I specially like the part when Roger Moore attempted to get members of congress to sign their kids to go fight in Iraq, and he managed to convince no one.

Aren't you glad you're not "american"? Sure, our government is as bad as the next, but at least we don't kill people to make us richer.

I specially like the part when Michael Moore attempted to get members of congress to sign their kids to go fight in Iraq, and he managed to convince no one.

Hopefully enough people see this film so that next time, they don't give out their votes so loosly.

I won't bother spewing out endless babble telling you how evil the U.S. is, but I do encourage people to see this movie.

Michael Moore does not care in the least about the prating of this film, and in fact, encourages people to do so, if it means that more people will see it, so long as people don't make economical profit from this film.

You can read Moore's position on all this within this article:
http://www.sundayherald.com/43167

And by all means go to the theatre and watch it, then buy the video. But for whatever reason, if you can't watch this film by those means, since we have Mr. Moore's blessing, I see no problem with posting this link:

http://s2.isohunt.com/download.php?mode=bt&id=2238634

You'll get the movie in around 20-40 minutes with a broadband connection.

The d/l didnt work BLAH!

Yoyoyo I watched it, er, downloaded it as I am not paying money to support some fat guy make propagandha films. I watched half of the first part of the download and then stopped because it didn't make me laugh like Bowling for Columbine did.

Damn, I'm sure glad I'm not American because everyone would hate me, but then again am I proud that I am Canadian so I can hate myself?

Basically the film spends it's time telling us how bad Bush is and only showing one side of the argument to give the impression that it is the only side. Like where it shows the protesters at his innaugeration. Why did Moore not show the people happy for Bush because there surely was? Maybe it didn't fit his message he was trying to shit on us. Also, Moore uses quotes and facts saying that Bush spent 40% or something of his time on vacation and shows him golfing, cutting wood, etc, but he fails to show all the buildings and trailers on the ranch where Bush has to do work in the morning. This was in Time of course where I read and saw pictures of this.

Also, Moore says that Bush "didn't know what to do" when he learned of the attacks on the Towers, so he just read the book with the kids. Now if Bush had simply just run out of that classroom without meeting the kids, Moore would have probably said that he was a racist because the kids were black, or that Bush didn't have enough time for black kids whose parents were most likely Democrats.

Also, Moore basically says that 9/11 was caused by Bush's lack of meetings and work, but it did not mention the fact that the attacks were being planned well before Bush - during the Clinton era. Now Moore should have said that Clinton should have been paying more attention to terrorists than sticking cigars up Monica Lewinsky's vagina or something of that sort.

I'm feeling dizzy now so I will stop. Maybe I went into watching this with a bad attitude towards Moore and his "documentaries", but I will still urge none of you to go and pay for it to support some fat guy make propagandha films to further his own political agendas. Hell, he can't even rebuke the rebukes that have been rebuked at his own arguments, he has to pay some people.

Yoyoyo I watched it, er, downloaded it as I am not paying money to support some fat guy make propagandha films. I watched half of the first part of the download and then stopped because it didn't make me laugh like Bowling for Columbine did.

Damn, I'm sure glad I'm not American because everyone would hate me, but then again am I proud that I am Canadian so I can hate myself?

Basically the film spends it's time telling us how bad Bush is and only showing one side of the argument to give the impression that it is the only side. Like where it shows the protesters at his innaugeration. Why did Moore not show the people happy for Bush because there surely was? Maybe it didn't fit his message he was trying to shit on us. Also, Moore uses quotes and facts saying that Bush spent 40% or something of his time on vacation and shows him golfing, cutting wood, etc, but he fails to show all the buildings and trailers on the ranch where Bush has to do work in the morning. This was in Time of course where I read and saw pictures of this.

Also, Moore says that Bush "didn't know what to do" when he learned of the attacks on the Towers, so he just read the book with the kids. Now if Bush had simply just run out of that classroom without meeting the kids, Moore would have probably said that he was a racist because the kids were black, or that Bush didn't have enough time for black kids whose parents were most likely Democrats.

Also, Moore basically says that 9/11 was caused by Bush's lack of meetings and work, but it did not mention the fact that the attacks were being planned well before Bush - during the Clinton era. Now Moore should have said that Clinton should have been paying more attention to terrorists than sticking cigars up Monica Lewinsky's vagina or something of that sort.

I'm feeling dizzy now so I will stop. Maybe I went into watching this with a bad attitude towards Moore and his "documentaries", but I will still urge none of you to go and pay for it to support some fat guy make propagandha films to further his own political agendas. Hell, he can't even rebuke the rebukes that have been rebuked at his own arguments, he has to pay some people.

I watched half of the first part of the download and then stopped because it didn't make me laugh like Bowling for Columbine did.

Damn, I'm sure glad I'm not American because everyone would hate me, but then again am I proud that I am Canadian so I can hate myself?

Why did Moore not show the people happy for Bush because there surely was? Maybe it didn't fit his message he was trying to shit on us.

Also, Moore uses quotes and facts saying that Bush spent 40% or something of his time on vacation and shows him golfing, cutting wood, etc, but he fails to show all the buildings and trailers on the ranch where Bush has to do work in the morning.

This was in Time of course where I read and saw pictures of this.

Also, Moore says that Bush "didn't know what to do" when he learned of the attacks on the Towers, so he just read the book with the kids. Now if Bush had simply just run out of that classroom without meeting the kids, Moore would have probably said that he was a racist because the kids were black, or that Bush didn't have enough time for black kids whose parents were most likely Democrats.

Also, Moore basically says that 9/11 was caused by Bush's lack of meetings and work, but it did not mention the fact that the attacks were being planned well before Bush - during the Clinton era. Now Moore should have said that Clinton should have been paying more attention to terrorists than sticking cigars up Monica Lewinsky's vagina or something of that sort.

I'm feeling dizzy now so I will stop. Maybe I went into watching this with a bad attitude towards Moore and his "documentaries", but I will still urge none of you to go and pay for it to support some fat guy make propagandha films to further his own political agendas. Hell, he can't even rebuke the rebukes that have been rebuked at his own arguments, he has to pay some people.

you've NEVER done anything wrong in your LIFE?

Maybe because the people who are against Bush and the techniques he used to win are completely devious?

What are u talking about? Bush didnt "win" He had less votes then Gore.

aww man, i need to watch this

i dont know much about american hisory.. cuz really... i think its stupid and unimportant to me..


but.... how did bush win if he had less votes then gore.. ?

No you don't.

Join us in our war on errorism

when really what they saw was either a) out of context b) distortion c) entirely false.

The big deal with film is that it is by someone who is not part of a political party who is trying to influence the vote in any way he can. And the proof is there to show that he is more interested in shock factor than straight facts. The danger of a film like this are people who will automatically take something as fact when really what they saw was either a) out of context b) distortion c) entirely false.

The funny thing about this is also that 6/8 months ago the Democratic party did not want to be affiliated with Moore but as soon as election time comes around they want to endorse him and use his film against Bush.