Computer Science Canada Obfuscated Coding Contest |
Author: | Martin [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 10:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Obfuscated Coding Contest |
200 bits for this one. What your program has to do is output "Hello World" to the screen. There's a catch though: your goal is to make your code as confusing and difficult to read as possible. Only rule is that your code must be indented properly. Your program must finish executing within 5 seconds of loading up. Go! |
Author: | Tony [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 10:59 am ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
|
Author: | rizzix [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:13 am ] |
Post subject: | |
that is not obfuscated tony.. its just bf. |
Author: | Martin [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:43 am ] |
Post subject: | |
One of the languages that is supported by this site, or that wtd has written a tutorial for only. |
Author: | Tony [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
*Opens up adminPanel and adds brainfuck to the list of forums* |
Author: | Martin [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 1:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Fine. -1000 bits for plagerizing. |
Author: | Brightguy [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 5:08 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: Obfuscated Coding Contest | ||
If you can't see the output make sure the form's AutoRedraw is True. |
Author: | rizzix [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 5:23 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
k, beat this:
|
Author: | zylum [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 5:38 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
rizzix wrote: k, beat this:
lmfao |
Author: | bugzpodder [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 5:58 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
at least mine is original
|
Author: | rizzix [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 6:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
yea so is mine nice one btw. |
Author: | Martin [ Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Can anyone beat these...? The race is on. Contest closes Sunday. |
Author: | bugzpodder [ Sat Feb 05, 2005 12:13 am ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
version two:
|
Author: | bugzpodder [ Sat Feb 05, 2005 12:37 am ] |
Post subject: | |
is there a judging criteria? messy/code length/etc |
Author: | rizzix [ Sat Feb 05, 2005 12:44 am ] |
Post subject: | |
yea good question.. although keep in mind martin, obfuscation is really vague.. it covers horrifyingly messy code to beautifully decorated code.. but one thing is for sure: the code should break standard coding conventions and they do tend to make decyphering difficult. edit: i suggest looking at international obfucated coding contests.. they give a better picture. |
Author: | md [ Sat Feb 05, 2005 9:54 am ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
C:
haha! I win! |
Author: | rizzix [ Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:34 am ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
here's a rather simple, yet amusing one:
|
Author: | Martin [ Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:34 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I'm going to put this up to a vote. It will be a combination of the artisticness and the unreadability of the code. |
Author: | Martin [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Contest closed. 200 bits to bugz, 100 bits to BrightGuy. Good job everyone |
Author: | rizzix [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
sadly only three eligible persons participated in the contest |
Author: | Catalyst [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:56 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
too late but oh well
|
Author: | rizzix [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 9:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
yea i think martin should extend the contest by another two weeks. (i'm expecting more to contribute) |
Author: | rizzix [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 9:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
catalyst, ur code does not compile (using g++ 3.4) |
Author: | Catalyst [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 9:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
hmm, ive been editing it, try now edit: new code works using gcc 3.3.1 |
Author: | rizzix [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 9:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
awesome, works |
Author: | Martin [ Sun Feb 06, 2005 9:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Alright, contest is extended for two more weeks, ending on the Sunday. |
Author: | Catalyst [ Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:41 am ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
better now |
Author: | rizzix [ Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
ehm you guys.. need to repost... cuz of the rollback we lost everything in that week.. |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Mon Sep 19, 2005 8:12 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
Sigh... And I spent a whole hour doing my crappy trial. Luckily, I saved it .
|
Author: | beard0 [ Mon Sep 19, 2005 8:27 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
Ah yes, here goes: (Again, idea from Tony, whose program incidentally does not work)
Edit: Changed const to var in the first line of code |
Author: | Mr. T [ Sun Oct 02, 2005 3:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Alex's Opinion |
Your code doesn't work beard0. |
Author: | beard0 [ Sun Oct 02, 2005 3:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Alex's Opinion |
Pwned wrote: Your code doesn't work beard0.
Thanks, does now. I had made a last minute change in spliting the hw string into two pieces to make it more readable, and forgot that I had used a constant, and didn't test. |
Author: | codemage [ Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:30 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
There wasn't a Turing solution yet when I started in... It's leaning more towards crypto than obfus... but here goes: (Turing)
|
Author: | Andy [ Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
err wtf u talking about, there is a turing solution on the last page |
Author: | beard0 [ Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:46 pm ] | ||||
Post subject: | |||||
codemage wrote: There wasn't a Turing solution yet when I started in... ;) It's leaning more towards crypto than obfus... but here goes:
(Turing)
It's missing the !
|
Author: | codemage [ Tue Oct 04, 2005 7:10 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Well done2750 |