Quote:
...but the following persons are excepted and shall not have the right to vote.
...
3. Idiots and insane persons.
...
3. Idiots and insane persons.
Computer Science Canada Lol Usa! |
| Author: | RapidCP [ Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Lol Usa! |
LOL, read the last paragraph in the Kentucky Constitution Section 145 Rights to vote. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/legresou/constitu/145.htm |
|
| Author: | Turing_Gamer [ Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Lol Usa! |
Quote: ...but the following persons are excepted and shall not have the right to vote.
... 3. Idiots and insane persons. |
|
| Author: | SNIPERDUDE [ Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
True. If you are diagnosed as such by a medical professional, you lose your right to vote until stated otherwise. |
|
| Author: | USEC_OFFICER [ Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
So if I was a medical professional, I could say that people were idiots and (perhaps) get away with it? "I'm sorry sir, but according to the tests, you are actually an idiot." |
|
| Author: | petree08 [ Sat May 01, 2010 10:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
Idiot is kind of an interesting word in it's history. It used to be the technical term for mentally challenged or mentally disabled. The word started to be used as an insult to relate people doing stupid things to being mentally challenged. Eventually idiot was being used more to describe stupidity so other words became used as the technical term of mentally challenged. The word retard only really came about because people used the previous term idiot as an insult, now that retard is considered an insult we use mentally challenged or disabled. |
|
| Author: | petree08 [ Sat May 01, 2010 10:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
but the point I was trying to make was that when that bill was written the word Idiot was probably being used to say mentally disabled. |
|
| Author: | USEC_OFFICER [ Sat May 01, 2010 2:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
They why didn't they say mentally disabled? |
|
| Author: | petree08 [ Sat May 01, 2010 7:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
because the bill was written back when idiot was used that way. |
|
| Author: | USEC_OFFICER [ Sun May 02, 2010 3:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
Oh, I though this was fairly recent. Never mind. |
|
| Author: | Turing_Gamer [ Mon May 03, 2010 11:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
AHH I hate history. But I guess that is a good reason since idiots can be told to vote for someone AND THEY WOULD DO IT. Idiots... |
|
| Author: | DemonWasp [ Mon May 03, 2010 1:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
Historically, a lot of laws like this were used to oppress minorities. Minority citizens would be deemed "idiots" or "insane" and denied their right to vote. Similar things have happened with sterilization laws, too. |
|
| Author: | billy10388 [ Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Lol Usa! |
RapidCP @ Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:51 am wrote: LOL, read the last paragraph in the Kentucky Constitution Section 145 Rights to vote.
http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/legresou/constitu/145.htm Such a very amazing link! |
|
| Author: | Nick [ Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
Quote: Text as Ratified on: November 8, 1955.
History: 1955 amendment was proposed by 1954 Ky. Acts ch. 2, sec. 1; original version ratified August 3, 1891, and revised September 28, 1891. most likely idiot == mentally disabled |
|
| Author: | Cezna [ Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RE:Lol Usa! |
Nick @ Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:17 am wrote: Quote: Text as Ratified on: November 8, 1955.
History: 1955 amendment was proposed by 1954 Ky. Acts ch. 2, sec. 1; original version ratified August 3, 1891, and revised September 28, 1891. most likely idiot == mentally disabled petree08 wrote: Idiot is kind of an interesting word in it's history. It used to be the technical term for mentally challenged or mentally disabled. The word started to be used as an insult to relate people doing stupid things to being mentally challenged. Eventually idiot was being used more to describe stupidity so other words became used as the technical term of mentally challenged. The word retard only really came about because people used the previous term idiot as an insult, now that retard is considered an insult we use mentally challenged or disabled. It does mean mentally disabled. I had heard that before, but never knew mentally disabled and insane people were not allowed to vote (it makes sense though, I geuss). Is this law common across other states and countries? What about Canada? *** (Anybody who can answer last two questions gets cake!) *** |
|
| Author: | Tony [ Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
Ontario: http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90e06_e.htm#BK40 Disqualifications are referenced in other places... Time for research. |
|
| Author: | chrisbrown [ Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot#United_States_law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffrage#History_of_suffrage_around_the_world Quote: 1988 - Supreme Court of Canada rules mentally ill patients have the right to vote.
2002 - Prisoners given the right to vote in the riding in which they received their conviction. All adult Canadians except the Chief and Deputy Returning Officers can now vote in Canada I'll be at your house tomorrow to collect my cake.  |
|
| Author: | Tony [ Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Lol Usa! |
London, Ontario, 2006 (so... municipal elections) http://www.electioncoverage.ca/faq.php#How_do_I_know_I%E2%80%99m_prohibited_by_law_from_voting_ Quote: You are prohibited form voting on voting day if you are: * a person serving a sentence of imprisonment in a penal or correctional institution * a corporation * a person acting as executor or trustee or in another representative capacity, except as a voting proxy * a person convicted of a corrupt practice for an election held within 5 years of voting day. |
|
| Author: | Cezna [ Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RE:Lol Usa! |
chrisbrown @ Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:03 pm wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot#United_States_law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffrage#History_of_suffrage_around_the_world Quote: 1988 - Supreme Court of Canada rules mentally ill patients have the right to vote.
2002 - Prisoners given the right to vote in the riding in which they received their conviction. All adult Canadians except the Chief and Deputy Returning Officers can now vote in Canada I'll be at your house tomorrow to collect my cake. Sorry, but: http://halflife.neoseeker.com/w/i/halflife/7/75/The_cake_is_a_lie.jpg ** (Damn, forgot you can't upload images in off topic, so here is a link) ** |
|
| Author: | Dan [ Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: RE:Lol Usa! |
Tony @ 26th July 2010, 5:23 pm wrote: London, Ontario, 2006 (so... municipal elections)
I wonder if this would stand up if challenged as the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled agisnted that kind of law in Sauve v. Canada (2002). Apparently disallowing people to vote on such grounds violates section 3 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Sauve v. Canada: http://csc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2002/2002scc68/2002scc68.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sauv%C3%A9_v._Canada_%28Chief_Electoral_Officer%29 Section 3 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: http://www.efc.ca/pages/law/charter/charter.text.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_Three_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms Charter of Rights and Freedoms wrote: DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS OF CITIZENS. 3. Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein. Section 33 disallows this section to be overridden by Parliament or a legislative assembly. So i would think this means that any Canadian of age can vote in an election. |
|