Computer Science Canada [SPLIT] From Bored Picture (about OSes..) |
Author: | Mazer [ Wed Feb 18, 2004 6:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Yeah, I think from Windows 2000 and above MSPaint let's you save as GIF and JPG (or at least JPG). But the compression is terrible. You'd be better off with IrfanView (www.irfanview.com? Website seems to be down right now...). You can convert to/from many different image formats. It also has batch renaming/conversion so that's cool too. There's other stuff you can do too which is pretty impressive considering it's only around 600kb. |
Author: | Maverick [ Wed Feb 18, 2004 9:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
haha i only got win 98 SE so thats why. Site doesnt work ![]() |
Author: | Mint [ Tue Jun 29, 2004 11:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Maverick wrote: haha i only got win 98 SE so thats why. Site doesnt work
![]() (Vomits) Wow, I feel sorry for you, no self respecting Jedi or Sith uses 98. |
Author: | Maverick [ Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Mint wrote: Maverick wrote: haha i only got win 98 SE so thats why. Site doesnt work
![]() (Vomits) Wow, I feel sorry for you, no self respecting Jedi or Sith uses 98. Its better then ME, 2000, and XP Home! |
Author: | Paul [ Sat Aug 07, 2004 11:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
WinME is the worst, I know someone who uses it, when I go over to her house, winME = no multitasking ever... it freezes whenever u try to, now if she'll only let me reformat her HD... do not ever get WinME, I'm sure 98SE is better... |
Author: | Tony [ Sun Aug 08, 2004 2:34 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Paul Bian wrote: now if she'll only let me reformat her HD...
be careful there... I disabled this one girl's computer for... 5 days ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Paul [ Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
tony wrote: I blame Darkness for talking me into running programs I didn't know anything about ... This better not be some kinda web cam hijacking program that lets u control the webcam ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Tony [ Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:25 am ] |
Post subject: | |
so if you ever come across videos with me... you know where it came from ![]() haha, no - but it is a good idea ![]() |
Author: | templest [ Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Maverick wrote: Mint wrote: Maverick wrote: haha i only got win 98 SE so thats why. Site doesnt work
![]() (Vomits) Wow, I feel sorry for you, no self respecting Jedi or Sith uses 98. Its better then ME, 2000, and XP Home! Better than XP? All Windows are disguisting, but in all seriousness... If you're going to use any Windows, at least use XP. ![]() |
Author: | Delta [ Thu Aug 19, 2004 5:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
He said XP Home... which is seriously completely crap... and it seems that it's being sold with most computer packages on the net... which is very gay. But XP Pro is by far the most stable in my oppinion... I would switch to Unix/Linux... but I need to be able to program in .NET next year otherwise I'm teh screwed... and I like to play the games I've got without wondering if they will work on the other OS... so ya XPpro is the only way to go if your bound by the windows virus... |
Author: | Mazer [ Thu Aug 19, 2004 6:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Delta wrote: so ya XPpro is the only way to go if your bound by the windows virus...
Not really the only way. God bless partitioning. ![]() |
Author: | Dan [ Fri Aug 20, 2004 2:27 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I do not know where u got this Win XP pro is more stable and so much better then XP home thing. As far as i know both verson are prity much the same excepted pro alows for dual cpu, more unix sytel conotrals over files (athougth u can get this on home by going in to safe mode), and pro has a full verson of remote desktop. Also Pro has some extrase trown in with are prity uless like a faxing app, a M$ webserver app (better free ones out there) and some M$ file ecnripting stuff (better free ones...). The real big difrence is that home is made to be simpler to set stuff up like netwroking and loging (athougth that realy just means the defatl setings are difrent.) The core of both OS are almost 100% the same and the only import dif in my option is the more money you have to pay for the word pro to come up on your boot screen. I have computers with both xp home and xp pro on them and they work and act almost 100% the same and crash about the same amount and home is just as big a pain in the ass as pro. If you are looking for an OS save your self alot of time, money and furestation and go with a linux distro. |
Author: | templest [ Fri Aug 20, 2004 1:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hacker Dan wrote: ...If you are looking for an OS save your self alot of time, money and furestation and go with a linux distro.
This is where your whole argument died. You where doing fine... right up 'till there. This is where we get into the whole *User scenario. Let me brake it down for you, as follows: Time: Gentoo took me three days to install, and after that, there was still much customization to be done. Granted, a newb can run Mandrake, but even then, there's much hardware tuning to be done, specially if you're someone that has an SiS video card / soundcard. Not everyone is computer literate, and it's posts like yours that makes them think that Linux is easier to setup and maintain than windows, this is untrue. Windows, on the other hand, Installs in 15 minutes, and works right out of the box. I created my own customized Windows install disk, which reduced the installation time, auto-fills my info into the dialogues (It's totaly automatic), and comes pre setup with the current ATI / Sound Blaster drivers, AVG Anti-Virus, SpyBot... ohh, and It's slipstreamed with SP2... completely up to date. Money: Once I installed linux I realized my video card, sound card, and ethernet card would have to be replaced. On top of that, being new at the time... I opted to run KDE as my desktop environment, due to it's direct similarities to Windows' Explorer. Here's the kicker... KDE takes up around 140 MBs of RAM to run... I had 256 RAM at the time... meh, time to get 1024. Yes, the operating system is free, but would your average Joe sixpack really want to sit down infront of his computer and have to deal with all these issues when he could just install Windows? Frustration: This statement deserved a very bold: "WTF?". Windows does provide various flavours of frustration, granted. But so does linux... I don't have spywars problems, virus problems, hardware problems, and the likes with Windows... why? Because I know how to avoid all that (router, anti-virus, SpyBot, ect)... When you can't get X to work, and you have to surf around in Lynx in a fullscreen console on linux-help forums asking how to get it working again, does that not cause frustration? When you seem to be doing everything right, yet wine won't run Warcraft III at full speed, does that not cause frustration? When there's an app you need to have to do something, but it's in source-code, and provides little to no explination as to how to compile it... does that not cause frustration? Hell... waiting 6 hours for some huge app like KDE to compile when updating, is that not inconvenient? I say if you are looking for an OS save yourself a lot of time, money, and frustration and go with Windows. If you are computer literate, have patience, a few extra bucks to screw around with, and feels like playing around with an Operating System a lot go with Linux. *User, n: A word IT professionals use for Idiot. |
Author: | Dan [ Fri Aug 20, 2004 2:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
templest wrote: Gentoo took me three days to install, and after that, there was still much customization to be done. No kidding, gentoo is made to be one of the most customizable distros. It is excpeted that it whould be hard to isntall and u whould have to customize alot since that is the point of that distro. templest wrote: Granted, a newb can run Mandrake, but even then, there's much hardware tuning to be done, specially if you're someone that has an SiS video card / soundcard. Not everyone is computer literate, and it's posts like yours that makes them think that Linux is easier to setup and maintain than windows, this is untrue. they are, well they are if u get a distro that is user frendly. Suse is extreaml easy to install and get wroking. it atacly found more of my hardware then windows did and instaled most of it better then windows did with out my help or even prodiving drivers. Idk what u mean abou mandrake i tryed that on one of my comps and it was also very easy to install and found all my hardware. Shure there is some distros that are hard to install but not all of them. templest wrote: Windows, on the other hand, Installs in 15 minutes, and works right out of the box. I created my own customized Windows install disk, which reduced the installation time, auto-fills my info into the dialogues (It's totaly automatic), and comes pre setup with the current ATI / Sound Blaster drivers, AVG Anti-Virus, SpyBot... ohh, and It's slipstreamed with SP2... completely up to date. well idk about you but windows xp did not work with all of my hard ware out of the box, i had to install drivers for things like my wifi card, netwrok card, sound card and graficks card to get it to work with them or to let them use all of there feruaters. But with SuSe linux it found them all and even was easer to congier them. For exmaple with my dial up modem, after it instaled the dirvers for it, it gave a list of isp in canada, ont and i could pick sympatico from it and it whould list all the infromtion for that isp witch makes it alot easer to get the info you need. templest wrote: Once I installed linux I realized my video card, sound card, and ethernet card would have to be replaced. On top of that, being new at the time... I opted to run KDE as my desktop environment, due to it's direct similarities to Windows' Explorer. Here's the kicker... KDE takes up around 140 MBs of RAM to run... I had 256 RAM at the time... meh, time to get 1024. Yes, the operating system is free, but would your average Joe sixpack really want to sit down infront of his computer and have to deal with all these issues when he could just install Windows? I am geting the fealing that you did somting horbley wrong when u instaled linux b/c i have one of the most unlinux comable computers and hardware and yet i was able to get almost all of it working with SuSe incuding video card, 3d sound card, ethernet and wifi cards. Also saying that linux has gerater system requerments then windwos may be the dumested thing i have ever hured. templest wrote: This statement deserved a very bold: "WTF?". Windows does provide various flavours of frustration, granted. But so does linux... I don't have spywars problems, virus problems, hardware problems, and the likes with Windows... why? Because I know how to avoid all that (router, anti-virus, SpyBot, ect)... When you can't get X to work, and you have to surf around in Lynx in a fullscreen console on linux-help forums asking how to get it working again, does that not cause frustration? When you seem to be doing everything right, yet wine won't run Warcraft III at full speed, does that not cause frustration? When there's an app you need to have to do something, but it's in source-code, and provides little to no explination as to how to compile it... does that not cause frustration? Hell... waiting 6 hours for some huge app like KDE to compile when updating, is that not inconvenient? As i side b4, i think you ether had a realy bad distro or you did somting horbly wrong when u instaled linux b/c the worst that has ever hapend to me in linux invaing X is when i tryed to upgraed my vid card drivers and it whould not load X. But then i just typed in yast and it borugth up the sytem confgi and i cahged the driver back very easly and it wroked agaen. Also about emulation of windows progmes on linux, how is this a fualt in linux? 1st of all the progame u are using to emulate them is not linux it is wine and 2nd if we are making a comaperson you whold have to try to emulate and linux progam on windows and see how that works out. Also my guse whould be that you could get it to work if u put the time in to reading some wine how tos. As for the sorce code thing, almost every import app has a rpm verson for most distros, in fact there are many sites full of 10000s of rpms for your disrto. agen if we are going to comper this faeraly you whould have to try to comple the same progme on windows witch whould probly be just as hard or if not harder. If you installed all the need/recmened apps when u installed linux you should be able to tpye in make, then make install as su root and it whould install the code. 6 hours for KDE to updated? how slow is your computer??? templest wrote: I say if you are looking for an OS save yourself a lot of time, money, and frustration and go with Windows. If you are computer literate, have patience, a few extra bucks to screw around with, and feels like playing around with an Operating System a lot go with Linux. I am starting to wonder if you have ever realy used linux, it makes no scen to say it cost "extra bucks" to use linux over windows and if you are buying new hard ware b/c you can not read the how tos on how to install drivers in linux then may be you should not be using a computer? There are linux distros out there that are just as easy to use and install as windows if not more so. I whould recomend you trying SuSe. And talk about frustaration with windows, there is so many things i could say about that, but do i realy need to? every windows user here whould know most of them and not to metion that you are sporting an evil comany with is going to try to take away your pricay in there next os. The only times i have ever had suse crash are when i am doing stoming realy realy realy dum or i have a porly writen app that was not made right and it breaks somting. But with windows you get crashs so much you learn to except them, everything crash on windows wthere it was made by M$ or not and the secrutry holes are crazy in windows. In the open sorce comunity the problems with linux (witch are not many) are fixed extreamly fast and there is ushely like 20 difrent versons of the fixe write by 20 difrent poelop. But with windows when and if they fix a bug they w8 a month to realse it if not more and they are the only ones that trutly know what is going on. I whould not put it past M$ puting there own verson of spy ware on there os and there whould be no way to find out if they did b/c it is not open sorce. In fact M$ has basicly side that they will put an mager amount of spy ware type apps in longhorn to keep the wrold safe from copy right infergment, hackers and virus. This means every file u make, copy, or send to some one will have your id on it and that every file u run or play will be know by M$ in there self apointed role as big borther. Lets see what u say about linux once longhorn comes out and poleop leran what M$ did to it. |
Author: | templest [ Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Quote: they are, well they are if u get a distro that is user frendly. Suse is extreaml easy to install and get wroking. it atacly found more of my hardware then windows did and instaled most of it better then windows did with out my help or even prodiving drivers. Idk what u mean abou mandrake i tryed that on one of my comps and it was also very easy to install and found all my hardware. Shure there is some distros that are hard to install but not all of them.
SuSe is great, if you want a distro that's as customizable as windows and have to wait for it to install over the internet from an FTP server. ![]() Quote: well idk about you but windows xp did not work with all of my hard ware out of the box, i had to install drivers for things like my wifi card, netwrok card, sound card and graficks card to get it to work with them or to let them use all of there feruaters. But with SuSe linux it found them all and even was easer to congier them. For exmaple with my dial up modem, after it instaled the dirvers for it, it gave a list of isp in canada, ont and i could pick sympatico from it and it whould list all the infromtion for that isp witch makes it alot easer to get the info you need.
Well, that's why you make your own custom Windows CD, which is what I did... if you read further on you would have noticed this... now if I could only do that with linux... I'd be set. And about sympatico... isn't that what the "Internet Connection Wizard" in windows is for? "What type of connection do you have?" "DSL" "Please enter password and user name" "Done." "Connecting." "..." "Connected." I don't need a list of ISP's... I know what ISP I have... just connect me... anyways, if you do need to list of all the ISP's in your area.. windows does that aswell. And if you want the specs on your connection, I believe that's what the "net" / 'ipconfig" commands are for. Quote: I am geting the fealing that you did somting horbley wrong when u instaled linux b/c i have one of the most unlinux comable computers and hardware and yet i was able to get almost all of it working with SuSe incuding video card, 3d sound card, ethernet and wifi cards. Also saying that linux has gerater system requerments then windwos may be the dumested thing i have ever hured.
SiS chipsets are extreamly uncompatible with linux... they work, but never well. And there is no Hardware Graphics Acceleration with SiS video cards in Linux, and the SiS sound card gives no sound in lots of apps (ie: quake, ut2k4.. ect). Read the fûcking post, I never said, implied, nudged, stated, or alledged that linux has more system requiredments than Windows. Hell, you can install linux on a gameboy with some hardware hacking. I said that KDE uses more system resources than Windows. Explorer uses about 32 MBs, KDE uses (in total) 140+. So if I want to run quake, I need to boot into X with blackbox so as to free up some RAM... which is really inconvenient. GNOME uses the same resources as KDE, actually, all desktop environments for linux use more resources than Windows' Explorer. Quote: As i side b4, i think you ether had a realy bad distro or you did somting horbly wrong when u instaled linux b/c the worst that has ever hapend to me in linux invaing X is when i tryed to upgraed my vid card drivers and it whould not load X. But then i just typed in yast and it borugth up the sytem confgi and i cahged the driver back very easly and it wroked agaen. Also about emulation of windows progmes on linux, how is this a fualt in linux? 1st of all the progame u are using to emulate them is not linux it is wine and 2nd if we are making a comaperson you whold have to try to emulate and linux progam on windows and see how that works out. Also my guse whould be that you could get it to work if u put the time in to reading some wine how tos. As for the sorce code thing, almost every import app has a rpm verson for most distros, in fact there are many sites full of 10000s of rpms for your disrto. agen if we are going to comper this faeraly you whould have to try to comple the same progme on windows witch whould probly be just as hard or if not harder. If you installed all the need/recmened apps when u installed linux you should be able to tpye in make, then make install as su root and it whould install the code. 6 hours for KDE to updated? how slow is your computer???
I think there are thousands of people that would disagree with you on the fact that gentoo is a horrible distro. This happened to me as a newb, and with my SiS chipset... this really is discouraging to the newbs... Windows isn't discouraging to the newbs, I wonder why... ![]() You can emulate any linux application in Windows with cygwin, just as easily, if not easier, than with wine on Linux. Not to mention, that cygwin provides all the tools... and after that, absolutely any linux app can be compiled as a windows' ".exe" binary and run from any windows box. I've read all the Wine How-Tos... That's why I don't have those problems anymore... but your average Joe SixPack won't want to. What user-friendly app makes you read 300 pages worth of documentation? Not all Linux distro's are RPM based, and "alien" only does so good of a job. Lots of programs require different compiler flags and manual configs, and simply doing a "./configure && make && make install" won't do. Install KDE from source, not update. My computer is 3.2 GHz slow. Quote: I am starting to wonder if you have ever realy used linux, it makes no scen to say it cost "extra bucks" to use linux over windows and if you are buying new hard ware b/c you can not read the how tos on how to install drivers in linux then may be you should not be using a computer? Hah, that one made my laugh. I've been using Linux since I was in grade 6. I'll always prefer to use linux over windows, but you're saying that Linux is a lot easier to use than windows... and that your average joe sixpack will be able to run it right out of the box and have no issues with it what-so-ever, which is entirely false. Try installing any video card from SiS on linux. I dare you, try, read every single mother fûcking how-to in the world... you still won't be able too, unless y ou write your own.. which is still impossible since they completely refuse to reveal any key driver specs that would allow open source developers to make one. Don't you think people would have made an SiS video driver by now for those who couldn't upgrade to nVidea or ATI cards? So far, they've managed to make them work, without hardware acceleration... which is pretty much useless. Don't fûck with me when it comes to linux... I was installing "linux from scratch" before you even knew what turing was. |
Author: | Dan [ Fri Aug 20, 2004 7:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
templest wrote: SuSe is great, if you want a distro that's as customizable as windows and have to wait for it to install over the internet from an FTP server. ![]() What are u talking about? i download the ISO file from there site and instaled via a cd. I also have insatled via a hard driver. SuSe can be instaled just as many ways and for free as any other distro of linux. It even has a live verson.... Also SuSe is far more customizable then windows, it just dose not give thos options if you are doing the basick install. There are far more adavced options you can get in to, but the idea is to make it simple by defalt and then alow of adavced setings if u slected them. Quote: Well, that's why you make your own custom Windows CD, which is what I did... if you read further on you would have noticed this... now if I could only do that with linux... I'd be set. I do, well as close as can be done. The windows xp cd i have is customized for the aline ware area 51-m extream. Still tho it dose not help much. Also you can do that with linux. Quote: And about sympatico... isn't that what the "Internet Connection Wizard" in windows is for? "What type of connection do you have?" "DSL" "Please enter password and user name" "Done." "Connecting." "..." "Connected." I don't need a list of ISP's... I know what ISP I have... just connect me... anyways, if you do need to list of all the ISP's in your area.. windows does that aswell. My point was that it is can be just as easy if not easer then windows, and i tryed both the windwos and suse one and the suse one was better. Quote: And if you want the specs on your connection, I believe that's what the "net" / 'ipconfig" commands are for. What dose this have to do with specs on your connection? For that to work the conection whould have to be allready set up or you whould not have an ip.... Quote: SiS chipsets are extreamly uncompatible with linux... they work, but never well. And there is no Hardware Graphics Acceleration with SiS video cards in Linux, and the SiS sound card gives no sound in lots of apps (ie: quake, ut2k4.. ect). Umm, i am prity shure there are drivers for them now....even if they are in the eraly stages. Quote: Read the fûcking post, I never said, implied, nudged, stated, or alledged that linux has more system requiredments than Windows. Hell, you can install linux on a gameboy with some hardware hacking. I said that KDE uses more system resources than Windows. Explorer uses about 32 MBs, KDE uses (in total) 140+. So if I want to run quake, I need to boot into X with blackbox so as to free up some RAM... which is really inconvenient. GNOME uses the same resources as KDE, actually, all desktop environments for linux use more resources than Windows' Explorer. Ethere way u look at it there is somting wrong with your agument, 1st if u are saying u are not talking about linux then what is the point? We where debating linux no KDE. Now if u say all linux desktops are more resources then windows you are still wrong b/c they can be custimzed for your computer just like linux can be. Expolere alone may take up about 32 MB but if u add in all the apps windows starts by defatl that M$ put in it is up to the 140s as well. (at least on my comps). Quote: I think there are thousands of people that would disagree with you on the fact that gentoo is a horrible distro. This happened to me as a newb, and with my SiS chipset... this really is discouraging to the newbs... Windows isn't discouraging to the newbs, I wonder why... ![]() I hope you are not implying that i think gentoo is a horrible distro, i find it fine. Just that it is NOT MADE FOR NEWBS, poleop who are newbs to linux should 1st try a live cd to find a SIMPLER DISTRO they like and then try to install that. Quote: You can emulate any linux application in Windows with cygwin, just as easily, if not easier, than with wine on Linux. Not to mention, that cygwin provides all the tools... and after that, absolutely any linux app can be compiled as a windows' ".exe" binary and run from any windows box. Yes, just as easy. witch was my point ![]() Quote: I've read all the Wine How-Tos... That's why I don't have those problems anymore... but your average Joe SixPack won't want to. What user-friendly app makes you read 300 pages worth of documentation? Windows? or anything eltes M$ makes? Quote: Not all Linux distro's are RPM based, and "alien" only does so good of a job. I know that but some are, any how i do not think compleing them is that hard if your linux is set up right and u read the read me files Quote: Lots of programs require different compiler flags and manual configs, and simply doing a "./configure && make && make install" won't do. So u have to read the redmean file and add a lite more info, it is not a hard thing to do uhsely. And if u turly can not get it to wrok there are ushely poleop who have made binerays for your distro if u look for them. Quote: Install KDE from source, not update. My computer is 3.2 GHz slow. Then there is somting wrong, b/c it should not take 6 hours to compile a file. I am thinking you did somting wrong if it toke 6 hours on a 3.2GHz. Quote: I've been using Linux since I was in grade 6. I'll always prefer to use linux over windows, but you're saying that Linux is a lot easier to use than windows... and that your average joe sixpack will be able to run it right out of the box and have no issues with it what-so-ever, which is entirely false. It can be just as easy if not more so, may be the avg joe sixpacks in your area are alot dummer then mine? Quote: Try installing any video card from SiS on linux. I dare you, try, read every single mother fûcking how-to in the world... you still won't be able too, unless y ou write your own.. which is still impossible since they completely refuse to reveal any key driver specs that would allow open source developers to make one. Don't you think people would have made an SiS video driver by now for those who couldn't upgrade to nVidea or ATI cards? So far, they've managed to make them work, without hardware acceleration... which is pretty much useless. May be this is the fault of SiS and not linux??? I mean if u are making PC parts they should work with almost any PC OS. This is not the fault of Linux but as u mentioed SiS. Quote: Don't fûck with me when it comes to linux... I was installing "linux from scratch" before you even knew what turing was. ....You are making many asumptions, you know nothing about when i used linux or when i used turing. How old do u think i am? Or a better question how old do u think you are? Also saying that "I was installing "linux from scratch" before you even knew what turing was." means so litte b/c the eralested i could know about turing was in grade 10, not b/c that is when i started progming but b/c turing is such an unknow lang. I have been using linux b4 i was in high school as well so i do not get your staments here at all. |
Author: | templest [ Sat Aug 21, 2004 12:20 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Quote: What are u talking about? i download the ISO file from there site and instaled via a cd. I also have insatled via a hard driver. SuSe can be instaled just as many ways and for free as any other distro of linux. It even has a live verson....
I downloaded that ISO aswell, thinking SuSE finally decided to open up a bit and make it easier (less time consuming) to install their Operating System, only to find out that it provides no kernel source and gcc, and YaST won't display these packaged to be installed. The LiveCD is just that, running linux off the CD, I want my OS on the HD. Quote: mm, i am prity shure there are drivers for them now....even if they are in the eraly stages.
Wrong, only hacks... which still don't provide hardware acceleration. Quote: Ethere way u look at it there is somting wrong with your agument, 1st if u are saying u are not talking about linux then what is the point? We where debating linux no KDE. Now if u say all linux desktops are more resources then windows you are still wrong b/c they can be custimzed for your computer just like linux can be. Expolere alone may take up about 32 MB but if u add in all the apps windows starts by defatl that M$ put in it is up to the 140s as well. (at least on my comps).
For a newb, KDE is linux (either that or GNOME). Even if you're not a newb, but prefer a fully working desktop environment as opposed to a basic window manager, you'll still feel the difference. I booted into Windows and ran: WinAMP, Fireworks, FireFox, ThunderBird, several dozen windows of explorer, and had them all display on the screen... explorer was up to a whopping 60 MBs, whereas KDE upon loading, showed a miniscule 133.7 MBs. There are no better desktop environments out than the two forementioned and the average Joe Sixpack, won't want to learn how to work soley on the shell just to avoid high resources, all he'll say is: "Why is my computer so slow?" Quote: I hope you are not implying that i think gentoo is a horrible distro, i find it fine. Just that it is NOT MADE FOR NEWBS, poleop who are newbs to linux should 1st try a live cd to find a SIMPLER DISTRO they like and then try to install that. Windows runs at it's optimal state without much configuration (not that you can anyways), with a pretty much automatic self-installer. And even the simplest distributions (see mandrake or redhat) require at least minimal knowledge of partitioning, and you need to know things such as your monitor's vertical / horizontal refresh rates, what software packages to install (which a newb will not be familiar with), and if you install everything, you're looking at the 3 GB linux distro, which is hardly more space efficient than windows. And after all that, the whole installation is very generic, meaning, you'll have to do a lot of tuning afterwards anyways. All I ever needed to do was go to windowsupdate, download about 20 MBs worth of updates, and done; now I can do what I want. Quote: Yes, just as easy. witch was my point Rolling Eyes
Let me rephrase that. It IS easier... you download the ~300 KB exe, install it, install the apps off the internet... done. You don't have to configure X, the soundcard, mouse, ect... just compile, and run the apps you want. No configs to write, font packages to hunt down, libraries to satisfy, ect. Quote: Windows? or anything eltes M$ makes?
The documentation microsoft provides for it's apps are on how to use the application, not how to get it working, they work pretty well once installed, never had an issue with office in my life (never had to read the documentation either). Quote: I know that but some are, any how i do not think compleing them is that hard if your linux is set up right and u read the read me files
Again with documentation, the average Joe SixPack wants it to work, he doesn't want to fix the issue. Quote: Then there is somting wrong, b/c it should not take 6 hours to compile a file. I am thinking you did somting wrong if it toke 6 hours on a 3.2GHz.
It's not compiling a file... It's compiling many, many, files. up and around ~400 MBs, which is pretty much the size of my entire gentoo install (if you don't concider KDE and GNOME as part of the OS). Quote: It can be just as easy if not more so, may be the avg joe sixpacks in your area are alot dummer then mine?
Don't under estimate the Average Joe SixPack. By "AJS" (Acronym), I'm not reffering to the 16 year old kid that likes computers and doesn't mind reading up on it. I'm reffering to the air heads that only want a computer for pr0n, MSN, and internet. I'm reffering to the girls that don't want to learn how to compile stuff on the computer just to get aMSN to work; these same girls who most likely don't know what the word 'compile' even means. I'm reffering to the average person that hasn't read a book out of geniune want for reading in their life. I'm reffering to about %70 of the population. ![]() Quote: May be this is the fault of SiS and not linux??? I mean if u are making PC parts they should work with almost any PC OS. This is not the fault of Linux but as u mentioed SiS.
Exactly. You're %100 right. But here's the thing, your AJS won't want to buy new hardware when they just bought their brand-spankin' new Compaq just to use linux. Quote: ....You are making many asumptions, you know nothing about when i used linux or when i used turing.
I'm merely deducing your experience with computers in general, pretty much how you were asuming my level of experience with linux due to my statement that linux costs "extra bucks". ![]() |
Author: | Dan [ Sat Aug 21, 2004 12:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
templest wrote: For a newb, KDE is linux (either that or GNOME). Even if you're not a newb, but prefer a fully working desktop environment as opposed to a basic window manager, you'll still feel the difference. I booted into Windows and ran: WinAMP, Fireworks, FireFox, ThunderBird, several dozen windows of explorer, and had them all display on the screen... explorer was up to a whopping 60 MBs, whereas KDE upon loading, showed a miniscule 133.7 MBs. There are no better desktop environments out than the two forementioned and the average Joe Sixpack, won't want to learn how to work soley on the shell just to avoid high resources, all he'll say is: "Why is my computer so slow?" I do not know how you are geting thos numbers, with no apps runing on windows i am using about 135mb to 140mb and it is about the same for KDE. templest wrote: Windows runs at it's optimal state without much configuration (not that you can anyways), with a pretty much automatic self-installer. And even the simplest distributions (see mandrake or redhat) require at least minimal knowledge of partitioning, and you need to know things such as your monitor's vertical / horizontal refresh rates, what software packages to install (which a newb will not be familiar with) Nope, the SuSe installer is by far easyer and better then the windows one. It will do the parting and hardware conf for you if u whont but it will also let you mess with them unlike windows. On the windows instaler it will only let you in to the parting stuff if it can not find a parten w/o windows on it. With is nuts, windows will install over everying that is not windows and it will even make more partens and instal it's self more times if u are trying to reinstall some times. It is a pain in a ass too get the windows instaler to do what you whont with parting. Also the SuSe instaler even looks graficlky better then the windows one and is by far easer to use then there crazy bule screen with a few graficks when it is not instaling over everything. templest wrote: and if you install everything, you're looking at the 3 GB linux distro, which is hardly more space efficient than windows. And after all that, the whole installation is very generic, meaning, you'll have to do a lot of tuning afterwards anyways. All I ever needed to do was go to windowsupdate, download about 20 MBs worth of updates, and done; now I can do what I want. IDK what u are talking about there, linux can be 3gb if u inistal abusltey everything but that is only b/c it comes with aboustly everything in some distros form office software to hacking tools some times. Linux's it's slef can be quite small and i have even instaled it on the ram in my game cube with dose not even have a hard driver and there are also some linux distros witch fix on floplys. Oh and are we going to talk about updates???? w/o thos dam windows updates your os will be so unscuer it will almost gaeritented to be pwned in one hour of being online. With M$ they only give out the updates once a month at best and let the secuity holes staty there in till they feal like fixing and in Linux the updates for any sercuirty hole and fixed daly and most distros have an updae system that works for more then the OS but with almost any app u have so you get thos sequity patachs b4 they beceom a problem. Also you need to instal alot more stuff on windows then the updates, windwos dose not come with any good apps like most linux distros do. With SuSE you get everything from open office to 4-5 difrent media players (witch u have the choice of instal or not) while with M$ they make u pay for there crapy ass office and the only things they give u is IE witch is bad enoguth and there meaid player with the lovey adds and crap they throw in. Quote: Let me rephrase that. It IS easier... you download the ~300 KB exe, install it, install the apps off the internet... done. Witch is all ready done in most linux distros.... Quote: You don't have to configure X, the soundcard, mouse, ect... just compile, and run the apps you want. No configs to write, font packages to hunt down, libraries to satisfy, ect. With my distro wine came prity much cofigerd, all i had to do was add in some dll from winxp witch i think they could not put in b/c they whould get sued by M$. Quote: The documentation microsoft provides for it's apps are on how to use the application, not how to get it working, they work pretty well once installed, never had an issue with office in my life (never had to read the documentation either). ROFL, never had an issue with a M$ project in your life? I don't blive that for a seconed. Also some times thos lonf linux how tos are need if u make your apps to work with, you know, more then one OS like some evil comanys.... Quote: It's not compiling a file... It's compiling many, many, files. up and around ~400 MBs, which is pretty much the size of my entire gentoo install (if you don't concider KDE and GNOME as part of the OS). Seems like you have issues with KDE and not Linux.... Quote: Don't under estimate the Average Joe SixPack. By "AJS" (Acronym), I'm not reffering to the 16 year old kid that likes computers and doesn't mind reading up on it. I'm reffering to the air heads that only want a computer for pr0n, MSN, and internet. I'm reffering to the girls that don't want to learn how to compile stuff on the computer just to get aMSN to work; these same girls who most likely don't know what the word 'compile' even means. I'm reffering to the average person that hasn't read a book out of geniune want for reading in their life. I'm reffering to about %70 of the population. ![]() Well with poleop that dum they are going to have just a hard time using windows as any other OS out there. And i am telling you linux can be just as easy. And there are binary verson of aMSN for some distros so it install is quite easy. Quote: I'm merely deducing your experience with computers in general, pretty much how you were asuming my level of experience with linux due to my statement that linux costs "extra bucks". ![]() No idea what you are try to say here, but i still do not see how it whould cost extra bucks, you can not blame linux b/c you have a crapy graficks card. And it is hardly as bad as u make it sound, it is not like you could not see anything, just can not do 3d aceration. Honstly the best OS set up you could have whould be a dual booting system with Linux and Windows. Linux for a good OS that works, is stable and is the best in almost everything and Windows for the one thing it beats linux in, popularity. The windows half could be usefull for the progames that only wrok on windows and for your 3d aceration, athougth ushely enougth wrok with wine will get thos apps wroking. And when it comes down to it, the turth is linux is open sorce so that means if you have a problem with it (like it is to hard to use) you could shut up and stop comapling about it and recode it but with windows you are stuck with w/e M$ whonts you to be stuck with. Once Linux starts checking on (and it is, just look at the IBM linux adds) more and more hardware comapys are going to start making there PCs to run both. Once that hapends all the hardware combity issues will be gone it will be even more clear that linux can be just as easy and better at the same time. P.S. i dont think any one but us is reading this any more other then us too, and since we are both stuck in our ways there realy is no point in conotiong this so i will most likey not take this any father if u post agaen. |
Author: | templest [ Sat Aug 21, 2004 1:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Sorry to burst your bubble, but I have a Geforce 6600 GT card. And I bought that because I was fed up with the unacceptable performance that disguisting SiS card delivered. Anyways, I'm getting pretty bored of this discussion. As of right now... ...But that doesn't mean I won't reply later on today or tomorrow when I need something to do again. ![]() Believe you me, I could keep going on 'till infinitum. Anyways, Where would you get that I have something against linux? I can't seem to find the thread in which I have an argument where I defend linux from Windows and one recommending gentoo linux to the newbs. But you have to be careful what kind of newb you mean. When I mean newb, I don't mean myself 5 years ago, I mean the one who doesn't care for computer at all and just wants pr0n and MSN. What I'm saying is that even I recognize the fact that Windows is easier to operate for the AJS. Anyways... yeah, y'know... I'll make a proper reply when I can. This is fun. ![]() |
Author: | Mazer [ Sat Aug 21, 2004 1:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
So I was on CGtalk a few days ago... man, I knew I sucked at drawing, but being back at that site is like a slap in the face. But it's a slap in the face by the hand of inspiration! So I'm gonna get an old sketch of mine and try to remake it... maybe then I can join Maverick as a starter-of-threads-about-pics-I've-drawn. |
Author: | Andy [ Sat Aug 21, 2004 1:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
rofl... guys there is something thats called live linux that is out.. you dl the iso file, burn it on a cd, and boot linux rite from the cd, no installation required! |
Author: | templest [ Sat Aug 21, 2004 5:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
and suse, and knoppix, and mandrake, redhat, fedora, debian, ect... ![]() |
Author: | Dan [ Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Heh, well my def of newbe is some one that at least knows what an OS is b/c if they did not how whould they ever get the idea of installing linux :p Live cds can be good if u do not whont to do much but it can not realy fuction as your main os. Live cds are also gr8 fro hacking windows systems ![]() |
Author: | Amailer [ Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Topic was wayout of topic so i siplit it ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Dan [ Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Amailer wrote: Topic was wayout of topic so i siplit it
![]() ![]() LOL, ya we where kind of pushing it there. i dont even know what the orgien topic was about. That has got to be a recored for going off topic. Oh well the deabte seems to be over for now any how. |
Author: | templest [ Sun Aug 22, 2004 12:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
These are the longest posts I've seen in my life, crunched into one page. ![]() EDIT: Two* pages. ![]() |