Yes, also, you forgot to mention King's Quest 8.
For real, though, I'd have to say Tribes was the most fun for multiplayer. Shame there aren't as many people playing now... and alot of the mod servers really take away from the game I think.
Computer Science Canada Best First Person Shooter |
| Author: | Martin [ Sat Aug 14, 2004 2:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Best First Person Shooter |
Alright people, cast your votes. If I say a game, any mods for that game fall under that game. So if you like Counter-Strike, vote Half-Life. Also, if you like Quake 2, vote Quake. I know I left a lot out, so if you think of something else, post it. |
|
| Author: | Dan [ Sat Aug 14, 2004 10:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Tribes, one not two tho. Tribes 2 killed alot of what was good with tribes one. Athougth Tribes is only good with some of the server mods like shfiter witch was gr8. |
|
| Author: | Amailer [ Sat Aug 14, 2004 11:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I liked BF 1942 with DC MOD <---- was fun.. |
|
| Author: | Martin [ Sat Aug 14, 2004 2:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Wow, I can't believe I forgot those two...drool... |
|
| Author: | Raugrist [ Mon Aug 16, 2004 8:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yes, also, you forgot to mention King's Quest 8.
For real, though, I'd have to say Tribes was the most fun for multiplayer. Shame there aren't as many people playing now... and alot of the mod servers really take away from the game I think. |
|
| Author: | shorthair [ Mon Aug 16, 2004 9:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
And the one i made GRRRRR , but i choose rainbow six 3 , sthena sword , or rainbow six as your poll permits |
|
| Author: | the_short1 [ Mon Aug 16, 2004 9:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
VOTE DOOM!!!!!! or it will all be your FINAL hour.. cuz DOOM is the ULTIMATE game!!!!! dont forget ur heritage!!! doom basically started it all... or ill take the CHAINSAW to u... 
evil lauigh.. . yea i know im not funny... |
|
| Author: | Amailer [ Mon Aug 16, 2004 8:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
BF 1942 with DesertCombat MOD http://desertcombat.com/?page=vehicles |
|
| Author: | TheZsterBunny [ Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
hrm. anyone remember 'Rise of the Triad'? how 'bout 'Duke Nukem 3D'? some of the older games were the most fun. I didn't like the original doom too much, it's only redeeming feature was its non-block levels (unlike wolfenstein 3d or rott). But from what I can tell, the first truly 3d game was Quake. I distinctly remember gibbing things and having guts bounce around. The best would have to have been Half-Life. Argue all you want, but when a games price remains the same even after 6 years, it must be pretty good. AVP2 and NOLF were fun, but I didn't like BF1942. it seemed too gamey. vote: Half-Life -Z |
|
| Author: | bugzpodder [ Tue Aug 17, 2004 6:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
wolfenstein |
|
| Author: | the_short1 [ Tue Aug 17, 2004 8:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
yea.. . i still play quake 1! yea i think it was the frist real 3d i have the old dos version.. and a GL version (its more 3d card oriented)... and the graphcis are wicked.. yea... Duke Nukem is fun.. i still paly taht too doom2 is much better then doom1 tho.. i saw doom3 on shelve today.. 90$.. ouch... and requires 64 or higher video card.... half life was like 30 $.... and required a lot less.. but they also said doom3 would have so dam good graphics... best lioghting and shadoes... so lifelike.. and a really good comment from pc gamer.. that i forget now.; meh.... idk about half life 2 tho.. wolfensteain 3d suckerd... graphics were way to blockish like someoen said... but doom3's price will prob go down with time like most other games.. |
|
| Author: | rizzix [ Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
maybe he meant return to castle wolfenstein |
|
| Author: | zomg [ Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
i voted other because counter strike condition zero is the best fricken game in the world |
|
| Author: | Martin [ Thu Oct 21, 2004 11:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Condition Zero falls under the Half-Life category. |
|
| Author: | zomg [ Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
o really, opps  |
|
| Author: | TheZsterBunny [ Wed Oct 27, 2004 6:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
No, I meant wolfenstein 3d. Wolfenstein 3d, and ROTT were both built along the same lines. All levels were composed of bricks (like cubes) and you had to navigate around them. The enemies were 8 (or less) pictures (for rotation) and a few for death. However, ROTT introduced the concept of height. you couldn't jump or duck, but you could climb stairs. It wasn't anything amazing, but you could easily build a random map generator. Doom and Duke Nukem 3D introduced actual 3D levels. You could have angular walls, large organic-ish structures, and a more 'realistic' level. However, in Doom, you were still constrained to 2 dimentions (I think). Around this time, Quake was released. Quake was the first fully 3D game. You had 3D monsters, 3D Maps (not blocks) and moving doors. I think this was the building block of all games to come. Alot of the cheat codes (console commands) originated in Quake, and have not changed much since. (i.e. sv_gravity 400). A good indicator of a games heritage is to look at the gibs. By playing Deus Ex, you can clearly see (after rocketing someone) that the game was based upon the unreal engine. Also all of the Quake 3 'Mods' (retail games with the same engine) boot up the same way. I remember playing Quake 3 once, and finding MoHAA in the mods menu. ^_^; I know, I'm a geek. -Z |
|
| Author: | Martin [ Wed Oct 27, 2004 7:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Doom and Doom 2 both used a more advanced raycasting algorithm, so it was only simulated 3d. |
|
| Author: | the_short1 [ Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
and doom2 had better graphcis then doom 1... . but both FAR exceeded wold 3d... yea.. i have quake1 i downloaded off kazaa lite a while back... it has a dos quake.. and a windows 3d quake .,. which runs a lto slower due to the crzy graphics.. was gl quake included with original game ? or did the person who made that game pack just include it himself>?/ if anyones interested.. i foupnd a torrent that is Doom 1 and 2 but modernized.. with real 3d graphics.... pm me if u want it., its like 500MB when downloaded... |
|
| Author: | MyPistolsIn3D [ Wed Oct 27, 2004 8:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cmon, timesplitters 2 guys. That game is awsome. Better than all those others. |
|
| Author: | Flea [ Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Rise of the Triad was the best Doom wannabe EVER. '95! U should read up on it if u never heard of it, maybe. It was a great game. But UT is still #1 overall for me. Q3 couldnt touch it, Halo was close but not quite there. Ut's not relaxing at all, which is why its so fun. Edit: HOLY SHIT!!! SOMEONE MENTINED ROTT!!! GOOD JOB BUNNY! Man, Im surprised. I thought nobody else played that game. |
|
| Author: | TheZsterBunny [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 9:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
About 7 years ago, I bought it online (from 3D Realms) for $60. 6 weeks later, the game was released for free in the x-mas edition of PC Gamer. Thats how I remembered it. And for those who don't know... They also had some nice easter-eggs. i.e. diffrerent music on holidays, different pictures, and different pictures. Also, the whole game wasn't meant to be taken seriously. One of the characters you could be had the name 'Ian Paul Freeley'. Boy, was that joke old. Another hidden name? The 3rd boss. A metal garbage can with a dozen rocket launchers. He was the 'Nasty Metallic Enforcer' (The NME - get it?) I still remember that game well. I've been trying to find the music from that game (not in MIDI format). Having fun still listening to that. Wrote my first web page with some of that music in the background ^_^. -Z |
|
| Author: | Flea [ Sun Oct 31, 2004 12:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Another hidden name? The 3rd boss. A metal garbage can with a dozen rocket launchers. He was the 'Nasty Metallic Enforcer' (The NME - get it?)
he was stephen hawkings in the wheelchair wasnt he? the last boss was a giant exploding head slash snake thing, who had larvae everywhere. yep, ROTT had funny stuff alright. Shrooms mode (a power-down where it looks like ur trippin out), dog mode (where you turn into an invincible dog. the dog digitized from one of the producers actual pets. you got smaller, too!), god mode (you became 10 times bigger than normal and anything you saw instantly died). cant forget the ultrabat (same story for the bat as the dog). I loved luring bad guys into those spinning blades. Yep, my issue was from a friends pc gamer mag. even doom producers played this game a lot for a while. Other games haev had funny stuff as well, though. I mean half-life had some good comic relief for the first bit of the game. New games just dont have as many easter eggs though, which is a totally good reason that ROTT is right up there in my mind, though the point of a general FPS is to kill stuff after all. And thats why UT gets my vote. |
|
| Author: | TheZsterBunny [ Sun Oct 31, 2004 2:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The second boss was the wheelchair dude. that was not stephen hawking, but one of the producers in an armchair. Nowadays, games take years to produce (HL2, Doom3, DNF), but looking back on this one... *a-hem* The game looks like it was produced with a 500$ budget in 3 weeks. and most of the budget was spent on beer. It was full of corny easter-eggs, poor graphics, and was loved by many. *sigh* those were the days. -Z http://www.classicgaming.com/rott/hell/ |
|
| Author: | the_short1 [ Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I still like doom2, and im liking the ideas of ROTT! anyone wana have a game ? is their network support (IP) or anything liek that:??? i read their was lan support.. but idk about the ip.. pm me if u got game... (looking for full version now.....) |
|
| Author: | templest [ Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Doom3, CounterStrike: Source, Half-Life: 2, Day of Defeat (And Source, when it's released), and Q3A.  |
|
| Author: | the_short1 [ Wed Nov 10, 2004 9:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ok hey all u guys.... i played ROTT A little.. and its a pretty good game.. comparable to doom2.., the gameplay is a bit better in doom2.. but this is just FUNNER.,. also this has crapier stairs and graphics.. but o well.. the FUN factor is GREAT./.. ik really liked the bouncies.. thats a big change from the almost always staying on ground doom2 .. http://66.90.75.92/suprnova//torrents/2833/Rise_of_the_Triad___Powerpack_Addon.torrent http://66.90.75.92/suprnova//torrents/2988/_DC__Rise_of_the_Triad__ROTTDC___Kikoken_SB_-rar.torrent i downloaded and used the frist one.. but its slow .. .the second one has much more seeders but just was released a little whiel ago.. ENJOY.. and let the ROTT feest begin.. |
|
| Author: | betaflye [ Wed Apr 20, 2005 7:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Half-Life. Day Of Defeat was awesome in the day. I'd get Half-Life 2 if I still played games, just for Day of Defeat Source. Hmm, maybe that isn't a bad idea. |
|
| Author: | axej [ Mon May 30, 2005 5:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
pariah dissappointed me so much 
i was so lucky my dad forced me to not preorder it. halo 2 wasn't that great either. |
|
| Author: | [Gandalf] [ Mon May 30, 2005 9:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
...look at the date... IMHO (not really the 'h' part) Halo stinks, HL2 smells, and CS isn't worth playing (those are in polite terms ).
I would put Wolfenstein Enemy Territory, but I guess I'll go with FarCry. That game had an alright storyline, nice gameplay, and sweet graphics - should really get more recognition. |
|
| Author: | BenLi [ Thu May 11, 2006 3:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Nobody here likes Socom? I like ghost recon, if it were not for the studpid AI team, i've shot my own so many times b ecause they waltz into my line of fire |
|
| Author: | axej [ Thu May 11, 2006 4:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
mmmm necro posting... a year after the fact ah well red steel looks good tho |
|
| Author: | ZeroPaladn [ Fri May 12, 2006 12:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quake and Quake II were awsome! Halo is runner up, but I still can get over the "gibbs" in that game! |
|
| Author: | codemage [ Mon May 15, 2006 8:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
NOLF for humour. Timesplitters for best console multiplayer. FarCry and Half-Life for ambiance and AI. |
|
| Author: | Martin [ Tue May 16, 2006 10:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
codemage wrote: NOLF for humour.
Timesplitters for best console multiplayer. FarCry and Half-Life for ambiance and AI. I remember in FarCry when I was hiding in a vent and one of the A.I. guys came in after me. One of those 'That's not supposed to be possible' moments. Tres cool. |
|
| Author: | [Gandalf] [ Wed May 17, 2006 4:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yeah, FarCry was great. Anyone see the previews to Crysis? Amazing, truly amazing. One of the only things I didn't like about FarCry is that there were so many monsters... Something which is happening in far, far too many games these days. |
|
| Author: | codemage [ Thu May 18, 2006 10:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Crysis looks nice. I hope it won't require an upgrade to Vista. |
|
| Author: | blaster009 [ Thu May 18, 2006 5:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I voted Half-Life cause I'm a CS junkie...And FarCry is the best game you can buy for $9.99 new. Ever. |
|
| Author: | s3arkay [ Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Other - Call of Duty |
|
| Author: | BenLi [ Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
rainbow six 3 owns you all |
|
| Author: | MysticVegeta [ Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
wtf. QUAKE GUYS QUAKE! Omg, How can you guys forget those variety of nice-4$$ weapons? and that freaky voice in the background? hehehe. Quake is the way to go.   Quake 4 = ultimate... 
HALO SUCKS |
|
| Author: | [Gandalf] [ Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
While Halo sucking is something I would definately agree with... Quake is just not fun. I don't get it, every game is exactly the same; the Quake series, the Doom series, ET: Quake Wars, and all that. You have one, you have 'em all. |
|
| Author: | MysticVegeta [ Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
well I used to play Quake 2, I found quake 4 to be different here in Canada. But maybe its cause I played Quake 2 or was it 1? 4 years ago in india. I am not really sure. I cant remmeber most of it, just remember though it used to be fun. Also, I enjoy playing Quake 4. but if only I had a better video card, it WOULD BE CLEAR-ER!!!!! -_- Man, I need a X1900 lol |
|
| Author: | Aziz [ Sat Jul 22, 2006 12:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Latest? Halo 2. The graphics were great, and the physics were sweet, storyline blew (Halo's 1 was awesome though), but it's the multiplayer that made this shine, not only the team aspects and solid stradegy but the matching system. No longer was a match just a match...it was for honour, rank. Not to mention have about 6-8 friends that played was good. Calling up my buddy and my cousin and taking on team snipers was fun as hell. Old school, definitely duke nukem 3D. Not only was it fun and expansive, but funny. I laughed my ass of at the "Balls of steel" pinball machine (but I was only like 10). And Quake (the first), as well, that game had me pissed off a lot, especially at the last level, I could never figure out how to kill that damn thing, until I finally just did it (by accident) |
|
| Author: | MysticVegeta [ Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Halo... SUCKS. The campaign is BORING. The multiplayer is LAGGY. But since I dont own an xbox cause I dont believe in buying consoles when you have a pc and dsl, I dont know how Halo 2 is. My friends say, it is excellent since in multiplayer, its limited to broadband users only? I am not really sure. But whenever microsoft decides to make halo 2... I will try it out on PC, and I already know, it cant be better than quake. |
|
| Author: | Martin [ Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Halo 2 is pretty good, it just ends too early. Kind of like "Huh, that's it?" The last boss is hella-difficult on Legendary. Right now I'm slowly working my way through Soldier of Fortune 2, which is quite the violent game. |
|
| Author: | Panopticon [ Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Deus Ex |
|
| Author: | Windsurfer [ Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Deus Ex is an RPG, it's nothing like a REAL FPS. ... Unless you're talking about Deus Ex 2, in which case, I laugh at you. |
|
| Author: | War_Caymore [ Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I fell in love with the first time i played the first quake game. then the second one was a little bit iffy, then the whole seies went downhill sence the 3rd one. still haven't tried the 4th one but not willing to spend a fortune to play it. go Quake! |
|
| Author: | ZeroPaladn [ Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
bro, no necroposting. (dont revive old topics) EDIT: shane calls your stupid for necroposting |
|
| Author: | cavetroll [ Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
definitely perfect dark 64 or perfect dark zero, both were great games with excellent stories. Also had some humor in them. |
|
| Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
Perfect dark zero was awful. How could anyone possibly like that? |
|
| Author: | cavetroll [ Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
I liked it, although now that I think about it the first one was definitely better but I enjoyed the second one. I don't actually have it but I have played multiplayer and a little bit of the story mode at a friends house. What I played I enjoyed. |
|
| Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
PDZ was an awful game. Resistance: Fall of man is better. Half-Life 2 is by far the greatest FPS ever created. |
|
| Author: | Mazer [ Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RE:Best First Person Shooter |
CodeMonkey2000 @ Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:11 pm wrote: PDZ was an awful game. Resistance: Fall of man is better. Half-Life 2 is by far the greatest FPS ever created.
You're always wrong and I'm always right. Give some reasons for your opinions, prick. |
|
| Author: | Clayton [ Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RE:Best First Person Shooter |
CodeMonkey2000 @ Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:11 pm wrote: PDZ was an awful game. Resistance: Fall of man is better. Half-Life 2 is by far the greatest FPS ever created.
By the way you explain your reasons for HL2 being the best game (wait, was there any?) there is, I can easily say that Counter Strike: Source is by far the best first person shooter ever made. Point is, just saying something doesn't make it fact, back up your opinions with some support. EDIT: GORRAMNIT, common sense beat me to it. |
|
| Author: | rdrake [ Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
I found Halo quite entertaining and that it had a lot of replay value. Multiplayer was always fun. Some levels were repetitive but overall it was a brilliant game. Halo 2 had a disappointing ending but was still quite fun like the original. Half-Life 2 was a fun game sometimes but boring others. I especially hated those damned antlions always popping out of nowhere when you step onto their beloved goddamn sand. They always got a revolver shot to the head for that one. I haven't really played the original Half-Life much despite owning it for a while now. Quake was fun when I was younger but it got boring fast. It's the same damn thing over and over again! Doom was pretty fun but I never really got into it. Doom 3 is pretty good at making you jump at some points. Unreal tournament is a wonderful game to play when you have a group of friends over. Other than that it's boring. |
|
| Author: | Clayton [ Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
Damn... my post got mutilated... Anywho, I personally like Halo 2. It's got an awesome multiplayer setup that's great for anywhere from 2 - 16 people to play, a good balance of weapons, and some good maps. The fact that you can create your own game scenarios is a major benefit as well. I found that that option was much better handled the second time around than in Halo 1. The campaign was a bit disappointing to be honest, I just didn't think the story was quite up to the standards of Halo 1. Definitely the big thing that Halo 1 has going for it over Halo 2 is the fact that the Warthogs are damn near indestructible. |
|
| Author: | JWHooper [ Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
Has anyone of you heard of a game called "Warrock"? I thought this game was a very good First Person Shooter game. This game is kinda popular in South Korea. |
|
| Author: | JWHooper [ Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
Also, "Sudden Attack" is a good game. |
|
| Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Mon Sep 24, 2007 4:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
Remember in the 90s when most fps's were reffered to as doom clones? Doom was so awesome. It was gory,violent plus it had a death match which was awesome. Why is halo 3 gaining so much hype? It's everywhere. Everyone is talking about it. I have a feeling M$ is paying big bucks for publicity. I personally prefer PC fps's more than console. |
|
| Author: | Zampano [ Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
My personal favourite is Goldneye because it was my first but I guess the James Bond games never got enough good games to be consistently called a serious FPS series. |
|
| Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Fri Sep 28, 2007 7:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
I remember Goldneye. That was back when Rareware was cool. |
|
| Author: | Strykr [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
CS:Source is my top FPS for now. Might start HL2 later. |
|
| Author: | Sean [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
I found Bioshock to be one of the better first-person shooter. |
|
| Author: | lordroba [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
i'll have to go with COD4 |
|
| Author: | BigBear [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
Wow I thought more people would vote for Halo. Maybe because it is for xbox and slow getting to PC. Halo 3 online is amazing. I believe the shield system in HAlo really make the game your not low from just killing someone and someone kills you. |
|
| Author: | Mackie [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
Counter Strike: Source, and if it counts; Garry's Mod. |
|
| Author: | michaelp [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
Is Call of Duty considered an FPS? |
|
| Author: | HellblazerX [ Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RE:Best First Person Shooter |
michaelp @ Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:06 pm wrote: Is Call of Duty considered an FPS?
How is it not an FPS? And right now, i'm playing alot of CS:Source, mainly cuz its one of the only game that works with my school's ISP. But its still a good game. |
|
| Author: | Michael516 [ Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
Half life is the best! |
|
| Author: | A.J [ Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
HALO ALL THE WAY!!! |
|
| Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
Meh I don't have an xbox, and console fps's in general suck. You need the keyboard and mouse. A new game I recently tried is portal. That game is soo freaking awesome. Does portal count as an fps? I still haven't played Crisis, that game looks amazing. As anyone here played it? |
|
| Author: | Mackie [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
If your in the first person, and your shooting I think it counts. I'd defiantly count Portal. |
|
| Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
But it has more emphasis on puzzle solving. |
|
| Author: | Mackie [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
Ya but it still meets the needed criteria, plus extra. So, it's a puzzle-fps, I guess. |
|
| Author: | jernst [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
team fortress 2! |
|
| Author: | OneOffDriveByPoster [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
Duke Nukem 3D |
|
| Author: | jernst [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RE:Best First Person Shooter |
CodeMonkey2000 @ Fri Sep 28, 2007 7:06 pm wrote: I remember Goldneye. That was back when Rareware was cool.
Ah goldeneye, that was one of the first FPS's that got me hooked on gaming...haha good call |
|
| Author: | syntax_error [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
portal = best game ever no if and or buts |
|
| Author: | Mackie [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
That, sounds very fanboyish of you. Portal is a great game, it's just not the best. Although that's just my opinion. |
|
| Author: | CodeMonkey2000 [ Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
I'd say Half-life is the best. CS:S is great too. A little fyi we have been talking about this for a really really really long time. |
|
| Author: | nastynika [ Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
Bioshock has to be one of the best new ones out there but i cant wait for gears of war 2 |
|
| Author: | DaveAngus [ Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
nastynika @ Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:27 am wrote: Bioshock has to be one of the best new ones out there but i cant wait for gears of war 2
Im no fan of Gears.... Bioshock was good! Hear about Alone in the Dark? If not go on the xbox360 marketplace (or youtube) and look it up. It looks amazingggg!!!!! |
|
| Author: | tenniscrazy [ Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
Bioshock is the best for single player in my opinion |
|
| Author: | btiffin [ Wed Apr 09, 2008 8:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
I was a fair fan of Ghost Recon. Someone here needs to make a Portal mod for the first Second Person shooter. Stand at a portal and shoot yourself in the face; over and over and over. Cheers |
|
| Author: | user1238 [ Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
DN3D and mods, especially Life's a Beach. |
|
| Author: | I Smell Death [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 6:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
I have to say that S.T.A.L.K.E.R. is my favorite fps, sure the engine might be a little dated but you easily get lost in the story. |
|
| Author: | Reality Check [ Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
I'm all about Counter Strike 1.6. I've played a lot of FPS games and some were fun and even memorable (like COD4) but none have that lasting appeal counter strike has for me. It's just so awesome. |
|
| Author: | andrew. [ Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
I like Half-Life 2, TF2, Portal (if that counts), Halo PC, and CoD4. |
|
| Author: | Zeroth [ Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Best First Person Shooter |
Goldeneye. It may be the granddaddy whom has inspired and guided the development of so many other FPS's, but its still the best. It can whup all these new-fangled FPSs, complain about kids on its lawn, and drive really really slowly... all at once! |
|
| Author: | gitoxa [ Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Best First Person Shooter |
Deus-Ex |
|