008 10:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
oo well congrats makie? |
Author: | Mackie [ Sun May 25, 2008 10:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Haha No congrats, I cheated. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Sun May 25, 2008 10:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
aww tisk tisk I would have as well =P |
Author: | apomb [ Sun May 25, 2008 11:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
why does your avatar keep growing mackie? EDIT: 3 pages left!! eeeeeee!! |
Author: | syntax_error [ Mon May 26, 2008 2:09 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
it changes. meh, world imploding or exploding? EDIT: it just might bee too much caffeine but i swear its 3 in the morning... |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon May 26, 2008 7:35 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
What? Mackie is evolving! |
Author: | Insectoid [ Mon May 26, 2008 8:03 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Spaming just to help the thread along.... |
Author: | nastynika [ Mon May 26, 2008 8:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
what will ackie become when he is finished evolving? |
Author: | StealthArcher [ Mon May 26, 2008 9:16 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Macktastico |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 11:46 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You'll see. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 1:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
heh, i noticed a while ago, but this last evolution was the biggest change... by the way mackie, can you P.M me the I.P of the ftp server, i seem to have forgotten it and want to ftp something up to my site. thanks! |
Author: | Shamikh [ Mon May 26, 2008 2:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Wow how does this survie so long? |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 2:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Shamikh @ Mon May 26, 2008 2:08 pm wrote: Wow how does this survie so long?
the collective will of the gods |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 2:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
More like some people think it's cool. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 2:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
more like YOUR FACE THINKS ITS COOL |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 2:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Oh. Damn. What ever shall I do? |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 2:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i'm all out of ideas, lets go get some tacos |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon May 26, 2008 2:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
The evolution of Mackie's avatars: |
Author: | Insectoid [ Mon May 26, 2008 2:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Hmm...Seems evolution is possible... |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 2:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
How the hell? Thats awesome, I didn't keep old ones. How did u get them? |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 2:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
He's stalking you. Or abusing his mod powers. One of the two. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon May 26, 2008 2:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yea, I'm totally stalking Mackie. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
He has mod powers!? the F*CK is this shit!? |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
ouuuuu... its lookin spancy now mackie, |
Author: | rizzix [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ Mon May 26, 2008 3:07 pm wrote: He has mod powers!? the F*** is this shit!?
CodeMonkey2000, Saad and HeavenAgain are new mods. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
so how far is it going to evolve? |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
rizzix @ Mon May 26, 2008 3:11 pm wrote: apomb @ Mon May 26, 2008 3:07 pm wrote: He has mod powers!? the F*** is this shit!?
CodeMonkey2000, Saad and HeavenAgain are new mods. I knew there were some new mods... but i didnt know it was that bad |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Hey now, go easy. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Saad, i only see on IRC, i dont even think ive seen him around the forums, unless he is an extensive turing poster... then ok i can understand. anyway, my opinions on the new mods is not as important as how close this thread is getting to 80 pages! |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's evolving for a reason, and will go as far as it takes to achieve its purpose. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
A purpose you say? I highly doubt it. |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I doubt your credentials. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You cannot doubt my Pilot's License jerk! |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I doubt it, since its only a GLIDER pilot license... barely a license at all |
Author: | isaiahk9 [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
All evolution is based off a purpose - our eyes to prevent us from running into walls, our complex brains to prevent us from sticking our hands in blenders, and our feet to prevent us from falling and cracking open our skull. but despite all our evolution, some people still do these things . . . |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Way to ruin a conversation. |
Author: | Dan [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
isaiahk9 @ 26th May 2008, 3:46 pm wrote: All evolution is based off a purpose
Aucatly it's based on natueral selection and the mutations are random, it only gives the aperence of purpose. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb @ Mon May 26, 2008 3:46 pm wrote: I doubt it, since its only a GLIDER pilot license... barely a license at all
Not true at all. I know some people with only their Glider Pilot License who are making a killer living (ie. six digit incomes), so I'd shut your mouth if I were you. |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I'd shut your mom If I were you. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Clayton @ Mon May 26, 2008 3:51 pm wrote: apomb @ Mon May 26, 2008 3:46 pm wrote: I doubt it, since its only a GLIDER pilot license... barely a license at all
Not true at all. I know some people with only their Glider Pilot License who are making a killer living (ie. six digit incomes), so I'd shut your mouth if I were you. i was joking...hence the "" face ... having a pilot license at all is impressive. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 3:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Ah, didn't even notice it there I was busy laughing at the beginning of another Evolution vs. Creation thread in the longest thread on CompSci.ca |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Did Godwin's law take effect? |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Not yet. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Wait, how close are we to 80 pages? |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Have we made it there yet? |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I want death and destruction damn it! |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I've almost had it with this page layout. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
This has got to be it? EDIT: Haha! Have fun in hell suckers! |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Cya guys in void! |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Nearly at 80. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
We're keeping this here for now, unless someone really objects. I just want to see the reaction |
Author: | Dan [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Another 20 pages! We can make it to 100! (Tho lets try to keep the spam down *looks in clayton's direction*) |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Hey, don't look at me. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
We won't if we keep it here. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I plan on moving it back either early tomorrow morning or much later tonight. We'll see. |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread (Part Deux) |
Add 80 pages to the current page and you get the correct number. This thread is in honor of... http://compsci.ca/v3/viewtopic.php?p=163090#163090 Who mysteriously disappeared shortly after turning 80. [edit by md] Fixed thread title to more accurately reflect this thread's status. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
considering you got the thread title wrong... nice fail. |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
Shut up! I forget what the full name was. Change the name then! |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
No. This is not the same thread, no matter how much you want it to be. If anything, there should be a tribute thread. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
NO i missed the final post! what the hell!? the name was pointless and contentious thread... by the way |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
I blame phpbb |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 4:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
i blame ... whoever didnt account for thread lengths over 80 pages |
Author: | Insectoid [ Mon May 26, 2008 5:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
lol... Who got the last post, anyway? |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon May 26, 2008 5:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
That's a secret. You had to be there. |
Author: | Nick [ Mon May 26, 2008 5:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
Clayton @ Mon May 26, 2008 4:28 pm wrote: I blame phpbb
I blame you... |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon May 26, 2008 5:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
For what? |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 5:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
The last post is debatable. The last post in the thread, and the post that broke it are separate things. PS 79 pages left! |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 5:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
you do realize it took over 2 years to get to 80 pages right? |
Author: | Insectoid [ Mon May 26, 2008 5:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
This isn't the kind of thing you do twice, now that it is confirmed that 81 pages is impossible |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 5:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
not if dan fixes the bug by then. |
Author: | Insectoid [ Mon May 26, 2008 5:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
Yes, if dan fixes the bug within 79 pages, then there is some purpose to this thread. Should have the title changed to "yet another poitless and contentious thread 2" |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 5:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
This is a placeholder until the other one comes back. |
Author: | syntax_error [ Mon May 26, 2008 5:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
i dont think it will |
Author: | Sean [ Mon May 26, 2008 6:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
No point in getting your hopes up. This thread most likely won't be brought back even if they fix it. Just continue this one, and praise the former one. |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 6:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
Probably a PHPBB problem, it's most likely still in the tables, just wont display. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon May 26, 2008 6:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Ahahaha, Mackie thinks that there is a bug in PHPBB. Mackie can't post here at this time!! |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 6:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
nope, i dont think so... our posts from that thread are no longer even being counted in "all posts" |
Author: | Nick [ Mon May 26, 2008 6:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
but the thread still holds the record in statistics... |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 6:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
odd |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon May 26, 2008 6:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
That's really strange. I think we brokened PHP. |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 6:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet Another Pointless And Continuous Thread |
Not that difficult. At least were still alive. |
Author: | md [ Mon May 26, 2008 8:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I have no idea what anyone is going on about. Clearly you're all crazy. |
Author: | Nick [ Mon May 26, 2008 8:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
damn you mods <.< |
Author: | rizzix [ Mon May 26, 2008 9:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Haha, looking at it from md's point of view, its pretty funny. (He missed all the action .. or did he ) Edit: It's even funnier how Dan is being blamed for all this mischief. |
Author: | md [ Mon May 26, 2008 9:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I go to work for a measly 7 hours and what happens? All hell breaks loose! Threads reach 80 pages and get moved by a certain mod who's name rhymes with haton, and I'm left to pick up the pieces! I hope your all happy, you've ruined my day. |
Author: | Clayton [ Mon May 26, 2008 9:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You bastard. Think of who's fun you ruined! |
Author: | Nick [ Mon May 26, 2008 9:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
and I suspected him all along |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon May 26, 2008 9:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It was funny reading the posts and watching the comments on IRC. |
Author: | Mackie [ Mon May 26, 2008 9:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I feel so betrayed... |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon May 26, 2008 9:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Mackie, is it just me, or is your avatar asexually reproducing by the means of binary fission? EDIT: Clayton, next time try deleting the thread. |
Author: | apomb [ Mon May 26, 2008 10:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I left work and came home to the thread being effed with, i was not happy. |
Author: | nastynika [ Tue May 27, 2008 8:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
welll it all semms to be in order now i can see that clayton had the breaking post and it seems to be back to normal |
Author: | Insectoid [ Tue May 27, 2008 9:24 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Wow...So it was a prank? Good stuff, made me lauph. |
Author: | md [ Tue May 27, 2008 9:29 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
IIRC the only real bugs with phpbb occur somewhere around 500 or 1000 pages. Clearly we're a long way off. |
Author: | Insectoid [ Tue May 27, 2008 9:47 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I see how this must have been funny to those in on the joke! "wtf? where'd it go? dan'd better fix this!" and "phpbb must suck, only 80 pgs before it crashes?" and "I forgot what the whole title was". Funny stuff. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue May 27, 2008 2:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
md @ Tue May 27, 2008 9:29 am wrote: IIRC the only real bugs with phpbb occur somewhere around 500 or 1000 pages. Clearly we're a long way off.
we got some work to do... but let's try to keep the spam to a minium |
Author: | Sean [ Tue May 27, 2008 2:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Kackie keeps evolving. Wonder what is next? |
Author: | Mackie [ Tue May 27, 2008 2:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Kackie eh? |
Author: | Sean [ Tue May 27, 2008 2:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
The M and the K are close together |
Author: | apomb [ Tue May 27, 2008 3:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
i cant wait till we get to 1337 posts in thius thread |
Author: | Mackie [ Tue May 27, 2008 3:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Then no one can EVER post again. |
Author: | Nick [ Tue May 27, 2008 3:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
of course we can Kackie |
Author: | Sean [ Tue May 27, 2008 3:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Err.. stop teasing me on my errors! |
Author: | gitoxa [ Tue May 27, 2008 3:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
It's okay Dean, you're a pretty cool guy. |
Author: | Clayton [ Tue May 27, 2008 5:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
You're all ridiculous. |
Author: | md [ Tue May 27, 2008 8:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Less spam or this can be locked. It's achieved it's purpose after all. |
Author: | btiffin [ Tue May 27, 2008 8:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
The thread is the message. to paraphrase Marshall McLuhan |
Author: | Mackie [ Tue May 27, 2008 8:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
btiffin, you know a lot of things. |
Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Tue May 27, 2008 8:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I fully endorse a lock. |
Author: | btiffin [ Tue May 27, 2008 9:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Mackie; why thank you. To be honest, it is more due to age than IQ. I like to think of my IQ in the 85 to 100 (and a little) range; depends on the day, the time and were the moon is. You will all find that your brain is a fairly large empty space; one life time won't fill it - so go ahead and try. Cheers |
Author: | apomb [ Tue May 27, 2008 11:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
CodeMonkey2000 @ Tue May 27, 2008 8:35 pm wrote: I fully endorse a lock.
and probably only because you will still be able to post in it. |
Author: | Dan [ Wed May 28, 2008 12:04 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
New mods do not have power in off topic.... |
Author: | apomb [ Wed May 28, 2008 7:07 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
heh oh... then i apologize for the remark. |
Author: | Mackie [ Wed May 28, 2008 7:20 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
apomb, I feel bad... You have no power, that's why I grant you the power of sight! *Poof* You'll see... |
Author: | nastynika [ Thu May 29, 2008 7:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
mackie your avatar is looking pretty cool how far r u planning on taking it? |
Author: | Insectoid [ Thu May 29, 2008 7:59 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Sponges. |
Author: | petree08 [ Thu May 29, 2008 9:22 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
lufa (?) |
Author: | apomb [ Thu May 29, 2008 9:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
nastynika @ Thu May 29, 2008 7:56 am wrote: mackie your avatar is looking pretty cool how far r u planning on taking it?
I cant find the exact post, but i believe he said "as far as it takes" |
Author: | Insectoid [ Thu May 29, 2008 2:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Nutmeg. |
Author: | nastynika [ Fri May 30, 2008 8:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
@ insectoid u must be bored |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Fri May 30, 2008 9:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Thank goodness this monstrosity is slowly dying... |
Author: | syntax_error [ Fri May 30, 2008 9:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
is it? |
Author: | Insectoid [ Sat May 31, 2008 9:44 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Startbar. |
Author: | Insectoid [ Sat May 31, 2008 9:51 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
I believe it is my civil duty to help in the assisting of the continuation of the continuity of the lenghening of the length of this pointless and contentious thread. |
Author: | Nick [ Sat May 31, 2008 11:35 am ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
let's not spam |
Author: | syntax_error [ Sat May 31, 2008 4:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
We really cant complain about spam in a off topic thread can we? |
Author: | Clayton [ Sat May 31, 2008 5:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Yes. There was a reason this forum's name was changed from Spam. |
Author: | md [ Sat May 31, 2008 11:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Yet another pointless and contentious thread. |
Lockity lock lock lock. |