Computer Science Canada What it will look like... |
Author: | Amailer [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:28 am ] |
Post subject: | What it will look like... |
im sure you all have see it, but for those of you who haven't here... (WTC) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Raugrist [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 2:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I probably saw it before, but I've gotta say it. That has got to be one of the ugliest buildings I've ever seen. |
Author: | Dan [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 2:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I like the newage look of it personaly. But is it wise to desing such a buliding like that? it brealy looks like it can stand by it's self never any posable atack on it. Kind of looks like it is melating in the 1st pic there, lol. |
Author: | PaddyLong [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I'd agree that the buildings look very weak, but I'm sure that with the advances in technology and past experiences they are designed to be very stable |
Author: | Paul [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 4:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Well, it looks great, but lets hope its not based on the last design, because of the great height, then it'd be burnable... which invites another 747... |
Author: | Amailer [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 6:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Next attack: Freedom tower, from under the ground... |
Author: | Paul [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 6:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
why does everything have to be either labled freedom or liberty? |
Author: | Cervantes [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 7:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
so, instead of building a spiral staircase, we built a straight staircase and have the building spiral around the stairs. ![]() |
Author: | Raugrist [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Well put Cervantes. I like that. When I first saw the picture I couldn't tell whether it was just a bad conept image or the building was really supposed to look all warped and twisted. |
Author: | Catalyst [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
amailer: its already been done (see WTC 1993) |
Author: | Amailer [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
umm? has it... then what the heck-- o well what it looked like ![]() |
Author: | Catalyst [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
not the building, the under-ground attack (see WTC 1993) |
Author: | Paul [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
... oh yea, the garage car bomb? |
Author: | Amailer [ Mon Jul 19, 2004 9:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
with a truck and only 6 people died.... wow lol. Umm they can still have air attacks. Fly a plane from anoter country direct with out warning and BOOM (if they air to air attack the will kill the people inside the plane). |
Author: | naoki [ Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Makes me want to just grab it and twist it back to normal like it was made of Playdoh. Seriously, how do we know the architect just didn't get pissed at his scale model and tweak it just to mess with his employers, and now we're stuck with that? Also, I hear it's gonna be the most easily recognized terrorist target known to man ![]() |
Author: | Raugrist [ Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
But can you blame them? They're just asking for an attack by building that thing. |
Author: | Amailer [ Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
But i don't think there would be another attack... |
Author: | Paul [ Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
yes... saddam is history, and bin laden is on dialysis... |
Author: | templest [ Wed Jul 21, 2004 6:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
That's not a design, what the hell is that!? That's any regular building you'd see in downtown Toronto that's been twisted to look like a twizler and has a huge pike on the top. Seriously, and what kind of a crack head would take this as a feasable design!? Heh... These bastards have no concept of design at all. That's really weak. Like something a drop-out/crack-head architect would make. Damnit! If the new design looked like this: ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Amailer [ Wed Jul 21, 2004 6:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Na, if you check the spyscrapers page or w/e, it shows some cool looking buildings there, some cool ones are in japan.. only some.. maybe only 1 UMmm |
Author: | rizzix [ Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
templest wrote: That's not a design, what the hell is that!? That's any regular building you'd see in downtown Toronto that's been twisted to look like a twizler and has a huge pike on the top. Seriously, and what kind of a crack head would take this as a feasable design!? Heh... These bastards have no concept of design at all. That's really weak. Like something a drop-out/crack-head architect would make. Damnit!
If the new design looked like this: ![]() ![]() heh that looks like a fortress |
Author: | Catalyst [ Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
what happened to the design is explained here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3861999.stm |
Author: | Dan [ Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:01 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Amailer wrote: But i don't think there would be another attack...
I am shure there will be if the U.S. keeps going as it is. Not necraly agested this buliding but on the U.S. When u keep opersing other conotrys around the world or just poleop in generaly you are going to get groups that fight back at any cost. Even if the U.S. where to take over the world there whould still be gorups of poleop that whould try to fight them. |
Author: | Amailer [ Thu Jul 22, 2004 7:52 am ] |
Post subject: | |
How about.. they get into one of the locations where the U.S nukes are keeped and launch it in there it's self ![]() |
Author: | Martin [ Fri Jul 23, 2004 11:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
They just need to put SA missile towers on the top of the towers to shoot down planes that come too close. I'd go for that job. |
Author: | Amailer [ Fri Jul 23, 2004 11:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
then if the missiles miss, they will fall somewhere down destroying other buildings ![]() |
Author: | Martin [ Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
And this is a problem because...? |
: |