Ok, done
1/5 as expectedComputer Science Canada DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
| Author: | bbi5291 [ Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
Why does 1001 not appear in the sample output? |
|
| Author: | Tony [ Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
Because I FAIL. Please disregard Question 3. |
|
| Author: | bbi5291 [ Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
Are there problems with the actual test data too, then? By "disregard question 3", do you mean that it isn't going to be counted? |
|
| Author: | Tony [ Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
Yes, there are problems in the test data as well. It would leave us with less post-contest cleanup maintenance if you were to not figure out a way to score anyway. |
|
| Author: | saltpro15 [ Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
...sooo do it or do not do it? |
|
| Author: | Dan [ Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
saltpro15 @ 25th November 2009, 4:37 pm wrote: ...sooo do it or do not do it?
Do the question as it is writen and don't try to manipulate it so you get 5/5 with incorect data that judge will mark right. |
|
| Author: | Tony [ Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
The thing is, the question is written wrong as well. I think Dan is saying "Do the question as it was intended". But the judge has wrong test data. |
|
| Author: | Dan [ Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
Tony @ 25th November 2009, 4:43 pm wrote: I think Dan is saying "Do the question as it was intended".
Indeed :p |
|
| Author: | saltpro15 [ Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
Ok, done 1/5 as expected |
|
| Author: | Tony [ Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
 |
|
| Author: | Vengeance101 [ Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
Hey, I hardcoded the problem and I got 0/5 for it. Is it because you took it down after a while? If so, missed out on some very easy points. |
|
| Author: | Tony [ Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3? |
Vengeance101 @ Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:36 am wrote: Hey, I hardcoded the problem and I got 0/5 for it.
I'm not sure how one even attempt to hard code a solution for variable input, but... 
http://compsci.ca/blog/hard-code/ |
|