Computer Science Canada Check if a string contains a word/sentence etc in Turing |
Author: | ThgilFoDrol [ Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Check if a string contains a word/sentence etc in Turing |
How do I check if a "get x" has a specific word/sentence in Turing? Is it possible in Turing? In java it's myString.contains(string[, separator]); how how would I do this in Turing? Thanks in advance. |
Author: | Aange10 [ Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:54 am ] | ||
Post subject: | RE:Check if a string contains a word/sentence etc in Turing | ||
You can do it, you just have to make the .contains procedure. It would look something like
|
Author: | Tony [ Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Check if a string contains a word/sentence etc in Turing |
index |
Author: | Aange10 [ Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | RE:Check if a string contains a word/sentence etc in Turing |
Oh yes, I forgot about index. But the Turing index function is terrible considering it stops at the first occurrence of what you are looking for, and doesn't provide a way to look for more occurrences. That would be why I do not use index. |
Author: | Tony [ Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Check if a string contains a word/sentence etc in Turing |
Aange10 @ Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:44 pm wrote: it stops at the first occurrence of what you are looking for, and doesn't provide a way to look for more occurrences.
Considering that #contains() returns a boolean value, I don't see how this is a problem. |
Author: | Aange10 [ Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RE:Check if a string contains a word/sentence etc in Turing |
Not to OT, but: Tony @ 2/11/2012, 2:54 pm wrote: Aange10 @ Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:44 pm wrote: it stops at the first occurrence of what you are looking for, and doesn't provide a way to look for more occurrences.
Considering that #contains() returns a boolean value, I don't see how this is a problem. -> Aange10 wrote: That would be why I do not use index. Not saying it matters in this scenario (or in comparison to #contains() in java) On the flip side, to the OP, Tony is correct about index being a valid and most likely superior way to solve your problem. |