Computer Science Canada

What is unix?

Author:  Martin [ Wed Jun 04, 2003 9:20 pm ]
Post subject:  What is unix?

I feel dumb for asking this, but what exactly is unix?

Author:  Homer_simpson [ Wed Jun 04, 2003 9:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

i dunno much about unix but i know that it is an OS very powerful(unhackable) and most of the powerful servers run on unix...

Author:  Asok [ Wed Jun 04, 2003 10:02 pm ]
Post subject: 

umm.. Unix is hackable just like any other OS.

Author:  Blade [ Wed Jun 04, 2003 10:07 pm ]
Post subject: 

yeah unix is hackable.. but its not nearly as easy as any other system. it was built for servers of any kind, therefore making it very stable. but it is not meant to be a workstation, thats where linux, windows nt/2000 pro/xp pro comes in.

Author:  Catalyst [ Wed Jun 04, 2003 10:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

it was not originally built for servers

Author:  Blade [ Wed Jun 04, 2003 10:41 pm ]
Post subject: 

what i read was it was originaly built to control different things like big time security systems... but its now more universal and more commonly heard of being used for servers.. i dunno what i read could've been wrong

Author:  Catalyst [ Wed Jun 04, 2003 10:45 pm ]
Post subject: 

i dont think your wrong but it wasnt originally designed for servers since it did begin in the 60's

Author:  Blade [ Wed Jun 04, 2003 10:50 pm ]
Post subject: 

Blade wrote:
what i read was it was originaly built to control different things like big time security systems... but its now more universal and more commonly heard of being used for servers.. i dunno what i read could've been wrong

i know it wasnt originally built for servers... thats not really what i meant, i was only trying to imply its now commonly used for servers

Author:  octopi [ Wed Jun 04, 2003 11:57 pm ]
Post subject: 

Unix, is well... It really depends, I don't know what the exact definition is, but I define it as, an operating system that manages disks like this

code:
/
/usr
/usr/bin/perl


In windows it would be like:
code:
C:\
C:\perl\
C:\perl\bin\perl


All unix versions use /'s instead of C:'s to access the hard disks.
Another thing thats not posible in windows is having your
/ only have 50mb
but having your
/usr have 800mb

(have more space in a directory then is in the directory above it. (if you want.))

Unix's also come with apache, perl, telnet, and other things right from the get go. (Most atleast.) Unix is really aimed towards the developer, more the the end user. Its a good operating system for web development and to use as a webserver.

Unix's are considered to be more stable, and handle errors, better then mac's and windows.

They are also considered to be more secure, but it really depends on who's using it, and how secure they make it. You can get some pretty secure windows machines, with little effort.

Unix's used to all be like dos, where you used commands to do what you want, but nowadays (with the linux, aimed at the end user) you can get graphical user interfaces to it, like KDE. But these make the system less stable.


btw:
code:
su-2.05b# uptime
12:25AM  up 24 days,  1:28, 2 users, load averages: 0.03, 0.05, 0.02
As of right now, my unix (FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE) machine has been up for over three weeks Very Happy

Author:  Homer_simpson [ Thu Jun 05, 2003 7:50 am ]
Post subject: 

that aint true i've seen unix looking like windows and u dont have to type anything...(like dos)

Author:  Blade [ Thu Jun 05, 2003 11:16 am ]
Post subject: 

octopi wrote:
Unix's used to all be like dos, where you used commands to do what you want, but nowadays (with the linux, aimed at the end user) you can get graphical user interfaces to it, like KDE. But these make the system less stable.

dude, you gotta read what the man is saying... he said there are GUI's to handle unix based systems... hence KDE

Author:  Homer_simpson [ Thu Jun 05, 2003 3:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

oops... Embarassed
sorry thought u said something else...

Author:  naoki [ Thu Jun 05, 2003 4:25 pm ]
Post subject: 

i hear it's hell to set up linux, but you've got a wicked comp capable of doing many things afterwards

and since linux is an improved version of unix you should really look there for understanding

Author:  Asok [ Thu Jun 05, 2003 4:38 pm ]
Post subject: 

dual booting between win XP and redhat linux was fairly easy for me to set up.

Author:  Blade [ Thu Jun 05, 2003 6:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

i had duel boot between madrake linux 8.0 and win xp before too.. and it wasn't very hard...

Author:  hello [ Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:28 pm ]
Post subject: 

is that not a web page editor like frontpage

Author:  Blade [ Thu Jun 05, 2003 9:24 pm ]
Post subject: 

no, they're operating systems (mandrake linux, windows xp)

Author:  rizzix [ Fri Jun 06, 2003 10:34 pm ]
Post subject: 

i've setup, installed, uninstalled, a thousand times now UNIX/Linux systems. I personally run my own favourite, which unlike other UNIX/Linux systems is HIGHLy productive, for any one. I use MACOSX now. It rocks. I believe it currently holds on of the most advanced technologies embeded in it. Coo eh! Windows Longhorn, will come to this standard only after 2005, which is ample amount of time for the NEXT,NEXT generation MacOS. Heh, i can't wait. ya windws is pretty much behind. Anyways the only reason UNIX systems are used as servers, is b/c, as i said it is not a very productive environment for almost everyone.

But o well, now i simply have UNIX installed on my comps (no dual boot!) for the sake of its amazing power, hence a great server platform. Other wize i simply use OSX.

o btw: catalyst, ur a great programmer, and i belive ur interested in the graphics programming/games etc. Listen up get a mac, u'll go crazy!

Author:  Catalyst [ Fri Jun 06, 2003 10:38 pm ]
Post subject: 

thx for the tip
ive been considering getting a mac recently but have yet to find the $

Author:  FDisk87 [ Sun Dec 07, 2003 3:36 pm ]
Post subject: 

I have set up many UNIX/Linux machines in my day, including Solaris on x86 (I was bored one day, I wish I had an Ultra SPARC iii), FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Mandrake Linux, Gentoo, Red Hat all versions from 5 and Knoppix to a HDD. I hope to buy a MAC one day to use OS X but for now I am stuck to x86 Sad

Author:  rizzix [ Sun Dec 07, 2003 7:45 pm ]
Post subject: 

nice!! tried installing debian.. its a real pain.. i finally got that installed.. then later on i screwed up the whole system by corrupting the display drivers.. meh.. just to warn u guys.. hehe be careful, every OS is vulnerable at its roots. nevertheless i'm too lazy to try fix that thing.. or reinstall =/ o well..

Author:  PaddyLong [ Sun Dec 07, 2003 9:04 pm ]
Post subject: 

linux is pretty fuckin cool Very Happy, so cool that I'm likely gonna switch over to it to use as my main os pretty soon ... next semester I start with linux/unix shell programming which should be pretty interesting

Author:  Blade [ Mon Dec 08, 2003 2:17 am ]
Post subject: 

i switched over to redat 9 in september, then Fedora core when it came out.... i had tonnes of problems with FC, so 2 days later i got Slackware 9.1 and ever since then i've been on it.... i like it the most... i've seen tonnes of other ones but i'm happy with slack.

i'll have to admit there are tonnes of die-hard windows fans out there, and the only reason i can think of being why, is because its "easier" to learn... anyone could probably pick up a comp and with a lil playing around they could have it figured out in no time... but there are too many downsides to it for me...

i have about 1600 people at my school, and i can count on one hand how many people use an OS other then windows. the people that dont use windows are the only ones that know there's such a thing as an os other then windows... so my school doesn't have the benefit of offering that course.

Author:  PaddyLong [ Mon Dec 08, 2003 11:53 am ]
Post subject: 

yeah I was planning to try out slackware... I've heard it's pretty good from a few other people. we worked with red hat 7.2 in our operating systems class this semester, I found it really really easy to set up... we had dual booting between windows 95 (and also dos obviously...) and linux

I think the situation you have about no one knowing there's such thing as other oses than windows is probably the same pretty much everywhere you go except for people who actually work in the high tech field or are interested in it in some way....

Author:  rizzix [ Mon Dec 08, 2003 11:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

wel u see guys.. i dunno about slackware and the others but almost every software created (for linux specially) is packaged for redhat, debian and gentoo. now also macosx as metapkg (but this not only include the specially designed software for linux but also unix) through the metapkg.org alliance (mostly fink Smile ).

never the less if i chose linux i'd go for redhat/suse. but if i chose unix i'd go for freebsd! those are the best u can get in terms of compatibility, performance and security on an overall average.

specilly compatibility/availability

--my 2 cents Smile


: