There is a waaaay more effective way of checking for a win. Look here
Computer Science Canada Turing Submission~OMOK |
| Author: | nogardreyals [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Turing Submission~OMOK |
This is a Turing Submission made by me for my CompSci ISU for grade 10. Of course I didn't not include comments or a flowchart as expected but I would just like to see the reactions. Well can you tell me if it is good or not?. If you find any glitches or room for improvement please tell me. |
|
| Author: | Zampano [ Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Turing Submission~OMOK |
I love the self promoting credit screen. *smile smiley* Pretty good, though I'd really like to know why you needed this game to be 'funded'. *wink smiley* |
|
| Author: | Carey [ Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Turing Submission~OMOK |
There is a waaaay more effective way of checking for a win. Look here |
|
| Author: | nogardreyals [ Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Turing Submission~OMOK |
If I use your way than I would be getting help from a Turing Expert 
And that would be plagerizing resulting in a zero and i wouldn't want that. 
And I'd rather use my own way that I thought of after days of thinking. Thx anyways 
Can anyone else give some feedback? |
|
| Author: | fishtastic [ Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Turing Submission~OMOK |
OMOK = connect five !! very game. code looks clean too. 
for the line checking part. there are many ways, and since you only have a small board you dont really need efficiency. I will just write it as short as I can, as long as it works. BTW, Can you make an AI? I know its hard but I dont wanna play again myself.  |
|
| Author: | Zampano [ Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Turing Submission~OMOK |
Carey @ Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:47 pm wrote: There is a waaaay more effective way of checking for a win. Look here :)
Hehe; I'm not sure, Carey. In my Connect Four Game, I was able to make collison detection is a grand total of 14 lines. It was a recursive function. |
|
| Author: | Carey [ Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | RE:Turing Submission~OMOK |
@ nogardreyals: I wasn't saying to copy the code, just use it to make your own method @ Zampano: Yes I realize that recursion could shorten the length and make it more efficient, but I didn't even know what recursion was when I made this. |
|
| Author: | Sean [ Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Turing Submission~OMOK |
With the get selection, you have it located under the selection word, how about adjusting it to 22, 40 to get it right after the colon. |
|