Computer Science Canada

New Longhorn Screenshots

Author:  Martin [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:43 am ]
Post subject:  New Longhorn Screenshots

For those of you who don't read Slashdot.

http://mirrordot.org/stories/38d3ca8d0f1450ecd904cfee28fb683c/index.html

I like the blur effect under the transparent Windows. Not sure what else Longhorn'll provide though...

Author:  md [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:32 am ]
Post subject: 

Looks good; the real question is how fast it is; and if you can run 3d games on one monitor while still getting the effects on the windows on your other monitor.

Author:  Amailer [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:50 am ]
Post subject: 

Okay... not much difference and I think it looks the same... uglier then the default XP theme Very Happy

I don't like the transparent thing (I have it and its annoying) I'm hoping you can turn that off and change the theme...

Why the heck is there a search box in the start menu... anyhow... IE 7.0 o.O um i don't like the look at all... now its just up to performance

Author:  Notoroge [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:19 am ]
Post subject: 

Agreed. Why the HELL don't they fix the underlying Operating System instead of fancy GUI? Competing with OS X on the visuals is useless if you don't have the system to back it up. But then again, it's Microsoft (tm). It's all about the visuals.

Author:  md [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:41 am ]
Post subject: 

I must point out that you really can't tell much about hte underlying OS (except that user stuff is now in the "Users" directory) from screen shots.

Author:  Notoroge [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:54 am ]
Post subject: 

Cornflake wrote:
I must point out that you really can't tell much about hte underlying OS (except that user stuff is now in the "Users" directory) from screen shots.
Obviously. But I've read some reports, articles, Microsoft Documentation, and the likes, which bring me to the conclusion that Longhorn is nothing but a pretty WindowsXP with a few more bundled apps.

Author:  Tony [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 12:06 pm ]
Post subject: 

Notoroge wrote:
Agreed. Why the HELL don't they fix the underlying Operating System instead of fancy GUI? Competing with OS X on the visuals is useless if you don't have the system to back it up. But then again, it's Microsoft (tm). It's all about the visuals.

This is funny because Longhorn still doesn't look as good as OSX, nor does it match OSX's underlying OS. Laughing

Author:  1of42 [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 1:55 pm ]
Post subject: 

Cornflake wrote:
I must point out that you really can't tell much about hte underlying OS (except that user stuff is now in the "Users" directory) from screen shots.


Thank you.

OH NOES!!11 THEY PRINTAD SCREENSH0TS!!!H4LP!111 WINDOWS SUCKZ0RS!11eleventyone!!1 Evil or Very Mad

Let's all get angry about all of the deep things we find out abou the operating system from this screenshot. Rolling Eyes

For the record: I don't think it looks greater. But I'm not going to spaz about it.

Author:  Amailer [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 2:42 pm ]
Post subject: 

History also says M$ sucks and allows some spazzing Rolling Eyes
Anyhow, I complained only about the look- nothing more Rolling Eyes but I don't expect much change in the the performance either but iunno never tried it

Author:  wtd [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:12 pm ]
Post subject: 

Yay, a fancy new skin for Windows XP.

Seriously, if Microsoft wants people to take thems seriously, then they have to show some sign that they're making real progress.

Why do people really like open source software? They like it because they can check on a day-to-day basis to see if problems and feature requests are being addressed, and if not, they can switch to some other software. With proprietary, closed source software, and especially with a vendor as tight-lipped as MS, you're stuck taking their word for it and waiting.

Author:  Notoroge [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:31 pm ]
Post subject: 

1of42 wrote:
Thank you.

OH NOES!!11 THEY PRINTAD SCREENSH0TS!!!H4LP!111 WINDOWS SUCKZ0RS!11eleventyone!!1 Evil or Very Mad

Let's all get angry about all of the deep things we find out abou the operating system from this screenshot. Rolling Eyes

For the record: I don't think it looks greater. But I'm not going to spaz about it.
*Thinking out-loud*
Resist the temptation...
Resist the temptation...
Resist the temptation...
Resist the temptation...
Resist the temptation...
Resist the temptation...
Resist the temptation...
Resist the temptation...
Resist the temptation...

*SNAP*

ARE YOU FØCKING STUPID!? DO I LOOK FØCKING STUPID?! EVERYONE IS FØCKING STUPID! YAY! LET'S ALL JUST FØCK OFF AND START YELLING OUT STUPIDITIES WITHOUT BOTHERING TO READ ANY OF THE POSTS REGARDING THEIR REASONINGS AS TO WHY WE CONCLUDE OUT OWN DECISIONS! LOOK AT ME! I LOVE TO TYPE "!11eleventyone!!1" BECAUSE IT MAKES ME LOOK WITTY AND INTELLIGENT! AS IF I HAVE A SENSE OF HUMOUR! IT DOESN'T BOTHER ME THAT IT'S AN IDIOT JOKE THAT'S BEEN WAY TOO OVERUSED TO HAVE ANY HUMOROUS EFFECT WHAT-SO-EVER! HEY EVERYONE! PLEASE LIKE ME! RANDOMLY RANTING ABOUT STUPID THINGS SO THAT PEOPLE CAN SEE WHAT HIGH STANDARDS AND CLASS I HAVE IS COOL! RIGHT?! RIGHT?! HEY! HEY! LOOK AT ME! PLEASE?! JUST FOR GOOD MEASURE, I'M GOING TO CALL YOU A SPAZ EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVEN'T SAID ANYTHING EXTATICALLY! OKAY!? THAT WAY I CAN SEEM COOL AND IN CONTROL WHILE I'LL SHOW EVERYONE HOW MUCH OF A MAC FANBOY YOU ARE! OKAY!? OKAY!? WILL YOU LIKE ME THEN!?

For the Record:
Notoroge wrote:
Obviously. But I've read some reports, articles, Microsoft Documentation, and the likes, which bring me to the conclusion that Longhorn is nothing but a pretty WindowsXP with a few more bundled apps.

Notoroge wrote:
Obviously. But I've read some reports, articles, Microsoft Documentation, and the likes, which bring me to the conclusion that Longhorn is nothing but a pretty WindowsXP with a few more bundled apps.

Notoroge wrote:
Obviously. But I've read some reports, articles, Microsoft Documentation, and the likes, which bring me to the conclusion that Longhorn is nothing but a pretty WindowsXP with a few more bundled apps.

Notoroge wrote:
Obviously. But I've read some reports, articles, Microsoft Documentation, and the likes, which bring me to the conclusion that Longhorn is nothing but a pretty WindowsXP with a few more bundled apps.

Notoroge wrote:
Obviously. But I've read some reports, articles, Microsoft Documentation, and the likes, which bring me to the conclusion that Longhorn is nothing but a pretty WindowsXP with a few more bundled apps.

Notoroge wrote:
Obviously. But I've read some reports, articles, Microsoft Documentation, and the likes, which bring me to the conclusion that Longhorn is nothing but a pretty WindowsXP with a few more bundled apps.


There. Will that suffice? Please tell me how many more times I have to repeat that sentence before it is burned into your thick, mushy, pudding of a brain of yours. At least Cornflake was polite about my ambiguous post, and allowed for contructive conversation. Whereas you are nothing more than an attention seeking whòre.

Update: Thank you....idiot.

Author:  Neo [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 4:13 pm ]
Post subject: 

Claping I am not worthy I'm with stupid

Author:  [Gandalf] [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:36 pm ]
Post subject: 

Yes...

All I can tell from those screenshots is that I'm going to have a lot of stuff to delete, or try to delete. Windows Media Player 10, IE7, MSN... At least they kept Command Prompt Neutral. Only improvement over XP that I could tell is that now they have "Lock Computer".

One thing I could never understand about XP was why they had those annoying and hard-to-use templates. Personally, I immediately go to "classic view", don't know about anyone else...

*edit* Hmm, it seems they also have double x, minimizer and maximizer boxes - should be interesting. Can't describe it better, just look at the screenshots!

Author:  Martin [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:46 pm ]
Post subject: 

It's not a matter of people taking Microsoft seriously. Microsoft doesn't have to worry about that...they have no real competition. Apple prices themselves out of the market, and Linux is too hard to use for people to want to switch on a large scale (not that the Linux users care). Microsoft targets 95% of the market with their software. Nobody else does that (which is why Microsoft is in such a comfortable position).

It looks like Microsoft is fixing the problems with the operating system. Monad will be the most powerful scripting tool to date (if it makes it in), and they're fixing the permission system to be more like how it should have been 5 years ago.

Author:  1of42 [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:51 pm ]
Post subject: 

Notoroge wrote:


*random bitching* *snip*

There. Will that suffice? Please tell me how many more times I have to repeat that sentence before it is burned into your thick, mushy, pudding of a brain of yours. At least Cornflake was polite about my ambiguous post, and allowed for contructive conversation. Whereas you are nothing more than an attention seeking whòre.

Update: Thank you....idiot.


Did I say your opinion wasn't correct? No. I simply pointed out (in a somewhat satirical way) that using every opportunity you can get to criticize Microsoft makes you come off as (to say the least) slightly ignorant. They're not perfect, they're not even that great, but seeing a screenshot and launching into a rant about them is rather pathetic.

The fact that you then spent what must have been a significant chunk of time to post entirely in bold, in alternating colors, steadily increasing in size , replacing all naughty words with weird accents (because that clearly obscures their meaning Rolling Eyes ) sort of goes to prove my point. Leaving the capslock key down makes the 12-year old image complete.

Excuse me for having a differing opinion and not being on the anti-MS Linux bandwagon, oh great all-knowing user of bold text.

And by the way, yes, after that post, you do look pretty

Notoroge wrote:
FØCKING STUPID

Author:  Tony [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

I advice the flaming Flaming to stop now. Thank you.

Author:  1of42 [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 6:54 pm ]
Post subject: 

Tony wrote:
I advice the flaming Flaming to stop now. Thank you.


I agree. Furthermore, i claim the moral high ground for not once swearing... mwahahaha 8)

Author:  Paul [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 7:24 pm ]
Post subject: 

I'd just like to point out, that even though you two disagree, the way you go about it is essentially the same. Notoroge just puts more love and time into his posts (+1 for effort!).

Anyhow, I think longhorn looks OK, if my computer was able to handle fancy GUI's, I'd use them... but as it is now... it can't. Besides, don't automatically fooey on Microsoft, my computer hasn't crashed once (other than when I stupidly securing my harddrive with only one screw) since I installed windows XP. I also didn't get any devastating virus's (I download heavily, and I don't use a firewall or a virus scanner, the last I checked in the first scan in years on XP, I found 2 trojans... minor things). Am I the only one that thinks this is a major improvement from the days of windows 98... gah! the horrible memories...

The point is, windows has improved, its easy to use (call me lazy for not wanting to try linux), and I really don't see the point of getting a mac, seeing as I'm not 1. rich or 2. a perfectionist of any kind. I'm just a normal computer user, not highly demanding. Windows is perfect for me... so microsoft isn't bad.

Many say that microsoft is standing in the way of progress with its monopoly. Well, business is business Razz

Author:  wtd [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:09 pm ]
Post subject: 

Windows isn't the ideal OS for anyone.

Author:  Notoroge [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:14 pm ]
Post subject: 

1of42 wrote:
Did I say your opinion wasn't correct? No. I simply pointed out (in a somewhat satirical way) that using every opportunity you can get to criticize Microsoft makes you come off as (to say the least) slightly ignorant. They're not perfect, they're not even that great, but seeing a screenshot and launching into a rant about them is rather pathetic.

The fact that you then spent what must have been a significant chunk of time to post entirely in bold, in alternating colors, steadily increasing in size , replacing all naughty words with weird accents (because that clearly obscures their meaning Rolling Eyes ) sort of goes to prove my point. Leaving the capslock key down makes the 12-year old image complete.

Excuse me for having a differing opinion and not being on the anti-MS Linux bandwagon, oh great all-knowing user of bold text.

And by the way, yes, after that post, you do look pretty

Notoroge wrote:
FØCKING STUPID
Oh boy, Oh boy, Oh boy, I love tough meat to chew on. Get's the jaw muscles working. It's been a while since I've tried this, so bare with me...
*Cracks Fingers*...

Quote:
(in a somewhat satirical way)
Not satirical. Ignorant. That joke is used to make fun of kids when using 'leet speak', which is not the case here. And if you really wanted to point something out, you'd be more like Cornflake, who although likes to argue, knows how to only do it when necessary and not trying to be an attention wh0re.

Quote:
using every opportunity you can get to criticize Microsoft makes you come off as (to say the least) slightly ignorant. They're not perfect, they're not even that great, but seeing a screenshot and launching into a rant about them is rather pathetic.
Please name *one single other post* in this forum... Better yet, search "Notoroge" on Google and tell me one single comment by me *anywhere* ranting about Microsoft. I advocate Microsoft's simplicity (though lack of security there-of is left for another topic). And being their customer (yes, purchased XP, unlike you who I'm %70 sure have a ripped version), I have a right to critisize its faults. I'd rather pay for something that didn't have all the whiz-bang and actually worked *well* rather than *pretty*. I read somewhere, "You can polish a lump of crap, but you just end up with a shiny lump of crap". Pathetic? Hardly. If people didn't complain about Microsoft's lacking support and deteriorating product quality, we'd still be using Windows 3.11. If anything, it's because of people like me that Microsoft keeps on track. Taking everything that is given to you without questioning it, is, in my opinion, pathetic.

Quote:
The fact that you then spent what must have been a significant chunk of time to post entirely in bold, in alternating colors, steadily increasing in size , replacing all naughty words with weird accents (because that clearly obscures their meaning Rolling Eyes ) sort of goes to prove my point. Leaving the capslock key down makes the 12-year old image complete.
. Yes, because you know I love to spam forums with complete nonsense (such as yourself) and that is exactly how I communicate myself with everyone here. My vocabulary consists entirely of that which I've learnt on Sesame St. Have you ever heard of creativity? You know, expressing my state of being in text. Not typing a string of LOL!s but instead using the different colours and font sizes to illustrate my state of mind? No, seeing as you can't make up your own jokes and have to resort to utterly (non satirical, yet horribly annoying) jokes such as "oneeleventyone". Which is also entirely out of context in this case. If anything, you fulfil the 12 Year-old stereotype. A young little boy infront of his computer looking up every other word on Reference.com in order to not lose credibility as a linguist. Making posts that lack any type of content, and which are, to a very great extent, useless. Also, "Launching in to a rant"? It was one sentence stating Microsoft's current market strategy. Jesus, how much of an idiot are you?

Quote:
Excuse me for having a differing opinion and not being on the anti-MS Linux bandwagon, oh great all-knowing user of bold text.
Your wit is lacking. Words cannot describe how much of an as-s you make yourself sound like. First off, I never flamed against Microsoft (Again, when have I?), I commented on their horrible marketing strategy. That has nothing to do with influencing your choice of OSs. I use Windows. I advocate Windows' simplicity. Hell, I think one of my first posts on this site was "Well, maybe Windows crashes because you don't know how to use it, because I like it, and have never had any problems".

Are you a Communist? Why do you hate Freedom? Why do you hate Democracy? Freedom of Speech means I can't shut you up for your opinion, and you can't screw with me about mine.

Did you notice no one was flaming here? Did you notice I corrected my vague comment at the notice of Cornflake? Why do you have to be the as-shole? Why do you come in here, with your plenty-witiful replies, and attempt at "stealing the show", as it were? Because you are a drama wh0re. You like attention. And there's no problem in that. But learn how to gain the right kind of attention. Nobody likes a child rapist. That's bad attention. Just like nobody likes idiots trying to ruin other people's conversations with their own nonsense because they want to look cooler or impress eFriends with your maturity.

I've never seen a more gross miss-use of English colloquialisms in my life. I am deeply offended, not at your hateful post, but at your parent's for having risen such an immoral and intellectually depraved child.

Author:  Mazer [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

Have you guys seen that new Dr. Pepper commercial? I don't much care for the drink (to be perfectly fair, I've never tried it but lately sugar drinks aren't looking so appetizing), but the commercial itself was wonderful.
The music fit so perfectly, and it's some great music.

Ah, Meatloaf. Seeing that commercial takes me back to when I was seven years old trying to fall asleep. No seriously, it does.
</semi-random>

(Everyone, let's not get too carried away, I don't want to have to lock this topic)

Author:  md [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:12 pm ]
Post subject: 

all the doctor pepper commercials are good... although some of them are a little strange...

Author:  Paul [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:16 pm ]
Post subject: 

I've actually never seen one, *gasp*. Well, I haven't watched TV in a long while actually, and if I do, only news.

Wtd, it may not be ideal, but care to suggest another OS with less bugs, less learning "how to" and suitable for a lazy bum like me? Razz

Author:  wtd [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

Paul wrote:
Wtd, it may not be ideal, but care to suggest another OS with less bugs, less learning "how to" and suitable for a lazy bum like me? Razz


Any modern Linux distro, FreeBSD, Mac OS X...

Definitely fewer bugs, no spyware/adware/malware concerns, more software installed "out of the box", easier to install additional software...

Author:  Paul [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:21 pm ]
Post subject: 

But I have no problems with what I use now, and I'm tooo laaazy to back up. I don't like change... you get the point, I'm whiny. Wink I did get used to firefox though. If changing to any of those will give me a similar experience, I'll definitely give one a try in the future Wink As for spyware, I haven't found one I couldn't squash by myself, and I get one about once every 4-5 months before, now almost never 'cause of carefullness Razz

Author:  wtd [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:24 pm ]
Post subject: 

Paul wrote:
almost never 'cause of carefullness Razz


Imagine not having to be paranoid about such things.

Author:  Notoroge [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:34 pm ]
Post subject: 

I personally like the new NesTea commercial. The one that has the same music that Bill Murray listens to in his headphones when diving underwater in "The Life Aquatic". I soooooooo want to find out what song that is. Any ideas? The commercial where the guy gets launched in a catapult.

Author:  [Gandalf] [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:37 pm ]
Post subject: 

Paul wrote:
But I have no problems with what I use now, and I'm tooo laaazy to back up. I don't like change... you get the point, I'm whiny. Wink I did get used to firefox though. If changing to any of those will give me a similar experience, I'll definitely give one a try in the future Wink As for spyware, I haven't found one I couldn't squash by myself, and I get one about once every 4-5 months before, now almost never 'cause of carefullness Razz

First off, my getting used to firefox took around 20 seconds - finding the tools>options and officially making it the best browser I had ever used.

See, the reason why MS and Windows are succeeding so much is because everyone has gotten used to Windows, and its only human nature to not want to change. If linux had started out like that, and now "free, open source windows" Laughing came out, not too many would be willing to change.

*edit* it's strange, I haven't seen any of these mentioned commercials Confused.

Author:  Notoroge [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

Hm, I wish there was a full length track of this one, http://www.digitalproducer.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=32082&afterinter=true But apperantly the music was made specifically for the commercial. Sad

Author:  brenn [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:41 pm ]
Post subject: 

Notoroge wrote:
[...]
I advocate Microsoft's simplicity (though lack of security there-of is left for another topic). And being their customer (yes, purchased XP, unlike you who I'm %70 sure have a ripped version), I have a right to critisize its faults. I'd rather pay for something that didn't have all the whiz-bang and actually worked *well* rather than *pretty*. I read somewhere, "You can polish a lump of crap, but you just end up with a shiny lump of crap". Pathetic? Hardly. If people didn't complain about Microsoft's lacking support and deteriorating product quality, we'd still be using Windows 3.11. If anything, it's because of people like me that Microsoft keeps on track. Taking everything that is given to you without questioning it, is, in my opinion, pathetic.
[...]


Hmm, I purchased Win XP. I must admit that I don't have much exposure to other operating systems, but I do like the simplicity associated with windows (me explaining to my parents how to use the computer: point, click, point, click ...I suppose it's generic for a lot of other OSes). I used Win 3.1 mostly, growing up.

I'm not really sure what I'm trying to get at here. Just that Windows can be really .... for some people, and NOT for some others.

Smile Troubled Windows OS-Tans (images appear not to be working..:S) --> teehee


Edit: *Grumble* >_< If that doesn't work, look at this and blame Tony Very Happy

Author:  Notoroge [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:11 pm ]
Post subject: 

http://compsci.ca/v2/viewtopic.php?t=8763&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=45
Meh, if I'm an Anti-Microsoft zealot, lemon pie is made with apples. Confused

Author:  wtd [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:12 pm ]
Post subject: 

brenn wrote:
Hmm, I purchased Win XP. I must admit that I don't have much exposure to other operating systems, but I do like the simplicity associated with windows (me explaining to my parents how to use the computer: point, click, point, click ...I suppose it's generic for a lot of other OSes). I used Win 3.1 mostly, growing up.


I use Ubuntu Linux 5.04 (Hoary). I'd wager that any basic system task more often than not can be explained more simply with my OS of choice than with Windows XP.

brenn wrote:
I'm not really sure what I'm trying to get at here. Just that Windows can be really .... for some people, and NOT for some others.


You're reaching to justify the fact that you feel more comfortable by making claims you can't back up.

You don't have to. It's understandable, and perfectly ok. You've had a lot more experience with Windows. Even if you've been doing things the wrong way, they're habit, so they feel right. I get that.

What would not be ok, for a person posting to compsci.ca is not being willing to leave that sheltered world of Windows.

Author:  Notoroge [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:18 pm ]
Post subject: 

wtd wrote:
I use Ubuntu Linux 5.04 (Hoary). I'd wager that any basic system task more often than not can be explained more simply with my OS of choice than with Windows XP.
Changing file permissions. Laughing

Author:  wtd [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

Notoroge wrote:
wtd wrote:
I use Ubuntu Linux 5.04 (Hoary). I'd wager that any basic system task more often than not can be explained more simply with my OS of choice than with Windows XP.
Changing file permissions. Laughing


Right-click the file and select "Properties". Select the permissions tab. Change permissions. Close Properties dialog.

Not terribly complex.

Author:  lyam_kaskade [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:27 pm ]
Post subject: 

wtd wrote:

I use Ubuntu Linux 5.04 (Hoary).


Is there a reason why they named this version "The Hoary Hedgehog"? Not that I'm the kind of person who snickers at stupid things, but they could have picked a word with better connotations than Hoary. Furthermore, hoary is a word that denotes something old/obsolete, which probably isn't a way you want to describe an OS. Especially one like Ubuntu.
But then, what do I know. I mean really.

Author:  Notoroge [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:32 pm ]
Post subject: 

Windows XP wrote:
Right-click the file and select "Properties". Select the Security tab. Change permissions. Close Properties dialog.
Not terribly complex.

Author:  [Gandalf] [ Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:38 pm ]
Post subject: 

wtd wrote:
Notoroge wrote:
wtd wrote:
I use Ubuntu Linux 5.04 (Hoary). I'd wager that any basic system task more often than not can be explained more simply with my OS of choice than with Windows XP.
Changing file permissions. Laughing


Right-click the file and select "Properties". Select the permissions tab. Change permissions. Close Properties dialog.

Not terribly complex.

That sounds a lot (exactly the same) like Windows.

*EDIT* Blast! oh well... Still, I didn't mean it that way...

Author:  wtd [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 12:41 am ]
Post subject: 

lyam_kaskade wrote:
wtd wrote:

I use Ubuntu Linux 5.04 (Hoary).


Is there a reason why they named this version "The Hoary Hedgehog"? Not that I'm the kind of person who snickers at stupid things, but they could have picked a word with better connotations than Hoary. Furthermore, hoary is a word that denotes something old/obsolete, which probably isn't a way you want to describe an OS. Especially one like Ubuntu.
But then, what do I know. I mean really.


Because they have a sense of humor?

Warty Warthog wasn't that "great" either.

Author:  Amailer [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:09 am ]
Post subject: 

That way... a mac is much easier to learn/simple o.O
Why not switch to a mac? (i hate my mac its so damm slow and old)
+ it doesn't cash as much...and it does (for a strange reason Laughing loads faster then my windows o.O)

Author:  Tony [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 9:51 am ]
Post subject: 

Amailer wrote:
a mac is much easier to learn
Why not switch to a mac?

Number of reasons. Something about being scared of trying out an alternative, and games. Some kids *need* their overclocked, water cooled, neon-glowing Windows box(es) to run their games at as high as 1/2 of the highest setting! It makes them feel bigger about themselves.

I keep on trying to convey the message that girls fall for Mac users Wink And no wonder, since a sleak iBook + ps3 would cost less than a Windows tower that makes fuses go pop! when that tertiary fan kicks in. And yes, I do know of a guy who cools his overclocked laptop with 3 separate fans (a cooling pad + 10" fan + 14" fan).

Author:  Notoroge [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 10:45 am ]
Post subject: 

5Ghz Overclocked AMD /w a liquid nitrogen cooling system. The procesor is so fast it glows! Unlike your puny macs that can't even go over 3.7Ghz (with the new Intel ones, the PPC can't go over 2.7! Shocked).

Author:  Martin [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 12:47 pm ]
Post subject: 

Tony wrote:
Amailer wrote:
a mac is much easier to learn
Why not switch to a mac?

Number of reasons. Something about being scared of trying out an alternative, and games. Some kids *need* their overclocked, water cooled, neon-glowing Windows box(es) to run their games at as high as 1/2 of the highest setting! It makes them feel bigger about themselves.

I keep on trying to convey the message that girls fall for Mac users Wink And no wonder, since a sleak iBook + ps3 would cost less than a Windows tower that makes fuses go pop! when that tertiary fan kicks in. And yes, I do know of a guy who cools his overclocked laptop with 3 separate fans (a cooling pad + 10" fan + 14" fan).


But you see...then you'd have to put up with people making fun of you for owning a mac...

And Notorage...Intel (and PowerPC) processors can all be overclocked. You'd be hard pressed getting an AMD64 past 3GHz, but getting an Intel processor to edge on 5GHz is trivial.

Author:  brenn [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 1:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

wtd wrote:

You're reaching to justify the fact that you feel more comfortable by making claims you can't back up.

You don't have to. It's understandable, and perfectly ok. You've had a lot more experience with Windows. Even if you've been doing things the wrong way, they're habit, so they feel right. I get that.

What would not be ok, for a person posting to compsci.ca is not being willing to leave that sheltered world of Windows.


I'm sorry, I didn't know there was a right or a wrong way of using a computer (--unless you mistaken the floppy eject-button for the power button.. ._.;; I've seen that happen).

It's a sheltered world based on simple facts that the Windows-users-group is bound by unspoken peer-pressure rules. It's not frequent to come across such _nice_ communities such as this one, who are willing to help people explore and learn how to use other OSes. Just because the majority of us have been conditioned into something so horrific and as apparently_wrong_ as Windows. It's become a comfort thing. Embedded into mainstream life style.

Being willing to try is much different than being willing to change. o_o;

Martin wrote:
But you see...then you'd have to put up with people making fun of you for owning a mac...


lol why DO people make fun of mac owners/users? XD

Author:  Notoroge [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 2:23 pm ]
Post subject: 

brenn wrote:
lol why DO people make fun of mac owners/users? XD
They're jealous. Mad

Author:  wtd [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 3:13 pm ]
Post subject: 

brenn wrote:
I'm sorry, I didn't know there was a right or a wrong way of using a computer


That was more of a hypothetical. More of a "even if you are using a computer the wrong way, if you've been doing so for a long enough time, it'll feel like the right way to do things."

Author:  brenn [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 3:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

wtd wrote:
That was more of a hypothetical. More of a "even if you are using a computer the wrong way, if you've been doing so for a long enough time, it'll feel like the right way to do things."


:S I don't really get that ^^;; So um, there's a right way and a wrong way? Or... ."even if", disregarding the nature of the rest of the sentence?

<-*dumb*... lol

Author:  Notoroge [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 3:46 pm ]
Post subject: 

It's like eating at a fancy restaurant with your bare hands. Sure, you can do it. You might be so used to doing it that you think it's right to eat it with your bare hands. But that doesn't change the fact that you were given a knife and fork for a reason. It might be hard to get used to that knife and fork, but in the long run it's what's best.

Also, he's saying "even if you do it the wrong way". Not, "even if there was a wrong way". Insinuating that there *is* a right and wrong. Smile

Author:  brenn [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:18 pm ]
Post subject: 

Notoroge wrote:
It's like eating at a fancy restaurant with your bare hands. Sure, you can do it. You might be so used to doing it that you think it's right to eat it with your bare hands. But that doesn't change the fact that you were given a knife and fork for a reason. It might be hard to get used to that knife and fork, but in the long run it's what's best.

Also, he's saying "even if you do it the wrong way". Not, "even if there was a wrong way". Insinuating that there *is* a right and wrong. Smile


Knives are meant to cut things.

Anyways, it's that kind of condescending attitude that comes across to people , even to those who would like to switch and try something else. It sounds discouraging and insulting.

Author:  Notoroge [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

brenn wrote:
Anyways, it's that kind of condescending attitude that comes across to people , even to those who would like to switch and try something else. It sounds discouraging and insulting.
Wuzzah-Wuzzah? Eh Shocked Confused Crying or Very sad
That's the last time I try and clear anything up.

Author:  wtd [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:35 pm ]
Post subject: 

brenn wrote:
Anyways, it's that kind of condescending attitude that comes across to people , even to those who would like to switch and try something else. It sounds discouraging and insulting.


All I mean to say is that I understand about comfort, but if you avoid trying other things, then you'll miss opportunities to find somewhere else where you'd be even more comfortable.

Here's a secret about programmers: we're lazy.

However, we work really hard at being lazy.

Do I use Linux despite being lazy? No. I use it because I am lazy. I don't want to constantly be checking for spyware or running anti-virus programs. I don't want to have to work to hunt down installers for programs and wonder if they're going to screw up my system.

I use Linux so I can avoid these hassles, and doing so gives me the ability to be lazy.

Author:  brenn [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:38 pm ]
Post subject: 

Notoroge wrote:
Wuzzah-Wuzzah? Eh Shocked Confused Crying or Very sad
That's the last time I try and clear anything up.


aww *huggle* Well, just put it this way: who are you to tell people that what they do is wrong? *Shrug* It just comes across as having a pompous, all-knowing attitude. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that anyone here's like that, it's just... the message comes across that way when a person takes authority over something as simple as "the right and wrong way of doing something". ^^;;

Author:  Notoroge [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:41 pm ]
Post subject: 

eh, I'm not the one saying anything. I was just explaining what he said in a more understandable manner. Since,
brenn wrote:
:S I don't really get that ^^;; So um, there's a right way and a wrong way? Or... ."even if", disregarding the nature of the rest of the sentence?

Author:  wtd [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:48 pm ]
Post subject: 

Perhaps we could define the wrong way as being the way of doing things that takes more time or involves more hassle than another, yet in the end accomplishes the exact same task?

Clearly if you're getting from point A to Point B using either method C or method D, then if method C is singificantly easier or simpler, it has a clear advantage.

There are just so many basic functionalities missing from Windows by default that I can't imagine anyone being more productive with Windows, unless they need something like AutoCAD, where Windows is the only option.

Author:  [Gandalf] [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

wtd wrote:
There are just so many basic functionalities missing from Windows by default that I can't imagine anyone being more productive with Windows, unless they need something like AutoCAD, where Windows is the only option.

That, I think, is the problem. There are too many things that Windows has been made the only option for. I won't list things, and couldn't really, but I think that's what makes it even harder for people to switch. They have gotten used to those unlisted things and when you use something for a long time, you don't usually want to stop (unless it's Turing Smile).

Author:  wtd [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 7:24 pm ]
Post subject: 

[Gandalf] wrote:
There are too many things that Windows has been made the only option for.


Are you so sure?

There are lots of programs written by Microsoft and other companies that will only run on Windows, but those programs are not the only way to get things done, and quite often, they're not even the best way to get things done.

Author:  lyam_kaskade [ Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:43 pm ]
Post subject: 

Being Dutch, I always thought the wrong way was the one that costed me the most money.

Windows XP=$$$
most programs made for Windows = $$$

Linux = free
most programs made for Linux = free

Even if you suppose Linux and Windows perform equally (which they don't), the choice is obvious.

(yes, I realize many open source programs are available on Windows, but they're also available on Linux so they don't count)

Author:  Martin [ Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:23 am ]
Post subject: 

wtd wrote:
brenn wrote:
Anyways, it's that kind of condescending attitude that comes across to people , even to those who would like to switch and try something else. It sounds discouraging and insulting.


All I mean to say is that I understand about comfort, but if you avoid trying other things, then you'll miss opportunities to find somewhere else where you'd be even more comfortable.

Here's a secret about programmers: we're lazy.

However, we work really hard at being lazy.

Do I use Linux despite being lazy? No. I use it because I am lazy. I don't want to constantly be checking for spyware or running anti-virus programs. I don't want to have to work to hunt down installers for programs and wonder if they're going to screw up my system.

I use Linux so I can avoid these hassles, and doing so gives me the ability to be lazy.


The programmer's mental process:
What? This'll take me an hour to do! So I'll write a program up in 10 minutes that'll make the computer do my job in two hours, and then I'll take a nap. And get twice the pay.


: