Computer Science Canada Windows Longhorn |
Author: | zomg [ Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Windows Longhorn |
Recently i have "aquired" a version of the infamous Windows LH build 4074. i just had to see what was so great about it. LH is only available foe those who are MSDN subscribers and is only out right now for developers. with that being said its obviously not gonna have the major features that the final will have. i found that it is really nothing more than WinXP with a GUI update, a new background, a few new things in "my computer", new icons and a sidebar(which is very annoying and makes your screen look very small) so there it is EDIT* there are also some new background processes that i have no idea what they lol i went to DXDIAG and looked what opperating system it was... and it is windowsXP 6.0 build 4074 has anyone else tried it? longhorn eh? do u think bill gates is compinsating for something lol |
Author: | josh [ Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
does that build have working implementation of the trusted computing technology yet? if os do you notice anything about it? |
Author: | Tony [ Fri Jan 14, 2005 4:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
a working implementation of the TC will set his computer on fire ![]() anyways - post up some screenshots or something. |
Author: | josh [ Fri Jan 14, 2005 4:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I did not mean fully working as in totally download lockout working, I meant do you see a differnece in the way you run apps due to interference by any implementation of TC/ |
Author: | rizzix [ Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Windows Longhorn |
shadow master wrote: lol i went to DXDIAG and looked what opperating system it was... and it is windowsXP 6.0 build 4074 has anyone else tried it? longhorn eh? do u think bill gates is compinsating for something lol hmm well backward compatibility.. the core should be the same.. actually.. just that it has a lot of new added features.. i mean well they are "trying" to compete with apple's techonologies. but then again just simply trying. ![]() |
Author: | zomg [ Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
How do i upload a screenshot ![]() |
Author: | Amailer [ Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
You can't in the off topic section... but you can do it at the Desktop Screenshots topic ![]() ![]() |
Author: | zomg [ Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:18 am ] |
Post subject: | |
ok the screenshots are now posted at http://www.compsci.ca/v2/viewtopic.php?p=70658#70658 if u want to see something specifically just ask me ![]() installation took me about 20 min and the whole install takes about 3GB of hardrive space... it runs adequate on my Athlon 64 2800+(kinda like Pentium3 1ghz running WinXp) i also have 784MB of RAM and 80gb sata HD beta 1 is supposed to be out in feb or something i look for to getting that version |
Author: | Blade [ Sun Jan 16, 2005 12:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
cant you change the size of the sidebar like you can with your taskbar/quicklaunch? |
Author: | [Gandalf] [ Sun Jan 16, 2005 4:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
or probably (hopefully ![]() |
Author: | Amailer [ Sun Jan 16, 2005 4:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
[Gandalf] wrote: or probably (hopefully
![]() Looks like you can (in one of the screenshots, i think 5 not sure) but anyhow, why did they include the sidebar? What good does it do? I just don't see the point of it. Also, are you still able to move the toolbar or w/e its called to the top of the screen? or is it only in a fixed position now beause of that sidebar? hmm |
Author: | Drakain Zeil [ Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
How ugly. I'll stick with my nice greyscale KDE + transparentness kthx. |
Author: | wtd [ Sun Jan 16, 2005 6:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Amailer wrote: [Gandalf] wrote: or probably (hopefully
![]() Looks like you can (in one of the screenshots, i think 5 not sure) but anyhow, why did they include the sidebar? What good does it do? I just don't see the point of it. Also, are you still able to move the toolbar or w/e its called to the top of the screen? or is it only in a fixed position now beause of that sidebar? hmm Theoretically the sidebar is immensel useful. It can provide a space that never gets overlapped by Windows for notifications from applications, or RSS feeds, or a thousand other things. |
Author: | Martin [ Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
the My Computer screen looks pretty nifty. I'll give longhorn a shot when it comes out. |
Author: | wtd [ Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
martin wrote: the My Computer screen looks pretty nifty.
You have to love the giant frickin' titlebar. |
Author: | rizzix [ Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
wtd wrote: martin wrote: the My Computer screen looks pretty nifty.
You have to love the giant frickin' titlebar. ha! well put. ![]() |
Author: | josh [ Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I can't think of any reason why they need such a giant titel bar. i like the new organization although it is nothing to special, but I can't stand all these things that serve no purpose and take up valuble screen space. |
Author: | Amailer [ Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Eh? it says there are 13 items in the folder, but i can only see 11. |
Author: | zomg [ Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
about the side bar thing... there probably is some way to change the size of it i cant try right now because im doin some stuff right now. as for changing the side, u can make it go on either the right or left(default right) the reason for that huge "my computer" top bar thing is to replace the side thing in xp... im not sure like it... as for IE... the back and forward buttons are the same as My Computer but the refresh, stop, home etc... buttons are all on there own little bar which is stupid because they are so small now o well do u guys want me to post any more pics of longhorn or its "features"? |
Author: | josh [ Sun Jan 16, 2005 10:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I wouldn't mind seeing a pick of the internet explorer, even though I would probobly use firefox. Also a pic of the controll panel (unless it is the same as XP) if you have the time. |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:29 am ] |
Post subject: | |
lol id post more but my quota is full now i have an internet explorer pic and a My computer "windows classic" theme pic coming id post if i could, ill ask Dan if i can get a limit increase |
Author: | Dan [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
shadow master wrote: ill ask Dan if i can get a limit increase
See i whould love to help but somting about thess qoutes does not have me jumping in to acation: shadow master wrote: i was gonna make my own turing forum site...but i wasnt quite sure how... but compsci has outgrown its self dan just doesnt know what to do except make to just - and i quote "control" the people of compsci. like wtf is he thinking... i kno i wasnt much of a flamer at compsci... but thats because i never really had to be... until things started getting crazy shadow master wrote: LMFAO!!! Im just gonna make that my friggen sig on compsci just to piss off dan lol shadow master wrote: i kno.. dans just cracked... shadow master wrote: i kno we split from compsci but heres the latest from dan lol context: i was asking mods and admins why u (templest) wasnt banned along time ago if u really were the main "problem on compsci". i mean come on political pressures... shadow master wrote: u kno what dan reminds me of... the story of julius Caesar, first he was alright... then this whole thing... shadow master wrote: ya i saw the front page lol. thats just pathetic shadow master wrote: ya compsci was full of jackasses, i wasnt a registered user there very long but for like almost 2 years i was leaching from that site lol Razz ya gotta love those stupid noobs that post 1 or 2 things and then leave I like that last one the best ![]() |
Author: | Amailer [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
shadow master wrote: o dont forget the fact that he took tony's admin powers away lol, dan never did anything about flamers, because im guessing he didnt care too much, but then when some of his friends started getting flamed all of the sudden it was differnet. thats pretty pathetic meh wat can u do? ![]() |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hacker Dan wrote: shadow master wrote: ill ask Dan if i can get a limit increase
See i whould love to help but somting about thess qoutes does not have me jumping in to acation: shadow master wrote: i was gonna make my own turing forum site...but i wasnt quite sure how... but compsci has outgrown its self dan just doesnt know what to do except make to just - and i quote "control" the people of compsci. like wtf is he thinking... i kno i wasnt much of a flamer at compsci... but thats because i never really had to be... until things started getting crazy shadow master wrote: LMFAO!!! Im just gonna make that my friggen sig on compsci just to piss off dan lol shadow master wrote: i kno.. dans just cracked... shadow master wrote: i kno we split from compsci but heres the latest from dan lol context: i was asking mods and admins why u (templest) wasnt banned along time ago if u really were the main "problem on compsci". i mean come on political pressures... shadow master wrote: u kno what dan reminds me of... the story of julius Caesar, first he was alright... then this whole thing... shadow master wrote: ya i saw the front page lol. thats just pathetic shadow master wrote: ya compsci was full of jackasses, i wasnt a registered user there very long but for like almost 2 years i was leaching from that site lol Razz ya gotta love those stupid noobs that post 1 or 2 things and then leave I like that last one the best ![]() ouch! okay first of all id like to explain, i was gone the weekend of the whole blowout with the flamers(first christmas holiday weekend) i always used to have my password remebered for this site(as im sure many of u do), my brother on all that weekend and seized his opportunity... ] second of all i would like to say sorry for each of the things that my bro has said, i take full responcibility for everything he has said. i guess i should have learned backwhen he did thsi to my previous account... none of this will happen again. again im srry to everyone on compsci... |
Author: | Dan [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
shadow master wrote: ouch! okay first of all id like to explain, i was gone the weekend of the whole blowout with the flamers(first christmas holiday weekend) i always used to have my password remebered for this site(as im sure many of u do), my brother on all that weekend and seized his opportunity... ] second of all i would like to say sorry for each of the things that my bro has said, i take full responcibility for everything he has said. i guess i should have learned backwhen he did thsi to my previous account... none of this will happen again. again im srry to everyone on compsci... Bull shit, man. Any one who has been to the site you posted that on knows it was you. You allways use this bro exucse when u do somting wrong on a fourm, hell u even used it on the fourm that was posted on to cover somting eltes up. You are not sorry, you suck up to who ever is runing the site u are on, since the site you where on was an anti-compsci.ca site u sucked up in that way, when u are here u suck up to us. I am not going to ban you for somthing like this b/c it was not posted on this site (there are no rules agest it), tho now that the truth is out (witch i have knowen for some time, just w8ing for a good moment) i think living with it will be a goon enougth lession for you. |
Author: | Andy [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
rofl... the classic exuse, blame it on the nxt guy |
Author: | Dan [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Andy wrote: rofl... the classic exuse, blame it on the nxt guy
ROFL, he just pmed with an link to a post on that site where he is saying that his bro was posting things, but the person he side was his bro is a personal firend of mine and is not even male..... |
Author: | Andy [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
baned? |
Author: | Dan [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Nope, there are no rules about being dumb, lieing poorly or posting anti-dan or anti-compsci.ca posts on other sites. I think leting peoleop know about it is good enought (funny too). |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hacker Dan wrote: Andy wrote: rofl... the classic exuse, blame it on the nxt guy
ROFL, he just pmed with an link to a post on that site where he is saying that his bro was posting things, but the person he side was his bro is a personal firend of mine and is not even male..... NO my bro is shadow master on that site ![]() |
Author: | Dan [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
shadow master wrote: NO my bro is shadow master on that site ![]() And thats why he made posts saying that his bro hacked is acount on that site as well? Whould that not mean u hacked his acount and then posted thos things any way? lol. |
Author: | Andy [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
doesnt this mean you got on his account that day and posted then? oman... this is just too halarious |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
jeez wow... even tho everyone now thnks im a jerk i will keep posting my programs, and screenshots, and not flame this site or anybody on this site just as usual, if people dont believe that really isnt my problem... ive said that I TAKE FULL RESPONCIBILTY and that IM SORRY and that THIS WONT HAPPEN AGAIN but thats not good enough. so o well ive tried to make things right, i am not a liar, BSer, flamer or anything else but if u all want to believe that i am then thats not my fault yes i posted then, and put a stop to all the flaming(if u had noticed). and if ur wondering how i got his password, i mean cmon im 3 years older than him pain can get anybody to talk... lol |
Author: | MihaiG [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
is it my or is this guy a terrible liar... jeez common you might have well said u wer skitzofrenic i would have believed that more... ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
so thats how it is...im gonna be the fall guy just to make other people to look good lol OMG this is the biggest joke ive ever heard, i mean common people u have to be kidding me... i dont want to flame anyone... i never have before this whole BS flamers war back in December and this account hasnt since then, and the fact, that anybody could have made that account and put my avatar on there. honest to god i have a gay ass little bro who just doesnt know when to quit. anybody could have made a hacker dan account on ximbio or Andy or Elcomndante and used there avatar... look ive never spammed like that before why would i dod it then and stop doing it again it doesnt make any logical sense... a personis either one way or the other and doesnt switch for one week and then switch back I realize that kno one will believe me...because hacker dan is against me and they all want to stay on his good side... but i will say nothing more about this... |
Author: | SuperGenius [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
keep digging |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
dig dig dig ![]() ![]() i havnt once flamed anybody for accusing me of something i havnt done why would i do it for one week only then switch back ![]() im on this site submit my programs and get feedback i have no reason to be an ass hole... |
Author: | Linux [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | leave the kid alone |
leave the kid alone hacker dan, i mean is it just me or is this a little too personal? was this site made really for the good of all those interested in computer science? or are your personal problems affecting how you run this site? In my mind this is harrasment, and you are no better than any of the people you are trying to "clean" out of this site. How far have you fallen from your utopian vision of what you wanted this site to be when you started? really hacker dan this is a personal matter and if you have a problem with shadowmaster you should take it up with him personally, and not crucify him infront of an audiance. I dont know if you know, or are capable of knowing the effect comsci has on some peoples lives, those who may want to get into computer science as a hobby or lifelong career. to paraphrase Jesus no kingdom that is divided against its self can succeed. And by bringing personal matters into comsci and attacking shadowmaster, you are dividing comsci. this entire thread should be deleted, because i think it is just too pathetic to be posted on comsci, and hacker dan, i am disapointed. |
Author: | josh [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
man, give it up, they got your number, the jig is up, the chicken has flown the coop... whatever you want to call it, you write your posts with the same sentace structure as your brother then, I am no speach analyst but even I can tell the same person made those posts. I mean comon, you must both put lots of .... in your posts then ![]() ![]() and i would be interested to know if this guy Linux wrote: leave the kid alone hacker dan, i mean is it just me or is this a little too personal? was this site made really for the good of all those interested in computer science? or are your personal problems affecting how you run this site? In my mind this is harrasment, and you are no better than any of the people you are trying to "clean" out of this site. How far have you fallen from your utopian vision of what you wanted this site to be when you started?
really hacker dan this is a personal matter and if you have a problem with shadowmaster you should take it up with him personally, and not crucify him infront of an audiance. I dont know if you know, or are capable of knowing the effect comsci has on some peoples lives, those who may want to get into computer science as a hobby or lifelong career. to paraphrase Jesus no kingdom that is divided against its self can succeed. And by bringing personal matters into comsci and attacking shadowmaster, you are dividing comsci. this entire thread should be deleted, because i think it is just too pathetic to be posted on comsci, and hacker dan, i am disapointed. has the same IP as shadow master ![]() |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
o boy now im being accused of this wat next will the fruit roll up company think up. lol i swear that wasnt me either wat is with u people ![]() |
Author: | josh [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
fine m aybe it wasn't you, but just saying that someone on this site definantly made that seperate acount just for that post so we wouldn't know who it was supposedly. |
Author: | Linux [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
gee could it be that someone is acually not chickenshit enough to stand up for someone else and speak there mind? gee then i guess you should just stfu and think for a second about what i said, may i sugguest READING IT AGAIN? and where are these rules that are refered to? i would like a link and perhaps you could make them a little more accessible so users know when they are being abused by mods or admins. |
Author: | josh [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I did read it, and I am not saying this to get on dans good side, but the evidence is really against him here. And you can stand up for whoever the F*** you want to, I dont' care, but by posting what you did you are hardly helping matters, and I don't see how I got anything wrong about what you say, and you are obviously someone on this site who just created the account for these posts. |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
josh wrote: fine m aybe it wasn't you, but just saying that someone on this site definantly made that seperate acount just for that post so we wouldn't know who it was supposedly.
hmm if that was the case then wtf is his joined date? december 29? ya i guess this all could have been planned out that long? naw i doubt it anyway thx for the input im finding this interesting...how is shadow master an evil sadistic bastard? and what are some ways we can try and prove he is? some much for... innocent till proven guilty but ya its good to accuse someone of something he didnt do... i love this site why would i say all those things, i come 5 times a day at least, i dont want to be branded a jerk for something i swear i didnt do |
Author: | josh [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Linux, O I owe you an appology, i just looked at your post count cuz I was pissed off and not at the join date. I am sincerely apologizing to you and I hope you accept it, but I still maintaing that this is total BS what Shadow Master is saying. |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
wow i cant believe... all this because i asked for a bit more uploading space |
Author: | Maverick [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hacker Dan wrote: shadow master wrote: ill ask Dan if i can get a limit increase
See i whould love to help but somting about thess qoutes does not have me jumping in to acation: shadow master wrote: i was gonna make my own turing forum site...but i wasnt quite sure how... but compsci has outgrown its self dan just doesnt know what to do except make to just - and i quote "control" the people of compsci. like wtf is he thinking... i kno i wasnt much of a flamer at compsci... but thats because i never really had to be... until things started getting crazy shadow master wrote: LMFAO!!! Im just gonna make that my friggen sig on compsci just to piss off dan lol shadow master wrote: i kno.. dans just cracked... shadow master wrote: i kno we split from compsci but heres the latest from dan lol context: i was asking mods and admins why u (templest) wasnt banned along time ago if u really were the main "problem on compsci". i mean come on political pressures... shadow master wrote: u kno what dan reminds me of... the story of julius Caesar, first he was alright... then this whole thing... shadow master wrote: ya i saw the front page lol. thats just pathetic shadow master wrote: ya compsci was full of jackasses, i wasnt a registered user there very long but for like almost 2 years i was leaching from that site lol Razz ya gotta love those stupid noobs that post 1 or 2 things and then leave I like that last one the best ![]() Too much time on your hands? |
Author: | Linux [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
josh wrote: Linux, O I owe you an appology, i just looked at your post count cuz I was pissed off and not at the join date.
I am sincerely apologizing to you and I hope you accept it, but I still maintaing that this is total BS what Shadow Master is saying. i accept your apoligy, but my main point is that dan should not bring personal matters to comsci. furthermore an admin should not bring anyone of his members out to be tarred and feathered, that is what is making me mad. i think that this entire thread should be deleted and dan should deal with it himself. |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
too late for that buddy ![]() |
Author: | rizzix [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
ah dont be foolish. this dosen't mean anyone can simply condemn the admin. also if and when the admin or mods do anything to anyone within the staff, its all an act or joke.. nothing personal.. we do this now-and-then for the fun of it. but its always within the staff we do not involve any compsci member except maybe some legendary members who are pretty much well know within the staff it self, there are quite a few of them here, ex: Coutsos, Catalyst etc.. some are given special powers with certain areas of compsci and sometimes special titles.. eventually some of them become mods.. but then again some decline (they rather have bits beyond that of an admin/mod along with a kickass title). |
Author: | Dan [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Linux wrote: josh wrote: Linux, O I owe you an appology, i just looked at your post count cuz I was pissed off and not at the join date.
I am sincerely apologizing to you and I hope you accept it, but I still maintaing that this is total BS what Shadow Master is saying. i accept your apoligy, but my main point is that dan should not bring personal matters to comsci. furthermore an admin should not bring anyone of his members out to be tarred and feathered, that is what is making me mad. i think that this entire thread should be deleted and dan should deal with it himself. 1st if i was leting personal matters interferec with my admin duitys i whould have punished shadow master. As you can see he has not be baned nor has anything been done to his acount. 2ndly, all i have done here is bourght out the truth, nothing more, nothing less. Thos qoutes where posted on a fourm by a user witch i blive to be him. I am not saying to hate him or anything, peoleop are geting that from the content of his own postings. 3rdly this is the offtopic sectinion and it in no way has to apply to compsci in any way. Also even if i whonted to bring personal matters in to this, i could not. To ban some one who is not magoraly breaking the rules and has any value to the site i whould need to bring it to a vote with the senior staff. In addtion what u are not realzing is that i am a person too, i have free will to post my options on this site just as much as any other user. P.S. Linux it is intresting u are deabing this from a postion of a user with very few posts and the magoiry of them being in the off topic section of this site. You excuces that peoleop will not go agested me b/c i am an admin is falwed, as i side in this post even if i whonted to i could not and whould not do anything to a user for saying there options. If any one has a problem with how i admin this site plz, post or pm me about it or the other staff. I whould not be made unless u where to fill it up with insultes and swear words or spam it aroces the site. |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
rizzix wrote: ah dont be foolish. this dosen't mean anyone can simply condemn the admin. also if and when the admin or mods do anything to anyone within the staff, its all an act or joke.. nothing personal.. we do this now-and-then for the fun of it. but its always within the staff we do not involve any compsci member except maybe some legendary members who are pretty much well know within the staff it self, there are quite a few of them here, ex: Coutsos, Catalyst etc.. some are given special powers with certain areas of compsci and sometimes special titles.. eventually some of them become mods.. but then again some decline (they rather have bits beyond that of an admin/mod along with a kickass title).
so all of this is a joke ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Amailer [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Alright before this gets put of hand lets put it to an end. Shadow master its not just because you asked for more upload space its because your started insulting someone on another forum- and no just once hmmmm ![]() Anyhow- lets leave it at that shall we? Hm yes. |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
thx...anyway i have a few more pics of longhorn in the desktops thing now one "classic theme" my computer and internet explorer |
Author: | Linux [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
hacker dan your a human? ![]() ![]() if i had known this to be a joke i wouldnt have gotten so mad, but i dont think shadowmaster knew that either, and how many other ppl may have thought the same thing? if i do have any more problems i will pm you and shadow master should too. but does really everyone who reads these posts know your joking? not that im saying that joking should be obliterated from this site, not even close. in reply to rizzix: isnt shadow master just a member? and he shure as hell isnt a legendary user as far as i know. in reply hacker dan: i never once said that people would all completly agree with you because you were admin of this site. you mistook the context of what i was saying. well its over, lets just leave it at that. |
Author: | rizzix [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
no this was not a joke.. i was refering to that tony thing.. this is real.. dan was mad.. cuz of the flamming he recieved in other forums |
Author: | Dan [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Linux wrote: if i had known this to be a joke i wouldnt have gotten so mad, but i dont think shadowmaster knew that either, and how many other ppl may have thought the same thing? I did't think it was a joke, i just whonted to know why some one who side they where leaving the site whould come back. It could be that he did not post that stuff and maybe he did, i am sitll justfided in whonting to know whats going on, eplstaly when they whont more upload space. Since that means more bandwith for the site and more hdd usesage. I whould not whont to give upload space to some one who could/whould use it to hurt the site. Also i do not find pics of longhorn to be the best use of the space ablivae for compsci.ca, if he whonted to post a turing project or somting then it whould be another sotry. Also i was saying that i am not modivated to go out of my way for a user that i do not turst. |
Author: | zomg [ Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hacker Dan wrote: Linux wrote: if i had known this to be a joke i wouldnt have gotten so mad, but i dont think shadowmaster knew that either, and how many other ppl may have thought the same thing? I did't think it was a joke, i just whonted to know why some one who side they where leaving the site whould come back. It could be that he did not post that stuff and maybe he did, i am sitll justfided in whonting to know whats going on, eplstaly when they whont more upload space. Since that means more bandwith for the site and more hdd usesage. I whould not whont to give upload space to some one who could/whould use it to hurt the site. Also i do not find pics of longhorn to be the best use of the space ablivae for compsci.ca, if he whonted to post a turing project or somting then it whould be another sotry. Also i was saying that i am not modivated to go out of my way for a user that i do not turst. i kno what u mean...and im sorry that u and if anyone else got mad...i admit this does look kinda fishy... i have deleted my chat program and some other things, so i have enough space, hopefully trust can be built again by the time i need more space ![]() anyway im watching RAW right now so cya |
Author: | Kyle [ Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Im on Dans side flaming compsci.ca and Dan is bad, if it was not for compsci i would be screwd. ![]() I blame my Brother for posting this and my Skiny-ness ![]() ![]() just Ban him hes tring to bring down Compsci |
Author: | josh [ Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
alright, first of all, don't get involved at this point, second of all, it has been 6 days since someone posted here, so we have obvioulsy decided to drop this stupid argument and move on, so I don;t see why you felt like you had to bring the topic back up again. This should probobly be locked as we don't really need further discussion of this topic -=cough cough, dan =- |
Author: | Maverick [ Sun Jan 23, 2005 5:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Kyle wrote: Im on Dans side flaming compsci.ca and Dan is bad, if it was not for compsci i would be screwd.
![]() I blame my Brother for posting this and my Skiny-ness ![]() ![]() just Ban him hes tring to bring down Compsci First of all stop talking about things you know nothing about. Second of all.. know your role ![]() |
Author: | Paul [ Sun Jan 23, 2005 5:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I believe shadowmaster. |
Author: | Amailer [ Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
ah this is still going on-- come on. Locked. Where are the froum mods for this section anyhow? |
Author: | Andy [ Mon Jan 24, 2005 4:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
dan fired naoki |