Computer Science Canada

Keylogger in Turing

Author:  tosb38 [ Tue Jun 10, 2008 3:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Keylogger in Turing

Im new to Turing and i was wondering if you could make a keylogger in Turing?

Author:  Insectoid [ Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:09 pm ]
Post subject:  RE:Keylogger in Turing

Why would you want to make a keylogger? and yes, it is possible, but I won't tell you how.

Author:  Saad [ Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: RE:Keylogger in Turing

insectoid @ Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:09 pm wrote:
Why would you want to make a keylogger? and yes, it is possible, but I won't tell you how.


Keystroke logging (often called keylogging) is a method of capturing and recording user keystrokes. (From Wikipedia)

Turing can read input from keyboard, however only for the active window. As a result, a keylogger is not possible with Turing since you can't record keystrokes that aren't done on the Turing window (Which goes against the purpose of the keylogger).

Author:  Insectoid [ Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:37 pm ]
Post subject:  RE:Keylogger in Turing

Oh, well thank you for correcting me!
No trying to steal your brother's passwords, now!

Author:  Srlancelot39 [ Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: RE:Keylogger in Turing

Insectoid @ Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:37 pm wrote:
Oh, well thank you for correcting me!
No trying to steal your brother's passwords, now!

dude, how did you know? 0.o

P.S......what is 'amg! an sig!'

Author:  TheGuardian001 [ Wed Sep 22, 2010 7:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Keylogger in Turing

This thread is 2 years old, and you didn't even contribute anything useful.

Please try not to necro.


(Also, "amg! an sig!" == "omg! a sig", sig being a forum signature.)

Author:  Insectoid [ Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:00 am ]
Post subject:  RE:Keylogger in Turing

I feel I should say something here in response to SrLancelot39, but I can't imagine what.

Amg! An nekromunsir!

Author:  Srlancelot39 [ Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:26 pm ]
Post subject:  RE:Keylogger in Turing

i dont even know what necroing is, so don't think that it is intentional. I also don't see the issue in replying to very old posts...they're only dead until someone picks it up again.


: