Computer Science Canada Help with collision star game |
Author: | marz [ Sat Jun 07, 2003 11:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Help with collision star game |
Hiya! Alright, now for my exam, I have chosen to do a very crappy like game, but hey, it will get me the marks I need. However, I need help badly! ![]() ![]() |
Author: | marz [ Sat Jun 07, 2003 11:52 am ] | ||
Post subject: | sorry | ||
Ok, sorry that extenstion didnt work. Here is my actuall game
|
Author: | Andy [ Sat Jun 07, 2003 11:52 am ] |
Post subject: | |
hmmm, very intresting game... of NOTHING dude, you your attatchment is blank |
Author: | AsianSensation [ Sat Jun 07, 2003 12:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Yeah, there are a lot of tutorials on collision detection, both circle and triangle, also Input.KeyDown, or if your not using 4.0.3(some letter), then getch will let you get input, there is also a tutorial on that. |
Author: | void [ Sat Jun 07, 2003 1:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
dude...no offense...but thats one pretty crappy game..ur falling stars are so glitchy that u can barely see them...and you have no ball....after 6/7 months of doing turing you SHOULD know how to use getch with the ords of the arrow keys or Input.KeyDown...its not that hard...there is a tutorial on that...and also...their is a tutorial on smooth animation AND one on collision detection...read them!!...i assure u that if u read them...then ur program will be AT LEAST 3 X as good as it is now, your questoins will be more precise (thus esier to answer)...AND you will get a higher grade than before (at least about 10% higher)...so yea....GO READ TUTORIALS |
Author: | Andy [ Sat Jun 07, 2003 2:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
damn, sorry that i have to do this but, marz, but i have to agree with void on this one, your game does suck. go to the tutorial section and read all the tutorials and then maybe your game wouldn't suck anymore. |
Author: | PaddyLong [ Sat Jun 07, 2003 6:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
void... I would have to disagree with your statements about after 6/7 months of using turing you should know how to use getch and the ords of arrow keys... those are things for specific tasks ... I think it is more important to learn the logics of programming before you start trying to learn specific things like getch and ords of arrow keys... |
Author: | Homer_simpson [ Sat Jun 07, 2003 9:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
i owned turing after 2 weeks of using it... ![]() |
Author: | Andy [ Sat Jun 07, 2003 9:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
and catalyst owned everyone after 4 months programming isn't that hard, that is if you want to learn it. |
Author: | void [ Sun Jun 08, 2003 10:28 am ] |
Post subject: | |
PaddyLong...i think ur an idiot for disagreeing with me..and ur reasoning for doing so is dumber than the fact that you actually disagreed.....using getch is something u learn along with get and put...the first two things in turing...if you used what u call "programming logistics" then...you would think...what is the only way i can get 1 Key input from the user...so that i can use the arrow keys....hmm....WHY NOT GETCH....and for the arrow keys...use ord..something i learned in the first week of using turing..and something my CS teacher taught us back in november....NOT TOO HARD NOW IS IT???....this is using logics....NO ONE TOLD HIM TO MEMORIZE THE ASCII CODES AND OTHER SUCH "SPECIFICS"....in programing there are VERY few specifics...and 50% if that is created by people with logic...and memorized by those without...so if you would please not be such a dumbass...much appreciation **The preceding did not express the feelings of CompSci.ca or any of its webmasters or members (other than me...void..the heartless feind) |
Author: | void [ Sun Jun 08, 2003 12:19 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | |||
wow...if you take out the huge intro...i think my program and urs do the same thing....very interesting isnt it? |
Author: | Andy [ Sun Jun 08, 2003 12:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
LOL, go void, way to kill the lil programmer's confidence |