333Mhz
yes i know its sad =(
but hey its the only computer i have and i guess it works
Computer Science Canada Computer |
| Author: | tomako [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 10:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Computer |
sooo.... what kind of computer does hacker gods have?!?!? |
|
| Author: | Lone]2 [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 10:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
333Mhz yes i know its sad =( but hey its the only computer i have and i guess it works |
|
| Author: | Prince [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 10:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
im stuck on a 233... i wanna build a 2.4GHz (or AMD Barton 2500+) but unfortunately for me i dont hav $1500  |
|
| Author: | tomako [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 10:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
oh yea... btw, i got a 804Mhz AMD Duron..... its 2 years old already......  |
|
| Author: | ZeroKelvin [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 10:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
i have a 400 mHz but tring to get a AMD 1800+ not asking for much but too bad im broke |
|
| Author: | Blade [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
i currently have four computers... 1. This is MY computer, no one touchy touchy or i brake you AMD Athlon XP 1700+ running at Athlon XP 2100+ speed Geforce 4 MX - 440 8X (64 ddr) MSI K7T Turbo 2, with 512 pc 133 ram 2. Duron 1000 with ATI Radeon 7000 (64 sdr) 256 pc 133 3. Duron 1300 with ATI Radeon 7000 (64 sdr) 256 pc 133 4. Athlon 1300 with Viper 770 Tnt2 192 pc 100 btw, all have the same mobo edit: I am also getting a new case with blue cold cathode next friday, i will post pics when its all done  |
|
| Author: | Ravage [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
lol I have no idea about my comp, I got it from my grandma, lol. Time to definately get a new one tho |
|
| Author: | Asok [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I have 6 comps, I'm not going to list all of them but it's like: 1. P3 800 2. AMD 2200 3. P4 1500 4. P3 500 5. P3 750 6. P3 600 I don't really use all of them... the AMD 2200 is my gamer box. The rest I use as a bed...  |
|
| Author: | JSBN [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Lets see i had 3 but one got stolen.... 
1)2GhZ, 512ram, 40gig HD 2)500mHz, 196ram, 10 gig HD 3)75MHz, 32ram,2 gig HD (<- got stolen) obviously i only use #1... |
|
| Author: | Blade [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
hahaha.... my slowest beats a lot of yours.... pitiful |
|
| Author: | Catalyst [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 1:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
2ghz 512ram 40gigs 333mhz 128ram 14gigs |
|
| Author: | jamez [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 1:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
xp 2400 512 ddr 80gb+40gb p2 500 256ram 40gb |
|
| Author: | Office of the Registar [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 2:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i have a 486!!! LOL |
|
| Author: | Blade [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 2:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
wow... thats why the internet is so slow... hahahahahaha jp |
|
| Author: | Office of the Registar [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 2:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
how about that new pentium 4 procesor coming out with 800 mhz FSB ? |
|
| Author: | Blade [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 2:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
yeah that supossed to be comin out soon, with the barton athlon xp's with 400 fsb |
|
| Author: | Tony [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
oh ya, that would be crazy... if I'd had money I'd get myself a P4 with 800 MHz FST and atleast 512 of RDRAM... in case you guys care. I've got a 550 Celeron
this sucks soo much, I have to fight my bro for it cuz he's a jackass. I'm getting a job this summer (or starting a charity) to get enough cash for a new laptop. Why laptop? So I can lock it away. |
|
| Author: | octopi [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I got a few: -AMD 1.2ghz (it was a gift.) -Running win2k -256mb -18gb -21in moni. -Intel Dual 733mhz (1.4ghz total) -win2k -256mb -2 hd, 22gb total (all scsi) -1gb jaz drive -21 inch moni. -Intel 400-500mhz-ish (another gift) -runs freebsd 4.7-Release -64-128mb ram -6gb hd -no monitor, keyboard, mouse, just use it via the network. -MIPS 180mhz (R5000) (sits on a shelf.) -running Irix 6.3 -512mb -6gb -Intel 450mhz (laptop) -win2k -128mb -6gb -13-14in moni. |
|
| Author: | Blade [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
octopi.... why win2k and not xp pro? |
|
| Author: | octopi [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Personal preference, I have tried xp, and well didn't like it, I know I can change the way it looks, so its back to normal (windows 2000 style) I just prefer win2k. |
|
| Author: | Martin [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ATI Radeon 9000 pro 128mb 512 DDR333 PC2700 ram 19" Flatscreen monitor AMD Athlon XP 2000+ 40 GB hd Nice, eh? All that for $1200 CDN (with shipping and tax)...video card's kinda bad though |
|
| Author: | Martin [ Fri Apr 25, 2003 11:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
See...my dad knows the Vice pres or pres of M$ canada, so we got office xp pro and windows xp pro for free (plus tons of free xbox games) |
|
| Author: | Blade [ Sat Apr 26, 2003 9:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
lol... radeon 9000 pro isnt a bad card man... its equal to the geforce 4 ti 4200 with 128 ddr... now if it was made by a not-so-good company... then yea it is bad lol |
|
| Author: | Martin [ Sat Apr 26, 2003 10:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
No, it's only a little bit faster than the geforce mx 64mb...and the funny thing is, the 128mb 9000 pro is slower than the 64mb 9000 pro |
|
| Author: | Blade [ Sun Apr 27, 2003 2:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic/20021218/index.html check this place out, it has the default clocks for the GPU's... even some of the speeds of the MX series are faster than the Ti series... lol but the 9000 is about equal to the ti 4200... and mx 440 lol |
|
| Author: | Catalyst [ Sun Apr 27, 2003 2:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
clocks arent a very good mesure, you might want to look at some benches |
|
| Author: | jamez [ Sun Apr 27, 2003 3:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
What he said. |
|
| Author: | Blade [ Sun Apr 27, 2003 11:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
if you go down, then you'll see... you can look at benches from 4 games, and 3dmark2k1 and depeding on what game you are playing is how close the 9000 series is to it.... but mostly geforce 3 ti 200 ... sometimes geforce 4 mx 440 - 8X |
|
| Author: | Martin [ Sun Apr 27, 2003 12:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
That seems pretty wrong Like saying that the Radeon 9700 pro is slower than the Radeon 8500 (not pro) and even slower than the geforce 4 ti 4200 64 mb... Check out www.sharkyextreme.com |
|
| Author: | Blade [ Thu May 01, 2003 11:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
those are clocks... just like the difference between athlon xp and p4... p4 is faster, and so is their bus, but the athlon xp is a better chip, it can render faster than the p4's... look at the comparasions between the xp 2700+ and p4 3.06.. |
|
| Author: | element [ Thu May 01, 2003 11:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
p-iii 800 mhz -> a one-two gone wrong.[/quote] |
|
| Author: | Office of the Registar [ Fri May 02, 2003 8:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
is that you alvin? element |
|
| Author: | Delta [ Fri May 02, 2003 9:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I've got a nice little 633 does just fine ahahahaha |
|
| Author: | Drakonius [ Mon May 05, 2003 10:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
i'm uising school resources and it is actually better than the on ei hav at home, maybe its b/c my comp has too much liesure in it like games and too little work |
|
| Author: | kythoon [ Mon May 05, 2003 4:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
windows xp 2.4 Ghz |
|
| Author: | Blade [ Mon May 05, 2003 5:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
lol... windows xp... anyone who has a "newer" comp has xp... |
|
| Author: | ZeroKelvin [ Tue May 06, 2003 9:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
i am using school's comp win xp 2.0 Ghz that's better than most ppl here |
|