-----------------------------------

bbi5291

Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:07 pm


DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3?

-----------------------------------

Why does 1001 not appear in the sample output?


-----------------------------------

Tony

Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:09 pm


RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3?

-----------------------------------

Because I FAIL. Please disregard Question 3.


-----------------------------------

bbi5291

Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:15 pm


Re: DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3?

-----------------------------------

Are there problems with the actual test data too, then? By "disregard question 3", do you mean that it isn't going to be counted?


-----------------------------------

Tony

Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:27 pm


RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3?

-----------------------------------

Yes, there are problems in the test data as well. It would leave us with less post-contest cleanup maintenance if you were to not figure out a way to score anyway.


-----------------------------------

saltpro15

Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:37 pm


RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3?

-----------------------------------

...sooo do it or do not do it?


-----------------------------------

Dan

Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:39 pm


Re: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3?

-----------------------------------

...sooo do it or do not do it?

Do the question as it is writen and don't try to manipulate it so you get 5/5 with incorect data that judge will mark right.


-----------------------------------

Tony

Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:43 pm


RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3?

-----------------------------------

The thing is, the question is written wrong as well. I think Dan is saying "Do the question as it was intended".

But the judge has wrong test data.


-----------------------------------

Dan

Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:51 pm


Re: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3?

-----------------------------------

 I think Dan is saying "Do the question as it was intended".


Indeed :p


-----------------------------------

saltpro15

Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:01 pm


RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3?

-----------------------------------

Ok, done :D  1/5 as expected


-----------------------------------

Tony

Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:02 pm


RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3?

-----------------------------------

:)


-----------------------------------

Vengeance101

Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:36 am


RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3?

-----------------------------------

Hey, I hardcoded the problem and I got 0/5 for it. Is it because you took it down after a while? If so, missed out on some very easy points.


-----------------------------------

Tony

Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:10 pm


Re: RE:DWITE #2 2009/2010 - Clarification in problem 3?

-----------------------------------

Hey, I hardcoded the problem and I got 0/5 for it.
I'm not sure how one even attempt to hard code a solution for variable input, but...
http://compsci.ca/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/machall_hard_code.jpg

http://compsci.ca/blog/hard-code/