Computer Science Canada

Mac VS PC

Author:  War_Caymore [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:29 am ]
Post subject:  Mac VS PC

what do you think is better? This is not about operating systems. This is about the computer in general.

Me, personaly, i think the PC will prevail.

Author:  Tony [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:49 pm ]
Post subject: 

not about the operating system? so like.. hardware?

Then Mac, without a question - as the 'computer in general' could run any OS (Mac, Linux, Windows), while a PC is limited to just the last two.

Otherwise the Intel architecture is fairly similar anyways.. so ultimately it depends on the manufacturer. Clearly Sony has better quality assurance than Dell.

Author:  ZeroPaladn [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:01 pm ]
Post subject: 

Tony wrote:
...as the 'computer in general' could run any OS (Mac, Linux, Windows), while a PC is limited to just the last two.


I agree. Of course, the Mac is kinda limited in the gaming and upgradable areas, but less viruses, and less spyware is a good thing too.

Overall.... Mac > PC

Author:  wtd [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:53 pm ]
Post subject: 

ZeroPaladn wrote:
Tony wrote:
...as the 'computer in general' could run any OS (Mac, Linux, Windows), while a PC is limited to just the last two.


I agree. Of course, the Mac is kinda limited in the gaming


Despite the fact that they can run Windows?

Author:  md [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:04 pm ]
Post subject: 

I think that this entire pol is flawed (as in the Mac advertising campain) because a PC is s personal computer; and as such a Mac IS a PC Wink

I think that mac hardware is great, but isn't as flexible as some other harware out there. Really it all depends on what you want to use your computer for Razz

Author:  Silent Avenger [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:33 pm ]
Post subject: 

I agree with Cornflake the poll is flawed. I prefere the windows operating system and for somereason I never like the Mac OS and I'm sure it never liked me. As for hardware you'll have to consider all the companies that make hardware and my preference there is HP.

Author:  War_Caymore [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

Cornflake wrote:
I think that mac hardware is great, but isn't as flexible as some other harware out there. Really it all depends on what you want to use your computer for Razz


... i see my flaw now. i dunno, i was just watching the commercials and i ws geting really pissed off on how they were downgrading the PC. I shouldn't have asked which one you think is better, it's all about how yorue going to use it.

TY Cornflake. I should re-state the question....

-- Which one would you buy? --

Author:  Silent Avenger [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:46 pm ]
Post subject: 

Hmm... which one would I buy? I'd still get a PC just like mine because it works well and I've had no problems at all since I got it.

Author:  neufelni [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:53 pm ]
Post subject: 

Right now I have a PC but the next computer I get will be a Mac. They are much better than PCs.

And I think that those commercials are great. They are so true.

Author:  Silent Avenger [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 4:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

Well I find Macs are rare around my place I'm sure they will be more common in the cities. I also stick with a PC because my school uses programs that aren't compatable with a Mac.

Here are a couple of vids I found about Macs. They are quite funny, and some of my friends who are Mac lovers think it's funny.

Why Macs suck: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3000282100255582958
Why Macs suck (Version 2): http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1215065532862862958&q=label%3Awindows+is+better+than+mac

Author:  War_Caymore [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 4:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

.... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA! *breathe*
.....AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHHAAAAAA....

*breathe*

HA! In your face MAC!

Author:  rdrake [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 4:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

Usually I prefer using PCs, though those shiny new 21" iMacs at my school might just change my mind... Also, I have yet to have a Mac as my everyday computer.

Either way, as long as it runs FreeBSD I'm happy. Cheaper (and reliable) hardware is a definite plus.

Author:  we64 [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

My next computer will be definitly be a Mac, I am getting sick of the normal PCs.
And yeah, mac can run windows now, but seriously, why do you want to do that, lol.

Author:  Andy [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

because 90% of the people in the world use windows, and it is one of the most employable skills currently

Author:  Tony [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:49 pm ]
Post subject: 

we64 wrote:
And yeah, mac can run windows now, but seriously, why do you want to do that, lol.

Because it's cheaper to run Windows on a Mac than on a Dell Laughing

Silent Avenger wrote:
have to consider all the companies that make hardware and my preference there is HP.

as in HP-UX ? Laughing

While on the topic, I'm not too fond of Solaris, but the Sun Ray setup is rather nifty.

The point is that there are a lot more types of hardware than PC or Mac. Though most of the others are geared towards the corporate world, and you wouldn't normally encounter them unless you work for a bunch of different IT companies.

Author:  NikG [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

Nick wrote:
Right now I have a PC but the next computer I get will be a Mac. They are much better than PCs.

And I think that those commercials are great. They are so true.
They are not all neccesarily true. People who know how to use PCs properly don't have all those problems.
I've never had any major problems with my pc because I know how to prevent spyware and virii.

And Andy is correct, most busineses use Windows so that's an important factor to consider.

So for my vote, I'll just say that buying a mac has NEVER crossed my mind.

Author:  [Gandalf] [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:34 pm ]
Post subject: 

I've never liked Macs so I guess that makes me a bit prejudiced. They cost too much and provide few benefits that I actually care about. The OS is another story altogether...

And seriously, who really gives a damn if your computer is shiny or not?

Author:  Tony [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:26 pm ]
Post subject: 

[Gandalf] wrote:
[Macs] cost too much...

Tony wrote:
we64 wrote:
And yeah, mac can run windows now, but seriously, why do you want to do that, lol.

Because it's cheaper to run Windows on a Mac than on a Dell

Well... to clarify that, Macs are cheaper than equivalently configured Dells. Obviously Dell can offer a very low-end machine, but for the target market segment, Macs are very compeditivly priced.

Author:  [Gandalf] [ Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:29 pm ]
Post subject: 

Maybe. I don't know all that much about the target market segment, but for myself, I'd much prefer to buy a reliable, fairly high end PC than spend that money on a Mac where it is being spent on things other than performance/reliability/etc.

Simply put, from what I've seen, you get less for your money when buying a Mac.

Author:  md [ Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:48 am ]
Post subject: 

I've actually found that mac hardware is worth it if the hardware does what you want. At least as far as laptops go. For desktop machines I tend to play with a lot of different hardware, and macs aren't known for their hardware support (independent of OS, there are hardware incompatibilities).

Mac OS X is nice; but I like linux (Gentoo!) more.

Author:  wtd [ Thu Sep 28, 2006 9:48 am ]
Post subject: 

I think everyone is still overlooking a simple fact.

Buy a Mac and you can run Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, *BSD, Solaris, etc.

Buy a personal computer from anyone else and you're left with one less option, operating system-wise.

So... the Mac is somehow less capable, and offers less choice?

Author:  Tony [ Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:29 am ]
Post subject: 

Cornflake wrote:
Mac OS X is nice; but I like linux (Gentoo!) more.

I know of at least one person who bought a Mac Laptop with the intend of using Linux on it as the primary OS.

Mac Laptops are an excellent choice, and do give you an option for one more OS than anything else. OSX has some exceptional native apps, anything is yet to come close to Adium Wink

Author:  md [ Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:39 am ]
Post subject: 

wtd wrote:
So... the Mac is somehow less capable, and offers less choice?
Only hardware wise - if your considering software too then the mac is usually the better option... unless you want ot play with lots of hardware Wink

Author:  War_Caymore [ Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:43 am ]
Post subject: 

The use of a MAC for the intent of using Linux sounds like alot of work. Then again, i'm no computer genius, and barely know a thing about any other OS than Windows. It jsut sounds like alot of work, to uninstall the OS that MACs come with and then install a diffrent OS.

It also sounds like alot of things can be screwed up in th process, converting all the drivers and stuff.

Just wondering though, cause i've been thinking that i should try out Linux out once i get my new computer as the primary OS and have windows as a secondary.

My CompTech teach has on his laptop both OS, but he can choose wich one to boot up. it sounds likle a pretty good idea.

Author:  wtd [ Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

War_Caymore wrote:
It jsut sounds like alot of work, to uninstall the OS that MACs come with and then install a diffrent OS.


Why would you have to uninstall anything?

Just use Apple's own Boot Camp software to install Linux in a dual-boot arrangement with Mac OS X. Then you can install Windows and use the Linux bootloader of your choice to triple-boot.

Really, I think you should get to know more about the reality of the situation before posting a poll like this.

Author:  Andy [ Thu Sep 28, 2006 5:14 pm ]
Post subject: 

from digg

Author:  BenLi [ Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:58 pm ]
Post subject: 

I've used Macs and PCs. Mac is obviously more stable and faster.
But I'm going to say PC due to the software selection

Author:  Tony [ Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:23 pm ]
Post subject: 

BenLi wrote:
But I'm going to say PC due to the software selection

Alright guys, lets learn to back up the statements we claim.

Now I'm well aware that OSX doesn't run Autodesk's AutoCAD. So setting games aside into their own category (I prefer console gaming anyways), what kind of software do Macs lack? Because in my experience it's the PCs that don't have the option to dual-boot into OSX and run my applications of choice.

Author:  [Gandalf] [ Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:55 am ]
Post subject: 

What you are mistakenly assuming is that Mac software appeals to the person in question. If it doesn't then, as I see it, PCs win all out.

Author:  md [ Fri Sep 29, 2006 1:24 am ]
Post subject: 

Like Gandalf says you can't count Mac OS as a plus if you don't like it or don't intend to use it. When it comes right down to it the choice between a Mac and a PC (god I hate that acronym... a mac used for personal computing is a PC for christs sake) is one of personal choice. There are pros and cons to either one; but those pros and cons are more a matter of choice then anything else.

Author:  wtd [ Fri Sep 29, 2006 7:01 am ]
Post subject: 

[Gandalf] wrote:
What you are mistakenly assuming is that Mac software appeals to the person in question. If it doesn't then, as I see it, PCs win all out.


It's not a mistaken assumption. You're assuming that is the assumption we're making. Wink

We're not. We're assuming that people who take about "choice" being a good thing would want to buy a computer that gives them the most choice in terms of software.

No, a Mac does not offer the absolute greatest level of hardware choice, but what you do get is good hardware at a good price. Assuming you don't want a bottom of the barrel configuration, what other choice could a person want? Smile

Author:  BenLi [ Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
Mac does not offer the absolute greatest level of hardware choice, but what you do get is good hardware at a good price


The "good price" part might be farfetched. Anyways, I'm not only talking about personal program. Mac is just not as popular as PCs and you might have some trouble trying to cross files between the two. Sure, many things are portable but some are still not.

I don't keep up with current news that much but last I heard, Macs used a EFI instead of a BIOS and was difficult to make compatible with Windows

Author:  Tony [ Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:34 pm ]
Post subject: 

BenLi wrote:
I don't keep up with current news that much but last I heard, Macs used a EFI instead of a BIOS and was difficult to make compatible with Windows

if you actually knew what EFI was, you wouldn't have made such a foolish post Laughing sorry

Author:  NikG [ Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:47 pm ]
Post subject: 

Tony, BenLi may not be totally wrong. From that wikipedia link you provided:
Quote:
In March 2006, Microsoft revealed that it will not support EFI for Windows Vista at launch, and will never support EFI booting on 32-bit CPUs due to lack of support from PC manufacturers and vendors. EFI support for x64 versions of Windows Vista will be included in a later service pack. Also, for testing purposes, the beta 2 release of Windows Vista "will include support for EFI" [1] but it will be removed in the final release.

Author:  wtd [ Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:57 pm ]
Post subject: 

That is easily remedied. EFI is flexible enough to emulate a classic BIOS.

Mactels have been running Vista natively for quite some time.

Author:  Andy [ Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:49 am ]
Post subject: 

wtd wrote:
Mactels have been running Vista natively for quite some time.


Wikipedia wrote:
the beta 2 release of Windows Vista "will include support for EFI" [1] but it will be removed in the final release.


...

Author:  wtd [ Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:42 am ]
Post subject: 

So I suppose all the people who did this really secretlt replaced the guts of their Macs with generic PC hardware.

Author:  md [ Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:45 pm ]
Post subject: 

Apparently no one has ever heard of "bootcamp". Windows/Linux/FreeBSD/Minix/<insert your OS here> WILL run on macs. At least it will if there are drivers for the mac hardware; and for most OSs there are such drivers.


: